[Rehospitalization for chronic bronchitis and atmospheric pollution in the city of Turin].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to W Arossa.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The aim of this study was to examine the discriminating power of six widely used, or recently introduced, reference values in the interpretation of pulmonary ventilation (FVC and FEV1) in occupational health surveys. These six reference values were applied to a sample of 400 Italian males; 200 of the sample were foundry workers and the other 200 were workers who were not occupationally exposed to dusts; 50% of each group were smokers. The relationship between the reference values and their capacity to discriminate between the workers occupationally exposed to dusts and the workers who smoked in each group was evaluated. The results showed very significant differences among the various reference values. Generally speaking these differences may be determined by the different selection criteria of the subjects under study, or may be a result of the different characteristics of the population included in the various studies. Our conclusions show the need for a critical approach to the use of reference values, particularly during screening tests.
A longitudinal study on exposure to tobacco smoke among adolescents was carried out in Turin (North-Western Italy) in January-February 1992 and in January-February 1993. In 1992, 394 schoolchildren aged 14-16 years were enrolled in a study protocol which consisted in answering a standardized questionnaire, measurement of urinary cotinine and testing of lung function (flow-volume curve--[FVC] and forced expiratory volume in I sec.--[FEV1]). In 1993, 333 schoolchildren from the same group repeated the survey. By comparison to urinary cotinine, findings obtained showed a reduction of increase, from 1992 to 1993, of -0.57% (p = 0.082) for FVC, and -0.66% (p = 0.05) for FEV1. Assuming that the systematic selection bias did not seem to have occurred, findings, obtained from a multiple regression analysis, showed that active and passive exposure to tobacco smoke, as measured by urinary cotinine, had a significant effect on lung growth (as measured by FEV1) in adolescents; this effect, though small, was dose-related.