Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S R Feldman

Publications and source records attributed to S R Feldman.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Better medication adherence results in greater improvement in severity of psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Patients are commonly nonadherent to medication regimens. In dermatology, there has been little study of the effect of nonadherence on outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To test the association between adherence behaviour and changes in severity of psoriasis. METHODS: Twenty-four subjects with psoriasis were enrolled in an 8-week, left/right, controlled trial of salicylic acid plus topical tacrolimus ointment vs. salicylic acid plus placebo. Subjects were given salicylic acid to apply to all lesions. The salicylic acid was supplied in a bottle with a medication event monitoring system cap in order to assess adherence to the salicylic acid. The primary outcome for this study was the relationship between the change in the disease severity (change in sum score of erythema, scale and thickness scores for a target plaque) and medication adherence. RESULTS: The mean initial disease severity was 5.8 on a nine-point sum score scale. For the topical tacrolimus-treated side, a decrease in adherence rate of 10% was associated with a 1-point increase in severity (P < 0.05). For the placebo-treated side, adherence was not significantly correlated with changes in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Nonadherence may have a significant role in altering clinical trial data, skewing it towards ineffectiveness. Improved outcomes in psoriasis may be achievable through interventions that improve patients' adherence to treatment.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Pruritus in adult dermatomyositis.

Dermatomyositis has a significant clinical component of pruritus that has not yet been studied. Pruritus can significantly affect the life of patients. The aim of the present work was to study the degree of pruritus experienced by patients. A four-question survey was sent to patients with documented dermatomyositis. The survey used a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to describe current, worst and daily pruritus, and the effect this has on daily activities. Twenty-six subjects returned completed questionnaires: four had no pruritus; the majority had a significant amount with means above 50 on the VAS. A mean of 44.6 was found for the effect on daily life. Further studies should be performed to examine the prevalence and severity of pruritus in this population and it's effect on their quality of life. Clinicians must be aware of the significant pruritus and provide adequate therapy to improve quality of life.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Development and validation of a health-related quality of life instrument for women with melasma.

BACKGROUND: Melasma can have significant emotional and psychological effects on those affected with the condition. In the past, the impact of melasma on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has been assessed using general measures of skin disease that equally weigh both the physical and psychosocial distress arising from the presence of a dermatological condition. OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to develop and validate a disease-specific HRQoL instrument to identify the areas of the patient's life most impaired by melasma as well as the effects of the condition on their level of functioning in correlation with disease severity: the Melasma Quality of Life scale (MELASQOL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A random sample of 102 women identified by an investigator as having melasma were evaluated by the investigator using the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI). The patients were then anonymously surveyed with the SKINDEX-16, the Fear of Negative Evaluation scale, the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), a skin discoloration evaluation questionnaire, and a measure of perceived life quality difference without melasma. The 10-item MELASQOL scale was devised from the comprehensive HRQoL assessment battery. RESULTS: The psychometric properties of the MELASQOL were comparable with the properties of the DLQI and the SKINDEX-16. The MELASQOL scores were highly correlated with the other HRQoL measures. The discriminatory ability of the MELASQOL is superior to the SKINDEX-16 and the DLQI for melasma. The three life domains most adversely affected by melasma (social life, recreation/leisure and emotional well-being) were highlighted by this instrument. These were the same three areas of life that patients believed would improve the most if they no longer were affected by the disease. CONCLUSIONS: The MELASQOL can be used to evaluate objectively the effect of melasma on a patient's HRQoL. The high correlation with the DLQI, the SKINDEX-16 and the skin discoloration questionnaire suggests that the new scale is a valid instrument, which can be used to monitor the level of impairment individuals suffer due to their melasma. The MELASQOL scores can help guide treatment methods as well as track the improvement of patients' HRQoL.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Physicians underutilize topical retinoids in the management of acne vulgaris: analysis of U.S. National Practice Data.

BACKGROUND: Topical retinoids are effective in the treatment of acne, yet no current guidelines existed in the literature until recently recommending their use as an integral part of mild to moderate acne treatment. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether underutilization of topical retinoids occurs in clinical practice. DESIGN: Weighted data on representative office visits with acne vulgaris diagnoses were analyzed using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS), from 1990 to 1999. RESULTS: Of the 54.2 million acne vulgaris visits, retinoids were prescribed at 35.3% visits. Dermatologists prescribed significantly more retinoids than non-dermatologists (39.4%' versus 23%). Dermatology visit was a significant predictor of topical retinoid prescription (RR: 2.27,95% CI: 1.63-3.17). Data suggest that prescribing retinoids for acne has been increasing over the past decade, primarily among dermatologists. CONCLUSION: There is a major difference between suggested treatment guidelines for acne and actual practice in the community. There is distinct under-utilization of topical retinoids for treatment of acne vulgaris by dermatologists and non-dermatologists.

Acne Vulgaris↗
PubMed2003

Disease severity and associated family impact in childhood atopic dermatitis.

AIM: To examine the association between childhood atopic dermatitis (AD) severity and family impact at baseline and after an intervention by a physician specialist, using validated measures of both severity and family impact. METHODS: Cross sectional self administered survey of parent-caregivers of 49 randomly selected children with AD; 35 parents were available for follow up. Family impact was measured using a modified AD Family Impact Scale completed by the parent-caregiver. The child's disease severity was measured using both the investigator's assessment via the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) and the caregiver's assessment via the recently validated Self Assessment Eczema Area and Severity Index (SA-EASI). RESULTS: The parent-caregiver's assessment of severity of the child was the most significant correlate of the family impact of the child's AD (p = 0.65 at baseline and p = 0.38 at follow up). In multivariate regression models, the parent-caregiver's estimate of severity remained the single strongest predictor of family impact before and after receipt of dermatologist care, as well as the difference in impact between pre and post-dermatologist care. CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence to support the ability of parent-caregivers of children with AD to accurately determine severity of their child's AD; perceived severity is the driver of the family impact of this condition. Treatment of a child by a physician specialist is associated with reductions in both perceived severity, as well as family impact of this condition.

Absenteeism↗
PubMed2002

Use of the Self-Administered Eczema Area and Severity Index by parent caregivers: results of a validation study.

BACKGROUND: The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) is used by dermatological investigators world-wide to assess eczema disease severity. EASI measures are, however, time-consuming and require trained personnel, thereby limiting its application to large-scale epidemiological studies. Additionally, the use of self-assessed severity indices in dermatology is restricted to adult subjects and conditions, thereby not addressing the needs of paediatric patients. OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate an instrument for a caregiver's self-assessment of the severity of his/her child's atopic dermatitis (AD), the Self-Administered EASI (SA-EASI). METHODS: Trained investigators performed a modified EASI assessment on the same day as an SA-EASI was obtained from 47 caregivers of children with AD. RESULTS: The SA-EASI was found to be a valid measure of the severity of AD. Total, acute and chronic SA-EASI scores predicted total, acute and chronic modified EASI scores (P < 0.0001). SA-EASI body surface area (BSA) scores predicted EASI BSA scores (P < 0.0001). SA-EASI pruritus scores correlated with the acute, chronic and total EASI scores (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The SA-EASI may provide caregivers the means to report the severity of their child's skin disease objectively. The high correlation with the EASI score observed in this sample implies that statistical inferences with the SA-EASI will be valid for large populations. In future studies, this will permit analysis of the relationship of skin disease severity to such measures as quality of life, disability, patient satisfaction and the costs of various therapies. Moreover, this SA-EASI instrument may allow older children, over 12 years old, to assess the severity of their AD.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2001

Lifestyle high-risk behaviors and demographics may predict the level of participation in sun-protection behaviors and skin cancer primary prevention in the United States: results of the 1998 National Health Interview Survey.

BACKGROUND: Sun and ultraviolet radiation exposure are major risk factors for skin cancer, and sun-protective behaviors and skin cancer examinations are means of primary prevention of skin cancer. The objective of this study was to evaluate the extent to which demographics and other high-risk behaviors may predict the reported level of participation in sun-protection behaviors and skin cancer primary prevention in the United States adult population. METHODS: Data on reported sun-protection behaviors and skin cancer examinations were obtained from surveys completed by adults in the 1998 National Health Interview Survey. Univariate and multivariate data analyses were performed using specialized statistics software. RESULTS: For the United States adult population surveyed (n = 32,440), only 21% of those surveyed indicated that they had ever had a skin cancer examination, and, of those, only 45% indicated that the skin cancer examination was within the past year. For sun-protective behaviors, only 23%, 27%, and 30% of those surveyed reported that they were very likely to wear protective clothing, stay in the shade, and use sunscreen, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The likelihood of participation in sun-protective behaviors and skin cancer prevention was related to a number of demographic characteristics and high-risk behaviors, including currently smoking cigarettes and wearing seatbelts.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Dermatologists and allergists have far more experience and use more complex treatment regimens in the treatment of atopic dermatitis than other physicians.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a prevalent skin condition, especially in the pediatric population. Whereas it has been shown that dermatologists prefer using more intensive therapy for AD than generalists, actual drug utilization has not been quantified. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to characterize visits for and treatment of AD in the office-based setting. METHODS: National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data from 1990 to 1997 was analyzed to determine the use of topical corticosteroids (including their relative potencies), oral antibiotics, and oral antihistamines in the treatment of AD. RESULTS: There were an estimated 900,000 outpatient visits per year for AD. If in some visits to generalists the diagnosis for AD was miscoded as contact dermatitis, there may have been as many as 3 million outpatient visits per year for AD. Topical corticosteroids were used in 67% of visits with a mean potency rank of 4.5 (4.3, 4.8 95% CI). Dermatologists saw 48% of all visits for AD (63 yearly visits/physician) and allergists saw 10% of visits (30 yearly visits/physician). Other physicians saw from 0.1 to 2 yearly visits per physician. Dermatologists were the most likely to use topical corticosteroids (81% of visits) and high-potency corticosteroid agents (22% of visits). Dermatologists and allergists were the only physicians to prescribe ultrahigh-potent corticosteroid agents (12% and 9% of visits, respectively) and were more likely than other physicians to use multiple-agent regimens (21% and 27% of visits treated with a corticosteroid agent, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Dermatologists and allergists have more expertise in the management of AD than other physicians, as suggested by their higher per capita visits and greater use of complex topical corticosteroid regimens.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed2001

The primary care provider and the care of skin disease: the patient's perspective.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the patient's perspective on dermatologic care provided by primary care providers (PCPs) or dermatologists. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of patients drawn from primary care and dermatology clinics. SETTING: Academic Veterans Affairs medical center. PATIENTS: Convenience sample of patients in either a primary care or a dermatology clinic. INTERVENTION: Survey questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients' confidence in having their skin problems cared for by PCPs and dermatologists and satisfaction with previous care rendered. RESULTS: A total of 137 patients in the primary care clinic (group 1) and 100 patients in the dermatology clinic (group 2) participated. Patients (N = 237) expressed confidence in their PCP's ability to treat rashes (62%), diagnose skin cancer (65%), perform skin biopsies (60%), "freeze" lesions with liquid nitrogen (50%), and perform cutaneous surgery (46%). Group 2 patients were significantly less likely to have confidence in their PCP than group 1 patients for all measures other than the use of liquid nitrogen. High levels of confidence were expressed in a dermatologist's ability for all 5 measures: 92%, 91%, 92%, 83%, and 85%, respectively. Patients were more confident in dermatologists' abilities to perform these procedures compared with PCPs (P<.001 for all comparisons). Of patients previously treated for skin disorders, there was a high rate of satisfaction with the treatment rendered by PCPs (81% for group 1 and 75% for group 2) and by dermatologists (92% for group 1 and 90% for group 2). However, patient satisfaction was higher for dermatology vs primary care for the treatment of skin disease (P<.001). Direct access to dermatologists was preferred. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients have confidence in their PCP to care for their skin disease, they have greater confidence in the care provided by dermatologists. Among patients previously treated for skin disease, satisfaction was higher with care rendered by dermatologists vs PCPs. Most patients prefer direct access to dermatologists should they develop a skin problem.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Waiting times to see a dermatologist are perceived as too long by dermatologists: implications for the dermatology workforce.

BACKGROUND: The issue of workforce requirements in dermatology has come to attention in recent years because it affects the delivery of dermatologic care in the United States. OBJECTIVE: To determine the waiting times for appointments with dermatologists in order to assess the adequacy of the current level of dermatology workforce. METHODS: Waiting times were determined for new and return patient appointments by telephone survey of a random sample of American Academy of Dermatology members. Physicians' perception of the adequacy of the number of dermatologists in their area was used as a criterion standard to validate waiting times as a measure of workforce adequacy. Benchmark waiting times of 3 weeks for a new patient appointment and 2 weeks for a return appointment were established. RESULTS: Physicians' estimates of the waiting time for a new patient appointment and their perceptions of the adequacy of the number of practicing dermatologists in their area were closely correlated (r = -0.65; P<.001), validating the use of waiting times as a measure of workforce adequacy. More than 60% of the dermatologists surveyed exceeded the criterion cutoff waiting times, and more than 42% of the US population lives in areas underserved by dermatologists. Dermatologists practicing in areas of higher population density were more likely to have shorter waiting times for new patient appointments and were more likely to include cosmetic dermatology in their practices. CONCLUSION: The long waiting times for appointments suggests that the current supply of dermatologists is not adequate to meet the demand for dermatologists' services.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2001

Demographics of aging and skin disease.

What are the dermatologic needs of aging and skin disease in the elderly in the new millennium? This question may be impossible to answer, but predictions may be derived from current sources of data. Data from the US Census Bureau and the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey are used to characterize current use of dermatologic care in the aging population of the United States and to estimate possible future trends in dermatologic care as the elderly population continues to grow. Dermatologic accompaniments of aging are briefly reviewed, as are issues in health care financing.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Cost of nonmelanoma skin cancer treatment in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Despite being the most prevalent form of cancer, the economic impact of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in the United States has not been assessed. OBJECTIVE: To determine the overall cost and to estimate the cost per episode of NMSC care in the United States in physicians' offices, outpatient surgery centers, and inpatient settings. METHODS: Data from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Study 1992-1995 were analyzed to obtain the total cost of NMSC and the cost in different settings. To normalize these data on a per episode basis, the cost in each setting was divided by the number of procedures performed in each setting obtained from the National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS, 1992-1997), the National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery (NSAS, 1994-1996), and the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS, 1995). RESULTS: The total cost of NMSC care in the United States in the Medicare population is $426 million/year. Physician office-based procedures for NMSC accounted for the greatest percentage of money spent to treat NMSC and the greatest percentage of procedures. The average cost per episode of NMSC when performed in a physician's office setting was found to be $492. The cost per episode of care in inpatient and outpatient settings were $5537 and $1043, respectively. CONCLUSION: Compared to other cancers, the relative magnitude of NMSC treatment costs is currently small because NMSC is managed efficiently and effectively, primarily in office-based settings. Legislative or regulatory measures that discourage office treatment of NMSC will lead to increased cost.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗
PubMed2001

The specialty of the treating physician affects the likelihood of tumor-free resection margins for basal cell carcinoma: results from a multi-institutional retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common cutaneous malignancy. Surgical experience and physician specialty may affect the outcome quality of surgical excision of BCC. METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective study of BCC excisions submitted to the respective Departments of Pathology at 4 major university medical centers. Our outcome measure was presence of histologic evidence of tumor present in surgical margins of excision specimens (incomplete excision). Clinician experience was defined as the number of excisions that a clinician performed during the study interval. The analytic sample pool included 1459 tumors that met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. Analyses included univariate and multivariate techniques involving the entire sample and separate subsample analyses that excluded 2 outlying dermatologists. RESULTS: Tumor was present at the surgical margins in 243 (16.6%) of 1459 specimens. A patient's sex, age, and tumor size were not significantly related to the presence of tumor in the surgical margin. Physician experience did not demonstrate a significant difference either in the entire sample (P <.09) or in the subsample analysis (P >.30). Tumors of the head and neck were more likely to be incompletely excised than truncal tumors in all the analyses (P <.03). Compared with dermatologists, otolaryngologists (P <.02) and plastic surgeons (P <.008) were more likely to incompletely excise tumors; however, subsample analysis for plastic surgeons found only a trend toward significance (P <.10). Dermatologists and general surgeons did not differ in the likelihood of performing an incomplete excision (P >.4). CONCLUSION: The physician specialty may affect the quality of care in the surgical management of BCC.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Patients seen in a dermatology clinic have unmet preventive health care needs.

Dermatologists provide special expertise in the care of patients with skin disease, whereas primary care providers have special expertise in preventive care. Patients bypassing their primary care provider to use dermatologists directly may miss an opportunity for identification of preventive health needs. We conducted a pilot study to determine whether patients seeing a dermatologist have unmet general preventive health care needs. A 1-page assessment was developed in accordance with the US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines and was distributed to a convenience sample of 161 patients in a dermatology clinic. Unmet needs were identified in the areas of screening tests, counseling, immunizations, vitamins, and replacement hormones. Of subjects aged 25 to 64 years, 94% without a primary care provider had unmet needs compared with 28% of subjects with a primary care provider. We found that patients seeing a dermatologist often had unmet preventive health needs. Dermatologists and primary care providers must work together to provide optimal skin care and preventive health care needs for the patient.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Implications of a utility model for ultraviolet exposure behavior.

Over the past several decades, the incidence of skin cancer has reached epidemic proportions. Despite numerous efforts to increase public awareness of the risks associated with solar radiation, people continue to sunbathe, use indoor tanning facilities, avoid photoprotective clothing, and fail to use sunscreen. We propose using an economic model, the utility model, to better understand how to reduce tanning behaviors. This model has been widely applied in financial decision-making as well as in analysis of risk-taking behaviors such as smoking. The model takes into account both the current perceived benefits of tanning and the future long-term risks. People tend to discount the future; they tend to weigh current benefits more heavily than future risks. As predicted by the model, past prevention efforts that have focused on long-term benefits gained by sun-protective behavior have been largely ineffective. In the current social environment, we cannot expect tanning reduction measures based solely on health education to be very effective. Only by changing public perceptions of a tan will efforts to decrease ultraviolet exposure behavior likely be successful.

Decision Making↗