Biomedical subjects

S Saini

Publications and source records attributed to S Saini.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

PubMed2000

Hepatic lesion detection and characterization: value of nonenhanced MR imaging, superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging, and spiral CT-ROC analysis.

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy for detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions of nonenhanced, superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced, or a combination of nonenhanced and SPIO-enhanced MR imaging and contrast-enhanced spiral computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Spiral CT and T2-weighted SPIO-enhanced (ferucarbotran-enhanced) MR imaging were performed in 35 patients within 2 weeks before surgery for malignant hepatic lesions. Only malignant lesions with histopathologic proof were considered. A total of 875 images with and 800 images without focal lesions were presented to five readers, who were asked to assess the presence and characterization of lesions by using a five-point confidence scale. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed. RESULTS: Nonenhanced and SPIO-enhanced images together and SPIO-enhanced images alone yielded the best performance for lesion detection. No differences were found among all imaging techniques with regard to lesion characterization (benign vs malignant). The combined approach resulted in larger area under the ROC curve (A(z) = 0.9062) and accuracy (85.3%) (P < 0.02), as compared with SPIO-enhanced MR imaging (A(z) = 0.8667; accuracy, 73.1%). CONCLUSION: SPIO-enhanced T2-weighted MR imaging was more accurate than nonenhanced T1-weighted and T2-weighted MR imaging and contrast-enhanced spiral CT for the detection of focal hepatic lesions. The combined analysis of nonenhanced and SPIO-enhanced images was more accurate in the characterization of focal hepatic lesions than was review of SPIO-enhanced images alone.

Contrast Media↗

PubMed2000

Addition of gadolinium chelates to heavily T2-weighted MR imaging: limited role in differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from metastases.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the addition of gadolinium-enhanced imaging to heavily T2-weighted MR imaging of the liver is valuable in differentiating hemangiomas from metastases. The T2 relaxation time was also included in our analysis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients with 52 proven liver lesions (24 hemangiomas and 28 metastases) larger than 1 cm underwent MR imaging at 1.5 T with T2-weighted spin-echo (TR/TE, 3000/80, 160) and gadolinium chelate-enhanced dynamic T1-weighted gradient-recalled echo (80/2.6, 80) pulse sequences. Images were reviewed by observers who were unaware of the patients' clinical history; first, only T2-weighted images were reviewed and then T2-weighted plus dynamic images were reviewed together. The T2 relaxation times were calculated for each lesion. Diagnostic accuracy by each method was compared using receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: Mean T2 relaxation times were 76 +/- 26 msec for metastases and 133 +/- 25 msec for hemangiomas. The addition of dynamic scanning to the T2-weighted sequence made a statistically significant difference for only one observer (p = 0.03). However, it did not make a statistically significant contribution for either observer when compared with the T2 relaxation time. Although addition of the dynamic images resulted in correct diagnosis of six lesions, three lesions were misdiagnosed after having been correctly characterized on the T2-weighted images alone. CONCLUSION: When optimized T2-weighted images are obtained and the T2 relaxation time is calculated, routine use of gadolinium enhancement for differentiation of hemangiomas from metastases is unnecessary although dynamic scanning is valuable in selected cases.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Quantitative measurements of medical images for pharmaceutical clinical trials: comparison between on-site and off-site assessments.

OBJECTIVE: In pharmaceutical clinical trials, quantitative measurements on medical images are often conducted to confirm drug efficacy. This study aims to compare the quantitative image analysis performance of an off-site core laboratory with the performance of investigators from multiple clinical sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a phase I clinical trial, 25 healthy subjects underwent dynamic brain single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scintigraphy with 123I-Altropane, a cocaine analogue with high affinity and selectivity for dopamine transporter sites in the striatum. In 20 patients examined on-site and off-site, a total of 80 measurements were made to calculate the drug's binding potential. A trained technologist off-site at a central core laboratory and on-site investigators at different clinical sites performed the image analysis. These results were compared with measurements made by a subspecialty radiologist whose assessments were the reference standard. Statistical analysis was performed using multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: Measurements from the central core laboratory (off-site) highly correlated (r = 0.95) with measurements of the reference standard. Measurements from the clinical sites (on-site) grouped together had lower correlation (r = 0.84) with the reference standard. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Training and experience in the specific type of image analysis are critical in obtaining consistent data. Quantitative analysis by dedicated personnel at a core laboratory provides highly reproducible results. The findings support off-site assessment of medical images in pharmaceutical clinical trials.

Adult↗

PubMed2000