Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10328596

Bladder cancer.

Abstract

Bladder tumor antigen, nuclear matrix protein 22, telomerase activity, fibrin degradation products assay, and a number of diagnostic tests on exfoliated urethelial cells are being tried to replace or decrease the frequency of cystoscopies. The results of these studies have shown that although some of these tests are promising, the standard of care for patients with hematuria or previously treated bladder carcinoma is still cystoscopy. New and non-invasive tests are on the horizon, however. It is essential to find accurate prognostic factors in patients with T1 disease which will predict the cases which will progress to muscle invasive disease. It has been clearly shown that the depth of invasion within the submucosa is closely related with survival. It has been established that continent diversions improve the quality of life in patients who have undergone cystectomy. Furthermore, this type of diversion was shown to improve survival. This fact can be attributed to early cystectomy which was prompted by the increased patient acceptance.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Ozen. 1999. Bladder cancer.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001622-199905000-00013

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Minimizing predictability while retaining balance through the use of less restrictive randomization procedures.

The interpretation of between-group comparisons is facilitated by the creation of treatment groups that are similar to each other in baseline composition. To prevent treatment effects from being confounded with time effects, most trials use restricted randomization to force balance. An unintended consequence of these restrictions is that they create patterns that allow for the prediction of future treatment allocations, and hence selection bias, especially in unmasked trials. In fact, the more restrictive the allocation procedure, the greater the potential for selection bias. It was decided, in the context of a recent clinical trial comparing two dosing schedules of paclitaxel and carboplatin for advanced stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer, that the randomized block procedure could not simultaneously protect sufficiently against both selection and chronological bias. In this paper we detail our development of the maximal procedure. The maximal procedure takes as input the extent of chronological bias allowed by the randomized block procedure, then matches it, but does so with fewer restrictions. This feature makes the maximal procedure more resistant to selection bias than the randomized block procedure is.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗