Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Trèves

Publications and source records attributed to R Trèves.

64 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

[Preventive therapy for nausea and vomiting in patients on opioid therapy for non-malignant pain in rheumatology].

OBJECTIVE: To determine if systematic use of metoclopramide associated with opioids (Morphine sulfate SR) decreases the incidence of nausea and vomiting (N&V), established adverse effects of opioids. METHOD: Open randomised study with 132 patients treated for non malignant pain (71 women, 61 men, mean age 53.4 years). One group (n = 76) was treated with morphine alone; the other (n = 56) with morphine plus metoclopramide. Mean duration of therapy: 6 days; mean dosage: 60 mg/d RESULTS: In the 2 groups, N&V were present in the first 72 hours. The frequency of N&V in the morphine group was 38.1% (conform with the literature). The systematic use of metoclopramide decreases the frequency of N&V: p < 0.005. However the use of morphine > 60 mg/d decreases N&V: p = 0.036. High dosages of morphine can have an antiemetic effect by interaction with the mu receptors in the antiemetic center and not in the trigger zone which has an emetic effect. CONCLUSION: The systematic use of metoclopramide with opioid therapy for non malignant pain in rheumatology decreases the risk of nausea and vomiting.

Aged↗

[Dupuytren's disease].

Dupuytren's disease is a contracture of the hand derived from the retractile fibrosis of the palmar aponeurosis, that leads to a progressive deformity in flexion of fingers. It has been named from the French surgeon Guillaume Dupuytren (1777-1835), that described it in 1831. In this note it is sketched a short biography of Dupuytren and the main clinical features of the disease are described, underlining some particular aspects of therapy.

Adult↗

[Prospective study of the analgesic action of clomipramine versus placebo in refractory lumbosciatica (68 cases)].

The authors sought to determine the analgesic activity of clomipramine (CMP) versus placebo, efficacy and side-effects according to the time of administration, long term clinical results and the relationship between plasma levels and analgesic effect. This double-blind randomised trial involved the infusion of 250 ml of glucose solution morning and evening versus placebo. CMP was administered at progressive doses for 8 days (maximum dosage 75 mg), either in the morning at 8 a.m. or in the evening at 6 p.m. Sixty eight patients accepted to be treated, all suffering from low back pain with or without sciatica. Maintenance treatment at the dose of 75 mg/day was then administered. CMP had a statistically significant analgesic action independent (rapidity of action) of its antidepressant activity. CMP was more effective and better tolerated (sedative and tranquilizer effect) in the evening. Long term results were poor (75% of cases). There was no link between plasma levels and clinical response. The authors noted that the analgesic activity of CMP was rapid, but for a duration limited to the short term and that this efficacy compared with the quite good results obtained with the placebo could be explained by a possible methodological bias (patients hospitalised and treated by intravenous infusions). The finding that CMP was better tolerated in the evening, without any loss of efficacy, is a positive feature (chronotherapeutic trial). Poor long term results could be partially explained by side-effects (66%). There was no relationship between analgesic effect and plasma levels.

Adult↗

[Muscular metastases. A case report (author's transl)].

Muscular metastases are exceptionally reported. The authors present a case of crural neuralgia in relation with a localisation in the psoas iliacus of a gastric carcinoma. A review of literature defines the rarity of this facts (156 cases) the etiology (carcinome more often) and the explication who is still obscur.

Adenocarcinoma↗

[Sulfasalazine or salazosulfapyridine in the treatment of rheumatoid polyarthritis. An open study of 46 patients. Review of the literature].

The SASP was studied in 46 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The efficacy criteria which were selected (decrease of the sed rate by more than 50 p. cent during the first hour, morning stiffness under 20 minutes, Ritchie's index inferior to 10 and decreased cortisone and NSAID doses), explain that 25 p. cent of the patients are considered as satisfied after 12 months of trial. The patients selected, present severe forms of the disease or forms resistant to other treatments. The improvement appears significant after the first month. Half of the patients left the trial either because of ineffectiveness, or evolutive relapse (21.73 p. cent) or because of side-effects (28.26 p. cent). The most frequently observed disorders and intolerances are of digestive nature. No serious accident is to be deplored. Such results are in accordance with the data from the literature. The SASP must therefore be considered as the fundamental treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. The new galenic forms, dissolving in the gastro-intestinal tract, have enabled to markedly improve the digestive tolerance.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗