Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10329290

Speed-dependent responses in V5: A replication study.

D Chawla·C Buechel·R Edwards·A Howseman·O Josephs·J Ashburner·K J Friston
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In a previous paper, we used fMRI to examine motion-sensitive responses in human area V5 as a function of stimulus speed. As predicted by electrophysiological findings, we observed optimal responses at intermediate speeds of around 7 to 30 degrees /s. These results revealed a nonlinear (inverted "U") dependency on speed that was also evident in V3a. In this paper we repeated the experiment using an improved stimulus and a larger range of speeds. We replicated our previous findings and extended our characterization of speed-dependent responses: Optimal responses were seen in V5 at speeds of 4 and 8 degrees /s and in V3a at speeds of 4 to 16 degrees /s. We were also able to show an interaction between speed (fast vs slow) and contrast (color > luminance) in V5. This interaction was anticipated on the basis of the different properties of the geniculate and extrageniculate inputs to V5. Finally, we were also able to demonstrate an interaction between motion (moving vs stationary) and contrast (color > luminance) in V4. This suggests that for V4, color-specific responses are augmented in the context of motion; or equivalently, that color contrast enhances any motion-sensitive responses in V4.

Explore related subjects

ArtifactsColorContrast SensitivityCuesHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMotionNonlinear DynamicsPhotic StimulationClinical TrialControlled Clinical TrialJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Chawla, C Buechel, R Edwards, A Howseman, O Josephs, J Ashburner, K J Friston. 1999. Speed-dependent responses in V5: A replication study.. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1999.0432

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Striping artifact removal in VisiumHD data through nuclear counts modeling.

MOTIVATION: 10x Genomics VisiumHD enables spatial transcriptomics at 2 µm × 2 µm resolution but exhibits slide-specific, non-periodic striping artifacts due to lane-width variability. These multiplicative row/column effects distort bin total counts and can bias downstream analyses. The state-of-the-art destriping approach is the normalization procedure used as a preprocessing step in bin2cell; it applies sequential high-quantile row- then column-wise normalization, which is asymmetric and can introduce edge effects/macro-stripes and distortions of large-scale total-count structure. RESULTS: We propose a statistical destriping approach that leverages nuclei segmentation from the co-registered H&E image. Assuming transcript abundance is constant within each nucleus, we model bin counts with a negative binomial distribution whose mean is a product of a nucleus-specific concentration and row- and column-specific stripe-factors reflecting lane-width variation. We fit all parameters in a generalized linear modeling framework with cross-validated regularization on stripe-factors and iterative dispersion estimation, and use the fitted parameters to correct the observed counts into a destriped image. On synthetic data with known ground truth, our method improves stripe-factor estimation accuracy and reduces error in corrected counts relative to bin2cell and bin2cell-derived baselines. Across four public VisiumHD slides, it consistently lowers striping intensity while substantially better preserving biological signal present in the large-scale global count structure and avoiding the artifacts introduced by other methods. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All source code and links to publicly available data used for this study are available at https://github.com/paolamalsot/destriping-GLM.

Artifacts↗
PubMed2008

Impairment of echocardiographic acoustic window caused by breast implants.

Cosmetic breast implants are increasing in popularity. The presence of a breast implant overlying the anterior mediastinal space as a cause of impairment of the echocardiographic acoustic window has not been described previously. Here, we report three cases with significant impairment of echocardiographic acoustic window caused by breast implants. Clinicians should be aware of this interference and women should be informed of this dilemma before considering this cosmetic surgery.

Artifacts↗