Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 10070687

Using missing data methods in genetic studies with missing mutation status.

Abstract

Because of current techniques of determining gene mutation, investigators are now interested in estimating the odds ratio between genetic status (mutation, no mutation) and an outcome variable such as disease cell type (A, B). In this paper we consider the mutation of the RAS genetic family. To determine if the genes have mutated, investigators look at five specific locations on the RAS gene. RAS mutated is a mutation in at least one of the five gene locations and RAS non-mutated is no mutation in any of the five locations. Owing to limited time and financial resources, one cannot obtain a complete genetic evaluation of all five locations on the gene for all patients. We propose the use of maximum likelihood (ML) with a 2(6) multinomial distribution formed by cross-classifying the binary mutation status at five locations by binary disease cell type. This ML method includes all patients regardless of completeness of data, treats the locations not evaluated as missing data, and uses the EM algorithm to estimate the odds ratio between genetic mutation status and the disease type. We compare the ML method to complete case estimates, and a method used by clinical investigators, which excludes patients with data on less than five locations who have no mutations on these sites.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Leong, S R Lipsitz, J G Ibrahim. 1999-02-28. Using missing data methods in genetic studies with missing mutation status.. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19990228)18%3A4%3C473%3A%3Aaid-sim21%3E3.0.co%3B2-h

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A multivariate approach for assessing severity of acute graft-versus-host disease in bone marrow transplantation.

Patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation are at high risk of developing acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) which is a primary limiting factor for this procedure inasmuch as it is responsible for high morbidity rates and is associated with poor survival outcome. To provide improved treatment assessment and better interpretation of clinical outcomes, we need a precise and objective assessment of GVHD. Severity of GVHD is commonly assessed using an imprecise categorical grading system that incorporates skin, gut and liver grades, as well as subjective assessment of clinical performance. These organ grades are based on arbitrary cutpoints of skin rash, diarrhoea volume and bilirubin level. The International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry proposed an alternative grading system based on different combinations of organ involvement and provided estimates of relative risk of treatment failure. On the basis of that work, we developed an empirical mathematical model that quantifies GVHD severity, and that uses continuous, rather than categorical, daily measurements for each organ system. We use model-predicted values as an index of severity for any combination of values. The proposed index allows a more precise comparison of GVHD profiles across different treatment protocols and also permits more refined analyses to address relationships between GVHD and clinical outcomes.

Biometry

Construction of uniform-balanced cross-over designs for any odd number of treatments.

Cross-over designs balanced for simple carry-over effects are commonly applied in clinical studies for the comparison of treatments for chronic conditions such as hypertension or asthma. Uniform-balanced cross-over designs have the desirable property that the treatment sequences are arranged so that, in the full design, each treatment is followed by every other treatment equally often. Such designs for an even number of treatments and the same number of sequences and periods are readily constructed using suitable cyclic Latin squares. For an odd number of treatments, pairs of squares may be combined to give uniform-balanced designs. Recently, computer search techniques have been used to find nearly-balanced Latin squares which may be combined in pairs or in sets of three to produce designs with the overall properties of uniformity and balance. In this paper, simple generating formulae are described which will give, for any odd number of treatments t > 3, uniform-balanced cross-over designs with p = t periods and n = kt treatment sequences for any k > or = 2. Tables of cross-over designs obtained from these simple formulae are presented for t < or = 15.

Biometry

Comparing several score tests for interval censored data.

I create a general model to perform score tests on interval censored data. Special cases of this model are the score tests of Finkelstein, Sun and Fay. Although Sun's was derived as a test for discrete data and Finkelstein's and Fay's tests were derived under a grouped continuous model, by writing all tests under one general model we see that as long as the regularity conditions hold, any of these three classes of tests may be applied to either grouped continuous or discrete data. I show the equivalence between the weighted logrank form of the general test and the form with a term for each individual, the form often used with permutation tests. From the weighted logrank form of the tests, we see that Sun's and Finkelstein's test are similar, giving constant (or approximately constant) weights to differences in survival distributions over time. In contrast, the proportional odds model (Fay's model with logistic error) gives more weight to early differences.

Biometry