Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10111352

Fast track evaluation methodology.

J R Duke
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Evaluating hospital information systems has taken a variety of forms since the initial development and use of automation. The process itself has moved from a hardware-based orientation controlled by data processing professionals to systems solutions and a user-driven process overseen by management. At Harbor Hospital Center in Baltimore, a fast track methodology has been introduced to shorten system evaluation time to meet the rapid changes that constantly affect the healthcare industry.

Explore related subjects

BaltimoreDecision MakingEvaluation Studies as TopicHospital Bed Capacity, 300 to 499Hospital Information SystemsPlanning TechniquesPurchasing, HospitalJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J R Duke. 1991. Fast track evaluation methodology.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10111352/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2002

The effect of active surveillance for vancomycin-resistant enterococci in high-risk units on vancomycin-resistant enterococci incidence hospital-wide.

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) have become a major cause of nosocomial infections and are now endemic in many geographic areas. The aim of this study was to describe the effect of active surveillance for patients with VRE in high-risk units on the VRE incidence rate hospital-wide. METHODS: We determined 4 time periods based on the intervention of active surveillance: preactive surveillance (period 1), active surveillance (period 2), no active surveillance (period 3), and reinstutition of active surveillance (period 4). VRE incidence rates based on first clinical culture for VRE per 10,000 patient days for each of these periods and incidence rate ratios were then calculated. RESULTS: Active surveillance in high-risk units was associated with a significant reduction in VRE incidence hospital-wide in 2 of the 3 comparisons made. The incidence rate ratio when comparing the first period of active surveillance (period 2) to the preactive surveillance period (period 1) was 0.63 (95% CI, 0.38-1.1); it was 0.36 (95% CI, 0.23-0.55) when comparing the first period of active surveillance (period 2) to the subsequent period (period 3) and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.54-0.85) when comparing the second period of active surveillance (period 4) to the prior period without active surveillance periods. CONCLUSIONS: Active surveillance culturing for VRE in the high risk-units prevented further VRE transmission, as evidenced by a significant increase in hospital-wide incidence rates when active surveillance was discontinued and a significant decrease in incidence rates when it was restarted.

Baltimore↗
PubMed2002

Preventing nosocomial transmission of pulmonary tuberculosis: when may isolation be discontinued for patients with suspected tuberculosis?

OBJECTIVE: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Thoracic Society recommend obtaining cultures of at least three sputum specimens for acid-fast bacilli (AFB) from patients in whom tuberculosis (TB) is suspected. On the basis of this, most hospitals isolate patients with suspected TB for 3 days or more until three smear (not culture) results are negative. Our objective was to evaluate the predictive value and sensitivity of these smears. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Four urban medical centers. METHODS: The posttest probability of TB given sequential negative AFB smears from 274 patients isolated for suspected TB and the sensitivity of sequential AFB smears from 209 patients with positive results on culture for pulmonary TB were measured. RESULTS: The posttest probabilities of having TB given one, two, and three negative AFB smears were low: 1.1% (3 of 265; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 0.23% to 3.27%), 0.4% (1 of 262; CI95 0% to 2.1%), and 0% (0 of 260; CI95, 0% to 1.4%), respectively. Among the 209 patients with positive results on culture for pulmonary TB, 169 (81%) had an expectorated sputum specimen sent, of which 91 (54%) were positive for AFB. Forty (24%) of the 169 patients had a second expectorated sputum specimen sent after the results of the first specimen were negative; only 6 (15%) of these had positive AFB smears. None of the 10 patients in whom the first two expectorated sputum samples yielded an AFB smear without an organism had a third AFB smear that was positive. CONCLUSION: Unless there is high clinical suspicion of pulmonary TB in a specific patient, the use of three AFB smears on expectorated sputa is a rational approach to discontinuing isolation for patients with suspected TB.

Baltimore↗