Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S R Feldman

Publications and source records attributed to S R Feldman.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Skin disease among Latino farmworkers in North Carolina.

An estimated 4.2 million seasonal and migrant farmworkers and their dependents live in the U.S. Most of these farmworkers are Latino. These workers are exposed to numerous occupational and environmental risk factors that can result in skin disease. Few data exist on the prevalence of skin disease in this population. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence and predictors of skin disease in a sample of Latino farmworkers in North Carolina. A sample of 59 farmworkers was recruited and interviewed at two camps during the 2004 agricultural season. A dermatologist completed a skin exam of each worker and recorded any skin disease present. Forty-two (77.7%) of the 54 men, and all five of the women examined had a diagnosed skin disease. For the men, onychomycosis (nail fungus, 31.5%), tinea pedis (foot fungus, 27.8%), and acne (24.1 %) were the most commonly diagnosed skin diseases, with contact dermatitis diagnosed in 5.6% of the sample. Other diagnoses included scars, sunburn, and atopic dermatitis. Among the women, diagnoses included melasma (dark patches on the face, 2 cases), xerosis (excessively dry skin, 1 case), tinea pedis (2 cases), onychomycosis (1 case), acne (1 case), and insect bites (1 case). There were no statistically significant differences between workers in the two camps despite different growing seasons and different crops harvested. Skin disease is prevalent among the North Carolina Latino farmworkers who participated in this study, with fungal disease being the most prevalent.

Acne Vulgaris↗

Systemic treatment for moderate to severe psoriasis: estimates of failure rates and direct medical costs in a north-eastern US managed care plan.

BACKGROUND: Estimates of US medical costs related to psoriasis treatment are limited and tend to understate the economic burden of moderate to severe psoriasis, which often requires the use of systemic agents, phototherapy or both. OBJECTIVE: To estimate treatment failure rates and direct medical costs associated with the use of systemic agents and phototherapy in US patients with psoriasis. METHODS: Claims records from a large New England-based health insurer were used to obtain patient-level data. Eligible patients with at least one claim listing an ICD-9-CM code for psoriasis (696.0; 696.1) were identified. Patients not receiving systemic treatments (methotrexate, cyclosporine, acitretin) or phototherapy (ultraviolet B with or without tar or petrolatum, psoralen and ultraviolet A [PUVA]) were excluded. Treatment failure was defined as a switch in therapy, augmentation with non-topical therapies, discontinuation following uptitration of dose or discontinuation following hospitalization. Medical costs included those related to pharmacy (over-the-counter medication excluded), institutional services (inpatient and outpatient) and professional services. RESULTS: A total of 2068 patients with moderate to severe psoriasis were included in the analysis. Over a 1-year period, approximately 20% of patients experienced treatment failure. The mean time to failure among patients who switched therapy ranged from 3 to 6 months. Mean annual pharmacy costs in the various treatment groups (categorized according to initial therapy received) ranged from 257 dollars to 1992 dollars per patient. Mean annual costs for institutional and professional services ranged from 156 dollars to 799 dollars and 183 dollars to 481 dollars per patient, respectively. The 99th percentile annual pharmacy and institutional costs exceeded 10,000 dollars and 18,000 dollars, respectively. CONCLUSION: Treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis with traditional systemic agents or phototherapy is associated with a high likelihood of treatment failure and a considerable economic burden.

Acitretin↗

Infliximab treatment results in significant improvement in the quality of life of patients with severe psoriasis: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a chronic disease that significantly diminishes the health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Infliximab is a chimeric, tumour necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody that has been shown to improve the signs and symptoms of plaque psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of infliximab induction therapy on the HRQOL of patients with severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 249 patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenous infusions of 3 or 5 mg kg(-1) of infliximab or placebo and were treated at weeks 0, 2 and 6. Patients completed the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at baseline and week 10. RESULTS: Infliximab induction therapy resulted in a substantial improvement in HRQOL. At week 10, patients in the infliximab 3- and 5-mg kg(-1) groups showed a median percentage improvement in DLQI scores of 84.0% and 91.0%, respectively, compared with 0% in the placebo group (P < 0.001). The median decrease from baseline in DLQI score at week 10 was 8.0 and 10.0 for the 3 and 5 mg kg(-1) infliximab groups, respectively, compared with 0 in the placebo group (P < 0.001). Thirty-three per cent and 40% of patients in the 3 and 5 mg kg(-1) infliximab groups, respectively, had a DLQI score of 0 at week 10, compared with 2% in the placebo group (P < 0.001). There was a strong correlation between the percentage change from baseline at week 10 in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores and the percentage change in DLQI scores during the same period (Spearman's correlation, 0.61, P < 0.001). When the infliximab and placebo treatment groups were combined, patients with at least 75% improvement in PASI scores between baseline and week 10 had a greater mean improvement in DLQI scores (81%) than those with 50-75% improvement in PASI during the same period (60%). CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab induction therapy resulted in significant improvement in HRQOL in patients with severe psoriasis.

Adult↗

Psoriasis assessment tools in clinical trials.

In clinical practice, broad global assessments of psoriasis disease activity and its effect on patients' quality of life are used to assess the severity of patients' disease and their response to treatment. In clinical trials, more objective, validated instruments are required. Several such instruments have been developed and continue to be developed to provide an assessment of the severity of the skin lesions. Because a lesion's impact on patients' lives varies widely among patients, there has been growing recognition of the need to measure the quality of life impact of the disease along with the severity of the lesions.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

A quantitative definition of severe psoriasis for use in clinical trials.

Clinical trials of new agents for severe psoriasis require clear, well-characterized and objective measurement criteria to define the study population. The purpose of this paper is to offer parameters defining 'severe' psoriasis for use in clinical trials. If patients have at least 10% body surface area (BSA) involved and a psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score > or =12, they have severe disease. While this definition assures inclusion of only patients with severe disease, a disadvantage is that some patients with truly severe disease (as defined by the impact of their disease on their quality of life) will be excluded. It is necessary to accept this trade off in order to have objective criteria, consistent across centers involved in clinical trials, for identifying patients affected by severe psoriasis.

Body Surface Area↗

A maintenance protocol for psoriasis plaques cleared by the 308 nm excimer laser.

OBJECTIVE: Using the 308 nm excimer laser, to evaluate the effectiveness of tapering the dose frequency on maintaining the clearance of psoriasis plaques after at least 75% clearance of a target plaque was achieved. METHODS: This prospective case series, conducted at a university-based dermatology practice, enrolled five adults with stable, mild-to-moderate plaque-type psoriasis vulgaris. Patients received 308 nm UVB doses to affected areas. Initial dosing was based on multiples of a pre-determined minimal erythema dose (MED). Delivered fluences were 100, 150, 200, 250, 300 and 350 mJ/cm(2), corresponding to MED levels of 1 through 6. Subsequent doses were based on response to treatment. Induction treatments were scheduled biweekly for a total of 15 treatments. After improvement of disease, tapering began as follows: one treatment per week for 4 weeks, one treatment every other week for 4 weeks, and one final treatment 4 weeks later for a total of seven treatments. The main outcome measure was maintenance of disease improvement as determined by the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score and percentage improvement of target lesion and total body disease during and after the laser therapy taper. A flare was defined as a 25% worsening of the percentage improvement. RESULTS: All five patients completed the protocol. All patients achieved > or = 75% clearance of target plaques. No flares were noted upon completing the first month of the taper in any patient, either per percentage improvement or per PASI scores. One month after the second month of the taper (total of six treatments), no flares were noted and four out of five patients had no flares per PASI scores. No patients, either at the end of induction or at any interval during the taper, met the definition of a 50% rebound of PASI scores. Adverse effects included erythema, blisters, hyperpigmentation and erosions. All were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Our results reaffirm that biweekly UVB laser treatments promote clearance of psoriatic plaques. A tapering of laser treatments may be beneficial in maintaining the level of plaque clearance obtained from biweekly laser treatments. Randomized, prospective trials are needed to establish laser therapy protocols for maintaining the plaque clearance achieved with the 308 nm excimer laser.

Adult↗

Giving patients 'perceived control' over psoriasis: advice for optimizing the physician-patient relationship.

Patients with psoriasis suffer from the effects of a chronic illness. One of the most bothersome aspects of the disease is a sense of loss of 'control.' 'Perceived control' is an important and well-studied psychological concept. The literature on perceived control offers guidance to help improve the physician-patient relationship and outcomes in chronic diseases such as psoriasis. Practical suggestions include the use of materials and other resources offered by patient advocacy groups (such as those from the National Psoriasis Foundation) and the development of a physician-patient relationship that gives the patient a sense of control of their disease.

Humans↗

Treatment of pityriasis versicolor in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Pityriasis versicolor is a common chronic superficial fungal infection of the skin. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine the frequency of visits for pityriasis versicolor and to assess how it is currently being treated. METHODS: Data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care survey were used from the years 1990-1999. RESULTS: There were 2.9 million visits per year in which pityriasis (tinea) versicolor was listed as a diagnosis; this corresponds to a visit rate of 110 visits per 100,000 persons per year. Visit rates varied among racial and ethnic groups, with the highest visit rates for black people and American Indians/Eskimos. A total of 76% of the medications listed at visits for pityriasis versicolor are FDA approved for the condition; however, many treatments that were prescribed were not. CONCLUSIONS: Given that as many as one-quarter of treatments prescribed for this easily treatable condition are inappropriate, continued education of medical practitioners concerning appropriate treatment options is needed.

Ambulatory Care↗

Prescribing practices for seborrheic dermatitis vary with the physician's specialty: implications for clinical practice.

The prescribing practices of different medical specialties (dermatology, family medicine, pediatrics and other) for seborrheic dermatitis were analyzed using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS). The frequency of use of various antifungal and anti-inflammatory medications was found to differ greatly between specialties, with the greatest difference being seen between dermatologists (who frequently prescribe the antifungal ketoconazole) and non-dermatologists (who most frequently prescribe corticosteroids).

Adolescent↗

Class I topical corticosteroid use by psoriasis patients in an academic practice.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a chronic skin disorder that can have a profound impact on the quality of life of patients. The treatment of psoriasis is complicated by the availability of numerous topical agents, systemic agents, and phototherapy. Of the topical preparations available, the ultra-high potency, or Class I steroids, have an important role in treating psoriasis. Their use is most appropriate for the treatment of plaques in regions excluding the face, axilla, groin and genitals. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the prescribing patterns of Class I topical corticosteroids within a large academic dermatology practice for patients with all types of psoriasis. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 650 patients with psoriasis from an academic dermatology practice was performed. Class I steroid use was defined as those patients who were observed to be currently using clobetasol propionate, halobetasol propionate, diflorasone, or augmented betamethasone dipropionate. RESULTS: A total of 79% of patients were prescribed topical steroids of any class while 46% of patients were prescribed a Class I steroid. In all, 58% of patients who received topical steroid therapy received a Class I agent; 11% of patients prescribed Class I steroids also received systemic therapy for their psoriasis. Conversely, 35% of patients who received systemic therapy were also receiving Class I topical therapy. DISCUSSION: In our department, Class I topical steroids are commonly used in the treatment of psoriasis. The superpotent topicals are often used as an adjunct to systemic therapy and will likely remain a mainstay of psoriasis therapy.

Administration, Topical↗

Racial differences in the treatment of pigmentation disorders in outpatient settings: analysis of US national practice data.

OBJECTIVE: Pigmentary disorders tend to disproportionately affect individuals with darker skin pigmentation. An understanding of why certain patients or races present more frequently to physicians would help guide attempts for early interventions and education for these patients. METHODS: Data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (1996-2000) were used to examine associations between the race/ethnicity of the patient and the type of skin-related visit. We examined the impact of non-white (and separately, black) individuals and Hispanic ethnicity on the probability of a pigmentary disorder or non-pigmentary disorder-related outpatient physician visit in weighted multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: Non-white patients have a higher probability of a pigmentary disorder-related skin condition visit than white patients (RR: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.29, 1.31). Black patients are more likely than non-black patients to be seen for a pigmentary disorder (RR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.04). Hispanic patients are less likely to be seen for a pigmentary disorder (RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.90, 0.91). This is in contrast to non-pigmentary skin disorder-related visits, where non-white, black, as well as Hispanic patients have a lower probability of visits than white individuals. CONCLUSIONS: There is a race-related differential in the treatment of pigmentary skin disorders, with non-white patients having a probability of receiving more care for these conditions in US outpatient settings. This lends support to our hypothesis that darker pigmentation in non-white populations is the driver of a differential in the utilization of pigmentation-related skin visits.

Ambulatory Care↗

A topical azithromycin preparation for the treatment of acne vulgaris and rosacea.

BACKGROUND: Erythromycin is a common therapy for acne and rosacea. A newer macrolide, azithromycin, offers superior tissue distribution and cellular concentration and is an effective oral anti-acne agent. Topical formulations such as erythromycin have been a major clinical therapy for acne. To date, no topical solution of azithromycin is available for the treatment of acne. OBJECTIVE: To prepare a stable topical 2% azithromycin formulation that could be used in an acne clinical trial to determine the efficacy of topical azithromycin in treating subjects with acne vulgaris and acne rosacea. METHODS: The study was divided into two phases. In phase I, azithromycin was prepared over a range of ethanol/water concentrations to determine solubility. The stability of a 2% azithromycin in 60% ethanol/water preparation was assessed by high-pressure liquid chromatography. The temperature, light, and pH dependence of the stability was also assessed. In phase II, a single center, randomized, double-blind, treatment-controlled study compared once-nightly application of topical 2% azithromycin versus 2% erythromycin. A total of 20 subjects with moderate inflammatory acne and 20 with rosacea were examined clinically at 0, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks for a 12-week period. Efficacy was evaluated with the Physician's Visual Analog Scale evaluation (PVAS), the papulopustule count, and acne severity rating (in subjects with acne). RESULTS: In phase I, azithromycin was soluble in 60% ethanol/water. A 2% azithromycin in 60% ethanol/water solution maintained stability at room temperature for up to 26 weeks but at 37 degrees C there was some decay (16%) at 26 weeks. The stability was greatest at pH 6.8 and was unaffected by ambient light exposure. In phase II, the number of inflammatory lesions decreased in both acne and rosacea subjects treated with 2% erythromycin (7.56, p=0.03 and 4.4, p=0.01, respectively). Azithromycin was not as effective for the treatment of rosacea. Both azithromycin (p=0.01) and erythromycin (p=0.03) treatment significantly reduced the inflammatory lesion count in acne vulgaris. No significant adverse events were identified in the acne group. In patients with rosacea, transient irritation occurred in five patients. CONCLUSIONS: A 2% azithromycin in 60% ethanol/water solution can be prepared and is stable for at least 6 months at room temperature. The methodology and power of the study were adequate to identify improvement in acne vulgaris and rosacea. Though it appears the formulation of topical azithromycin was at least comparable with topical erythromycin, larger studies would be needed to determine whether topical azithromycin has any significant advantage over topical erythromycin.

Acne Vulgaris↗

Improved health-related quality of life following a randomized controlled trial of alefacept treatment in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis has a negative impact on patients' quality of life. Treatment strategies should address both the cutaneous manifestations of the disease and their impact on quality of life. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of alefacept on quality of life in 553 patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. METHODS: In this multicentre, double-blind, parallel-groups study, patients were randomized to receive alefacept for two courses, alefacept in course 1 and placebo in course 2, or placebo in course 1 and alefacept in course 2. In each course, alefacept 7.5 mg or placebo was administered once weekly by 30-s intravenous injection for 12 weeks followed by 12 weeks of observation. The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Dermatology Quality of Life Scales (DQOLS) and Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) were administered at baseline, 2 weeks after the last dose in both courses, at the beginning of course 2, and at the end of the observation period in both courses. RESULTS: In course 1, alefacept significantly reduced (improved) mean DLQI scores compared with placebo: 4.4 vs. 1.8 at 2 weeks after the last dose (P<0.0001) and 3.4 vs. 1.4 at 12 weeks after the last dose (P<0.001). Patients who received two courses of alefacept experienced additional enhancement of quality of life measures during the second course. Similar results were observed for the DQOLS. The SF-36 survey confirmed that alefacept had no negative impact on general quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Alefacept improved quality of life in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis and maintained this benefit for at least 12 weeks following cessation of treatment. A second course of alefacept provided additional quality of life benefit.

Adolescent↗

Anger and acne: implications for quality of life, patient satisfaction and clinical care.

BACKGROUND: Acne is a common skin disorder with a significant psychological and social impact for some people. Little is known about how personality and emotional traits affect acne and its impact on quality of life and treatment. Trait anger (TA), which is related to heart disease and other morbidities, may also affect acne and patients' adjustment to it. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relationship between TA and acne severity, skin-related quality of life, satisfaction with treatment, and adherence to treatment. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A sample of 479 individuals with acne completed a survey instrument to assess acne severity, skin care practices, skin-related quality of life, satisfaction with treatment, adherence, TA and demographic variables. Respondents who reported high TA were compared with individuals with low TA on outcome variables. Regression analyses adjusted for covariates and identified the significant predictors of quality of life, satisfaction and adherence. RESULTS: High TA was unrelated to acne severity (P = 0.2) or frequency of face washing (P = 0.9). Anger was significantly related to both global quality of life (P < 0.001) and skin-related quality of life (P = 0.002) as well as to satisfaction with treatment (P = 0.001) and adherence to treatment advice (P = 0.05) in bivariate analyses. Regression analyses revealed that high TA remained a significant predictor of global (P < 0.001) and skin-related quality of life (P = 0.003) and satisfaction with treatment (P = 0.04), but not adherence to treatment advice (P = 0.8) after controlling for covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Anger is associated with the quality of patients' lives and with their satisfaction with treatment. Care of acne patients should include attention to anger and other chronic emotional states, quality of life, as well as to clinical severity. Simple guidelines are suggested for how clinicians might approach this important aspect of care.

Acne Vulgaris↗