Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T Conroy

Publications and source records attributed to T Conroy.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Development of an EORTC disease-specific quality of life module for use in patients with gastric cancer.

Quality of life (QL) is an important outcome in clinical trials in oncology. There is currently no valid international QL measure for gastric cancer. This paper describes the development of a QL module for gastric cancer to supplement the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of life (QLQ-C30) questionnaire. Phases I to III of module development were conducted in the United Kingdom, France, Germany and Spain according to EORTC QL Group guidelines. Twenty relevant QL issues were generated from the literature and interviews with health professionals (n=24) and patients (n=58). This produced a 24 item provisional module. Further testing in 115 patients resulted in the QLQ-STO22, containing 22 questions, conceptualised into five scales and four single items, related to disease symptoms, treatment side-effects and emotional issues specific to gastric cancer. The use of the QLQ-C30 supplemented by the QLQ-STO22 will provide a comprehensive QL measure for international trials in gastric cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

High-dose radiation therapy and neoadjuvant plus concomitant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced squamous-cell anal canal cancer: final results of a phase II study.

PURPOSE: To analyse toxicity and response to a new scheme of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and concomitant radiochemotherapy (RT-CT) for locally advanced anal canal squamous-cell carcinoma (ACC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty patients with an ACC > 40 mm and/or with lymph node involvement were included (1 T1, 52 T2, 14 T3, 13 T4, 18 N0, 30 N1, 32 N2-N3). Two cycles of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and CDDP were delivered as neoadjuvant CT and two during RT-CT. Pelvic (+/- inguinal) RT delivered 45 Gy in 25 fractions of 1.8 Gy. Involved fields were boosted after a one to two month gap (15-20 Gy). The median follow-up was 29 months. RESULTS: One patient died of a pulmonary embolism on day 4. All patients received the entire treatment, with reduced 5-FU doses in 27% of the cases because of acute toxicity. Sixty-four grade 3 and five grade 4 toxicities were observed. No toxic death occurred. Complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) rates were, respectively, 10% and 51% after neoadjuvant CT, 67% and 28% after RT-CT and 93% and 5% after treatment completion (including 4 abdomino-perineal resections). The three-year actuarial overall, tumour-specific, colostomy-free, relapse-free, disease-free and event-free survivals were 86%, 88%, 73%, 70%, 67% and 63%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Tolerance was good. After neoadjuvant CT, most of the patients were objective responders. After treatment completion, all but five achieved CR. The long-term results confirm the durability of local control and low toxicity on the sphincter. An ongoing phase III intergroup trial analyses the impact of neoadjuvant CT, and the benefit of a high-dose boost irradiation, on local control and colostomy-free survival.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

[Standards, options and recommendations for tumor markers in colorectal cancer].

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the French National Federation of Comprehensive Cancer Centers (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centers and specialists from French Public University or General Hospitals, and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome of cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To define, according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project, the characteristics of the main tumor markers in colorectal cancer and their potential role in the management of patients with this malignancy. METHODS: Data were identified by searching Medline and the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 117 independent reviewers, and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centers. RESULTS: The main recommendations for the tumor markers in colorectal cancer are: 1) The carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is the reference serum marker (standard). 2) All the analyses for a given patient must be performed in the same laboratory, using the same technique (standard, expert agreement). 3) CEA or CA 19-9 should not be used for screening or diagnosis (standard, level of evidence B2). 4) High initial serum concentration of CEA is of bad predictive value (standard, level of evidence C). CEA is an independent prognostic factor of survival in colorectal cancers with lymph node metastases (standard, level of evidence B2). 5) CEA is the most sensitive biological parameter for the screening of hepatic metastases (standard, level of evidence B2). 6) CEA serum concentration before palliative chemotherapy is an independent prognostic factor of survival (standard, level of evidence B2). The combination of CEA assay with imagery techniques and clinical examination can help monitor the response to palliative chemotherapy (standard), in particular in non measurable disease (standard, expert agreement). 7) In 65% of the cases, CEA is the first indicator of relapse (standard, level of evidence B2). CEA is the choice marker for monitoring patients with colorectal cancer (standard, level of evidence B2). 8) A sustained biological follow-up including CEA assay can be used to predict the operability of recurring tumors (standard, level of evidence B2). Nevertheless, no survival advantage has been shown (standard).

Antigens, Tumor-Associated, Carbohydrate↗
PubMed2001

[Tamoxifen for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a complete response].

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma tissue contains estrogen receptors and some pilot studies have suggested that tamoxifen could increase the survival of patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. However data of comparative studies are conflicting. We report the case of a woman who presented with unresectable pancreatic head carcinoma with hepatic metastasis. The patient refused chemotherapy and was treated with tamoxifen 30 mg/day. A complete clinical remission of 50 months was observed. A further large-scale study may be required to assess the usefulness of tamoxifen in the second-line treatment of advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2000

[Non-surgical treatments of esophageal cancers].

INTRODUCTION: Despite improvements in surgical techniques and perioperative mortality, only slight improvements in the 5-year survival of patients with esophageal cancer have been observed in the last 20 years. Many patients with apparently localized cancer will have recurrences or metastatic disease despite surgery with curative resection. Consequently, multimodal therapies, including chemotherapy and radiotherapy, were introduced. This review outlines and critically analyzes current non-surgical treatments, including palliative care. CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS: Esophageal cancers appear to be chemosensitive but the median duration of response is short and toxicity consistent, especially in metastatic disease. Consequently, palliative chemotherapy should be offered preferably within a clinical trial. Chemotherapy as the only adjuvant treatment cannot be recommended outside clinical trials. Radiotherapy alone as a curative treatment has been proven to be inferior to chemoradiotherapy in inoperable tumors. Some data support the use of preoperative chemoradiotherapy, but randomized trials are conflicting. A pathological complete response has been identified as a favorable prognostic factor for survival. Self-expanding esophageal metal stents are a simple and effective palliative treatment of malignant dysphagia and can be considered as the reference treatment in patients with obstruction of the lower esophagus or with fistula. FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS: Taxanes should be evaluated in randomized studies using chemotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy. Progress in radiotherapy, such as accelerated fractionation, greater radiation dose, and the addition of brachytherapy, will increase locoregional control and probably survival. The role of secondary surgery in patients responding to chemoradiotherapy still needs to be answered.

Brachytherapy↗
PubMed2000

Investigating the proximal limit of lymphadenectomy in patients with adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus in the mid-thoracic region

AIMS: The benefit of extended lymphadenectomy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus is established, but there is little evidence to support this in patients with adenocarcinoma. The aim of this study was to investigate the extent of lymphatic spread of oesophageal adenocarcinomas, and particularly the proximal spread in tumours located in the mid thorax. METHODS: Twenty-six consecutive patients with tumours arising between 29 and 35 cm from the incisor teeth underwent three-stage oesophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy, including nodes in the recurrent laryngeal chains. The proximal extent was measured by endoscopic ultrasonography and confirmed at operation, with division of the lymph node harvest into anatomical sites according to the Japanese classification of oesophageal cancer. RESULTS: There were 21 men and five women, with a mean age of 64 (range 42-78) years; seven patients were lymph node negative in both the mediastinal and abdominal fields. Six patients had nodal metastases more than 2 cm above the tumour and all had extensive involvement of other nodes at the level of the tumour or below, with 7, 7, 9, 12, 15 and 18 nodes positive. There were no patients in whom nodes above the tumour contained metastases while those at the level or below were clear. CONCLUSIONS: Dissection of proximal lymph nodes along the recurrent laryngeal nerve chains in patients with adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus is not warranted. Lymphatic spread above the level of the tumour occurs in association with extensive lymph node involvement elsewhere and removal of proximal nodes from difficult locations is not warranted as a means of improving staging or survival.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2000

[Concurrent concentrated radio-chemotherapy of epidermoid cancer of the esophagus. Long-term results of a phase II national multicenter trial in 122 non-operable patients (FFCD 8803)].

OBJECTIVES: Concomitant radiochemotherapy improves survival from inoperable esophageal cancer compared to radiotherapy alone. Several regimens of radiotherapy (standard or concentrated split course radiotherapy) are used, however the optimum protocol remains to be determined. The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy and tolerance of concentrated concomitant split course radiochemotherapy. Prognostic factors as well as those positively influencing complete response were also studied. METHODS: This multicentric phase II trial looked at patients with histologically proven, inoperable, squamous cell esophageal carcinoma without metastases or invasion of the tracheobronchial mucosa. Treatment included 3 cycles of chemotherapy by 5-FU continuous infusion (800 mg/m2.d D1-D5, D22-D26, D43-D47), cisplatin (70 mg/m2 D2, D23, D44) and radiotherapy 15 Gy/5d (D1-D5, D22-26, D43-D47). Efficacy was analyzed by endoscopy, biopsy and computerized axial tomography during the 12th week of treatment. RESULTS: The trial included 122 patients from 21 centers (110 M and 12F, mean age 63.1 +/- 8.6 years, range 40-78). In accordance with the TNM-UICC classification (1978), 8 patients were classified stage I (T1 N0), 13 stage II (T2 N0), 100 stage III (T3 and/or N1) and stage was unknown in 1 patient. Median follow-up was 63 months. Treatment was complete in half of the patients. 5 premature deaths (4.1%) were recorded over the treatment period, one of which was directly linked to the toxicity of the treatment. 16% of patients showed at least one severe side-effect. 117 patients received all 3 cycles of the treatment, 88 of them without delay, and all were evaluated. 58 (47.5% of the patients included) showed a complete response with a negative biopsy, 36 (29.5%) showed a partial response, 13 (10.7%) were stable and 10 (8.2%) showed progressive disease. The median duration of complete responses was 11.5 months. Symptomatically, dysphagia improved in 80% of the cases, performance status in 40%, and weight gain was observed in 30% of the patients with weight loss. At evaluation, oral feeding was impossible in 4 patients only and possible in 113 patients; however, endoscopic treatment of the dysphagia remained necessary in 28 patients. Median survival in the 122 patients included was 13.0 +/- 1.6 months and survival rates were 52.9, 29.8 and 12.1% at 1, 2 and 5 years, respectively. Three pretherapeutic prognostic factors influenced survival in a multivariate analysis: initial severe dysphagia (risk of premature death increased 3-fold in the first year), circumferential extension and the differentiated nature of the tumor (risk of death doubled regardless of the time delay). Factors influencing a complete clinical response were an early tumor stage, a poorly differenciated tumor in patients older than 65, and no circumferential extension. The risk of recurrence was 54.8% at 1 year in the 58 patients with complete remission. Complete circumferential extension and a well or moderately differentiated tumour influenced recurrence. CONCLUSION: This trial confirms the efficacy and good tolerance of concentrated split course radiochemotherapy in patients with inoperable esophageal cancer with a 5-year survival rate of 12%. This reinforces the need for a comparative trial (split course irradiation vs standard irradiation) such as the one currently being conducted in France.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Prognostic implications of downstaging following preoperative radiation therapy for operable T3-T4 rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic value of tumor downstaging after preoperative radiation for resectable rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighty-eight patients with non-metastatic resectable rectal cancers (76 T3 and 12 T4) were treated with preoperative irradiation. Median dose was 40 Gy (30-46 Gy) delivered over 32 days (range 11-40). Seventeen patients received preoperative chemotherapy, two courses of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) 350 mg/m2/day and folinic acid 20 mg/m2/day; 5 days per week during the first and fifth weeks of radiotherapy. Surgery was performed with a mean delay of 46 days after completion of irradiation and included 66 abdominoperineal resections and 22 anal sphincter-preserving procedures. Postoperative chemotherapy was administered in 44 patients. RESULTS: Histological tumor stages were: complete histological response in 7%, pT2N0 in 19%, pT3N0 in 46%, and pT2-3N1 in 28%. Tumor downstaging occurred in 26%. No predictive factor of downstaging was statistically significant. The median follow-up was 33 months. The 3- and 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were 100% for the pT0N0 and pT2N0, respectively, 89% and 68% for pT3N0, and 64% and 0% for pT2T3N1. After preoperative irradiation, the pathological tumor stages remained a prognostic factor. Patients with downstaging (pT0T2N0) had significantly higher cancer-specific survival rates than the group without downstaging: 100% and 80% at 3 years, and 100% and 45% at 5 years; respectively (p = 0.011). The 3- and 5-year recurrence free-survival rates were 94% for the group with downstaging and 56% and 50%, respectively, for the group without downstaging (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Downstaging after preoperative irradiation in this retrospective study results in an improvement in local control and survival.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1998

High-dose methotrexate for the treatment of primary cerebral lymphomas: analysis of survival and late neurologic toxicity in a retrospective series.

PURPOSE: The impact of treatment options on survival and late neurologic toxicity was investigated in a series of patients with primary cerebral lymphoma (PCL) and no known cause of immunosuppression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prognostic factors for survival and treatment-induced late neurotoxicity were investigated in a retrospective series of 226 patients with PCL. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 76 months, the median overall survival was 16 months and 5-year survival was 19%. In a univariate analysis, age greater than 60 years, performance status, CSF protein level greater than 0.6 g/L, involvement of corpus callosum or subcortical grey structures, detectable lymphoma cells in CSF, increased serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), but not histological subtype, were significantly correlated with a poor survival. Treatment with chemotherapy versus radiotherapy alone (P = .05), high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX; P = .0007), and cytarabine (P = .04) correlated with a better survival in univariate analysis. Using the Cox model, age, performance status, and CSF protein were independently correlated with survival. After adjustment of these factors, treatment with an HDMTX-containing regimen remained the only treatment-related factor independently correlated with survival (P = .01). The projected incidence of treatment-induced late neurotoxicity was 26% at 6 years in this series, with a median survival from the diagnosis of late neurotoxicity of 12 months. Treatment with radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy was the only parameter correlated with late neurotoxicity in multivariate analysis (relative risk, 11.5; P = .0007). CONCLUSION: Patients with PCL treated with regimens that included HDMTX followed by radiotherapy have an improved survival, but not a higher risk of late neurotoxicity as compared with other treatment modalities in this series.

Adolescent↗