Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S S Kroll

Publications and source records attributed to S S Kroll.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Influence of radiation on late complications in patients with free fibular flaps for mandibular reconstruction.

Carcinoma of the mandible is a disease that evokes images of devastating functional and cosmetic outcomes. Most of these malignancies require treatment with surgical resection and perioperative irradiation (XRT). To minimize the incidence of postoperative complications, the timing of perioperative XRT has been questioned. This study reviewed 140 patients at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center over a 7-year period who underwent mandibular resection and reconstruction with a free fibular flap. The patients were divided into the following four groups: (1) preoperative XRT followed by immediate reconstruction, (2) preoperative XRT followed by delayed reconstruction, (3) postoperative XRT, and (4) no XRT. The complications studied included exposure of bone and hardware, orocutaneous fistula, osteoradionecrosis, partial and complete flap loss, and severe cervical contractures. Of the 140 patients studied, 59 (42%) had at least one complication. Complications per group were the following: group 1, 45%; group 2, 46%; group 3, 47%; and group 4, 28%. The results show that the incidence of complications is relatively equal between groups that received preoperative vs. postoperative XRT.

Combined Modality Therapy↗
PubMed1999

An approach to the repair of partial mastectomy defects.

In many cases, breast deformity caused by partial mastectomy can be reduced or corrected by plastic surgery. Partial breast reconstruction is best performed immediately after the partial mastectomy using an approach determined by the size of the breast and the defect. Small defects in large breasts usually need no reconstruction. For larger defects in large breasts, breast reshaping (similar to reduction mammaplasty) combined with a contralateral breast reduction is usually the best option. For medium-sized or smaller breasts with small to moderate-sized defects, local flaps from the subaxillary region are very useful. If the defect is too large for correction with local tissue, a latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap is usually the best choice. Using these techniques, patients can achieve aesthetically better outcomes from breast-conservation therapy, even when larger tumors are being treated or when wider margins are taken to reduce the risk of tumor recurrence. By working together with an oncologic surgeon and facilitating the removal of larger tumors, the plastic surgeon can widen the indications for both breast-conservation therapy and breast reconstruction at the same time.

Breast↗
PubMed1999

Local recurrence risk after skin-sparing and conventional mastectomy: a 6-year follow-up.

In this study, the records of all patients at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center with T1 or T2 breast cancer who were treated between March of 1986 and November of 1990 with mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction were reviewed for the presence of recurrent disease. Patients with in situ disease were not included. Patients were included in the study if a local recurrence occurred (regardless of the length of follow-up) or if a follow-up of 6 years or longer could be obtained. Patients were grouped according to the use or nonuse of skin-sparing mastectomy, by tumor stage, and by nuclear grade of the tumor. The series included 154 patients, of whom 114 had skin-sparing mastectomies and 40 had nonskin-sparing mastectomies. The local recurrence rate in the skin-sparing mastectomy group was 7.0 percent, whereas in the nonskin-sparing mastectomy group it was 7.5 percent. The sample size in the nonskin-sparing mastectomy group was too small for meaningful statistical analysis, but the data suggest that there is no clinically important difference in recurrence rates between the two groups. We conclude that the use of skin-sparing technique for early breast cancer patients does not significantly increase the risk of tumor recurrence after mastectomy.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1999

Integrated breast mound reduction and nipple reconstruction with the wraparound flap.

A new method for nipple reconstruction is described that combines revision of an autologous tissue breast mound with creation of a projecting nipple. The method is applicable only to reconstructed breast mounds that must be reduced or lifted to achieve symmetry with the opposite breast. In this technique, the mound is reduced as if it were a normal breast, using an inverted-T or vertical mammaplasty pattern. In this way, breast projection can be increased and, if necessary, the inframammary fold can be elevated. A rectangular flap is created from skin and subcutaneous tissue that would normally be discarded during the breast reduction, and this flap is wrapped around on itself to form a projecting nipple. This new technique avoids the flattening of the breast mound usually seen after nipple reconstruction because it does not take tissue away from the completed breast mound to make the nipple. In appropriate patients who require reduction in size of their reconstructed breast mound, the wraparound flap nipple reconstruction is worth considering.

Female↗
PubMed1998

Synchronous elective contralateral mastectomy and immediate bilateral breast reconstruction in women with early-stage breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The role of elective contralateral mastectomy (ECM) in women with early-stage breast cancer who elect or require an ipsilateral mastectomy and desire immediate bilateral breast reconstruction (IBR) is an intellectual and emotional dilemma for both patient and physician. In an attempt to clarify the rationale for this approach, we reviewed our experience with ECM and IBR and evaluated operative morbidity, the incidence of occult contralateral breast cancer, and patterns of recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 155 patients with primary unilateral breast cancer (stage 0, I, or II) and negative findings on physical and mammographic examinations of the contralateral breast who underwent ipsilateral mastectomy and simultaneous ECM with IBR between 1987 and 1995. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 46 years (range, 25 to 69 years). Clinical stage at diagnosis was stage 0, I, and II in 19.4%, 54.2%, and 26.4% of patients, respectively. Factors likely to influence the use of ECM were family history of breast cancer in first-degree relatives (30%), any family history of breast cancer (56%), difficulty anticipated in contralateral breast surveillance (48%), associated lobular carcinoma in situ (23%), multicentric primary tumor (28%), significant reconstructive issues (14%), and failure of mammographic identification of the primary tumor (16%). Skin-sparing mastectomies were performed in 81% of patients. Overall, 70% of patients underwent reconstruction using autogenous tissue transfer. Reoperations for suspected anastomotic thrombosis were performed in seven patients. Two patients experienced significant partial or complete flap loss. Histopathologic findings in the ECM specimen were as follows: benign, 80% of patients; atypical ductal hyperplasia, 12% of patients; lobular carcinoma in situ, 6.5% of patients; ductal carcinoma in situ, 2.7% of patients; and invasive carcinoma, 1.3% of patients. Eighteen patients (12%) had evidence of locoregional or distant recurrences, with a median follow-up of 3 years. In one patient (0.6%), invasive ductal carcinoma developed on the side of the elective mastectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ECM and IBR cannot be justified if the only oncologic criterion considered is the incidence of occult synchronous contralateral disease. However, in a highly selected population of young patients with a difficult clinical or mammographic examination and an increased lifetime risk of developing a second primary tumor, ECM and IBR is a safe approach.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Soft tissue reconstruction following hemipelvectomy.

BACKGROUND: Resection of primary and metastatic pelvic bone disease may result in large soft tissue deficits. Guidelines for soft tissue reconstruction following pelvic bone resection were evaluated in a retrospective study. METHODS: Over a 5-year period 21 patients (31%) required soft tissue reconstruction following pelvic bone resection. Data on these patients were retrieved from case records. RESULTS: Twelve patients underwent immediate, planned reconstruction, 1 a two-stage reconstruction, and 8 patients required a delayed procedure for complications after bone resection and primary closure. Soft tissue reconstruction was usually accomplished with muscle-based flaps; (25 flaps in 20 patients: 20 pedicled, 5 free), or with skin grafts alone (1 patient). Specific postreconstruction complications occurred in 9 patients, 5 in flaps based on the ipsilateral rectus muscle. CONCLUSION: Flap closure is indicated to achieve primary closure and eliminate deadspace. The ipsilateral rectus muscle should be used with caution and contralateral-based rectus flaps considered. Indications for free flaps include the size and location of the defect and availability of tissue from an amputated limb.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Reconstruction of posterior mandibular defects with soft tissue using the rectus abdominis free flap.

Immediate reconstruction of posterior mandibular composite defects by replacement with vascularised bone is ideal in principle, but may have excessive morbidity for certain patients who, because of poor general health or a poor tumour prognosis, are not good candidates for a complex surgical procedure. Also, if the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is missing, the continuity of the entire mandible cannot be restored without either reconstructing the TMJ or resorting to a prosthesis. For such patients, reconstruction of the posterior defect without bone using a rectus abdominis free flap or other soft-tissue flap may be a good alternative. A series of 21 patients with posterior mandibular defects underwent this type of reconstruction. The patients reconstructed only with soft tissue were found to have a reasonable cosmetic appearance, and speech and swallowing function were very acceptable. For posterior mandibular defects that include a missing condyle this approach is an acceptable alternative, especially for patients who are poor candidates for more complex surgical procedures.

Bone Transplantation↗
PubMed1998

Bilateral breast reconstruction in very thin patients with extended free TRAM flaps.

A lateral extension of the free TRAM flap design is described for use in unusually thin patients who desire bilateral autologous tissue breast reconstruction. Because of the exceptionally good blood supply to the free TRAM flap, the lateral extensions are viable even when the flap is folded double to increase its thickness and projection. To increase the volume of the reconstructed breast, the flaps can be extended as far laterally as the surface of the operating table will permit. With this approach, bilateral TRAM flap breast reconstruction is possible even for extremely thin patients.

Female↗
PubMed1998

Does prior irradiation increase the risk of total or partial free-flap loss?

Answers to the question, "Does previous irradiation of a recipient site interfere with reconstruction by free-tissue transfer?" have been elusive. In an attempt to address that question, all free-flap procedures performed for reconstruction of the breast or of head and neck defects at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between May 1, 1988 and February 15, 1996 were reviewed. The effects of prior irradiation of the recipient site on the incidence of total flap loss, partial flap loss, and thrombosis were assessed. During the study period, 1384 eligible free-flap reconstructions were performed. Total flap loss and partial flap loss were more common in the 428 flaps transferred to previously irradiated sites than in the patients without previous irradiation, but multiple logistic regression analysis showed that these differences were due to confounding factors. The authors conclude that previous irradiation of flap recipient sites does not statistically significantly affect the rate of partial or total free-flap loss.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Reconstruction of complex radiation-induced injuries using free-tissue transfer.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of free-tissue transfers for the reconstruction of radiation-induced complex injuries. The case files for patients who underwent reconstruction for radiation-induced injuries between May 1988 and November 1995 at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty patients in whom 33 free flaps were done were included. Radiation-induced defects were located in the head and neck (n=23), extremities (n=4), chest wall (n=2), and inguinal area (n=1) The mean period between irradiation and injury was 78 months (range: 4 months to 38 years). Free-tissue transfer was successful in 97 percent (32/33) of patients. The overall complication rate was 40 percent (12/30). Flap donor sites included the fibula (n=12), latissimus dorsi (n=6), rectus abdominis (n=6), iliac crest (n=4), scapula (n=3), and radial forearm (n=2). Large-caliber vessels in the cervical, axillary, or inguinal regions were most commonly used to revascularize flaps. Vein grafts were used in five cases for the artery (2/5) or vein (3/5). Pedicle thrombosis occurred in three cases in recipient vessels located within the irradiated field. Two flaps were salvaged; one was lost, and the patient required a second free-flap reconstruction The mean follow-up was 40 months (range: 2.5 to 83 months). The disease-free survival rate was 67 percent (20/30), local failures occurred in 10 percent (3/30) of patients, and 23.3 percent (7/30) of patients either died or were lost to follow-up. Healing of radiation-induced wounds may be achieved using free-tissue transfers, but complications are frequent. Large-caliber irradiated vessels may be used to revascularize flaps, but there may be an increased risk of pedicle thrombosis.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Second free flaps in head and neck reconstruction.

Over the past decade, free-tissue transfer has greatly improved the quality of oncology-related head and neck reconstruction. As this technique has developed, second free flaps have been performed for aesthetic improvement of the reconstructed site. This study evaluated the indications for and the success of second free flaps. Medical files for patients who underwent second free flaps for head and neck reconstruction at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, from May 1, 1988 to November 30, 1996, were reviewed. The flaps were classified as being either immediate (done within 72 hr) or delayed (done within 2 years) reconstructions. Indications, risk factors, recipient vessels, outcome, and complications were analyzed. Of the 28 patients included in this study, 12 had immediate (nine as salvage after primary free flap failure, and three for reconstruction of a soft-tissue defect), and 16 had delayed second free flaps (two for reconstruction of a defect resulting from excision of recurrent tumors, and 14 for aesthetic improvement). Reconstruction sites included the oral cavity in 18 patients; the midface in six; the skull base in two; and the scalp in two. The success rate for the second free flaps was 96 percent. Five patients had significant wound complications. In a substantial number of cases, identical recipient vessels were used for both the first and second free flaps. The authors conclude that second free flaps can play an important role in salvaging or improving head and neck reconstruction in selected patients. In many cases, the same recipient vessels can be used for both the first and second flaps.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

A comparison of resource costs of immediate and delayed breast reconstruction.

The resource cost (cost to our hospital) of providing mastectomy plus breast reconstruction was calculated for 276 patients who had received both mastectomy and breast reconstruction at our institution. All patients had completed the entire reconstructive process, including reconstruction of the nipple. The resource costs of providing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction were compared with those of mastectomy with subsequent delayed reconstruction. We found that the mean resource cost for the 57 patients who had separate mastectomy followed by delayed breast reconstruction ($28,843) was 62 percent higher than that of mastectomy with immediate reconstruction ($17,801; n = 219, p < 0.001). Similar differences were found when patients were subgrouped by type of reconstruction (TRAM versus tissue expansion and implants), by laterality (unilateral versus bilateral), and by history of preoperative irradiation. We conclude that mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction is significantly less expensive than mastectomy followed by delayed reconstruction and can potentially conserve resources.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1998

Fat necrosis in free and pedicled TRAM flaps.

One purported advantage of the free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap for breast reconstruction is that, compared with the conventional TRAM flap, it has a better blood supply and therefore a lower incidence of fat necrosis. We tested this claim by reviewing the incidence of fat necrosis, both clinically and mammographically, in a group of 110 patients with 116 TRAM flap breast reconstructions who had undergone mammography of their reconstructed breasts. Of the 49 breasts reconstructed with free TRAM flaps, 4 (8.2 percent) had clinically evident fat necrosis, and 1 (2.0 percent) had fat necrosis that was detectable by mammography. Of the 67 breasts reconstructed with conventional TRAM flaps, 18 (26.9 percent) had clinically detectable fat necrosis, and 9 (13.4 percent) had fat necrosis that was detectable mammographically. Both of these differences were statistically significant (p = 0.0113 for clinical fat necrosis; p = 0.031 for mammographic fat necrosis). Fat necrosis was more common in patients who were obese or had a history of smoking, but neither association was statistically significant. We conclude that the use of the free TRAM flap reduces the incidence of fat necrosis in the reconstructed breast.

Abdominal Muscles↗
PubMed1998

Why autologous tissue?

Breast reconstruction with autologous tissue achieves more natural results and a better simulation of a real breast than reconstruction based on prosthetic implants. Unlike implant-based reconstructions, which tend to develop capsular contractures, the results of autologous tissue reconstruction tend to improve with time. In the long run, the costs of autologous breast reconstruction with transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flaps are equal to or lower than those of reconstruction with tissue expansion and implants. Consequently, autologous tissue is preferable for most patients, provided they are suitable candidates for the surgery required by autologous reconstruction.

Breast Implants↗
PubMed1998

Bilateral breast reconstruction.

For appropriate patients, who are aware of and accept the risks involved, contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and bilateral reconstruction can provide a good solution to an otherwise difficult problem. Bilateral reconstruction can produce exceptionally good aesthetic results and, because good symmetry is achieved in the initial surgery, it only costs about 5% more than unilateral reconstruction. This article discusses the techniques, advantages, and disadvantages of bilateral reconstruction.

Female↗