Biomedical subjects

Clinical trials

Explore PubMed citations mentioning clinical trials and randomized studies. Verify study design and publication details in the original PubMed record and linked article.

Follow this topic with RSS

969 records · Page 12Linked to original sources

PubMed2026

Effectiveness of the DASH diet versus alternative dietary interventions for hypertension management: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet is widely recommended for blood pressure control; however, its comparative effectiveness relative to other structured dietary interventions remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of the DASH diet versus alternative dietary interventions on blood pressure and cardiometabolic outcomes in adults. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Multiple databases were searched from inception to February 2026. Eligible studies included adults with elevated blood pressure or hypertension comparing the DASH diet with other dietary interventions or usual care. Continuous outcomes were pooled using random-effects models and expressed as mean differences (MD) or standardized mean differences (SMD). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: A total of 22 randomized controlled trials were included in the qualitative synthesis, of which 10 were included in the meta-analysis. The DASH diet did not demonstrate a statistically significant advantage over comparator diets in reducing systolic blood pressure (MD = 1.30; 95% CI: -1.54 to 4.14) or diastolic blood pressure (MD = 0.21; 95% CI: -3.72 to 4.14), with substantial heterogeneity observed across studies. Significant effects were identified for selected cardiometabolic outcomes, including reductions in urinary sodium excretion (MD = -32.89; 95% CI: -62.76 to -3.01), LDL cholesterol (MD = -8.59; 95% CI: -14.64 to -2.54), and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (MD = -0.49; 95% CI: -0.52 to -0.46), as well as an increase in urinary potassium excretion (MD = 11.76; 95% CI: 4.08 to 19.44). The certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to very low across outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The DASH diet was not superior to other dietary interventions in reducing blood pressure; however, it demonstrated consistent benefits in selected cardiometabolic parameters. Given the overall low certainty of evidence and substantial heterogeneity, these findings should be interpreted cautiously. Future research should focus on well-designed trials with standardized outcomes and longer follow-up to clarify comparative effectiveness.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Adjunctive intermittent theta-burst stimulation for first-episode schizophrenia: A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) combined with pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy in first-episode schizophrenia remains unclear. This study evaluated adjunctive iTBS with risperidone and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and explored serum biomarkers indicating treatment response. METHODS: In this randomized, assessor-blind trial, 100 first-episode schizophrenia patients received either iTBS plus risperidone and CBT (iTBS group, n = 50) or risperidone and CBT alone (control, n = 50) for 3 months. The primary outcome was change in PANSS total score at 4 weeks and 3 months. Response was defined as a ≥ 50 % PANSS reduction. Secondary outcomes included cognitive function (MCCB subtests) and serum GDNF, cortisol, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) levels. RESULTS: The iTBS group showed significantly greater reduction in PANSS total scores than controls at both 4 weeks and 3 months (mean difference at 3 months: -13.3, 95 % CI: -16.8 to -9.8; P < 0.001), with a higher responder rate (76 % vs. 48 %). Significant improvements across all cognitive domains were observed in the iTBS group (all P < 0.001). Post-treatment, the iTBS group exhibited higher GDNF and lower cortisol and DHEA-S levels (all P < 0.001). A combined biomarker panel demonstrated superior discriminative performance for treatment efficacy (AUC=0.865 after cross-validation). Adverse events were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adding iTBS to risperidone and CBT significantly improves clinical symptoms and cognitive function in first-episode schizophrenia. The combination of GDNF, cortisol, and DHEA-S shows promise as a composite biomarker for treatment response, though sham-controlled validation is warranted.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

A Sentiment-Based Comparison of AI- and Physician-Generated Empathic Statements in Palliative Care.

CONTEXT: Empathic communication promotes trust in patient-provider relationships. As healthcare integrates artificial intelligence (AI) into patient communication, we have yet to understand how these models' communication compares to that of physicians. OBJECTIVES: Our primary objectives were to examine patient preferences for AI-generated vs. palliative care physician-generated empathic statements addressing fear and anxiety around cancer treatment, and to analyze associations between linguistic features and patient preferences. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of the PALL-AI trial, a randomized controlled survey comparing cancer patients' preferences of AI- to physician-generated empathic statements. Physicians and AI were provided the same prompt with a maximum sentence length. Patient preferences for each statement were measured in blinded surveys. We analyzed sentiment of the statements using the Valence Aware Dictionary and Sentiment Reasoner (VADER) and the National Research Council Canada (NRC) Emotion Lexicon. We evaluated associations between sentiment scores and patient preferences using Spearman's correlation coefficients. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients completed blinded surveys, preferring the AI-generated statement 72.4% of the time. VADER sentiment analysis showed all three AI statements displayed positive sentiment, while all three physician statements displayed negative sentiment. Controlling for statement length, AI statements used twice as many positive words as human statements. However, they contained a similar number of negative words. Of the eight NRC emotions, "trust" and "joy" demonstrated the strongest correlations with patient preference. CONCLUSION: Patients preferred AI-generated statements around cancer care over those from palliative care physicians when standardized for prompt and statement length. Analysis shows AI-generated statements contain more positive language which may be the factor driving patient preference toward AI.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Randomized Trial of Intensive Nurse-Led Follow‑Up Versus Standard Care in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND:  Nurses play a key role in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management. This randomized controlled trial evaluated intensive nurse-led program in patients with IBD starting advanced therapy. METHODS:  Patients were randomized (1:1) to intensive nurse follow‑up (Arm A) or standard care (Arm B). Both arms received baseline nurse education; Arm A additionally had scheduled nurse calls and visits. Primary outcome was reduction in IBD‑Disk score in W12. Secondary outcomes were W52 reduction, robust response (> 20-point improvement), and IBD-Disk remission (score < 40). RESULTS: Overall, 98 patients were randomized (Arm A: n = 50; Arm B: n = 48) with similar baseline characteristics. Mean baseline IBD‑Disk scores were 49.2 ± 20.7 in Arm A and 42.0 ± 19.8 in Arm B (p = 0.07). At W12, both groups improved, with greater IBD-Disk reductions in Arm A (16.1 ± 22.9 vs. 10.1 ± 20.1, p = 0.09). At W52, improvement was greater in Arm A (18.4 ± 20.7 vs 9.4 ± 17.8; p = 0.08). More patients achieved robust response in Arm A (49% vs 21%, p = 0.013) at W12. By W52, IBD-Disk remission was achieved by 22/25 (88%) patients in Arm A vs 18/28 (64%) in Arm B (p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS:  In this pilot randomized trial, intensive nurse-led follow-up did not significantly improve IBD-Disk at week 12, yet favorable trends of functional outcomes were observed. Intensive nurse‑led follow‑up program may improve quality of life in patients with IBD. These findings support the integration of specialist IBD nurses to improve patient‑centered outcomes.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training at Different Levels of Arterial Occlusion Pressure on Body Composition and Athletic Performance in Youth Soccer Players: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

This study aimed to investigate the effects of low-load blood flow restriction training (BFRT) performed at different levels of arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) on body composition, maximal strength, and athletic performance in youth soccer players. Twenty-four male youth soccer players were randomly assigned to 40% AOP group, 60% AOP group, or control group. Participants in the BFRT groups performed lower-limb resistance training at 30% of one-repetition maximum (1RM) under the corresponding pressure conditions, whereas the control group trained without BFR. Training was conducted three times per week for six weeks. Body composition, back squat 1RM, countermovement jump (CMJ), T-test, and 30-m sprint performance were assessed before and after the intervention. Results showed that lower-limb muscle mass increased significantly in both the 40% AOP group (mean change = 0.55 kg, 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.97 kg, P = 0.010) and the 60% AOP group (mean change = 0.83 kg, 95% CI: 0.37 to 1.29 kg, P < 0.001), with the 60% AOP group showing significantly greater gains than the control group (between-group difference = 1.48 kg, 95% CI: 0.40 to 2.56 kg, P = 0.008). Back squat 1RM improved significantly in both the 40% AOP group (mean change = 6.50 kg, 95% CI: 3.90 to 9.10 kg, P < 0.001) and the 60% AOP group (mean change = 9.25 kg, 95% CI: 6.75 to 11.75 kg, P < 0.001), with the 60% AOP group demonstrating superior strength gains compared with the 40% AOP group (between-group difference = 2.94 kg, 95% CI: 0.20 to 5.68 kg, P = 0.048). CMJ height and T-test performance improved significantly in both the 40% AOP group (CMJ: mean change = 2.07 cm, 95% CI: 0.80 to 3.34 cm, P = 0.002; T-test: mean change = -0.23 s, 95% CI: -0.35 to -0.11 s, P = 0.001) and the 60% AOP group (CMJ: mean change = 2.65 cm, 95% CI: 1.00 to 4.30 cm, P = 0.003; T-test: mean change = -0.26 s, 95% CI: -0.38 to -0.14 s, P < 0.001), with no significant differences between the two BFRT groups (all P > 0.05). No significant changes were observed in 30-m sprint performance across groups (all P > 0.05). This study showed that six weeks of low-load (30% 1RM) blood flow restriction training performed at both 40% and 60% AOP was associated with improvements in lower-limb muscle mass, squat strength, and selected aspects of athletic performance in youth soccer players, compared with low-load training without BFR. While both pressure levels elicited comparable improvements in CMJ and agility performance, training at 60% AOP was associated with greater adaptations in lower-limb muscle mass and squat strength, with no additional benefits observed for 30-m sprint performance.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Conduction System Pacing Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Atrioventricular Block and Anticipated High Pacing Burden.

Right ventricular pacing (RVP) in patients with atrioventricular (AV) block and high anticipated pacing burden is associated with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) in approximately 12% to 20% of patients, whereas conduction system pacing (CSP) preserves more physiologic ventricular activation and may mitigate these consequences; the totality of contemporary randomized evidence has not been systematically pooled. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CSP with RVP in patients with AV block or anticipated high ventricular pacing burden and a minimum 6-month follow-up, with co-primary outcomes of PICM incidence and change in left ventricular ejection fraction (ΔLVEF) and secondary outcomes of heart failure hospitalization (HFH), all-cause mortality, composite clinical endpoint, and paced QRS duration (PROSPERO CRD420261400227); random-effects meta-analysis used DerSimonian-Laird estimation. Five RCTs (LBBP-FAVOUR, CSPACE, Prague CSP, PACE-HF, STAY; N = 806) met inclusion criteria. CSP significantly reduced PICM (hazard ratio [HR] 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18 to 0.48; p <0.001; I² = 0%; k = 4), was associated with greater LVEF preservation (pooled mean difference [MD] +4.41%, 95% CI +1.82 to +6.99; p = 0.001; I² = 87%; k = 5), and reduced HFH (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.48; p <0.001; I² = 0%; k = 5). CSP shortened paced QRS duration (MD -27.5 ms, 95% CI -32.6 to -22.5; p <0.001; k = 5). All-cause mortality was numerically lower with CSP but did not reach significance (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.12; p = 0.10; k = 4). In a prespecified sensitivity analysis restricting to multicenter trials with N ≥ 150, all findings were concordant with the primary analysis. In conclusion, CSP substantially reduces PICM, preserves LVEF, and reduces HFH compared with RVP in patients with AV block and anticipated high pacing burden, supporting its consideration as the preferred pacing strategy in appropriately selected patients.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Preoperative Patient Education on Opioid Use and Pain After Surgery: A Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of preoperative analgesic education on postoperative opioid consumption, pain scores, and patient satisfaction with analgesia. BACKGROUND: Effective postoperative pain management is crucial for patient recovery and satisfaction, yet opioid use poses risks of tolerance and addiction. Preoperative patient education offers a potential avenue to mitigate opioid reliance and improve pain management outcomes. METHODS: This single-center randomized trial was conducted at the Cleveland Clinic Main Campus between October 2021 and October 2023. Adult patients scheduled for hip arthroplasty or laparoscopic-assisted abdominal surgery with an ASA physical status of 1 to 4 were eligible. Patients with a history of prolonged opioid use, planned regional block or epidural analgesia, or limited English fluency were excluded. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either an analgesic educational video or a generic video about surgery and hospitalization. The primary outcome was opioid consumption during the initial 72 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes included time-weighted average pain scores and patient satisfaction with analgesia. RESULTS: Among 957 analyzed patients, preoperative analgesic education did not significantly reduce opioid consumption (adjusted ratio of geometric means, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.86-1.18; P =0.890) or improve pain scores (adjusted mean difference, -0.1; 95% CI, -0.3 to 0.2; P =0.617). Patient satisfaction scores also did not differ significantly between groups (adjusted mean difference, -0.1; 95% CI, -0.3 to 0.2; P = 0.611). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative analgesic education did not result in clinically meaningful reductions in opioid consumption or improvements in pain management outcomes. Further research may explore more intensive educational interventions to optimize postoperative pain management strategies.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Adjunctive 0.015% Triamcinolone Acetonide Topical Spray With Lokivetmab Versus Lokivetmab Monotherapy as 'Reactive Therapy' for Canine Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomised, Single-Blinded, Controlled Preliminary Trial.

BACKGROUND: Lokivetmab is considered an effective systemic therapy for dogs with atopic dermatitis (AD); however, utilisation of lokivetmab with adjunctive topical anti-inflammatory glucocorticoids has not been investigated in canine AD. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy of lokivetmab and 0.015% triamcinolone acetonide (TCA) spray in dogs with AD. ANIMALS: Twenty dogs with nonseasonal AD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a randomised, single-blinded (investigators only) 4-week controlled trial. Dogs were randomised to receive lokivetmab monotherapy or lokivetmab-TCA spray per manufacturer instructions. Clinical assessments included the Canine Atopic Dermatitis Extent and Severity Index, 4th iteration (CADESI-04), CADESI-04E (i.e., extracted erythema grade alone) and the 10-grade pruritus Visual Analog Scale (PVAS10) at Day (D)0, D14 and D28. Complete blood count and serum biochemical analysis were performed on D0 and D28. RESULTS: The median CADESI-04 and CADESI-04E scores in the lokivetmab-TCA group were significantly reduced on D14 (p < 0.05 for both) and D28 (p < 0.01 for both) compared to baseline; there were no significant differences in lesional scores at any time point for the lokivetmab monotherapy group. Lokivetmab-TCA significantly reduced CADESI-04E values compared to the lokivetmab monotherapy group on D28 (p = 0.04). Both interventions significantly reduced PVAS10 scores on D14 and D28 compared to D0 (p < 0.05 for both groups). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Topical application of TCA spray may be a useful and safe adjunctive therapy for systemic lokivetmab to alleviate pruritus and clinical lesions in the initial management of canine AD patients.

Animals↗

PubMed2026

Effects of adjunctive memantine on executive function and global cognition in bipolar disorder (BD): A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment contributes substantially to disability in bipolar disorder (BD), but effective pharmacologic options remain limited. This trial evaluated whether adjunctive memantine improves global cognition and executive function in BD. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial, patients with bipolar I disorder (B1D) receiving lithium and olanzapine were assigned to memantine or placebo. Memantine was titrated to 20 mg/day over 6 weeks. Cognitive outcomes were assessed at baseline, week 6, and week 18. Global cognition was measured with the Neurocognitive Assessment Battery (NuCog), and executive function with the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB). Data were analyzed using generalized estimating equations and Bonferroni-adjusted post-hoc tests. RESULTS: Sixty-three participants were randomized (memantine, n = 31; placebo, n = 32), and all completed follow-up. Groups were comparable at baseline for demographic and clinical variables and for most cognitive measures. Both groups improved over time (P < 0.001), but improvement was greater with memantine for global cognition at week 6 (MD = 9.32; 95% CI, 4.84-13.81; P < 0.001) and week 18 (MD = 12.69; 95% CI, 8.67-16.71; P < 0.001). FAB total scores favored memantine at week 18 (MD = 2.68; 95% CI, 1.76-3.61; P < 0.001), but not at week 6. Domain analyses showed significant benefits for NuCog attention, visuoconstructional ability, memory, and executive function, and for several FAB subscales by week 18. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive memantine improved global cognition and, over longer follow-up, executive function in BD. These findings support NMDA receptor modulation as a potential strategy for cognitive dysfunction in BD.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Effectiveness of psychologically informed physical therapy, tendon-specific exercise program and routine physical therapy in prolonged unilateral shoulder pain and symptom correlations with imaging: a single-center, randomized, parallel-group, three-arm study (RESPECT).

BACKGROUND: Shoulder complaints are one of the most common musculoskeletal ailments. Patient-specific characteristics such as obesity, depression and physical labor are established risk factors, whereas imaging findings are common and associations between specific imaging findings and symptomatology is limited. General exercises are considered useful in treatment whereas evidence for specific tendon exercises is lacking. Biopsychosocial model is also recommended, but has not been extensively studied concerning shoulder symptoms. This article describes the study protocol designed to evaluate the effectiveness and the cost-effectiveness of routine and specific physical therapy (PT) interventions. Imaging is performed for descriptive, longitudinal and imaging-symptom correlation studies. METHODS: The Rehabilitation of Shoulder Pain: Evaluation and Clinical Trial (RESPECT) is a randomized three-arm parallel-group study involving 300 participants aged 20 to 60 years with prolonged unilateral shoulder pain. Participants will receive either routine PT, physiotherapist-guided tendon-specific exercise program or psychologically informed PT. Bilateral shoulder radiographs, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging will be done at the baseline and at 12 and 36 months. Electronic surveys will be completed at the baseline and at 3, 6, 12 and 36 months. The primary outcome will be patient-specific functional scale (PSFS) at 12 months, analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), adjusted for baseline PSFS. DISCUSSION: RESPECT will provide systematic and controlled data regarding different PT interventions in prolonged shoulder symptoms, which is currently limited. Being one of the most common sources of musculoskeletal pain, improved management could reduce symptom-related burden and prolonged functional impairment at individual and population level. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Registration number NCT07235969; Registered November 18th, 2025; Version: 1.0.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Repeated low-level red-light therapy for improving asthenopic symptoms and accommodation in presbyopia.

BACKGROUND: To assess the short-term effectiveness of repeated low-level red light (RLRL) therapy in relieving asthenopia and enhancing accommodation in presbyopia. METHODS: This randomized, parallel-group, double-masked clinical trial enrolled adults with presbyopia and self-reported asthenopia. Participants were allocated using computer-generated randomization and randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to RLRL or sham groups. Blinding included participants, examiners, assessors, and statisticians. The primary outcome was the change from baseline in the Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire (CVS-Q) score at day 31. Secondary outcomes were the change in accommodative amplitude (AA), Near Activity Visual Questionnaire (NAVQ) score, habitual near visual acuity, near-addition power, accommodative facility, positive and negative relative accommodation, binocular cross-cylinder response, and accommodative convergence-to-accommodation ratio. Continuous outcomes were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS: Sixty-four of 66 randomized participants (aged 41-62 years) completed the 1-month trial. At day 31, RLRL showed greater improvement than sham in CVS-Q score (adjusted mean difference, -1.75 points; 95% CI, -3.10 to -0.39), binocular AA (1.09 D; 95% CI, 0.37 to 1.82), and NAVQ score (-8.07 points; 95% CI, -14.17 to -1.97). The effect on AA was most pronounced in a subgroup of eyes with baseline amplitude >2.0 D (adjusted mean difference 1.33 D; 95% CI 0.32-2.34). Other measures did not differ between groups at each visit. No treatment-related adverse events were reported. Adherence was similar between groups (mean compliance: 98.2% vs 97.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term treatment with RLRL significantly reduced asthenopic symptoms and improved accommodative amplitude in individuals with presbyopia.Trial registration: NCT06745661 (registered December 8, 2024).

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Effects of lavender oil preparation silexan on different symptoms of major depression - results from a randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is characterized by depressed mood, anhedonia, and loss of energy, which can be accompanied by associated symptoms and co-morbidities. Psychiatric scales such as the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) must account for the complex nature of depression. METHODS: The MADRS total score change between baseline and week 8 was the primary outcome measure in a randomized, double-blind clinical trial investigating the antidepressant efficacy of 8 weeks' treatment with silexan compared to sertraline and placebo in patients with mild or moderate MDD. We report on a pre-planned, exploratory analysis of the individual MADRS items. Treatment effects were assessed using analyses of covariance with baseline adjustment, based on an estimand strategy. RESULTS: 498 subjects (silexan 170, sertraline 171, placebo 157) were treated and analyzed. After 8 weeks, silexan was superior to placebo for 5 out of the 9 MADRS items analyzed ("apparent sadness", "reported sadness", "reduced appetite", "concentration difficulties", "lassitude"; P < .05) and showed clinically important adjusted mean value differences >0.2 points for 7 out of the 9 items. Item-level results for silexan and sertraline were mainly comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Silexan had a strong over-all antidepressant effect, with the most pronounced improvements affecting the cardinal symptoms of depression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT2020-000688-22 first entered on 12/08/2020. Significance statement Patients with depressive disorders can show many different symptoms. To better characterize the clinical action of an antidepressant, it is therefore important to analyze not only the overall value of a depression scale but also the individual items that describe these symptoms. Silexan is a preparation from lavender oil whose antidepressant effect has been proven in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 8-week study in patients with mild or moderate major depressive disorder. Based on the individual items of the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale that was used as the main outcome for efficacy, we found in an exploratory, hypothesis-generating analysis that silexan had a rather broad antidepressant effect in the participants of our study, with potentially clinically meaningful advantages over placebo for 7 out of the 9 individual items investigated. This applied in particular to the main symptoms of depression, namely sadness and lassitude. Our single-item analysis thus helps to understand the antidepressant effects of silexan in more detail. Significant outcomes In patients with mild to moderate major depressive disorder, lavender oil preparation silexan has a clinical profile similar to that of the selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor sertraline based on an item-level analysis of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Silexan has a significant antidepressant effect that includes an alleviation of depressed mood, anhedonia, and loss of energy, the cardinal symptoms of depression. The broad improvement of symptoms of depression could not be explained by the proven anxiolytic efficacy silexan alone but indicates an independent, direct antidepressant effect. The present item-level analysis provides valuable and detailed additional insights into the therapeutic profiles of silexan and sertraline and may help clinicians to tailor antidepressant treatment to the specific symptoms of a patient. Limitations For item-level analyses of the MADRS, no validated thresholds for the assessment of the clinical importance of changes over time have been defined, taking into account that different items may have different thresholds. Even though our analyses were pre-defined, they were exploratory and did not include studywise type I error level control. Their generalizability beyond the study population is therefore limited.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Patient-reported outcomes in pediatric regional anesthesia trials: current use and limitations.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review examines the current use and limitations of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in pediatric regional anesthesia research. Despite the increasing emphasis on patient-centered outcomes, existing pediatric outcome assessment frameworks may inadequately capture the pain experience and interference with daily living. RECENT FINDINGS: Across 17 identified randomized controlled trials and 15 ongoing studies, PROM use remains highly variable, with consistent reliance on observational pain scales such as the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability scale and limited incorporation of standardized, longitudinal health-related quality-of-life measures. SUMMARY: Current pediatric PROM frameworks remain fragmented, limiting comprehensive evaluation of recovery. Greater standardization and incorporation of developmentally appropriate, longitudinal outcome measures are needed to better align clinical research with meaningful patient-centered endpoints and to improve assessment of functional and psychosocial recovery.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Comparison of Ketamine and Pregabalin on Postoperative Opioid Usage and Pain Management in Spinal Fusion: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Spinal fusion is associated with substantial early postoperative pain and opioid exposure. Both ketamine and pregabalin are widely incorporated into Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols as opioid-sparing adjuncts. However, their comparative efficacy and safety in this specific setting remain uncertain. Our objective was to compare ketamine and pregabalin indirectly for early postoperative opioid consumption, pain, and adverse events in adults undergoing spinal fusion. METHODS: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Trials were searched from inception through October 2025. Eligible studies were randomized trials enrolling adults undergoing instrumented spinal fusion, randomized to perioperative ketamine, pregabalin, or control, and reported extractable 24-hour opioid consumption or pain outcomes. Continuous outcomes were pooled as mean differences in MME or VAS units, and adverse events were reported descriptively. A connected treatment network was analyzed using random-effects models. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed with the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. RESULTS: Thirteen trials (n=879) were included: ketamine (n=210), pregabalin (n=271), and control (n=398). Six trials contributed opioid data (3 ketamine, 3 pregabalin). Using pregabalin 150 mg as reference, ketamine was associated with lower 0-24-hour opioid use (MD -56.99 mg MME; 95% CI -99.56 to -14.43). Control (MD +21.31; 95% CI -1.05 to +43.66) and pregabalin 300 mg (MD -13.22; 95% CI -40.41 to +13.96) did not significantly differ from pregabalin 150 mg. Seven trials contributed 24-hour VAS data, with control being associated with higher pain versus pregabalin 150 mg (MD +0.84; 95% CI +0.01 to +1.66), while ketamine and pregabalin 300 mg were not k significantly different. Adverse events were generally infrequent and similar to control. CONCLUSIONS: Both ketamine and pregabalin provide early opioid sparing with comparable 24-hour analgesia. Ketamine showed a larger opioid-sparing point estimate, but indirect comparisons are imprecise. Adequately powered head-to-head trials with standardized protocols and adverse event reporting are needed.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Ibuprofen versus acetaminophen for acute mild-to-moderate pain management in pediatric populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of their efficacy.

UNLABELLED: Ibuprofen and acetaminophen are the most widely used analgesics in pediatric practice for the management of acute mild-to-moderate pain. Despite their widespread use, the comparative analgesic efficacy of these two agents in children remains a subject of ongoing debate, with existing evidence largely derived from heterogeneous clinical settings and small individual trials. Therefore, this study aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze randomized controlled trials comparing the analgesic efficacy of ibuprofen versus acetaminophen in pediatric populations with acute mild-to-moderate pain. A systematic literature search was conducted up to May 2026 in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The review was conducted and reported in accordance with the PRISMA-Children and Adolescents (PRISMA-C) 2026 reporting guideline. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials comparing ibuprofen with acetaminophen in children and adolescents (defined as individuals aged 0 to < 18 years) with acute pain, reporting at least one extractable efficacy outcome. Continuous outcomes were synthesized as standardized mean differences (Hedges' g) using random-effects models; dichotomous outcomes were pooled as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool and certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework. Eight randomized controlled trials enrolling 1325 participants were included. Three pediatric trials contributed to the primary continuous pain outcome meta-analysis (n = 196 analyzable participants), yielding a pooled SMD of - 0.28 (95% CI - 0.57 to 0.00; p = 0.052; I2 = 0%), indicating a small effect favoring ibuprofen that did not reach conventional statistical significance. Given the small number of contributing studies (k = 3), the I2 statistic should be interpreted with caution as it has limited power to detect heterogeneity in this context. For the dichotomous pain freedom outcome (2 trials, n = 114), no significant difference was observed (pooled RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.53-1.99; p = 0.93; I2 = 0%). A prespecified sensitivity analysis including an adult soft-tissue injury trial attenuated the pooled effect toward the null (SMD - 0.15, 95% CI - 0.38 to 0.09; p = 0.23; I2 = 36.6%). Narrative synthesis of additional studies generally demonstrated comparable analgesic efficacy between the two agents across postoperative and outpatient pediatric settings. The overall certainty of evidence was rated as low for both primary outcomes, primarily due to imprecision and indirectness. CONCLUSION: Current evidence from randomized controlled trials does not demonstrate a superiority of ibuprofen over acetaminophen for acute mild-to-moderate pain management in children. Both agents appear to provide clinically meaningful analgesia across heterogeneous pediatric pain settings. The clinical choice between agents should be guided by individual patient factors, including contraindications to NSAIDs, the inflammatory nature of the pain etiology, and patient-specific characteristics. The low certainty of evidence underscores the need for adequately powered, methodologically rigorous trials to definitively establish the comparative efficacy of these two analgesics in the pediatric population. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Ibuprofen and acetaminophen are the two most widely used non-opioid analgesics for acute mild-to-moderate pain in children, and both are recommended as first-line agents by major international guidelines. • Prior meta-analyses in mixed pediatric-adult populations have suggested a modest analgesic advantage of ibuprofen over acetaminophen, but pediatric-specific evidence has remained limited and methodologically heterogeneous. WHAT IS NEW: • This systematic review and meta-analysis, restricted to randomized controlled trials in pediatric populations, found that ibuprofen showed a small effect favoring pain reduction compared with acetaminophen (SMD - 0.28, p = 0.052), although this did not reach conventional statistical significance. • The analgesic advantage of ibuprofen may be more pronounced in pain etiologies with a significant inflammatory component (e.g., fractures). At the same time, both agents appear broadly equivalent in most other acute pediatric pain settings, supporting individualized analgesic selection based on clinical context and patient-specific factors.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

A Meta-analysis of the intervention effects of ball sports on children with autism Spectrum disorder.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the overall efficacy of ball sports interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and to explore potential moderators that may influence intervention outcomes. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials were retrieved from nine databases (e.g., CNKI, PubMed) from 2000 to April 2025. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 18.0, with subgroup analyses by age, duration, frequency, session length, and ball sport type. RESULTS: A total of 14 randomized controlled trials involving 406 children were ultimately included. Meta-analysis results indicated that ball sports had a significant overall intervention effect on children with ASD (SMD = -1.12, 95% CI: -1.56, -0.68, P < 0.05), with significant improvements observed in social skills (SMD = -0.55), verbal communication (SMD = -0.85), and behavioral problems (SMD = -1.10). Subgroup analysis indicated that interventions involving mini-basketball or other ball sports with simple rules-conducted over a 12-week period, 3-5 times per week, for 30-60 min per session-yielded better outcomes, with children aged 3-6 years showing more consistent benefits. CONCLUSION: Ball-based interventions effectively alleviate core ASD symptoms. Structured moderate-intensity programs are recommended as adjunct therapies. Future studies should standardize protocols and examine long-term benefits.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Psychotherapy vs antidepressants in heart failure: Impact of adherence.

BACKGROUND: Depression affects nearly half of patients with heart failure (HF), which is associated with increased morbidity and reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This secondary per-protocol analysis of a previously published randomized trial evaluated the behavioral activation (BA) versus antidepressant medication (MEDS) among patients with depression and HF who adhered to study interventions. METHODS: This analysis is based on a pragmatic randomized comparative-effectiveness trial conducted from 2018 to 2022, with a 1-year follow-up. 416 participants diagnosed with HF and a DSM-5 depressive disorder were randomized to BA or MEDS, and the current analysis examined outcomes according to treatment adherence. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was depressive symptom severity (PHQ-9) at 6 months, and the secondary outcomes were physical and mental HRQoL (SF-12v2-PC and SF-12v2-MC, respectively) and HF-specific HRQoL (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire; KCCQ) overall and clinical scores (KCCQ-OS and KCCQ-CS), at 3, 6, and 12 months. High adherence was defined as completion of >75-100% of intervention components. Overall adherence rates were similar between BA and MEDS. At 6 months, among patients with >75-100% adherence who followed treatment as directed in both arms, BA was associated with higher Mental HRQoL (SF-12v2-MC: 5.22; 95% CI: 0.72 to 9.72; p = 0.023) and higher HF-specific HRQoL (KCCQ-OS: 16.08; 95% CI: 7.20 to 24.97; p < 0.001); (KCCQ-CS: 16.04; 95%CI: 7.05 to 25.02; p < 0.001) compared to MEDS. There were no significant differences in depressive symptoms or physical HRQoL at 6 months. INTERPRETATION: Both BA and MEDS were equally effective treatments for depression in HF. However, among highly adherent patients, BA was associated with greater improvements in mental and HF-specific HRQoL than MEDS. FUNDING/SUPPORT: The study was funded by PCORI Award Number: 2017C2-7716.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

A two-center randomized clinical superiority trial of single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy for severe obesity: SASSY study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass is a novel metabolic bariatric surgery intended to enhance metabolic outcomes and reduce the risk of postoperative complications. Although preliminary outcome data for single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass are promising, evidence from adequately powered, randomized head-to-head comparisons is scarce. This trial compares the efficacy and safety of single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy in patients with class II obesity (body mass index = 35.0-39.9 kg/m²) with at least one obesity‑related comorbidity or class III obesity (body mass index ⩾40.0 kg/m²). METHODS: This two-center randomized clinical superiority trial enrolls patients eligible for metabolic bariatric surgery at two specialized Norwegian centers. Included patients are randomly assigned (1:1) to either single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass or sleeve gastrectomy with standardized perioperative treatment and care. The primary endpoint is the between-group difference in change in body mass index from baseline to 2 years after single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy. Secondary endpoints include additional weight loss outcomes, the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease, surgical and postoperative complications, obesity-related comorbidities, nutritional status, bone mineral density, gastrointestinal symptoms, quality of life, and rates of revisional and conversion surgery. All endpoints will be evaluated at 2 and 5 years after surgery. Statistical analyses utilize linear mixed models and analysis of covariance within an intention-to-treat framework. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide high-level evidence with robust and comparative outcome data on single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, aiming to clarify the clinical utility of single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass and inform surgical practice. Findings will address gaps in medium- and long-term evidence regarding weight loss, safety, comorbidity resolution, and quality of life following single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass.

Humans↗