Biomedical subjects
William J Gradishar
Publications and source records attributed to William J Gradishar.
Albumin-bound nanoparticle paclitaxel.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Randomized phase III trial of marimastat versus placebo in patients with metastatic breast cancer who have responding or stable disease after first-line chemotherapy: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial E2196.
PURPOSE: To determine whether a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor improves progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic breast cancer who have responding or stable disease after first-line chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred seventy-nine eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive oral marimastat (10 mg bid; n = 114) or a placebo (n = 65) within 3 to 6 weeks of completing six to eight cycles of first-line doxorubicin- and/or taxane-containing chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Patients were evaluated every 3 months until disease progression. RESULTS: When comparing placebo with marimastat, there was no significant difference in PFS (median, 3.1 months v 4.7 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.74; P = .16) or overall survival (median, 26.6 months v 24.7 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.46; P = .86). Patients treated with marimastat were more likely to develop grade 2 or 3 musculoskeletal toxicity (MST), a known complication of the drug indicative of achieving a biologic effect, compared with patients administered placebo (63% v 22%, respectively; P < .0001). Patients with grade 2 or 3 MST had significantly inferior survival compared with patients who had grade 0 or 1 MST (median, 22.5 months v 28.2 months; P = .04). In addition, patients who had a marimastat plasma concentration of at least 10 ng/mL at month 1 and/or 3 were significantly more likely to have grade 2 to 3 MST (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Marimastat does not prolong PFS when used after first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Patients with higher marimastat levels exhibited MST, and MST was associated with inferior survival.
Capecitabine plus paclitaxel as front-line combination therapy for metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter phase II study.
PURPOSE: The goal of this multicenter, open-label phase II study was the clinical evaluation of combination therapy with the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine and the taxane paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients with MBC received oral capecitabine at 1650 mg/m(2)/d (825 mg/m(2) twice daily) on days 1 through 14, and intravenous infusion of paclitaxel at 175 mg/m(2) on day 1 of each 21-day treatment cycle. Treatment continued until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or patient' s decision to discontinue. Patients (35 to 76 years old) had a median Karnofsky performance status of 90%. Forty-four patients (94%) received study treatment as first-line therapy for metastatic disease. RESULTS: Objective responses occurred in 24 (51%) patients; seven (15%) complete responses and 17 (36%) partial responses. Stable disease lasting 180 days or more was observed in nine (19%); the clinical response rate was 70%. Median duration of response was 12.6 months, median time to disease progression was 10.6 months, and median overall survival time was 29.9 months. The most common treatment-related adverse events, regardless of severity, were alopecia, hand-foot syndrome, nausea, and fatigue. Neutropenia (15%), alopecia (13%), and hand-foot syndrome (11%) were the only grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events that occurred in more than 10% of patients. CONCLUSION: The combination of capecitabine plus paclitaxel is a highly active and generally well-tolerated regimen for first-line treatment of MBC.
Evidence-based use of neoadjuvant taxane in operable and inoperable breast cancer.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) is standard therapy for patients with locally advanced breast cancer and is increasingly used for early-stage operable disease. The aim of NC is a pathological complete response (pCR) in the breast and axillary lymph nodes, which is the best predictor of improved outcome and prolonged survival. The taxanes docetaxel and paclitaxel are potent agents in breast cancer management, with promising single-agent activity and acceptable tolerability in the neoadjuvant setting. In this review of the taxanes as NC for operable and inoperable breast cancer, we include all fully published Phase II-III studies enrolling > or =30 patients. Current evidence suggests that the sequential administration of taxane- and anthracycline-based therapy may be superior to concomitant administration. Indeed, until the recent Phase III Aberdeen study (n = 162), it was uncertain whether NC could prolong survival. In this study, sequential docetaxel after anthracycline-based NC significantly enhanced the clinical response rate and pathological complete response, and yielded a significant 3-year survival advantage, versus anthracycline-based NC alone. Recently, the Phase III National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) trial B27 trial (n = 2411) showed that sequential docetaxel after doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide significantly increased both clinical and pathological response rates for operable breast cancer, with the benefit evident in both estrogen receptor-positive and estrogen receptor-negative patients. This apparent superiority of a sequential anthracycline-taxane regimen is limited to docetaxel, with no similar Phase III trials of paclitaxel versus a non-taxane-based comparator having been conducted to date. In conclusion, current evidence supports the inclusion of a taxane in NC schedules for patients with large and locally advanced breast cancer.
Tamoxifen--what next?
Most patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) ultimately die due to disease progression. Consequently, treatments for ABC are predominantly palliative in nature and, therefore, the tolerability profile of a given treatment is particularly relevant in these patients. While cytotoxic chemotherapy and endocrine therapy exhibit efficacy in hormone-sensitive, advanced disease, it is endocrine therapy that combines efficacy with minimal acute toxicity. Tamoxifen has been the chosen endocrine therapy for postmenopausal, hormone-sensitive, ABC for over 20 years. More recently, new endocrine agents with different mechanisms of action from tamoxifen have been introduced. Evidence indicates that the aromatase inhibitors anastrozole (Arimidex; AstraZeneca; Wilmington, DE), letrozole (Femara; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.; East Hanover, NJ) and exemestane (Aromasin; Pharmacia Corp.; Peapack, NJ) offer superior efficacy and tolerability to tamoxifen in the first-line treatment of postmenopausal, hormone-sensitive ABC. Similarly, after tamoxifen failure, fulvestrant (Faslodex; AstraZeneca), a new estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist that downregulates the ER, is at least as effective as anastrozole, is well tolerated, and is not cross-resistant with tamoxifen. Unlike tamoxifen, fulvestrant has no known agonist effects. The sequential use of such agents may prolong the time during which endocrine therapies can be used, thereby avoiding the more acute toxicities associated with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Indeed, a series of studies has shown that this sequential use is a relevant, active, and well-tolerated option. Establishing the comparative efficacies and optimal sequences that incorporate the newer endocrine agents will be central in determining the future role of hormonal therapy in ABC; the results of this work will determine the relative place of tamoxifen in what is a rapidly changing therapeutic environment.
Implications of first-line adjuvant treatment with aromatase inhibitors in recurrent metastatic breast cancer.
The role of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy has gone unchallenged until recently. With the introduction of the selective aromatase inhibitors (AIs), the paradigm for treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women is changing. New data from randomized clinical trials have shown the impact of the use of an AI compared with tamoxifen or in sequence with tamoxifen. This review will emphasize some of the highlights from these data sets and the limitations of our current knowledge. Finally, we will discuss the implications of the use of nonselective AIs in the adjuvant setting for the patient who develops recurrent metastatic disease.
Conventional adjuvant chemotherapy with or without high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation in high-risk breast cancer.
BACKGROUND: The prognosis for women with primary breast cancer and 10 or more involved axillary lymph nodes is poor. High-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation has been reported to be effective in the adjuvant setting for patients at high risk for relapse. METHODS: We randomly assigned 540 female patients with primary breast cancer and at least 10 involved ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes to receive either six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (CAF) or the same adjuvant chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and thiotepa and autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. RESULTS: Among the 511 eligible patients, there was no significant difference in disease-free survival, overall survival, or the time to recurrence between those who received CAF alone and those who received CAF plus high-dose chemotherapy and stem-cell transplantation. Among 417 patients fulfilling strict eligibility criteria, the time to recurrence was longer for patients who underwent stem-cell transplantation than for those who received CAF alone. In the transplantation group, nine patients died of transplantation-related complications and a myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia developed in nine. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation to six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with CAF may reduce the risk of relapse but does not improve the outcome among patients with primary breast cancer and at least 10 involved axillary lymph nodes. Conventional-dose adjuvant chemotherapy remains the standard of care for such patients.
Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741.
PURPOSE: Using a 2 x 2 factorial design, we studied the adjuvant chemotherapy of women with axillary node-positive breast cancer to compare sequential doxorubicin (A), paclitaxel (T), and cyclophosphamide (C) with concurrent doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by paclitaxel (T) for disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS); to determine whether the dose density of the agents improves DFS and OS; and to compare toxicities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 2,005 female patients were randomly assigned to receive one of the following regimens: (I) sequential A x 4 (doses) --> T x 4 --> C x 4 with doses every 3 weeks, (II) sequential A x 4 --> T x 4 --> C x 4 every 2 weeks with filgrastim, (III) concurrent AC x 4 --> T x 4 every 3 weeks, or (IV) concurrent AC x 4 --> T x 4 every 2 weeks with filgrastim. RESULTS: A protocol-specified analysis was performed at a median follow-up of 36 months: 315 patients had experienced relapse or died, compared with 515 expected treatment failures. Dose-dense treatment improved the primary end point, DFS (risk ratio [RR] = 0.74; P =.010), and OS (RR = 0.69; P =.013). Four-year DFS was 82% for the dose-dense regimens and 75% for the others. There was no difference in either DFS or OS between the concurrent and sequential schedules. There was no interaction between density and sequence. Severe neutropenia was less frequent in patients who received the dose-dense regimens. CONCLUSION: Dose density improves clinical outcomes significantly, despite the lower than expected number of events at this time. Sequential chemotherapy is as effective as concurrent chemotherapy.
Progress in systemic adjuvant therapy of early-stage breast cancer.
Despite major improvements in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer over the past 15 years, many controversies exist surrounding the optimal adjuvant therapies for these patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy has been demonstrated to reduce recurrence and improve mortality, but questions persist as to what is the optimal regimen and how much adjuvant therapy should be administered. Among the adjuvant chemotherapy issues that remain controversial are the role of the taxanes and the optimal number of adjuvant chemotherapy treatment cycles. In the realm of adjuvant endocrine therapy, the early results of the Anastrozole, Tamoxifen and Combination (ATAC) trial have led to confusion as to how best to treat postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer. Clinicians are faced with the decision of choosing between tamoxifen and anastrozole. The enthusiasm for so-called targeted therapies, such as trastuzumab, in patients with metastatic disease, is now being carried over into the adjuvant setting. Multiple clinical trials around the world are evaluating the potential benefit of adding trastuzumab to chemotherapy in patients with HER2-positive, early-stage breast cancer. In the United States, clinicians are faced with many decisions on how to optimally treat patients with early-stage breast cancer. Evidence-based treatment guidelines such as those developed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) provide a useful algorithm for assisting in making treatment decisions. It is hoped that, in the next few years, the results of ongoing clinical trials now underway will lead to further improvements in the outcome of patients with early-stage breast cancer.
Adjuvant systemic therapy of early stage breast cancer.
Adjuvant chemotherapy reduces the risk of recurrence and mortality in patients with early stage breast cancer. Anthracycline-based regimens are the most widely used standard in the United States. The inclusion of the taxanes into adjuvant chemotherapy programs offers an improvement in disease-free survival rates and probably overall survival rates compared to an anthracycline-based regimen alone. Although adjuvant chemotherapy is effective in all age groups, the magnitude of benefit is greatest in younger premenopausal patients. Treatment decisions need to be individualized. Dose-dense chemotherapy approaches are promising and can be considered an option for patients with early stage breast cancer. Adjuvant tamoxifen therapy should be administered for 5 years in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Adjuvant tamoxifen should be administered after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy. Data from the ATAC (Arimidex, tamoxifen, alone, or in combination) trial provide a compelling argument for choosing anastrozole as adjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early stage breast cancer. Long-term follow-up of patients is necessary to determine the effects of chronic aromatase inhibitor treatment on bone density, cognitive function, and other endpoints.
Advances in endocrine therapy for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Expedition Inspiration Fund for Breast Cancer Research Meeting 2003.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Role of capecitabine (Xeloda) in breast cancer.
One rationale for the development of new treatment strategies for advanced breast cancer is to provide targeted antineoplastic therapy, while at the same time improving the quality of life of patients. One such drug, capecitabine (Xeloda), is an oral fluoropyrimidine 5-fluorouracil carbamate. Capecitabine is converted to 5-fluorouracil primarily in cancer tissue and it has been demonstrated to combine ease of administration, a manageable toxicity profile and potent antineoplastic activity. Capecitabine is widely used in metastatic breast cancer and offers symptom palliation and in combination with docetaxel (Taxotere) improved survival compared with docetaxel alone. Its toxicity profile includes hand-foot syndrome and stomatitis and diarrhea, whereas its hematologic side effects are mild. Capecitabine has been evaluated as a single agent in women with advanced breast cancer where it offers an overall response rate of 20-30%. Capecitabine is synergistic with other chemotherapeutic agents, such as the taxanes, where it increases the response rate to over 40%. This review will place the available data on the use of capecitabine in metastatic breast cancer as a single agent or as part of a combination regime in context.
Epirubicin versus doxorubicin: which is the anthracycline of choice for the treatment of breast cancer?
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women in the United States. The addition of anthracyclines to adjuvant therapy regimens has resulted in improvement in overall survival of patients. The 2 most commonly used anthracyclines are doxorubicin and epirubicin. Comparison studies in the metastatic setting have shown that, at similar doses, these 2 anthracyclines provide similar response rates. However, their toxicity profiles differ somewhat. The major side effects of anthracyclines are cardiotoxicity and myelosuppression. The equimolar dose ratios of doxorubicin to epirubicin for myelosuppression and cardiotoxicity are 1:1.2 and 1:1.7-2.0, respectively. There have been many studies comparing different schedules and doses of anthracyclines in the adjuvant setting. However, direct comparisons between doxorubicin and epirubicin in early-stage breast cancer have not been performed to date. In this article, we are attempting to provide an overview of current use of doxorubicin and epirubicin in breast cancer
Choosing between endocrine therapy and chemotherapy--or is there a role for combination therapy?
Results from many randomized trials of adjuvant breast cancer therapy have been presented in several overviews and at subsequent meetings. This manuscript reviews the current status of both chemo- and endocrine therapy and the prospects for combination therapy, as summarized at the NIH and St Gallen Consensus meetings. In conclusion, treatment selection should be based primarily on endocrine responsiveness; however, a collaborative approach involving the development of new agents and investigation of their optimal integration into therapy programs will ensure progress and improved patient care.
A rationale for the reinitiation of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in women receiving fewer than 5 years of therapy.
The overview analysis of adjuvant therapy trials in early-stage breast cancer by the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) compared 1, 2, and 5 years of adjuvant therapy. The optimal benefit to patients in terms of reduced risk of recurrence and death was clearly conferred by 5 years of therapy with tamoxifen compared to shorter durations of therapy. Many women with early-stage breast cancer treated in the past received a recommendation for shorter durations of tamoxifen therapy. The obvious question is whether reinitiating tamoxifen to complete a full 5-year course would further reduce the risk of recurrence and death. In an attempt to explore this issue, we have analyzed recurrence rates in women who received different durations of tamoxifen therapy in the adjuvant setting. The data used for this analysis are directly from the EBCTCG. Our analysis suggests that women who received 1-2 years of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy may benefit from reinitiation of tamoxifen to complete a 5-year course.
The evolving role of endocrine therapy for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.