Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H Sahla

Publications and source records attributed to H Sahla.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

[Allergy to macrolides. 21 cases].

OBJECTIVE: Allergic drug reactions to macrolides are extremely rare and there is little information in the literature concerning relevant diagnostic tests. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients were recently seen for assumed allergies (principally urticaria) to diverse macrolides. Skin tests (prick and intradermal tests) were performed with injectable forms of spiramycin and erythromycin. Seventeen out of 21 patients were provoked under strict hospital surveillance. RESULTS: Only 3 patients had a positive provocation test and were thus truly allergic (to spiromycin). They had positive skin tests to both macrolides tested. CONCLUSION: Most hypersensitivity reactions to macrolides are therefore diagnosed with provocation tests.

Adolescent↗

[Allergy to macrolide antibiotics. Review of the literature].

MACROLIDE CLASSES: Macrolides are characterized by their basic structure made up of a lactonic cycle with 2 osidic chains. They are classified according to the number of carbon atoms in the cycle: 14-membered macrolides (erythromycin, troleandomycin, roxithromycin, dirithromycin, clarithromycin), 15-membered macrolides (azithromycin) and 16-membered macrolides (spiramycin, josamycin, midecamycin). MACROLIDE ALLERGY: Allergy to macrolides is extremely rare (0.4% to 3% of treatments). The little information available in the literature is insufficient to establish the usefulness of diagnostic tests. An immediate IgE-dependent hypersensitivity has been shown with erythromycin in some cases but the mechanism remains unknown and skin tests are quite often negative. Clinical manifestations are the same as those encountered with beta-lactams. It would appear that macrolide allergies are unlikely to be class allergies. This is important as eviction advice could be limited to the single causal macrolide.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

[Corticosteroid-resistant asthma: basic aspects].

A CONTROVERSIAL DEFINITION: The current definition of corticosteroid-resistant asthma is a spirometry definition. There is however, no consensus on dose, treatment duration, steroid administration route and the degree of FEV1 non-reversibility allowing the diagnosis of corticosteroid-resistant asthma. Finally, the beneficial effect of steroids in clinical terms (symptom frequency, number of hospitalizations, quality of life) is not taken into consideration, thus nearly one-half al all patients included in studies on corticosteroid resistance are taking long-term oral steroids. This subgroup of patients must be considered individually when examining these studies. COMPLEX PATHOGENESIS: There are a wide range of anomalies described in the literature involving: glucocorticoid pharmacokinetics, cytokine regulation, cell function (monocytes, lymphocytes, eosionophils), and transcription factors (glucocorticoid and AP-1 receptors). DIFFICULT THERAPEUTIC MANAGEMENT: There are several prerequisites before proposing exceptional regimens using cyclosporine, gold salts, methotrexate, or immunoglobulins: i) certain diagnosis of asthma (with CT scan and ultrasonographic explorations if needed, ii) proper control of environmental factors and good compliance, iii) proof of the absence of clinical benefit with long-term corticosteroids. These exceptional therapeutic schemes have their disadvantages and are only warranted by clinically patent corticosteroid resistance (whatever the "biological" cause).

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗

Predictive capacity of histamine release for the diagnosis of drug allergy.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of immediate allergic reactions to drugs is difficult, requiring in vitro test development. Basophils are likely to be involved in these reactions, and to evaluate the sensitivity, the specificity, and the predictive values of the histamine-release test, we performed a prospective study in 68 patients tested for suspected drug allergy. METHODS: Positive diagnosis was established by history, skin tests, and, if needed, oral provocation tests. Histamine release in the presence of the drug was assessed on heparinized whole blood by enzyme immunoassay (Immunotech, France), and the cutoff value was set at 5% of total histamine content. Spontaneous and anti-IgE-induced histamine release was also studied in all subjects. RESULTS: All patients presented to our clinic with reactions ranging from maculopapular exanthema to anaphylactic shock. Thirty-five patients had proven drug allergy; 33 were not allergic to drugs and served as a control group together with 40 other subjects with no history of drug allergy. Net histamine release was positive in 18/35 allergics and 27/73 nonallergics, giving poor sensitivity (51.4%), specificity (63.0%), and positive predictive value (29.3%), but valuable negative predictive value (81.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The usefulness of the in vitro histamine-release test for the diagnosis of drug allergy appears to be insufficient.

Acetaminophen↗

VEGF levels in asthmatic airways do not correlate with plasma extravasation.

BACKGROUND: Vascular permeability/vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a multifunctional cytokine which plays a role in chronic inflammation and angiogenesis. Its expression in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) has not been determined although VEGF may be relevant to the pathophysiology of asthma in which oedema is an important feature. METHODS: We studied VEGF, albumin and IgA immunoreactive levels in the BAL fluids obtained from 27 chronic stable asthmatics, nine untreated chronic bronchitis patients and 15 control subjects. RESULTS: BAL fluid levels of VEGF and VEGF normalized to IgA were not significantly different in any patient group. Both asthmatic steroid- and non-steroid-treated groups had significantly lower albumin levels in their BAL fluids explaining most of the 179% increased VEGF normalized to albumin ratios in non-steroid treated asthmatics. Moreover, VEGF and albumin markers correlated in control subjects (r = 0.73, P = 0.006) and in chronic bronchitics (r = 0.75, P = 0.03, Spearman test), but not in asthmatics. VEGF was inversely correlated with asthma severity (GINA/NHLBI scores) in non-steroid treated asthmatics (tau = - 0.52, P = 0.009, Kendall test). CONCLUSIONS: Thus, the potential role of VEGF in asthma requires further studies on bronchial biopsies and induced sputum.

Adult↗

[Immunobiology of respiratory allergy].

Respiratory allergies are frequent and the etiological diagnosis is not always easy. Most often, the allergy assessment is vital. For the allergist, this assessment begins with skin tests which must be complemented by measurement of the level of specific IgE in case of doubt. For the generalist or physician who does not have special competence in allergy, an alternative to a specialist consultation at once is a multi-allergen test of detection. This assessment is necessary to set out the etiological diagnosis and facilitate the responsibility of the therapy.

Allergens↗

Six-hour trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-graded challenge in HIV-infected patients.

BACKGROUND: Hypersensitivity reactions to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) are very common in HIV-infected patients, leading to drug discontinuation. However, it is the drug of choice as prophylaxis for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the safety and long-term efficacy of a 6-hour TMP-SMX-graded challenge in a group of hypersensitive HIV-infected patients. METHODS: Forty-four consecutive HIV-infected patients with documented TMP-SMX hypersensitivity were seen in our outpatient allergy department. They ingested 12 doses of increasing amounts of TMP-SMX at half-hour intervals. Thereafter, they took 80/400 mg TMP-SMX daily and were advised to "treat through" every nonbullous cutaneous adverse reaction. RESULTS: All 44 patients tolerated the procedure without any adverse reactions during the day of challenge. Eleven of the 44 patients experienced mild hypersensitivity reactions on days 1 to 2 (8 patients) and 8 to 10 (3 patients), consisting mainly on a 1-day pruritic maculopapular eruption. Two patients stopped TMP-SMX at day 1, and 2 stopped it at days 10 and 15, giving an overall success rate at 1 month of 91% (40 of 44). Two were successfully rechallenged late. After a median follow-up of 10 months, 42 patients were taking TMP-SMX without any adverse reaction, giving an overall success rate of 95%. CONCLUSIONS: A 6-hour graded challenge with cautious "treating through" of mild reactions enables more patients to take TMP-SMX and is safe and effective.

Administration, Oral↗

The use of home nebulizers in adult asthma.

Nebulization therapy is an approach for the treatment of respiratory diseases such as asthma which was not anticipated in the international recommendations for the treatment of asthma and which merits study. Even if the place of nebulizers in the treatment of asthma exacerbations has been validated, this is not the case for adult asthmatic subjects with chronic asthma. While asthma control for most patients can be achieved using metered-dose inhaler and dry powder inhaler therapy, some patients may require regular home nebulized therapy. Before determining the objectives and therapeutic characteristics of nebulization in the treatment of chronic asthma in the adult patient, we shall first describe the pathophysiological elements involved in the treatment of asthma and of the couple 'nebulized substance-nebulizer' leading to an optimal nebulization.

Adult↗

Glucocorticoid insensitive asthma: a one year clinical follow up pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Glucocorticoid resistant or insensitive asthmatic subjects are usually defined as patients whose baseline pre-bronchodilation forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of less than 70-80% predicted improves significantly in response to beta 2 agonists but by less than 15% following 1-2 weeks of 40 mg prednisolone daily. Since there is little long term clinical information on these patients, a one year prospective study was performed to assess whether glucocorticoid sensitivity may vary over time. METHODS: Nineteen severe asthmatic subjects were studied and received 40 mg prednisolone daily for seven days. Prednisolone was given for a further seven days in glucocorticoid insensitive asthmatics and then stopped. Patients were followed up for one year and the glucocorticoid test was repeated on five patients in each group six months later. RESULTS: Eleven patients were classified as glucocorticoid insensitive and eight as glucocorticoid sensitive on day 7. The demographic characteristics of the patients were similar in both groups. Four glucocorticoid insensitive patients became responsive after one further week of prednisolone treatment. Six months later, four of five glucocorticoid sensitive patients and three of five previously glucocorticoid insensitive patients were glucocorticoid sensitive. CONCLUSIONS: Glucocorticoid sensitivity varies over time.

Adult↗