Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10228485

[Corticosteroid-resistant asthma: basic aspects].

Abstract

A CONTROVERSIAL DEFINITION: The current definition of corticosteroid-resistant asthma is a spirometry definition. There is however, no consensus on dose, treatment duration, steroid administration route and the degree of FEV1 non-reversibility allowing the diagnosis of corticosteroid-resistant asthma. Finally, the beneficial effect of steroids in clinical terms (symptom frequency, number of hospitalizations, quality of life) is not taken into consideration, thus nearly one-half al all patients included in studies on corticosteroid resistance are taking long-term oral steroids. This subgroup of patients must be considered individually when examining these studies. COMPLEX PATHOGENESIS: There are a wide range of anomalies described in the literature involving: glucocorticoid pharmacokinetics, cytokine regulation, cell function (monocytes, lymphocytes, eosionophils), and transcription factors (glucocorticoid and AP-1 receptors). DIFFICULT THERAPEUTIC MANAGEMENT: There are several prerequisites before proposing exceptional regimens using cyclosporine, gold salts, methotrexate, or immunoglobulins: i) certain diagnosis of asthma (with CT scan and ultrasonographic explorations if needed, ii) proper control of environmental factors and good compliance, iii) proof of the absence of clinical benefit with long-term corticosteroids. These exceptional therapeutic schemes have their disadvantages and are only warranted by clinically patent corticosteroid resistance (whatever the "biological" cause).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Jaffuel, M Mathieu, P Chanez, H Sahla, F B Michel, P Godard, J Bousquet, P Demoly. 1999-04-03. [Corticosteroid-resistant asthma: basic aspects].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10228485/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Randomized trial of blood eosinophil count monitoring as a guide to corticosteroid dosage adjustment after heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Increases in blood eosinophil counts (EOS) beyond 0.06 x 10(9)/liter precede treated heart allograft rejection. An oral prednisolone dose of 0.35 mg/kg/day usually suppresses EOS below this threshold. METHODS: We designed a randomized trial to compare our empirical protocol for steroid dose adjustment with a novel protocol guided by EOS monitoring during the first 3 months after heart transplantation. Eighty patients were randomized to either have their EOS reported and used for steroid dose adjustment (RG; n=40), or not reported (NG; n=40). RG patients had their steroid dosage increased if EOS exceeded 0.06 x 10(9)/liter. RESULTS: RG patients had an 83% lower risk of treated rejection (P=0.035) and lower median intravenous dose of methyl-prednisolone (P=0.017) than NG during the first 6 postoperative weeks. The proportion of diagnostic increases in EOS that were followed within 2 weeks by treated rejection was 42% greater in NG than RG (P=0.0001), compatible with a direct impact of EOS-guided prednisolone dose adjustment on the risk of subsequent rejection. Overall, RG had less than half the risk of rejection of any grade (P<0.001) and significantly more rejection-free biopsies than NG (P=0.001). The mean oral prednisolone dosage was significantly greater in RG than NG during the first (P=0.014) and second (P=0.001) 6 weeks of follow-up. This did not increase the incidence of serious steroid-related side effects. CONCLUSIONS: EOS monitoring is a simple, cheap, and effective means of optimizing steroid immunosuppression. Restriction of the EOS-guided steroid dosing protocol to periods of prolonged hospitalisation during the first 3 postoperative months should limit the requirement for higher prednisolone dosage without affecting immunosuppressive efficacy.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗