Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10358243

Friction in perspective.

S Braun·M Bluestein·B K Moore·G Benson
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In the past, most frictional resistance studies have been conducted in a steady state condition that does not simulate the dynamics of the oral environment. Various oral functions as chewing, swallowing, speaking, etc, as well as the oral tissues contacting any orthodontic appliances, result in periodic, repetitive, minute relative motion at the bracket/arch wire interfaces several thousand times each day. This in turn affects the normal forces at the interfaces, and because frictional resistance is directly proportional to the normal force, a pilot study was undertaken to emulate the dynamic environment of the oral cavity and its effect on frictional resistance. Tests of a limited sample of stainless steel arch wires and brackets typically used in sliding mechanics revealed that frictional resistance was effectively reduced to zero each time minute relative movements occurred at the bracket/arch wire interfaces. Factors such as the degree of dental tipping, relative arch wire/slot clearances, and method of tying, did not have a measurable effect on frictional resistance in the simulated dynamics of the oral environment.

Explore related subjects

Dental Stress AnalysisFrictionKineticsOrthodontic BracketsOrthodontic WiresPilot ProjectsRubberStainless SteelTooth Movement TechniquesComparative StudyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Braun, M Bluestein, B K Moore, G Benson. 1999. Friction in perspective.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70286-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2000

The physical mechanisms of complete denture retention.

The purpose of this article is to assist the practitioner to understand which factors are relevant to complete denture retention in the light of the current understanding of physics and materials science and thus to guide design. Atmospheric pressure, vacuum, adhesion, cohesion, surface tension, viscosity, base adaption, border seal, seating force and muscular control have all been cited at one time or another as major or contributory factors, but usually as an opinion without proper reference to fundamental principles. Although there has been a detailed analysis published, it seems appropriate that a restatement of the points in a collated form be made. In fact, denture retention is a dynamic issue dependent on the control of the flow of interposed fluid and thus its viscosity and film thickness, while the timescale of displacement loading affects the assessment. Surface tension forces at the periphery contribute to retention, but the most important concerns are good base adaptation and border seal. These must be achieved if full advantage is to be taken of the saliva flow-related effects.

Dental Stress Analysis↗
PubMed2000

Relationship between the standards of removable partial denture construction, clinical acceptability, and patient satisfaction.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Little is known about the importance of published fabrication standards in determining the outcome of treatment with mandibular distal extension removable partial dentures in patients of community practices. PURPOSE: This study describes mandibular partial dentures worn by patients from King County, Wash., and examines the validity of standards of design and fabrication by relating the standards to measures of clinical acceptability and patient satisfaction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty-two people treated in private dental practices who responded to a mail survey about satisfaction with a partial denture were examined. Eight standards of fabrication, overall clinical acceptability of the prosthesis, and tissue health were evaluated clinically. Patient satisfaction was assessed by questionnaire. Associations between variables were assessed by contingency tables and odds ratios. RESULTS: Half the prostheses met 4 or fewer of the 8 standards, and these were responsible for nearly all the displacement of tissue by the framework. Forty-three percent of the dentures (35/82) were rated clinically acceptable. Of the remaining dentures, 38 could be made acceptable by modifications. The remaining 9 dentures needed replacement. Sixty-three percent of the patients examined were satisfied with the dentures. There was a relationship between tissue health and the fabrication standards related to rest form, base extension, stress distribution, and framework fit. This study found no relation between tissue health and other design or fabrication features. None of the standards were found to be related to patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: This study found partial support for the validity of design/fabrication standards for removable partial dentures. The most important standards are rest form, base extension, and stress distribution. The standards appear to be unrelated to patient satisfaction.

Dental Stress Analysis↗
PubMed2000

Finite element analysis of stress relaxation in soft denture liner.

To gather knowledge related to establishing criteria for selecting soft denture liners for individual patients, the effects of certain properties of soft denture liners on stress distribution were evaluated by two-dimensional finite element analysis. A partial mandibular edentulous ridge crest was modelled. Six combinations of thickness (mucosa: 1 or 2 mm; soft denture liner: 1, 2, or 3 mm) and 18 combinations of Young's modulus (mucosa: three kinds; soft denture liner: six kinds) were analysed. The ratio of maximum to minimum stress in the mucosa (stress ratio) was calculated to estimate stress concentration. In the case of thin mucosa (1 mm thickness), the lower the Young's modulus of the soft denture liner, the lower the stress ratio. However, if the soft denture liner had a lower Young's modulus than the mucosa, stress concentrated adversely. These results suggest that the elasticity of the soft denture liner should match the elasticity of the mucosa to obtain the optimum cushioning effect.

Dental Stress Analysis↗