Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 1027807

Thin lens rationale projected.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C E Williams. 1976. Thin lens rationale projected.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1027807/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Microscopic observations of superficial ultrastructure of unworn siloxane-hydrogel contact lenses by cryo-scanning electron microscopy.

The purpose of this study was to analyze three commercial siloxane-hydrogel contact lens materials, lotrafilcon A, balafilcon A, and galyfilcon A, by cryogenic scanning electron microscopy (cryoSEM). The fully hydrated lenses were frozen in slush liquid nitrogen and qualitatively observed in a cryogenic scanning electron microscope. The superficial ultrastructure of the siloxane-hydrogels was observed at the areas where the lens fractured during sample cryogenic preparation. There are qualitative differences among the three examined materials in the complex polymer network structure existing between the outer layer and the underlying polymer. CryoSEM, although destructive, is a useful tool to investigate the structure of polymers used in contact lenses. This technique allows the observation of the inner structure of polymers in the hydrated state. The ultrastructure, the polymer network underlying the outer surface of siloxane-hydrogels by cryoSEM microscopy, have never been reported before.

Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic↗

Microscopic observation of unworn siloxane-hydrogel soft contact lenses by atomic force microscopy.

In the present study, samples of lotrafilcon A, balafilcon A, and galyfilcon A contact lenses were observed by atomic force microscopy (AFM) in tapping mode at areas ranging from 0.25 to 400 microm2. Mean roughness (Ra), root-mean-square roughness (Rms) and maximum roughness (Rmax) in nanometers were obtained for the three lens materials at different magnifications. The three contact lenses showed significantly different surface topography. However, roughness values were dependent of the surface area to be analyzed. For a 1 microm2 area, statistics revealed a significantly more irregular surface of balafilcon A (Ra = 6.44 nm; Rms = 8.30 nm; Rmax = 96.82 nm) compared with lotrafilcon A (Ra = 2.40 nm; Rms = 3.19 nm; Rmax = 40.89 nm) and galyfilcon A (Ra = 1.40 nm; Rms = 1.79 nm; Rmax = 15.33 nm). Ra and Rms were the most consistent parameters, with Rmax presenting more variability for larger surface areas. The higher roughness of balafilcon A is attributed to the plasma oxidation treatment used to improve wettability. Conversely, galyfilcon A displays a smoother surface. Present observations could have implications in clinical aspects of siloxane-hydrogel contact lens wear such as lens spoliation, resistance to bacterial adhesion, or mechanical interaction with the ocular surface.

Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic↗

Dynamic wettability properties of a soft contact lens hydrogel.

The wettability of poly[2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-co-methacrylic acid] (pHEMA-MAA) soft contact lenses was investigated in the absence and presence of block copolymer surfactants and lysozyme using the sessile drop method. The advancing dynamic contact angles (Thetaw/a) values are reported for water as a function of sequential wetting and drying cycles. The Thetaw/a values for the pHEMA-MAA in the absence of surfactant and lysozyme increased from approximately 20 degrees to 100 degrees as the number of cycles increased from two to ten, and they were independent of the pHEMA-MAA bulk water content. The change from the highly hydrophilic to hydrophobic pHEMA-MAA surface could not be reversed using the sequential wetting and drying cycles even under repeated exposures to saline solution. The effect of block copolymer surfactants with different molecular weights (MW) and hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) values on the pHEMA-MAA wettability were also studied. Low Theta(w/a) values were observed for pHEMA-MAA hydrogels that were treated with T1304 (MW 10500, HLB 14) and T904 (MW 6700, HLB 15). The surface tension data indicated that these surfactants were incompletely desorbed from the pHEMA-MAA and that the rate of desorption was slow in the timescale of the cycling experiments. Comparatively, poor wettability was observed for pHEMA-MAA surfaces presoaked in T304 (MW 1650, HLB 16) and T1107 (MW 15000, HLB 24) as Thetaw/a values greater than 90 degrees were measured for these surfactants. The surface tension data indicated that the rate of desorption of T304 and T1107 from the pHEMA-MAA was rapid and that they had a low affinity to the pHEMA-MAA. High contact angles were observed for the pHEMA-MAA hydrogels treated with lysozyme and also for the T1107 presoaked pHEMA-MAA that was also treated with lysozyme. Zero wetting angles throughout the sequential cycling were observed for the T1304 pre-treated pHEMA-MAA that had been treated with lysozyme. These results suggested that the adsorbed lysozyme on the pHEMA-MAA hydrogel had no significant influence on its wetting properties when the hydrogel was pre-treated with T1304.

Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic↗