Biomedical subjects

R A Good

Publications and source records attributed to R A Good.

At least 811 records · Page 45Linked to original sources

PubMed1974

Effect of transfer factor therapy on mixed lymphocyte culture reactivity.

We have studied the effect of dialyzable transfer factor therapy on three patients with immunodeficiency disease and in one patient who demonstrated no evidence of deficiency of either humoral or cellular immunity. We found evidence for nonspecificity in the effect of transfer factor on mixed lymphocyte culture reactivity. The data suggest that in patients with immunodeficiency disease a maturation of lymphocytes may lead to a generalized increased immune responsiveness. More profoundly, our data show that transfer factor may induce changes in the expression of histocompatibility determinants. We observed changes in the expression of determinants capable of stimulating in the mixed lymphocyte culture reaction as well as an increase in the capacity of lymphocytes to respond.

Antigens, Bacterial↗

PubMed1974

A functional examination of hapten-binding derivatives from a murine myeloma protein with immunoglobulin features.

Various enzymatic derivatives of the murine myeloma protein IgA(MOPC-315) were subjected to hapten-binding quantitation and circular dichroic analysis in an attempt to ascertain the structural localization and functional definition of the immunoglobulin active site. The extrinsic Cotton effects observed with near saturation of the active site of the derivatives using epsilon-Dnp-L-lysine were qualitatively and quantitatively identical when normalized with respect to their macromolecular content of Dnp-binding sites; ellipticity maxima of 378 and 438 nm and an ellipticity minimum of 325 nm were recorded. Fluorescence quenching data confirmed the molecular nature of the derivation products of IgA(MOPC-315) but also introduced disparity with respect to binding kinetics, i.e., K values of 2.31 x 10(6), 6.62 x 10(6), and 2.06 x 10(7) M(-1) were determined for IgA(MOPC-315), Fab'(MOPC-315), and Fv(MOPC-315), respectively. We speculate that the results can be explained by possible modulating effects on haptenbinding contributed by novel conformations introduced through proteolysis.

Animals↗

PubMed1974

Protection of lethally irradiated mice by spleen cells from neonatally thymectomized mice.

Long-lived, immunologically vigorous (C3H(f) x A(f))F(1) hybrids were produced after lethal irradiation by administration of spleen cells from C3H(f) or syngeneic donors. Further, neonatally thymectomized C3H(f) or A(f) strain donors reconstituted irradiated C3H(f) or (C3H(f) x A(f))F(1) hosts. In addition, C3H(f) spleen cells from nonthymectomized 10- to 15-day-old donors protected irradiated hybrid mice, but A(f) cells of young mice as well as of older mice produced graft-versus-host reaction and early death in irradiated C3H(f) or (C3H(f) x A(f))F(1) hybrids. Abrogation of secondary disease by treatment of irradiated mice with spleen cells from allogeneic neonatally thymectomized mice is possibly attributable to diminished immunologic competence of the cells grafted, followed by the development of immunological tolerance of the donor cells. Donor cells, receiving thymus influence in the recipient host after transplantation, could explain the long-lived immunologically vigorous radiation chimeras that did not experience graft-versus-host reactions. The findings of this study help to understand the differential susceptibility of A(f) and C3H(f) mice to development of tolerance to one another's antigens observed in prior investigations. It appears that, in these mice, the host thymus influences the maturation of the spleen cells from young mice or from neonatally thymectomized mice. However, this influence was often greater in mice given 767 rads than in those given 1046 rads. This differential influence is possibly attributable to irradiation damage to the thymus produced by the higher dose of irradiation. Spleen cells from neonatally thymectomized mice can be differentiated and expanded by the thymus of the host. The differential susceptibility of T(1), early differentiation stages, of thymus-dependent lymphocytes and T(2), late differentiation stages, of thymus-dependent lymphocytes to tolerance induction and immunostimulation, respectively, are proposed as the bases for these otherwise paradoxical influences.

Animals↗

PubMed1974