subject

Critical Care

Critical Care: explore 5 source-linked works published from 2026 to 2026, with original documents and citations.

This collection is a preview while coverage and quality are evaluated.

Coverage and selection

Includes records with this source-supplied label or an explicit phrase match in their metadata. Matches indicate a mention, not proof that a paper uses a method or tests a material. Source versions are consolidated by DOI.

Sources: pubmed. Collection updated 2026-09-15. Counts describe this index, not the complete source archives.

PubMed2026

External ventricular drain safety campaign and opportunities for global neuroanesthesiology quality and safety.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review describes the conceptualization and implementation of the External Ventricular Drain (EVD) Safety Campaign, a global patient safety initiative by the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care. It summarizes recent literature on EVD insertion and maintenance, highlights opportunities to advance quality and safety in neuroanesthesiology, and outlines priorities and a framework for future work. RECENT FINDINGS: The Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care launched a global initiative to improve EVD management. EVD insertion and maintenance remain key areas of ongoing research and quality improvement, particularly in reducing complications. SUMMARY: The EVD Safety Campaign provides a structured framework to improve care delivery and patient outcomes worldwide. Continued focus on standardization, education, and complication reduction, especially infection prevention, will be essential to advancing the field.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage care in a middle-income public healthcare system: A real-world neurocritical care cohort.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although aneurysm treatment capacity has expanded worldwide, outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) remain strongly influenced by neurocritical care (NCC) delivery, referral pathways, and access to specialized treatment. Contemporary data describing real-world aSAH care in resource-limited healthcare systems remain scarce. We aimed to characterize treatment patterns, NCC delivery, complications, and outcomes in a large Brazilian public referral center. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included consecutive adults with confirmed aSAH admitted between June 2018 and March 2022 to a high-volume Brazilian tertiary referral center. Only patients admitted within five days of symptom onset were included. Demographic, clinical, radiological, treatment, complication, and outcome data were extracted from institutional records. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and 3-month functional outcome assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were included. Disease severity was high, with 45% presenting WFNS grades 4-5, 73% modified Fisher grade 4 hemorrhage, and 64% hydrocephalus. Endovascular treatment was performed in 73% of cases, and median time from admission to aneurysm treatment was 1 day. Despite early treatment capability, only 28% of patients were admitted to an ICU within 48 h, while 38% never received ICU care. Delayed cerebral ischemia occurred in 43%, radiologic vasospasm in 58%, ventriculitis in 22%, and infectious complications in 57%. External ventricular drainage was required in 42%, and vasoactive drugs were used in 85%. In-hospital mortality was 42%, and 66% had unfavorable 3-month outcomes (mRS 4-6). CONCLUSIONS: This real-world cohort highlights the substantial neurocritical care burden of aSAH in a middle-income public healthcare system. Despite timely access to definitive aneurysm treatment, patients experienced frequent neurological and systemic complications, emphasizing that contemporary aSAH care extends well beyond aneurysm occlusion.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Anabolic androgen therapy in critically ill adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Critical illness is characterized by a catabolic, proinflammatory state. Anabolic agents, such as testosterone, have therefore been proposed as therapeutic targets. Our objectives were to assess the effects of testosterone in critically ill populations on patient-important outcomes and identify design limitations to inform future studies. We searched for randomized control trials (RCTs) through Medline, Embase, and EBM Reviews databases from inception through February 24, 2026, including English language articles enrolling adults (≥18 years) admitted to ICU where anabolic androgen therapies (AAT) were compared with placebo or standard of care. Studies had to report at least one of: mortality, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, or duration of mechanical ventilation. We extracted data independently using a standardized data extraction tool, and feedback was received from all co-authors to ensure agreement. For each outcome, we performed meta-analyses using a random-effects model with inverse variance weighting in RevMan. We used the GRADE approach to assess certainty in pooled estimates of effect. Of 1325 screened articles, we found 4 that fit our inclusion criteria. Together, we judged risk of bias as 'some concerns' in 3 trials and 'high' in the final trial, and ultimately found that the effects of anabolic-androgen therapy on patient-important outcomes uncertain. With the uncertainty of current evidence for the effects of anabolic-androgen therapy in critically ill adults, there is insufficient support for its routine use. Future randomized evidence is needed to determine whether anabolic-androgen therapy improves clinically-important outcomes and better define its safety profile in critically ill adults.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Alarms and alarm management with automated versus conventional ventilation in neurocritical care patients.

INTRODUCTION: False or clinically irrelevant alarms are a major driver of ICU alarm fatigue and nursing workload. Ventilator alarms make up a large share, and although automated ventilation modes can reduce manual adjustments, their effect on alarm burden is still unclear. This issue can be particularly relevant in neurocritical care patients, where precise ventilator and alarm management is imperative for patient safety. OBJECTIVES: This explorative post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial compared alarm frequency and management between automated ventilation and conventional ventilation in neurocritical care patients. METHODS: Ventilator alarms and manual ventilator changes were captured continuously from the ventilator for up to 24 h per patient. The primary endpoint was a composite of workload-relevant alarms; with alarm management interventions at the ventilator as a key secondary outcome. Additional endpoints included redundant alarms, alarm duration and ventilator management. RESULTS: 13 patients received automated ventilation and 24 received conventional ventilation. No difference was observed in workload-relevant alarm frequency between automated and conventional ventilation (3.28 [2.87 to 4.30] vs 3.73 [1.66 to 7.33] alarms per hour; P = 0.81), while alarm management interventions at the ventilator were lower with automated ventilation (0.14 [0.10 to 0.15] vs 0.21 [0.17 to 0.31] interventions per hour; P = 0.01). Other alarm frequencies, duration of alarms and ventilator management were similar. CONCLUSIONS: In this exploratory post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial in neurocritical care patients during the early phase of mechanical ventilation, automated ventilation did not reduce the frequency of total or workload-relevant alarms, nor their duration, but was associated with fewer alarm management interventions compared to conventional ventilation. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Automated ventilation may not reduce alarm frequency in neurocritical care patients, but the observed reduction in alarm-related bedside interventions suggests a potential benefit for nursing workload.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Empirical Meropenem Versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam for Critically Ill Adults With Sepsis: Feasibility of a Randomised Trial.

BACKGROUND: Meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam are commonly used empirical antibiotics in critically ill adults with sepsis, but whether one is superior to the other is uncertain. METHODS: The Empirical Meropenem versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam for Adult Patients with Sepsis (EMPRESS) trial is an ongoing investigator-initiated, randomised, open-label, adaptive clinical trial with an integrated feasibility phase comparing empirical treatment with meropenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam in critically ill adults with sepsis. The integrated feasibility phase enrolled 200 participants across 10 intensive care units (ICUs) in Denmark between 28 June and 12 December 2025. Five pre-specified feasibility criteria were evaluated; if all feasibility criteria were met, the trial would proceed unaltered, whereas failure to meet one or more criteria would require intervention and re-evaluation. RESULTS: We randomised 200 of 284 screened patients (70.4%). The median age was 70 years (interquartile range (IQR): 60-77), 65.5% were males. At randomisation, 80.0% received vasopressors or inotropes, and 43.5% were on invasive mechanical ventilation. Four of five pre-specified feasibility criteria were met: time to completion of the feasibility phase (5.5 months vs. threshold < 12.0 months), recruitment proportion (70.4% vs. threshold ≥ 50.0%), proportion of participants without consent to the continued collection of data (2.5% vs. threshold < 5.0%) and protocol adherence (81.0% vs. threshold ≥ 75.0%). The proportion of participants with timely primary outcome data availability (30-day mortality) within 45 days was 85.5% and below the pre-specified threshold of ≥ 95.0%. The proportions were low in the first 3 months (33.3%, 22.2% and 30.8%, respectively), increasing to 95.8% in the last month of the feasibility phase. All-cause mortality at 30 days was 30.5%, and specific serious adverse reactions occurred in 4.0% of participants. CONCLUSIONS: In this integrated feasibility evaluation of the EMPRESS trial comparing empirical meropenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam in critically ill adults with sepsis, four of five pre-specified feasibility criteria were met. The unmet criterion, timely primary outcome data availability, improved substantially during the feasibility phase. We consider the trial feasible and will proceed without modifications. EDITORIAL COMMENT: This feasibility study assessed recruitment, randomised allocation and data collection for the multicentre EMPRESS trial. For adaptive trials on trial platforms, careful interim checking of trial design functions is an important and necessary process. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Information System EUCT number: 2023-509703-33-00; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06184659; Universal Trial Number: U1111-1301-6379.

Humans↗

Compare source metadata on this page

Work	Published	Source identifier	Source
External ventricular drain safety campaign and opportunities for global neuroanesthesiology quality and safety.	2026-08-24	PMID 42438063	pubmed
Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage care in a middle-income public healthcare system: A real-world neurocritical care cohort.	2026-08-05	PMID 42556000	pubmed
Anabolic androgen therapy in critically ill adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.	2026-07-29	PMID 42526360	pubmed
Alarms and alarm management with automated versus conventional ventilation in neurocritical care patients.	2026-06-18	PMID 42314451	pubmed
Empirical Meropenem Versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam for Critically Ill Adults With Sepsis: Feasibility of a Randomised Trial.	2026	PMID 42674465	pubmed

These are bibliographic comparisons, not experimental rankings. Follow the original document for methods and conditions.