Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T Conroy

Publications and source records attributed to T Conroy.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Clinical impact of pharmacokinetically-guided dose adaptation of 5-fluorouracil: results from a multicentric randomized trial in patients with locally advanced head and neck carcinomas.

A significant link between 5-fluorouracil (5FU) plasma concentration and its therapeutic activity has been demonstrated in colon and head and neck cancer patients for 5FU used as a continuous infusion. Dose adjustment based on pharmacokinetic follow-up has been proposed to decrease hematological and digestive toxicities, but the clinical impact of this approach has not yet been demonstrated. A randomized multicentric study was conducted to evaluate the clinical interest of 5FU dose adaptation guided by pharmacokinetics. One hundred twenty-two head and neck cancer patients were randomly assigned to receive induction chemotherapy with cisplatin (100 mg/m2, day 1) and 5FU (96-h continuous infusion), either at standard dose (St-arm; 4 g/m2) or at a dose adjusted according to the 5FU area under the curve (AUC0-48h; PK-arm). In total, 106 patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. In the PK-arm (n = 49), 5FU doses and area under the curve were significantly reduced during cycle 2 and cycle 3 (P < 0.001) as compared with the St-arm (n = 57). Grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombopenia were significantly more frequent in the St-arm as compared with the PK-arm (17.5% versus 7.6%, respectively; P = 0.013). No grade 3-4 mucositis occurred in the PK-arm, whereas 5.1% was observed in the St-arm (P < 0.01). The objective response rate was comparable in the two treatment arms: 77.2% in the St-arm versus 81.7% in the PK-arm. The present study is the first to demonstrate, in a randomized design, the clinical interest of an individual 5FU dose adaptation based on pharmacokinetic survey, in terms of therapeutic index improvement.

Adult↗

[Cisplatin, 5-FU and preoperative radiotherapy in esophageal epidermoid cancer. Multicenter phase II FFCD 8804 study].

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy and tolerance of preoperative radiochemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Patterns of recurrence and prognostic factors were also studied. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicentric phase II trial included patients deemed operable. Preoperative treatment associated 5-FU 800 mg/m2/d by continuous infusion, cisplatin 20 mg/m2/d and radiotherapy 3 Gy/d D 1-5 and D 22-26. Resection was planned 50 to 60 days after the beginning of therapy. RESULTS: Seventeen centers accrued 96 patients, mean age 55.4 years. According to UICC 1978 classification: stage I 13%, stage II 53% and stage III 30%. Mean follow-up was 73 months. Pre-operative treatment was delivered at full dose in half of the patients. Ten percent of the patients did not receive the second cycle. Toxicity reached grade 3 in 23% and grade 4 in 7% of the patients. Two preoperative deaths occurred. Curative resection was performed in 82% of the patients. Operative mortality was 9%. tumors were sterilized on the operative specimen in 20% of the patients and microscopic remnants were observed in 13%. Preoperative clinical work-up overestimated histologic response in 10% of the cases underestimated it in 29%. After 2 years, a recurrence was observed in 56% of the patients: loco-regional in 30%, metastases in 19% and both in 7%. Median survival was 17 months and survival rates were 58% at 1 year and 25% at 5 years. Four prognostic factors influenced survival in multivariate analysis (Cox model): hematological toxicity grade 3 or 4, no complete response, circumferential extension > 2/3 and nodes visible on CT-scan. Factors positively influencing complete response were in multivariate analysis: a fungating tumor, weight loss < 8% and a full dose preoperative treatment. CONCLUSION: In this study, preoperative treatment associating 5-FU-cisplatin and radiotherapy allowed a high resectability rate, with one third of patients achieving complete or nearly complete histologic response. A randomized study is warranted to know whether this combined treatment is better than surgery alone.

Adult↗

[Diagnosis of local recurrences and metastases from colorectal cancers].

The risk of relapse of colorectal cancer depends on tumor characteristics such as location and Dukes' stage. Recurrences may be metastatic only (70%), locoregional only (20%) or both (10%). The main objective of postoperative follow-up is to detect recurrent disease as early as possible, in order to allow curative resection. Most relapses are now diagnosed when still asymptomatic. Different imaging methods help to diagnose these recurrences. The CT scan allows to examine the liver, lymph nodes, anastomosis and the pelvic cavity. MRI can bring complementary information in some selected cases. Lastly, percutaneous needle biopsies will be useful to prove the diagnosis. For the detection of distant metastases, chest X-ray, hepatic echography and CT scan examination can be used.

Colonic Neoplasms↗

Simultaneous high-dose external irradiation and daily cisplatin in unresectable, non-metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: a phase I-II study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Clinical trials have demonstrated that high dose radiation therapy and daily cisplatin (CDDP) could increase local control and survival in carcinoma from various sites. The present phase I-II study has combined high dose radiation therapy and daily CDDP at escalating dosages. METHODS: From August 1994 to December 1995, 23 patients with non-resectable carcinoma of the pancreas were enrolled in a phase I-II multicentric, pilot study to test the toxicity and the effectiveness of high dose radiotherapy and daily cisplatin (CDDP) at escalating dosages. A dose of 6 mg/sqm/day of CDDP was selected for the phase II step since no grade IV toxicity occurred in any patient in the phase I step. RESULTS: Toxicity was considered fairly acceptable. At the time of analysis, the 23 patients who entered the study had clear evidence of evolutive disease either locally or distantly in the liver. It is suggested that high dose radiotherapy (60 Gy continuously) and daily CDDP have little effect on local control of the tumor and survival, and only a moderate effect on pain. CONCLUSIONS: In unresectable, apparently non-metastatic cancers of the pancreas, there is an urgent need for new agents or new combinations of agents to be tested.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Randomised phase II study of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) versus cisplatin alone in advanced squamous cell oesophageal cancer.

Patients with measurable or evaluable locally advanced or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus were treated with cisplatin (CDDP), 100 mg/m2, combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 as a continuous infusion from days 1-5 (Arm A) or with CDDP alone (Arm B). Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. 92 patients were randomised centrally, 88 were eligible. The response rate was 35% (95% CI (confidence interval), 20-54%) in Arm A and 19% (95% CI, 8-35%) in Arm B. One complete response was observed in each arm. The median duration of survival was 33 weeks and 28 weeks for Arm A and Arm B, respectively. Haematological and non-haematological toxicities were more frequent and more severe in Arm A. The most prominent toxicities were grade 4 aplasia and septicaemia (2), meningeal haemorrhage (1), cerebrovascular accident (3) and ischaemia of the lower limbs (1) all occurring in Arm A. Overall, seven treatment-related deaths (16%) were observed in Arm A, none in Arm B. The severe side-effects induced by the combination suggest that, currently, no standard chemotherapy can be recommended for patients with advanced squamous cell oesophageal cancer.

Adult↗

Preliminary results of a phase II study of high-dose radiation therapy and neoadjuvant plus concomitant 5-fluorouracil with CDDP chemotherapy for patients with anal canal cancer: a French cooperative study.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil-mitomycin C) concomitant with radiotherapy (RT) increases local control and colostomy-free survival in advanced anal canal carcinomas (ACC). The purpose of this prospective trial was to analyse the toxicity of and response to an induction chemotherapy combining 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and CDDP administered concomitantly with irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients (24 F/6 M, mean age 60, range 38-74) with an advanced ACC > 40 mm and/or with node involvement were prospectively treated (1 T1, 16 T2, 8 T3, 5 T4, 10 N1, 1 N2, 8 N3) from November 1994 to January 1996. Two induction and two concomitant cycles of 5-FU (800 mg/ m2 D1-4 infusion) and CDDP (80 mg/i.v./m2 at D1) were delivered. RT consisted of 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/fr, 5 fr/w) on pelvis +/- inguinal nodes or 30 Gy (3 Gy/fr, 4 fr/w) by direct perineal field. A boost (15-20 Gy) was delivered six weeks later. RESULTS TOXICITY: one patient died of a pulmonary embolism on D4. The remaining 29 received the entire treatment, with reduced 5-FU doses in 11 patients because of acute toxicity. The RT boost was delayed for one patient (aplasia). In 109 cycles, 3 grade 4 and 17 grade 3 toxicities were observed; there were no toxic deaths. Tumor response: the complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) rates were, respectively, 11% and 61% after induction chemotherapy, 59% and 31% after concomitant radiochemotherapy and 96% and 0% two months after completion of the treatment. No tumor progression was observed. CONCLUSION: the treatment was well tolerated and there was good compliance. After induction chemotherapy, most of the patients were in PR, with some even in CR. After completion of the treatment all but one were in CR. The tumor response and the long term results of 50 patients will be analysed before initiation of a randomised trial is considered.

Adult↗

Phase II study of irinotecan in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in chemotherapy-naive patients and patients pretreated with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of irinotecan (CPT-11) in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in both chemotherapy-naive and pretreated patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred thirteen patients (aged 18 to 75 years) with metastatic colorectal cancer, World Health Organization (WHO) performance status < or = 2, and life expectancy > or = 3 months were treated with CPT-11 350 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. All 178 patients eligible for efficacy analysis had not received more than one prior fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy regimen (adjuvant or palliative) and had adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function. RESULTS: Primary tumor sites were the colon (71%) and rectum (28%). Sixty-six percent of the patients had > or = two metastatic sites. Ninety-eight percent of the patients had undergone previous surgery, and 77.5% had received prior chemotherapy. Thirty-two of 178 eligible patients achieved on objective response (four complete responses [CRs] and 28 partial responses [PRs]; response rate, 18%; 95% confidence interval, 12.6% to 24.4%), 65 were stable, and 59 progressed. The response rate was 17.7% in the pretreated group and 18.8% in the chemotherapy-naive group. Within the former subgroup, response rates of 16.1% were reported in patients who were progressive on prior 5-FU chemotherapy and 19.1% in patients who were progressive off such treatment. The median duration of objective response (9.1 months) and median time to achievement of a response (9.3 weeks) did not differ between chemotherapy-naive and pretreated patients. The most frequent adverse events were neutropenia, which developed in 80% of the patients, delayed diarrhea (87%), alopecia (88%), fatigue (81%), and nausea/vomiting (77%). All these adverse events were manageable. Severe (WHO grade 3 or 4) neutropenia was only observed in 18% of the cycles, leukopenia in 11%, delayed diarrhea in 11%, and nausea and vomiting in 3%. Development of simultaneous grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and delayed diarrhea during 4% of the cycles was the safety issue of greatest concern. CONCLUSION: CPT-11 has definite activity in the treatment of advanced metastatic colorectal cancer both in chemotherapy-naive and in pretreated patients who experienced disease progression on 5-FU, which suggests a lack of cross-resistance between CPT-11 and 5-FU. Diarrhea and neutropenia, the major toxicities of CPT-11, contribute to the risk to develop febrile neutropenic sepsis.

Adult↗

Results of a phase II trial of epirubicin and cisplatin (EP) before and after irradiation and 5-fluorouracil in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: an EORTC GITCCG study.

The objective of the present study was to define the role of chemotherapy, in the form of the EP regimen, consisting of epirubicin (E) and cisplatin (P) in addition to irradiation in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for treatment of pancreatic cancer. 53 eligible patients with histologically or cytologically proven locally advanced pancreatic cancer were treated with three cycles of E 60 mg/m2 (if this dose was well tolerated then the dose of E was increased by 10 mg/m2 in the next cycle; 80 mg/m2 was the maximum dose for the following cycles) and P 100 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks, followed after 4 weeks by a split course of irradiation of 40 Gy with 5-FU 500 mg/m2 on each of the first 3 days of each 20 Gy treatment segment. This was followed by another three cycles of EP in patients who achieved stable disease (SD) or a better response after the first three cycles. The treatment given with standard anti-emetics was moderately tolerated. The chemotherapy related toxicity consisted mainly of myelosuppression and the chemoradiotherapy related toxicity of gastrointestinal side-effects. However, due to the long duration of treatment which made the whole treatment difficult to endure, only 18/53 (34%) actually completed the full treatment regimen. Responses were evaluated after the first three cycles and 4 weeks after the completion of the treatment by serial CT-scans using standard criteria. The results in 53 evaluable patients after the first three cycles of EP were as follows: 1 patient achieved a clinical complete response (CR), 7 a partial response (PR) (CR + PR: 15%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 11-33%), 36 patients (68%) had stable disease (SD) and 6 patients progressive disease (PD). There was 1 early PD, 1 toxic death and 1 patient could not be evaluated. The response at the end of the treatment was 3 CR, 11 PR (CR + PR: 14/53 (26%); 95% CI: 15-40%), 30 SD and 6 PD. The median time to progression was 8.9 months and the median duration of response 13.1 months. The median survival of all treated patients was 10.8 months (range 7 days to 41.5 months), of responders 15.1 months and, of the patients with SD 10.3 months. These results are comparable to other combined modality regimens reported in the literature for locally advanced disease. The addition of the systemic treatment with E and P offers no additional advantage to combined modality treatment alone.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Phase II trial of vinorelbine in metastatic squamous cell esophageal carcinoma. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Treat Cancer Cooperative Group.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the response rate and toxic effects of vinorelbine (VNB) administered as a single agent in metastatic squamous cell esophageal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-six eligible patients with measurable lesions were included and were stratified according to previous chemotherapy. Thirty patients without prior chemotherapy and 16 pretreated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy were assessable for toxicity and response. VNB was administered weekly as a 25-mg/m2 short intravenous (i.v.) infusion. RESULTS: Six of 30 patients (20%) without prior chemotherapy achieved a partial response (PR) (95% confidence interval [CI], 8% to 39%). The median duration of response was 21 weeks (range, 17 to 28). One of 16 patients (6%) with prior chemotherapy had a complete response (CR) of 31 weeks' duration (95% CI, 0% to 30%). The overall response rate (World Health Organization [WHO] criteria) was 15% (CR, 2%; PR 13%; 95% CI, 6% to 29%). The median dose-intensity (DI) was 20 mg/m2/wk. VNB was well tolerated and zero instances of WHO grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity occurred. At least one episode of grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia was seen in 59% of patients. A grade 2 or 3 infection occurred in 16% of patients, but no toxic deaths occurred. Other side effects were rare, and peripheral neurotoxicity has been minor (26% grade 1). CONCLUSION: These data indicate that VNB is an active agent in metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Given its excellent tolerance profile and low toxicity, further evaluation of VNB in combination therapy is warranted.

Abdominal Pain↗

A double-blind, randomised comparison of the anti-emetic efficacy of two intravenous doses of dolasetron mesilate and granisetron in patients receiving high dose cisplatin chemotherapy.

This multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised trial was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of single intravenous doses of dolasetron mesilate and granisetron in the prevention of acute emesis and nausea due to high-dose (> or = 80 mg/m2) cisplatin. Single intravenous doses of 1.8 or 2.4 mg/kg of dolasetron mesilate or 3 mg of granisetron hydrochloride were administered in a volume of 50 ml over a 5-min period, beginning 30 min prior to cisplatin (> or = 80 mg/m2) administration. The number and timing of emetic episodes, time to administration of escape anti-emetic medication, severity of nausea by visual analogue scale (VAS), and safety were monitored for 24 h after the start of cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. Investigators' evaluations of overall efficacy and patients' satisfaction with therapy were recorded at the end of the 24-h study period. Of the 474 patients evaluable for efficacy, complete responses were achieved by 54, 47 and 48% of patients given dolasetron mesilate 1.8 mg/kg, dolasetron mesilate 2.4 mg/kg and granisetron, respectively. Statistically, treatment groups had comparable complete and complete plus major responses, times to first emesis, and use of escape medication; patient maximum nausea severity and treatment satisfaction ratings; and physician nausea severity and overall efficacy assessments. For the majority of efficacy endpoints, 1.8 mg/kg dolasetron mesilate produced numerically superior responses compared with the 2.4 mg/kg dose. Gender and prior chemotherapy were significant predictors of complete response; males and chemotherapy-naive patients had higher responses. The overall incidences of adverse events were comparable among the treatment groups; headache and diarrhoea were most common. In conclusion, 1.8 and 2.4 mg/kg of dolasetron mesilate and granisetron (3 mg) were equally effective in preventing nausea and vomiting induced by highly emetogenic cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. In addition, because no additional benefit was observed with 2.4 mg/kg of dolasetron mesilate and numerically greater responses were observed with the 1.8 mg/kg dose, the lower dose of 1.8 mg/kg is optimal for further clinical development.

Adult↗

Randomized trial comparing conventional intravenous bolus FEC and FEC with high-dose infusional 5-fluorouracil as first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer.

FEC (5-FU 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) administered as a conventional bolus schedule is widely used in treatment of advanced breast cancer. 5-FU is thought to be more efficient when administered at high doses as a continuous infusion. The aim of this study was to compare the response rate, time to treatment failure, and overall survival obtained with standard FEC regimen (group A) and FEC with high-dose infusional 5-FU (750 mg/m2 per day/days 1 to 5) (group B). One hundred and seventy-eight patients entered this study, 89 in each arm; 10 were noneligible. Both groups were comparable for age, performance status, menopausal status, hormonal receptor status and prior treatment of the initial tumor, duration of relapse free interval, and type and number of disease sites. One hundred and forth patients were evaluable for efficacy. The response rate was 33.3% in group A (1.4% complete response-CR), and 39.4% in group B (9.8% CR) (ns). In an intent to treat basis (n = 168) the response rates were 26.8% and 34.1%, respectively, in groups A and B (ns). The response rate in liver metastasis was significantly higher in group B (57.1%) than in group A (20.0%) (P = 0.03). The time to treatment failure and overall survival were not different between the two groups. One hundred and fifty-three patients were evaluable for toxicity. 10.7% of the patients in group A and 16.0% in group B stopped treatment due to toxicity. Stomatitis was more frequently observed in group B than in group A (46.7% versus 2.6%, respectively, p < 10(-9)). The rates of other side effects were similar in the two groups. In conclusion, the two regimens gave similar overall response rates, time to treatment failure and survival, but infusional 5-FU yielded a better response rate in the liver metastasis.

Adult↗

[Diagnosis and staging of colorectal cancers].

Early colorectal cancer produces no symptom, thus justifying efforts at detection in screening programs. Symptoms are usually secondary to obstruction, local invasion, perforation or bleeding. Any fecal bleeding must be investigated to rule out a colorectal cancer. The initial imaging study to identify a colorectal cancer is often colonoscopy, which is frequently supplemented with a double contrast barium enema. Once the presence of cancer is histologically proven, the preoperative evaluation includes detection of hepatic and extrahepatic spread, especially with ultrasound and CT scan. Endorectal ultrasonography has been shown to be a significant advance for staging rectal cancer. It provides the best staging in selecting patients for preservation of sphincter function and for adjuvant therapies. The most useful prognostic factors in tumors without distant metastases are the depth of tumor extension, the number of positive lymph nodes and the histologic grade. Preoperative CEA level, vascular invasion and ploidy are also important prognostic factors.

Colorectal Neoplasms↗

Acute antiemetic efficacy and safety of dolasetron mesylate, a 5-HT3 antagonist, in cancer patients treated with cisplatin. European Dolasetron Study Group.

Dolasetron mesylate (MDL 73,147EF), a new serotonin receptor (5-HT3) antagonist was administered to 164 cancer patients naive or non-naive to chemotherapy, in single, rising doses of 10, 20, 30, 40, or 50 mg i.v. 15 minutes prior to an infusion of cisplatin. The severity of nausea and number of episodes of emesis were recorded during the 24-hour period following cisplatin administration. There were significant differences between the dose groups, sex, and naive and non-naive patients. There were also significant dolasetron dose-dependent differences for no emesis (p = .01), less than 3 emetic episodes (p = .01), time-to-onset of nausea (p = .04), and time-to-onset of emesis (p = .003). The severity of symptoms was greater for females, for patients with previous chemotherapy, and with shorter duration of cisplatin infusion. Adjustment for these variables and the study center reduced the associations between the dose of dolasetron mesylate and the outcome variables. The principal adverse events were headache (11%) and diarrhea (6%). Dolasetron mesylate was well tolerated; a single dose of 40 or 50 mg controlled acute nausea and vomiting induced by highly emetogenic chemotherapy in the majority, in particular in chemotherapy-naive and male patients. In conclusion, 50 mg and a larger dose merit study in controlled trials with stratification for sex and previous chemotherapy.

Adult↗

[Indications for palliative surgery in digestive cancerology].

The data of the literature demonstrate the poor global results of surgical treatment of the principal gastrointestinal cancers: oesophagus, stomach, bile ducts, liver, exocrine pancreas, colon and rectum. Surgery which was thought to be curative all too frequently proves to be simply a palliative procedure. The risk of failure is so high that a strategy should now be systematically adopted, combining surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and symptomatic treatments. The rigor of this multidisciplinary approach is based on comparative studies confirming the prospective series and measuring the quality and duration of survival. Some protocols provide considerable improvement, for example preoperative radiotherapy of cancers of the rectum, or propose an interesting alternative such as the combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in cancer of the oesophagus. The participation of surgeons in multicentre prospective studies should validate and improve current oncological practice while also evaluating the contribution of a new method such as laparoscopic surgery. This commitment includes a definition of therapeutic objectives, definition of the reference treatment, selection of the criteria of the quality of the procedures involved in this treatment and objective assessment of the results.

Biliary Tract Neoplasms↗

Simplified chronomodulated continuous infusion of floxuridine in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Numerous preclinical and clinical trials showed that circadian-modified 5-fluoro-2-deoxyuridine (floxuridine; FUdR) infusion administered with a totally implantable programmable pump is associated with lower toxicity, higher dose intensity, and improved therapeutic outcome in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: Between July 1988 and March 1991, the authors treated 30 patients with metastatic RCC with circadian-timed infusion FUdR at 0.15 mg/kg/day x 14 days at monthly intervals with a programmable portable pump. Time modification was simplified with one-third of the daily dose given between 11 p.m. and 11 a.m. and two-thirds given between 11 a.m. and 11 p.m. The characteristics of the patients were as follows: 19 men; 11 women; median age, 60 years (range, 28-82 years); median World Health Organization (WHO) performance status: 2 (range: 0-3); 77% failed prior systemic treatment. The main sites of tumor involvement were lungs (70%) and bone (53%). RESULTS: One hundred twenty-eight cycles were completed (median, 3 cycles per patient; range: 1-18 cycles per patient). Toxicity developed in 10 (33%) patients, primarily Grade 1-2 nausea/vomiting (6 patients), Grade 3 diarrhea (3 patients), and Grade 2 hand-foot syndrome (1 patient). In 28 patients evaluable for response, the authors observed four partial responses (14%; 95% confidence interval, 4-33%) and five stabilizations of the disease, including three minor responses. The median duration of response was 12 months (range, 8-24 months), and the median survival time was 6 months. CONCLUSION: Circadian continuous infusion FUdR may be an effective outpatient treatment for metastatic RCC, with low toxicity and good quality of life in responding patients.

Adult↗