Biomedical subjects
S Boon
Publications and source records attributed to S Boon.
Handling sharps with care.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Multiple personality disorder in The Netherlands: a clinical investigation of 71 patients.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the phenomenology of multiple personality disorder as presented in a group of Dutch patients. METHOD: Seventy-one patients with multiple personality disorder were interviewed with the Dutch version of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Dissociative Disorders (SCID-D); following the SCID-D, the Structured Trauma Interview was administered. Before the interview, patients completed the Dissociative Experiences Scale. RESULTS: The presenting characteristics of the patients showed a striking resemblance to those in several large North American series. Patients had spent an average of 8.2 years in the mental health system prior to correct diagnosis. Patients presented with many different symptoms and frequently received other psychiatric or neurological diagnoses. A history of childhood physical and/or sexual abuse was reported by 94.4% of the subjects, and 80.6% met criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with multiple personality disorder have a stable set of core symptoms throughout North America as well as in Europe. To improve the detection of patients at high risk for multiple personality disorder, standardized instruments for inquiry about dissociative pathology should be used as part of routine diagnostic assessment.
Diagnosing dissociative disorders in The Netherlands: a pilot study with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Dissociative Disorders.
OBJECTIVE: To improve the ability to diagnose dissociative disorders in The Netherlands, the authors conducted a study using a Dutch version of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Dissociative Disorders (SCID-D) with additional questions on childhood trauma and symptoms of borderline and histrionic personality disorders. METHOD: All interviews were audiotaped or videotaped and rated by two investigators separately. Forty-four patients (42 women and two men) participated in the study. Most of the patients had been referred for evaluation of dissociative symptoms; five had participated in a nationwide survey on incest. None of the patients had ever received a diagnosis of a dissociative disorder, and none had evidence of organic brain syndrome or mental retardation. All patients were in active treatment; 23 were being treated in an outpatient psychiatric service, 13 in an inpatient psychiatric service, and eight in private practice. Thirty-two patients had been psychiatric inpatients at least once. RESULTS: Four diagnostic groups of patients were identified: two with dissociative disorders (12 patients with multiple personality disorder and 11 with dissociative disorder not otherwise specified), one with DSM-III-R personality disorders (11 patients), and one without dissociative or personality disorders (10 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Dissociative disorders are clearly not only an American phenomenon. The diagnosis can be made outside of the United States if the symptoms are sought. The SCID-D proved to be a promising instrument.
Multiple personality disorder.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Tradimus. Job opportunities: on yer bike.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.