Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Verdecchia

Publications and source records attributed to P Verdecchia.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Task Force II: blood pressure measurement and cardiovascular outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To reach a consensus on the prognostic significance of new techniques of automated blood pressure measurement. METHODS: A Task Force on the prognostic significance of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring wrote this review in preparation for the Eighth International Consensus Conference (28-31 October 2001, Sendai, Japan). This synopsis was amended to account for opinions aired at the conference and to reflect the common ground reached in the discussions. POINTS OF CONSENSUS: (1) Prospective studies in treated and untreated hypertensive patients and in the general population have demonstrated that, even after adjusting for established risk factors, the incidence of cardiovascular events is correlated with blood pressure on conventional as well as ambulatory measurement. Ambulatory monitoring, however, significantly refines the prediction already provided by conventional blood pressure measurement. (2) White-coat hypertension is usually defined as an elevated clinic blood pressure in the presence of a normal daytime ambulatory blood pressure. Event-based studies in hypertensive patients have convincingly demonstrated that the risk of cardiovascular disease is less in patients with white-coat hypertension than in those with higher ambulatory blood pressure levels even after controlling for concomitant risk factors. Based on prognostic evidence, white-coat hypertension can now be defined as a conventional blood pressure that is persistently equal to or greater than 140/90 mmHg with an average daytime ambulatory blood pressure of below 135/85 mmHg. The issue of whether or not white-coat hypertension predisposes to sustained hypertension needs further research. (3) There is a growing body of evidence showing that a decreased nocturnal fall in blood pressure (<10% of the daytime level) is associated with a worse prognosis, irrespective of whether night-time dipping is studied as a continuous or a class variable. (4) Intermittent techniques of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring are limited in terms of quantifying short-term blood pressure variability. Proven cardiovascular risk factors such as old age, a higher than usual blood pressure and diabetes mellitus are often associated with greater short-term blood pressure variability. After adjusting for these risk factors, some - but not all - studies have nevertheless reported an independent and positive relationship between cardiovascular outcome and measures of variability of daytime and night-time blood pressure, for example standard deviation. (5) Reference values for ambulatory blood pressure measurement in children are currently based on statistical parameters of blood pressure distribution. In children and adolescents, functional rather than distribution-based definitions of ambulatory hypertension have yet to be developed. (6) Several studies of gestational hypertension have shown that, compared with office measurement, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is a better predictor of maternal and fetal complications. Pregnancy is a special indication for ambulatory monitoring so that the white-coat effect can be measured and pregnant women are not given antihypertensive drugs unnecessarily. (7) Ambulatory pulse pressure and the QKD interval are measurements obtained by ambulatory monitoring that to some extent reflect the functional characteristics of the large arteries. The QKD interval is correlated with left ventricular mass, and ambulatory pulse pressure is a strong predictor of cardiovascular outcome. (8) Under standardized conditions, the self-measurement of blood pressure is equally as effective as ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in identifying the white-coat effect, but further studies are required to elucidate fully the prognostic accuracy of self-measured blood pressure in comparison with conventional and ambulatory blood pressure measurement. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory blood pressure measurement refines the prognostic information provided by conventional blood pressure readings obtained in the clinic or the doctor's office. Longitudinal studies of patients with white-coat hypertension should clarify the transient, persistent or progressive nature of this condition, particularly in paediatric patients, in whom white-coat hypertension may be a harbinger of sustained hypertension and target-organ damage in adulthood. Finally, the applicability, cost-effectiveness and long-term prognostic accuracy of the self-measurement of blood pressure should be evaluated in relation to conventional blood pressure measurement and ambulatory monitoring.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Original articles prognostic value of combined echocardiography and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in hypertensive patients at low or medium cardiovascular risk.

BACKGROUND: The clinical value of echocardiography and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in hypertensive patients at low immediate risk of cardiovascular disease is still unknown. METHODS: Echocardiography and ABPM were performed in 715 untreated subjects with essential hypertension World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension stage I or II and low or medium cardiovascular risk defined by the absence of diabetes, previous cardiovascular events, left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy at electrocardiography, proteinuria, stages III-IV retinopathy and creatinine levels > 106.08 mmoll (1.2 mg/dl) and the presence of one or two traditional risk factors. RESULTS: The LV mass was increased in 26.5% of these subjects. Subjects with a limited blood pressure reduction from day to night (non-dippers) were 11.3%. Over 1-13 years of follow-up, 31 subjects developed a first major cardiovascular event. The event rate (per 100 person-years) was 0.60 in the subgroup with a normal LV mass vs 1.63 in that with an increased LV mass (p < 0.017), and 0.74 in dippers vs 3.75 in non-dippers (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, the relative risk of cardiovascular events was 1.70 (95% confidence interval-CI 1.23-2.36) for each 11 g/m(2.7) increment in LV mass (p < 0.01), and 2.77 (95% CI 1.12-6.83) in non-dippers vs dippers (p < 0.05). Overall, on the basis of results of combined echocardiography and ABPM, 33% of subjects were at increased risk of future cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: At standard first-line work-up performed on hypertensive subjects at low or medium cardiovascular risk, combined echocardiography and ABPM identify an increase in the risk of subsequent cardiovascular disease in one third of subjects.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed2001

[Pulse pressure and mean pressure: physiopathology and predictive value of coronary events and ictus].

Increased pulse pressure (PP) reflects an increased stiffness of aorta and other large elastic arteries. These arteries dilate by about 10% during systole and contract owing to elastic return during diastole. As a result, blood flow towards periphery becomes less pulsatile and more continuous. An increased stiffness of aorta and large elastic arteries due to progressively reduced elastic content with aging (atherosclerotic processes) leads to increased systolic blood pressure (BP), because of their reduced distension during systole, and decreased diastolic BP due to their reduced blood content at the beginning of diastole. Several epidemiological studies have shown that PP is the BP component which most closely predicts cardiovascular risk, particularly over 55 years of age. In particular, increased PP is an important predictor of coronary events, while increased mean BP is a more specific predictor of cerebrovascular events.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed2000

Subclinical left ventricular dysfunction in systemic hypertension and the role of 24-hour blood pressure.

The relation between blood pressure (BP) and left ventricular (LV) systolic function in systemic hypertension is controversial. We assessed the relation of LV midwall fractional shortening (FS) to 24-hour BP in 1,702 never-treated hypertensive subjects (age 48 +/- 12 years), who underwent 24-hour BP monitoring and echocardiography. Stress-corrected endocardial and midwall FS (the latter calculated taking into account the epicardial migration of midwall during systole) were predicted in hypertensives on the basis of the values observed in 130 healthy normotensives (age 43 +/- 13 years, office BP 126/78 mm Hg). Subjects below the fifth percentile of observed-to-predicted FS had depressed LV function. The use of midwall FS resulted in an increase from 3.5% to 17.5% in the proportion of patients with depressed chamber function. Compared with the group with normal function, subjects with low midwall LV function had similar office systolic BP (155 +/- 21 vs 154 +/- 17 mm Hg), but increased 24-hour systolic BP (140 +/- 17 vs 133 +/- 12 mm Hg, p <0.001). Midwall FS had a closer negative relation to 24-hour systolic BP than to office systolic BP (r = -0.27 vs -0.08, p <0.001), whereas this difference was not apparent for diastolic BP (r = -0.23 vs -0.20). Compared with endocardial FS, midwall FS had a stronger inverse association to LV mass (r = -0.45 vs -0.16, p <0.001). Thus, an increased 24-hour BP load may chronically lead to depressed myocardial function in systemic hypertension in the absence of clinically overt heart disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Clinical relevance of office underestimation of usual blood pressure in treated hypertension.

Average 24-h blood pressure (BP) is more representative of usual BP than office BP. However, the clinical relevance of 24-h BP in treated hypertensive subjects is incompletely known. Thus, we studied 395 uncomplicated hypertensive subjects (209 men, 53+/-10 years) who were receiving antihypertensive drug therapy from >1 year. All subjects underwent 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring and M-mode echocardiography. Subjects were classified by tertile of the difference between observed and predicted 24-h systolic BP (the latter determined by regressing 24-h systolic BP on office systolic BP): higher-than-predicted (III tertile), around the regression line (II tertile), and lower-that-predicted (I tertile) 24-h BP. Despite similar office BP (144/89, 141/88, and 144/89 mm Hg in the III, II, and I tertile, P = not significant), age, body mass index, and duration of hypertension, left ventricular mass was greater in the subjects with higher-than-predicted 24-h systolic BP (50+/-14 g x m(-2.7)) than in the other two groups (46+/-13 g x m(-2.7) and 42+/-10 g x m(-2.7), both P < .05). The III tertile also showed a more concentric left ventricular geometric pattern (relative wall thickness was 0.42+/-0.08, 0.40+/-0.07, and 0.38+/-0.07 in the III, II, and I tertile, P < .001) and a reduced systolic function at the midwall level (16.8+/-3, 17.7+/-3, and 18.2+/-3, P < .001). In conclusion, treated hypertensive subjects whose 24-h BP is notably higher than one would predict from office BP are more likely to develop left ventricular hypertrophy, a strong adverse prognostic marker. In a sizable subset of treated hypertensive subjects, BP measured in the physician's office underestimates usual BP and its impact on left ventricular structure.

Antihypertensive Agents↗
PubMed2000

Arterial wall thickening at different sites and its association with left ventricular hypertrophy in newly diagnosed essential hypertension.

The impact of hypertension on vascular structure at different arterial sites and the relation of vascular hypertrophy with left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy in the early stages of essential hypertension are unclear. In 96 newly diagnosed, never-treated, uncomplicated hypertensive subjects aged < 55 years (43 +/- 9 years, 68 men, clinic blood pressure 152/99 mm Hg, 24-h blood pressure 135/89 mm Hg), we measured LV mass (M-mode echocardiography) and intima-media thickness (IMT) of the carotid and femoral arteries (high-resolution B-mode ultrasound). The average of 24 carotid and 24 femoral IMT readings (common and internal carotid or common and superficial femoral, right and left side, far and near wall, three sampling points per segment) was analyzed. Carotid and femoral IMT were strongly related to each other (r = 0.77). Subjects with LV hypertrophy (n = 33) had a greater IMT at the carotid (0.84 +/- 0.2 v 0.71 +/- 0.2 mm, P < .0001) and femoral (0.77 +/- 0.1 v 0.64 +/- 0.1 mm, P < .0001) level. Carotid IMT showed a positive correlation with LV mass (r = 0.46) and age (r = 0.38), and an inverse one with high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (r = -0.26). Femoral IMT was associated positively to LV mass (r = 0.50), age (r = 0.33) and triglycerides (r = 0.29), and inversely to HDL-cholesterol (r = -0.33). The association between IMT (both carotid and femoral) and LV mass held after controlling for age and other confounders in a multiple regression analysis. In summary, in the early stages of hypertension arterial wall thickening appears to be a diffuse process, which occurs in parallel at the carotid and femoral level and shows a positive association with LV hypertrophy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Long-term effects of losartan and enalapril, alone or with a diuretic, on ambulatory blood pressure and cardiac performance in hypertension: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: The long-term effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers on ambulatory blood pressure and cardiac performance have never been examined comparatively. OBJECTIVE: We compared losartan and enalapril in their long-term effects on office and ambulatory blood pressure, cardiac structure and function, and routine biochemical tests. DESIGN: In the setting of the Progetto Ipertensione Umbria Monitoraggio Ambulatoriale (PIUMA) study, 22 hypertensive subjects were studied with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and echocardiography before and after an average of 3.3 years of treatment with losartan 50mg daily. These subjects were matched in a 1:3 ratio with a group of 66 subjects treated with enalapril 20mg daily. Case-control sampling was based on age (+/-5years), sex, pre-treatment office blood pressure (+/-5mmHg) and ambulatory blood pressure (+/-5mmHg), and duration of treatment (+/-6months). An additional group of subjects who interrupted their treatment with enalapril (n=18) or losartan (n =2) because of unwanted effects before execution of the follow-up study was not included in the analysis. RESULTS: Hydrochlorothiazide was added during follow-up in order to optimize blood pressure control (office blood pressure <140mmHg systolic and 90mmHg diastolic) in 10 subjects (45%) in the losartan group and 34 subjects (52%) in the enalapril group. Office and ambulatory blood pressures were lowered to a similar extent by losartan and enalapril. Left ventricular mass decreased from 98 to 87g/m(2) with losartan (P <0.01) and from 98 to 89 g/m(2) with enalapril (P <0.01). The change in left ventricular mass over time was more closely associated with the change in ambulatory blood pressure than with office blood pressure in both groups. Left ventricular internal diameter did not change with either drug. The endocardial shortening fraction, mid-wall shortening fraction and Doppler indexes of active diastolic relaxation did not change with either drug. None of the biochemical parameters showed a significant change. Serum uric acid showed a slight and non-significant reduction only in the losartan group. CONCLUSION: In this case-control study in uncomplicated subjects with essential hypertension, losartan and enalapril, alone or combined with a diuretic, effectively and equally lowered office and ambulatory blood pressure and induced a significant reduction in left ventricular mass during long-term treatment. Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function remained unchanged with either regimen.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Continuous relation between left ventricular mass and cardiovascular risk in essential hypertension.

The detection of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy on echocardiography is a powerful risk indicator in essential hypertension. However, the prognostic impact of LV mass values within the "normal" range and the shape of the relation between LV mass and prognosis remain unclear. Thus, 1925 white subjects with uncomplicated essential hypertension underwent off-therapy 24-hour blood pressure monitoring and M-mode echocardiography. During 4. 0+/-2 years of follow-up, there were 181 major cardiovascular events (2.4/100 patient-years) and 49 deaths from all causes. In the 5 gender-specific quintiles of LV mass distribution (partition values: 92, 105, 120, and 138 g/m(2) in men and 79, 91, 102, and 116 g/m(2) in women), cardiovascular event rates were 0.8, 1.7, 2.2, 2.9, and 4. 3 per 100 patient-years. After adjustment for several risk factors, including 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure, the relative risk (RR) of developing a cardiovascular event increased progressively from the first quintile (RR 1) to the second (RR 1.6, 95% CI 0.8 to 3.1), third (RR 1.9, 95% CI 1.01 to 4.0), fourth (RR 3.0, 95% CI 1.5 to 5. 8), and fifth (RR 3.5, 95% CI 1.8 to 6.8) quintile. For all-cause death, the RR in the fifth quintile compared with the first quintile was 4.3 (95% CI 1.2 to 13.4). In conclusion, the powerful relation between LV mass and risk of cardiovascular disease in subjects with uncomplicated essential hypertension is continuous over a wide range of LV mass values, even below the current "upper normal" limits. The relation remains significant after control for traditional risk factors, including ambulatory blood pressure.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure : current evidence and clinical implications.

This article is a critical review of the available evidence on the prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure (ABP). Several event-based cohort studies have shown that ABP improves cardiovascular risk stratification over and beyond traditional risk factors, including office BP. Most of these studies have been conducted in subjects with essential hypertension who were untreated at the time of execution of ABP monitoring; other studies have been conducted in subjects who were poorly controlled with treatment or in the general population. In these studies, ABP was examined as a continuous variable or with operational risk categories. Cardiovascular risk showed a direct and independent association with the observed ABP (systolic, diastolic, and pulse) and an inverse association with the degree of BP reduction from day to night. Cardiovascular risk was also directly associated with the difference between the observed value of ABP and that predicted from the office BP. White-coat hypertension versus ambulatory hypertension and dippers versus nondippers are 2 classifications based on arbitrary operational risk categories. A blunted or absent BP reduction from day to night, defined with ABP as a continuous variable or with operational thresholds, was also associated with a worse outcome regardless of the average value of ABP during the 24 hours. Overall, these studies indicate that ABP monitoring is particularly valuable to refine cardiovascular risk stratification in untreated subjects with office hypertension and in those with resistant hypertension. Intervention studies targeted at ABP are now needed.

Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory↗
PubMed2000

Relation between serum uric acid and risk of cardiovascular disease in essential hypertension. The PIUMA study.

The question of serum uric acid as an independent risk factor in subjects with essential hypertension remains controversial. For up to 12 years (mean, 4.0) we followed 1720 subjects with essential hypertension. At entry, all subjects were untreated and all were carefully screened for absence of cardiovascular disease, renal disease, cancer, and other important disease. Outcome measures included total cardiovascular events, fatal cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality. During 6841 person-years of follow-up there were 184 cardiovascular events (42 fatal) and 80 deaths from all causes. In the 4 quartiles of serum uric acid (division points: 0.268, 0.309, and 0.369 mmol/L [4.5, 5.2, and 6.2 mg/dL] in men; 0.190, 0.232, and 0.274 mmol/L [3.2, 3.9, and 4.6 mg/dL] in women), the rate (per 100 person-years) of cardiovascular events was 2.51, 1.48, 2.66, and 4.27, that of fatal cardiovascular events was 0.41, 0.33, 0.38, and 1.23, and that of all-cause deaths was 1.01, 0.55, 0.93, and 2.01, respectively. The relation between uric acid and event rate was J-shaped in both genders. After adjustment for age, gender, diabetes, total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratio, serum creatinine, left ventricular hypertrophy, ambulatory blood pressure, and use of diuretics during follow-up, uric acid levels in the highest quartile were associated with increased risk for cardiovascular events (relative risk, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.01 to 3.00), fatal cardiovascular events (relative risk, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.02 to 3.79), and all-cause mortality (relative risk, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.57) in relation to the second quartile. In untreated subjects with essential hypertension, raised uric acid is a powerful risk marker for subsequent cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality.

Antihypertensive Agents↗
PubMed2000

Comparison of electrocardiographic criteria for diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension: the MAVI study.

BACKGROUND: Standard electrocardiography (ECG) is a specific, but poorly sensitive tool for diagnosis of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. In a large population of subjects with hypertension we tested some standard ECG criteria in their sensitivity and specificity for LV hypertrophy. LV mass at echocardiography was the reference standard. METHODS: In the setting of the MAVI (MAssa Ventricolare sinistra nel soggetto Iperteso) study, the ECG and echocardiographic tracings of 947 hypertensive subjects were read blindly in a central office. RESULTS: Prevalence of LV hypertrophy at ECG was 0.6, 3.0, 4.8, 7.1, 11.1, 11.9 and 18.4%, respectively, using the following criteria: Wilson, typical strain, Romhilt-Estes score > or = 5 points, Gubner-Ungerleider, Sokolow-Lyon, Cornell voltage (S(V3)+R(avL) > 2.8 mV in men or 2.0 mV in women) and Perugia score (positivity of at least one of the following: S(V3)+R(aVL) > 2.4 mV in men or > 2.0 mV in women, a typical strain pattern, or a Romhilt-Estes point score >or = 5). Prevalence of LV hypertrophy at echocardiography ranged from 27.2% (LV mass > 125 g/m2) to 49.9% (LV mass > 51.0 g/m2.7). Using the latter gold standard, sensitivity and specificity of the above ECG criteria were 0.8 and 99.6% (Wilson), 3.8 and 97.9% (strain), 5.9 and 96.4% (Romhilt-Estes), 9.7 and 95.6% (Gubner-Ungerleider), 11.2 and 91.1% (Sokolow-Lyon), 15.2 and 91.4% (Cornell), and 22.2 and 85.4% (Perugia score). CONCLUSIONS: Sensitivity of traditional ECG criteria for LV hypertrophy in subjects with hypertension is poor. However, the combination of three highly specific criteria (Romhilt-Estes, LV strain and Cornell) in a cumulative score produces a rise in sensitivity without excessive deterioration of specificity, with a prevalence of LV hypertrophy at ECG of 18.4%. Traditional interpretation of ECG is valuable and should be reconsidered in the clinical work-up of subjects with hypertension.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Persistence of increased left ventricular mass despite optimal blood pressure control in hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular hypertrophy is an adverse risk marker in essential hypertension and its regression has a favorable effect on prognosis. It is unclear whether blood pressure normalization induced by long-term therapy is able to normalize left ventricular mass completely. METHODS: In the setting of a prospective cohort study, 107 consecutive hypertensive patients who achieved blood pressure normalization (clinic blood pressure < 140/90 mmHg on > or = 3 consecutive visits) under long-term (1-10 years, average 2.9) drug treatment were individually matched with 107 healthy normotensive controls by gender, age (+/- 5 years), body mass index (+/- 3 kg/m2), and clinic systolic blood pressure (+/- 5 mmHg) in a case-control design. All subjects underwent 24-hour blood pressure monitoring and M-mode echocardiography. RESULTS: Treated hypertensive patients and normotensive controls did not differ by age, body mass index, clinic blood pressure (128/82 vs 128/81 mmHg), and 24-hour blood pressure (120/77 vs 120/76 mmHg). Left ventricular mass and relative wall thickness were greater in the hypertensive than in the normotensive group (97 +/- 24 vs 86 +/- 17 g/m2 and 0.40 +/- 0.08 vs 0.37 +/- 0.08, both p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Left ventricular mass is greater in well-controlled hypertensive patients than in normotensive controls matched by age, obesity, gender, and clinic and 24-hour blood pressure. This finding is consistent with the lower than epidemiologically expected reduction in coronary heart disease risk during antihypertensive therapy and might reflect the persistent effect on left ventricular mass of hemodynamic and/or non-hemodynamic factors other than blood pressure in treated patients with essential hypertension.

Antihypertensive Agents↗
PubMed2000

[Cardiac failure in hypertensive cardiopathy].

Elevated blood pressure and left ventricular hypertrophy are powerful independent predictors of heart failure. In hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy at electrocardiography doubles the risk of heart failure. The individual absolute risk of heart failure, however, remains quite low in the absence of myocardial infarction, valvular heart disease and diabetes. For example, in a 60-year-old asymptomatic man with systolic blood pressure 160 mmHg, the risk of developing heart failure is 0.37% per year in the absence of left ventricular hypertrophy and 0.90% per year in the presence of hypertrophy. If ischemic heart disease, valvular heart disease and diabetes coexist in the same subject, the risk of heart failure rises to 5.1% and 9.5% in the absence and presence of left ventricular hypertrophy, respectively. Several mechanisms may explain the increased risk of heart failure in hypertensive subjects with left ventricular hypertrophy. Among these, increased collagen deposition in the interstitial space among myocytes could lead to impaired diffusion of oxygen and other substances towards hypertrophied myocytes, whose metabolic demand is increased. Left ventricular hypertrophy increases the risk of heart failure both at normal (diastolic) and low cardiac output. There is an inverse association between left ventricular mass and velocity of diastolic relaxation. Early diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy through electrocardiography or echocardiography and aggressive treatment of patients with hypertrophy are probably the best ways to prevent heart failure associated with hypertension. Controlled intervention studies clearly showed that treatment of hypertension reduces the occurrence of heart failure by 25-50%, particularly in the elderly with isolated systolic hypertension. In a sizable proportion (about 20%) of asymptomatic patients with hypertension, left ventricular systolic performance estimated by echocardiography at mid-wall level is reduced. These patients appear to be at increased risk of major cardiovascular events including heart failure.

Echocardiography↗
PubMed2000

[Guidelines].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Echocardiography↗
PubMed1999

Value of a simple echocardiographic linear predictor of left ventricular mass in systemic hypertension.

The need for calculations limits the clinical use of left ventricular (LV) mass. Because LV mass is strictly dependent on wall thickness for every given value of LV external dimension, we tested the clinical value of the sum of LV external dimension plus ventricular septal thickness plus posterior wall thickness as predictors of standard LV mass. We studied 295 healthy normotensive subjects and 1,686 subjects with systemic hypertension, followed up for 1 to 9 years. In the normotensive group, the predictor of LV mass showed a very close association with standard LV mass according to an allometric model (LV mass [g] = 0.230 x LV mass predictor [cm]3.01), with 99.7% of LV mass variability explained by the model. Also, in the hypertensive group, the LV mass predictor showed a very close allometric relation to standard LV mass (R2 = 0.998). During follow-up there were 154 cardiovascular morbid events and 50 deaths from all causes. The risk of cardiovascular morbid events and that of death increased to a similar extent with LV mass normalized by body surface area, height or height2.7, as well as with the LV mass predictor. The risk estimates for cardiovascular morbidity and all-cause mortality provided by models including either LV mass predictor or LV mass uncorrected or corrected by height, body surface area, or height2.7 did not show any statistical differences between the different models. In conclusion, the sum of LV external dimension plus ventricular septum thickness plus posterior wall thickness, easily measurable from the M-mode echocardiographic tracing, very closely predicts standard LV mass in adult hypertensive subjects. The prognostic value of this measure does not differ from that of standard LV mass.

Adult↗