Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

William J Gradishar

Publications and source records attributed to William J Gradishar.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Associations of neighborhood deprivation with breast cancer tumor genomics, targeted treatment use, and survival.

PURPOSE: Neighborhood environments appear to influence breast cancer biology and outcomes. This study evaluated somatic, treatment, and outcome differences by Area Deprivation Index in patients with metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: Retrospective, population-based cohort study using clinical and genomic data gathered between 2015 and 2024 at four academic institutions in the United States. The outcomes were differences in circulating tumor DNA mutation profiles, PI3K inhibitor use, and survival between patients with metastatic breast cancer living in high deprivation (Area Deprivation Index&#x2009;&#x2265;&#x2009;60 by national rank) and low deprivation (<&#x2009;60) neighborhoods. RESULTS: Among 1127 patients with metastatic breast cancer, 335 (29.7%) lived in high deprivation areas. These patients were more likely to have TP53 mutations (Odds ratio 1.49, 95% Confidence Interval 1.07-2.08, P&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.018). Among hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative patients eligible for PI3K inhibitors, those from high deprivation areas were less likely to receive them (17.4% vs. 36.7%, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.02). Median survival from the time of circulating tumor DNA testing was significantly shorter in the high deprivation group (24 months versus 28 months, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.04) and for Black patients in the high deprivation group versus Black patients in low deprivation group and all White patients (15 months versus 25-28 months, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.02). CONCLUSIONS: We found that patients with metastatic breast cancer living in high deprivation neighborhoods were more likely to have TP53 mutations, an indicator of aggressive disease biology, less likely to receive PI3K inhibitors, and had shorter overall survival compared to patients living in low deprivation neighborhoods by Area Deprivation Index.

Humans↗
PubMed2006

Gene expression in breast cancer.

We now recognize that all breast cancers are not the same. Different characteristics in gene expression profiles result in differential clinical behavior. With the use of gene microarrays, different subtypes of breast cancer have been characterized. The basal subtype is characterized by high expression of keratins 5 and 17, laminin, and fatty acid-binding protein 7. The ERBB2+ subtype is characterized by high expression of genes in the ERBB2 amplicon. The luminal A subtype is characterized by the highest expression of the ER alpha gene. The luminal B and C subtypes have a lower expression of the ER cluster. The importance of these different subtypes lies in the fact that they differ in clinical outcome, with the basal and ERBB2+ subtypes having the worse prognosis and the luminal A group having the best prognosis. Different strategies for evaluating tumors in a clinical setting have been developed. Two such strategies are the 21-gene assay (Oncotype DX; Genomic Health, Redwood City, CA), which is currently in commercial use in the United States, and the 70-gene assay, which has been developed by a group in the Netherlands. These assays have been shown to predict clinical outcome and response to therapy. However, to date these gene assays have not been studied in a prospective manner. Over the next year, prospective clinical trials will be initiated using these predictive tools in the treatment of breast cancer. In the near future, clinical decisions will most likely be dictated by the genetic characteristics of the tumor, with the clinical characteristics becoming less important. Tailoring our treatment based on individual tumor characteristics will help us develop better therapeutic strategies and save many patients from receiving unnecessary toxic therapy.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2006

Albumin-bound paclitaxel: a next-generation taxane.

Taxanes are standard treatment for metastatic breast cancer; however, the solvents used as vehicles in these formulations cause severe toxicities. The FDA recently approved a solvent-free formulation of paclitaxel for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer that utilises 130-nanometer albumin-bound (nab) technology (Abraxane; nab-paclitaxel) to circumvent the requirement for solvents. nab-Paclitaxel utilises the natural properties of albumin to reversibly bind paclitaxel, transport it across the endothelial cell and concentrate it in areas of tumour. The proposed mechanism of drug delivery involves, in part, glycoprotein 60-mediated endothelial cell transcytosis of paclitaxel-bound albumin and accumulation in the area of tumour by albumin binding to SPARC (secreted protein, acidic and rich in cysteine). Clinical studies have shown that nab-paclitaxel is significantly more effective than paclitaxel formulated as Cremophor EL (CrEL, Taxol, CrEL-paclitaxel), with almost double the response rate, increased time to disease progression and increased survival in second-line patients. The absence of CrEL from the formulation is associated with decreased neutropenia and rapid improvement of peripheral neuropathy with nab-paclitaxel, compared with CrEL-paclitaxel. For these reasons, nab-paclitaxel can be administered using higher doses of paclitaxel than that achievable with CrEL-paclitaxel, with shorter infusion duration and without the requirement for corticosteroid and antihistamine premedication to reduce the risk of solvent-mediated hypersensitivity reactions. Taken together, these studies have demonstrated that nab technology has increased the therapeutic index of paclitaxel compared with the conventional, solvent-based formulation.

Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel↗
PubMed2006

Plasma matrix metalloproteinases 7 and 9 in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with marimastat or placebo: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial E2196.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic and predictive utility of measuring plasma levels of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-7 and MMP-9 in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treated with the oral MMP inhibitor (MMPI) marimastat or a placebo. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We measured plasma levels of MMP-7 and MMP-9 using an enzyme-linked immunoassay method in 140 evaluable patients with MBC enrolled on a multicenter clinical trial that compared the MMPI marimastat with placebo. Specimens were collected after completion of first-line chemotherapy in patients who had responding or stable disease and 3, 6, and 12 months after initiation of marimastat (10 mg orally twice daily) or placebo. RESULTS: Baseline plasma MMP-7 and MMP-9 levels did not correlate with each other or with progression-free or overall survival. In addition, serial evaluation of plasma MMP-7 and MMP-9 levels revealed no significant changes over time in the marimastat or placebo groups or any correlation with trough plasma marimastat level. CONCLUSION: We conclude that measurement of plasma MMP-7 or MMP-9 levels, as performed in our trial, was not a useful prognostic or predictive factor in patients with MBC or in patients treated with an MMPI.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2006

NCCN Task Force Report: Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer.

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) first published the NCCN Breast Cancer Treatment Guidelines in 1996. The Guidelines address the treatment of all stages of breast cancer across the spectrum of patient care and have been updated yearly. Adjuvant therapy for breast cancer has undergone an especially rapid evolution over the past few years. Therefore, the NCCN Breast Cancer Guidelines Panel was supplemented by additional experts to form the Adjuvant Therapy Task Force to provide a forum for an extended discussion and expanded input to the adjuvant therapy recommendations for the Breast Cancer Treatment Guidelines. Issues discussed included methods of risk-stratification for recurrence; how biologic markers such as HER2 status, quantitative estrogen receptor, or genetic markers can be incorporated as prognostic or predictive factors; and how age, menopausal status, and estrogen receptor levels impact benefits from chemotherapy and endocrine therapy. Additionally, the task force discussed the strategies for use of aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal women and the potential incorporation of trastuzumab into adjuvant therapy of women with HER2/neu positive breast cancer. This supplement summarizes the background data and ensuing discussion from the Adjuvant Task Force meeting.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

HER2 testing in breast cancer: NCCN Task Force report and recommendations.

The NCCN HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer Task Force was convened to critically evaluate the ability of the level of HER2 expression or gene amplification in breast cancer tumors to serve as a prognostic and a predictive factor in the metastatic and adjuvant settings, to assess the reliability of the methods of measuring HER2 expression or gene amplification in the laboratory, and to make recommendations regarding the interpretation of test results. The Task Force is a multidisciplinary panel of 24 experts in breast cancer representing the disciplines of medical oncology, pathology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, epidemiology, and patient advocacy. Invited members included members of the NCCN Breast Cancer Panel and other needed experts selected solely by the NCCN. During a 2-day meeting, individual task force members provided didactic presentations critically evaluating important aspects of HER2 biology and epidemiology: HER2 as a prognostic and predictive factor; results from clinical trials in which trastuzumab was used as a targeted therapy against HER2 in the adjuvant and metastatic settings; the available testing methodologies for HER2, including sensitivity, specificity, and ability to provide prognostic and predictive information; and the principles on which HER2 testing should be based. Each task force member was charged with identifying evidence relevant to their specific expertise and presentation. Following the presentations, an evidence-based consensus approach was used to formulate recommendations relating to the pathologic and clinical application of the evidence to breast cancer patient evaluation and care. In areas of controversy, this process extended beyond the meeting to achieve consensus. The Task Force concluded that accurate assignment of the HER2 status of invasive breast cancer is essential to clinical decision making in the treatment of breast cancer in both adjuvant and metastatic settings. Formal validation and concordance testing should be performed and reported by laboratories performing HER2 testing for clinical purposes. If appropriate quality control/assurance procedures are in place, either immunohistochemistry (IHC) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) methods may be used. A tumor with an IHC score of 0 or 1+, an average HER2 gene/chromosome 17 ratio of less than 1.8, or an average number of HER2 gene copies/cell of 4 or less as determined by FISH is considered to be HER2 negative. A tumor with an IHC score of 3+, an average HER2 gene/chromosome 17 ratio of greater than 2.2 by FISH, or an average number of HER2 gene copies/cell of 6 or greater is considered HER2 positive. A tumor with an IHC score of 2+ should be further tested using FISH, with HER2 status determined by the FISH result. Tumor samples with an average HER2 gene/chromosome ratio of 1.8 to 2.2 or average number of HER2 gene copies/cell in the range of greater than 4 to less than 6 are considered to be borderline, and strategies to assign the HER2 status of such samples are proposed.

Advisory Committees↗
PubMed2005

Phase III trial of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel compared with polyethylated castor oil-based paclitaxel in women with breast cancer.

PURPOSE: ABI-007, the first biologically interactive albumin-bound paclitaxel in a nanameter particle, free of solvents, was compared with polyethylated castor oil-based standard paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This phase III study was performed to confirm preclinical studies demonstrating superior efficacy and reduced toxicity of ABI-007 compared with standard paclitaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to 3-week cycles of either ABI-007 260 mg/m(2) intravenously without premedication (n = 229) or standard paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) intravenously with premedication (n = 225). RESULTS: ABI-007 demonstrated significantly higher response rates compared with standard paclitaxel (33% v 19%, respectively; P = .001) and significantly longer time to tumor progression (23.0 v 16.9 weeks, respectively; hazard ratio = 0.75; P = .006). The incidence of grade 4 neutropenia was significantly lower for ABI-007 compared with standard paclitaxel (9% v 22%, respectively; P < .001) despite a 49% higher paclitaxel dose. Febrile neutropenia was uncommon (< 2%), and the incidence did not differ between the two study arms. Grade 3 sensory neuropathy was more common in the ABI-007 arm than in the standard paclitaxel arm (10% v 2%, respectively; P < .001) but was easily managed and improved rapidly (median, 22 days). No hypersensitivity reactions occurred with ABI-007 despite the absence of premedication and shorter administration time. CONCLUSION: ABI-007 demonstrated greater efficacy and a favorable safety profile compared with standard paclitaxel in this patient population. The improved therapeutic index and elimination of corticosteroid premedication required for solvent-based taxanes make the novel albumin-bound paclitaxel ABI-007 an important advance in the treatment of MBC.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Safety considerations of adjuvant therapy in early breast cancer in postmenopausal women.

Because of its proven efficacy profile based on long-term data, tamoxifen has been the standard adjuvant endocrine therapy for hormone-sensitive early breast cancer for the past 30 years. However, there is well-established evidence that long-term use of tamoxifen is associated with serious side effects. As adjuvant endocrine therapy is generally administered for long periods of time, the safety and tolerability of agents used in this setting are of particular importance. Due to their superior efficacy over tamoxifen, newer agents, such as the third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs), are already established therapies for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. In addition, recent trials indicate that the AI anastrozole ('Arimidex') has improved efficacy compared with tamoxifen in the adjuvant setting in postmenopausal women. The other third-generation AIs have reported disease-free survival benefits but not in the absence of prior treatment with tamoxifen; letrozole ('Femara') has been compared with placebo following 5 years of tamoxifen therapy and exemestane ('Aromasin') has been compared with tamoxifen following 2-3 years of prior treatment with tamoxifen. Long-term safety data show that anastrozole also has a more favorable overall safety profile compared with tamoxifen, particularly in terms of life-threatening events such as endometrial cancer and thromboembolism. Anastrozole alone, therefore, provides a new option for adjuvant therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive early breast cancer. The AIs have differing pharmacological profiles, which may translate into dissimilar adverse event profiles in the adjuvant treatment setting, but patient follow-up in most trials is relatively short to make a valid comparison. It cannot, therefore, be assumed that all AIs will be equally well tolerated in the adjuvant setting. Further data on the long-term safety of AIs other than anastrozole are therefore required to allow overall risk:benefit assessments on these agents to be made.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

The future of breast cancer: the role of prognostic factors.

There remains a number of unmet clinical needs in patients with breast cancer that research and development aims to address. More sensitive and specific indicators of prognosis are required to identify those patients at greatest risk for disease progression. A number of biological markers including the cyclins, circulating epithelial cells, and components of the urokinase plasminogen system have been shown to correlate with patient outcome. Genomic analysis also has the potential to predict patient response to specific agents, thus ensuring patients derive the maximum benefit from the treatment they receive. Patients who require treatment are often exposed to the undesirable toxic effects that are associated with some treatments. Liposomal and nanoparticle formulations of currently available agents have been shown to be at least as effective as their parent compounds but with improved safety and tolerability profiles. Studies into patient quality of life during therapy have highlighted the importance of early administration of an erythropoietic agent to treat chemotherapy-induced anemia. Further research in breast cancer should further optimize the treatment patients receive ensuring that patients not only live longer but also have quality survival.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2005

Hormonal therapy for primary breast cancer: scientific rationale and status of clinical research.

Endocrine therapies have played an important role in the management of breast cancer for many years. Tamoxifen had been the unchallenged standard in the adjuvant setting until recently. Data from recent clinical trials have emphasized the emerging roles of aromatase inhibitors and ovarian ablation in patients with early breast cancer. This review highlights previous data that led to the recognition of tamoxifen as the gold standard hormonal therapy in the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer. We then discuss clinical trials demonstrating the impact of aromatase inhibitors as an alternative to tamoxifen or as a component of sequential treatment with tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer. Finally, we review data related to the incorporation of ovarian ablation into the treatment of early breast cancer in premenopausal women.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗
PubMed2005

Adjuvant therapy of breast cancer.

The treatment of early-stage breast cancer includes the use of chemotherapeutic and hormonal agents. Both chemotherapy and hormonal therapy have been shown by large, randomized trials to offer a survival advantage. The most commonly used chemotherapeutic agents used in the United States are doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC). However, 3 studies have suggested that there may be an advantage in the use of taxanes in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Furthermore the use of dose dense chemotherapy, incorporating AC and paclitaxel, has shown very promising results. It is well established that tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), improves overall survival (OS) in women with hormone receptor (HR) positive breast cancer. However, the results from large multicenter, randomized trials, suggest the potential superiority of aromatase inhibitors, compared to tamoxifen or an advantage of sequencing tamoxifen followed by an aromatase inhibitor (AI). The role of ovarian suppression is still being investigated in patients who have received prior chemotherapy. Newer agents, such as the monoclonal antibody against the HER2/neu receptor, trastuzumab, are now being studied as adjuvant therapy in early-stage breast cancer. In the next few years, with the completion of several large randomized trials, we will be able to answer several questions, including the optimal way of incorporating AIs into adjuvant therapy, the long-term sequella of using trastuzumab in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer and the role of ovarian suppression combined with an aromatse inhibitor in premenopausal women with breast cancer.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2005

Final results of a phase II trial of preoperative TAC (docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) in stage III breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The use of preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer has been demonstrated to result in similar disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Additionally, the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) in the breast after preoperative chemotherapy has been shown to correlate with survival. The objective of this study was to determine the pCR rate in patients with stage III breast cancer treated with 4 cycles of TAC (docetaxel 75 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) on day 1 before surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From November 1998 through August 2001, we treated 40 patients (mean age, 47 years) with stage III breast cancer with TAC administered every 3 weeks for 4 cycles. RESULTS: We now report follow-up at 24 months. Responses were seen in 83% of patients, with 25% experiencing a clinical complete response, of which 4 patients (10%) had pCRs. At a follow-up of 2 years, data on DFS and OS are available on 37 patients: 12 patients (38%) had disease progression, and 7 patients (21%) had died. Despite the use of prophylactic ciprofloxacin, some degree of myelosuppression was seen in all patients, with 24 patients (63%) experiencing grade 3/4 neutropenia. CONCLUSION: Based on the pCR rate seen in this trial, docetaxel given concomitantly with AC (doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) for 4 cycles does not appear to be superior to 4 cycles of AC as preoperative treatment for stage III breast cancer. Based on other trials, longer durations of therapy and/or sequencing of AC and docetaxel may result in a higher pCR rate.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Single-agent topotecan as first-line chemotherapy in women with metastatic breast cancer: final results of eastern cooperative oncology group trial E8193.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this multicenter phase II trial was to evaluate the clinical activity of topotecan as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer and previous exposure to adjuvant doxorubicin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable disease received a 72-hour continuous intravenous infusion of topotecan 1.3 mg/m(2) per day repeated every 21 days. The primary objective was to determine whether > or = 4 responses were observed among 30 evaluable patients after 3 cycles of therapy using a 2-stage design (> or = 2 responses required in the first 20 evaluable patients). Duration of response, time to tumor progression, overall survival, and toxicity were also examined. Thirty-five patients altogether received 78 cycles of therapy (median, 3 cycles; range, 1-8 cycles). RESULTS: Two partial responses (6%; 95% confidence interval, 0.7%-19%) were observed among 30 evaluable patients (median age, 55 years; range, 34-76 years; median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, 0; range, 0-2). Median time to progression and overall survival were 2.3 months and 18.7 months, respectively. Myelosuppression was the most common toxicity among 34 evaluable patients (grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 62% and 53%, respectively) with only 1 life-threatening event. CONCLUSION: Although tolerable, this dose and schedule of topotecan has limited activity in unselected patients with breast cancer even as first-line therapy. Identification of potential predictive markers of response and toxicity is encouraged before considering further studies of topotecan and camptothecin analogues in breast cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2005

Current and future perspectives on fulvestrant.

Fulvestrant, an estrogen receptor antagonist with no known agonist effects, is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of hormone-sensitive breast cancer after antiestrogen failure in postmenopausal women. Numerous phase II and III clinical trials of fulvestrant that are designed to build on its efficacy in breast cancer and explore its value in other tumors are ongoing or in the final planning stage. Favorable safety, dose-response, and pharmacokinetic data led to the initiation of clinical trials to evaluate loading and higher doses with the aim of building on the well-defined efficacy of fulvestrant. Recently reported results of phase II trials by the North Central Cancer Treatment Group and the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research support the clinical activity of fulvestrant after recurrence or progression on a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor, and 2 international phase III trials are ongoing in this setting. As a first-line treatment for metastatic disease, fulvestrant is currently being evaluated in combination with anastrozole versus anastrozole alone in 2 phase III trials, 1 by the Southwest Oncology Group and the other being conducted mainly in Scandinavia. Preclinical data have also led to randomized phase II trials of fulvestrant in combination with the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, gefitinib, and the HER2/neu-targeted antibody trastuzumab. Additional phase II and III trials are currently evaluating fulvestrant plus tipifarnib, Theratope vaccine, or the dual kinase inhibitor, GW572016. Although fulvestrant is undergoing robust clinical development as a treatment for breast cancer, investigation of this agent in other types of solid tumors has only just begun.

Anastrozole↗