Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Verdecchia

Publications and source records attributed to P Verdecchia.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Left ventricular hypertrophy as an independent predictor of acute cerebrovascular events in essential hypertension.

BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) confers an increased risk for cerebrovascular disease in apparently healthy patients with essential hypertension. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 2363 initially untreated hypertensive patients (mean age 51+/-12 years, 47% women) free of previous cardiovascular disease were followed up for up to 14 years (mean 5 years). At entry, all patients underwent diagnostic tests, including ECG, echocardiography, and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring. At entry, the prevalence of LVH was 17.6% by ECG (Perugia score) and 23.7% by echocardiography (LVM >125 g/m(2)). Over the subsequent years, 105 patients experienced a first stroke or transient ischemic attack. The cerebrovascular event rate was higher among patients with LVH at entry, diagnosed by either ECG or echocardiography, than among those without hypertrophy (both P<0.01). After control for the significant influence of age, sex, diabetes, and 24-hour mean ambulatory BP, LVH by ECG conferred an increased risk for cerebrovascular events (relative risk [RR] 1.79; 95% CI 1.17 to 2.76). LVH by echocardiography also conferred a higher risk for cerebrovascular events (RR 1.64; 95% CI 1.07 to 2.68). For each increase in LV mass of 1 SD (29 g/m(2)), there was a significant independent increase in the risk for cerebrovascular events (RR 1.31; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.58). CONCLUSIONS: In apparently healthy patients with essential hypertension, LVH diagnosed by ECG or echocardiography confers an excess risk for stroke and transient ischemic attack independently of BP and other individual risk factors.

Blood Pressure↗

Prognostic significance of endothelial dysfunction in hypertensive patients.

BACKGROUND: Forearm endothelial dysfunction, characterized by an impaired vasodilating response to acetylcholine (ACh), may be associated with several cardiovascular risk factors, including essential hypertension. Although the prognostic value of coronary endothelial dysfunction has been demonstrated, that of forearm endothelial dysfunction is still unknown. Methods and Results-- Endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation was investigated in 225 never-treated hypertensive patients (age, 35 to 54 years) by intra-arterial infusion of increasing doses of ACh and sodium nitroprusside. Patients were divided into tertiles on the basis of their increase in ACh-stimulated forearm blood flow (FBF) from basal: group 1, from 30% to 184%; group 2, from 185% to 333%; and group 3, from 339% to 760% increase from basal. During a mean follow-up of 31.5 of months (range, 4 to 84 months), there were 29 major adverse events at the cardiac (n=19), cerebrovascular (n=9), or peripheral vascular (n=1) level. Events included myocardial infarction, angina, coronary revascularization procedures, stroke, transient cerebral ischemic attack, and aortoiliac occlusive disease. Event rate per 100 patient-years was 8.17, 4.34, and 2.02 in the first, second, and third tertiles of peak percent increase in FBF during ACh infusion. The excess risk associated with an FBF increase in the first tertile was significant (relative risk, 2.084; 95% CI, 1.25 to 3.48; P=0.0049) after controlling for individual risk markers, including 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that forearm endothelial dysfunction is a marker of future cardiovascular events in patients with essential hypertension.

Acetylcholine↗

Different prognostic impact of 24-hour mean blood pressure and pulse pressure on stroke and coronary artery disease in essential hypertension.

BACKGROUND: We tested the hypothesis that the steady and pulsatile components of blood pressure (BP) exert a different influence on coronary artery disease and stroke in subjects with hypertension. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed data on 2311 subjects with essential hypertension. All subjects (mean age 51 years, 47% women) underwent off-therapy 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring. Over a follow-up period of up to 14 years (mean 4.7 years), there were 132 major cardiac events (1.20 per 100 person-years) and 105 cerebrovascular events (0.90 per 100 person-years). After adjustment for age, sex, diabetes, serum cholesterol, and cigarette smoking (all P<0.01), for each 10 mm Hg increase in 24-hour pulse pressure (PP), there was an independent 35% increase in the risk of cardiac events (95% CI 17% to 55%). Twenty-four-hour mean BP was not a significant predictor of cardiac events after controlling for PP. After adjustment for age, sex, and diabetes (all P<0.05), for every 10 mm Hg increase in 24-hour mean BP, the risk of cerebrovascular events increased by 42% (95% CI 19% to 69%), and 24-hour PP did not yield significance after controlling for 24-hour mean BP. Twenty-four-hour PP was also an independent predictor of fatal cardiac events, and 24-hour mean BP was an independent predictor of fatal cerebrovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: In subjects with predominantly systolic and diastolic hypertension, ambulatory mean BP and PP exert a different predictive effect on the cardiac and cerebrovascular complications. Although PP is the dominant predictor of cardiac events, mean BP is the major independent predictor of cerebrovascular events.

Adult↗

High-normal serum creatinine concentration is a predictor of cardiovascular risk in essential hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Determination of serum creatinine concentration is recommended in all patients with hypertension as a marker of target organ damage. However, the possibility that creatinine values within the reference range might contribute to stratification of cardiovascular risk in essential hypertension has never been tested. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the setting of the Progetto Ipertensione Umbria Monitoraggio Ambulatoriale Study, for up to 11 years (mean, 4 years) we followed up 1829 white patients with hypertension (mean +/- SD age, 51 +/- 12 years; 53% men; office blood pressure, 157/98 mm Hg) free of cardiovascular events and with normal pretreatment creatinine levels (men, <136 micromol/L [<1.5 mg/dL]; women, <120 micromol/L [<1.4 mg/dL]) who also underwent 24-hour blood pressure monitoring and electrocardiography before therapy. RESULTS: During follow-up, there were 175 fatal or nonfatal major cardiovascular morbid events (2.4 per 100 patient-years). Event rate increased progressively from the first to the fourth sex-specific quartiles of creatinine distribution (1.5, 2.3, 2.3, and 3.5 per 100 patient-years; P =.003 by log-rank test). After adjustment (in a multivariate Cox model) for age, sex, diabetes, cholesterol, smoking, left ventricular hypertrophy, and 24-hour pulse and mean blood pressures (P<.05 for all), creatinine concentration was an independent adverse predictor of cardiovascular morbid events (P =.01). The observed excess risk was 1.30 (95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.59) for a 20-micromol/L (0.23-mg/dL) increase in creatinine concentration. CONCLUSIONS: A serum creatinine value within the reference range is a predictor of cardiovascular morbidity in white patients with essential hypertension. Its prognostic value persists after adjustment for several powerful confounders, including average 24-hour blood pressure and left ventricular hypertrophy.

Adult↗

Using out of office blood pressure monitoring in the management of hypertension.

Self-measurement of blood pressure (BP) and 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) are increasingly used in order to improve cardiovascular risk stratification over and beyond traditional methods, including sphygmomanometric BP measurement. Self-measured BP has the advantage of being cheap, quite representative of the usual BP over long periods of time, and devoid of the "white coat" effect. Only a few data exist on the prognostic value of self-measured BP. Most of the outcome studies with 24-hour ABPM have been conducted in patients with essential hypertension who were untreated at the time of execution of ABPM. Cardiovascular risk showed a direct association with ambulatory BP and an inverse association with the degree of BP reduction from day to night. White coat hypertension versus ambulatory hypertension and dippers versus nondippers are two classifications based on arbitrary operational risk categories. ABPM may be valuable for refining cardiovascular risk stratification in untreated subjects with office hypertension, as well as those with resistant hypertension.

Blood Pressure↗

Left ventricular mass and cardiovascular morbidity in essential hypertension: the MAVI study.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the prognostic value of left ventricular (LV) mass at echocardiography in uncomplicated subjects with essential hypertension. BACKGROUND: Only a few single-center studies support the prognostic value of LV mass in uncomplicated hypertension. METHODS: The MAssa Ventricolare sinistra nell'Ipertensione study was a multicenter (45 centers) prospective study. The prespecified aim was to explore the prognostic value of LV mass in hypertension. Admission criteria included essential hypertension, no previous cardiovascular events, and age > or =50. There was central reading of echocardiographic tracings. Treatment was tailored to the single subject. RESULTS: Overall, 1,033 subjects (396 men) were followed for 0 to 4 years (median, 3 years). Mean age at entry was 60 years, and systolic/diastolic blood pressure was 154/92 mm Hg. The rate of cardiovascular events (x100 patient-years) was 1.3 in the group with normal LV mass and 3.2 in the group (28.5% of total sample) with LV mass > or =125 g/body surface area (p = 0.005). After adjustment for age (p < 0.01), diabetes (p < 0.01), cigarette smoking (p < 0.01) and serum creatinine (p = 0.03), LV hypertrophy was associated with an increased risk of events (RR [relative risk] 2.08; 95% CI [confidence interval]: 1.22 to 3.57). For each 39 g/m(2) (1 SD) increase in LV mass there was an independent 40% rise in the risk of major cardiovascular events (95% CI: 14 to 72; p = 0.0013). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show a strong, continuous and independent relationship of LV mass to subsequent cardiovascular morbidity. This is the first study to extend such demonstration to a large nationwide multicenter sample of uncomplicated subjects with essential hypertension.

Aged↗

Optimizing assessment of carotid and femoral intima-media thickness in essential hypertension.

Large artery intima-media thickness (IMT) is considered an integrated marker for the total individual burden of arteriosclerosis, and a graded index for cardiovascular risk. However, several different aggregate indexes of IMT on B-mode ultrasound have been used by various investigators, and the optimal number of IMT readings is currently unsettled. In 128 newly diagnosed, never treated, uncomplicated hypertensive subjects aged <55 years (43 +/- 9 years, blood pressure [BP] 152/99 mm Hg), we measured left ventricular mass (M-mode echocardiography, average of five or more measurements) and IMT of common carotid and common femoral arteries. For each segment, 12 IMT measurements were performed, and the average of 1 and 3 readings (right far wall), 6 readings (right side), and 12 readings (right and left side, far and near wall, 3 sampling points) was analyzed. The relation of IMT with left ventricular mass increased progressively with increasing number of readings, from 0.35 (1 reading) to 0.51 (12 readings) for common carotid artery, and from 0.31 to 0.56 for common femoral artery (both P <.001). For each 0.2-mm increase in common femoral IMT, the age-adjusted relative risk of having left ventricular hypertrophy was 1.31 for 1 reading, and increased up to 3.59 for the average of 12 readings. In summary, the association of IMT with left ventricular mass depends strongly on the number of IMT readings. The average of several readings in each segment, including right and left side and far and near wall, carries the closest association to left ventricular mass, and should be preferred for clinical purposes in hypertensive subjects.

Adult↗

Independent predictors of isolated clinic ('white-coat') hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension guidelines recommend 24 h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring in hypertensive subjects with suspected isolated clinic hypertension (ICH). However, the pre-test probability of ICH based on the distribution of its independent predictors has not yet been estimated in hypertensive subjects with mildly elevated blood pressure. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the independent predictors of ICH in mildly hypertensive subjects. METHODS: In the setting of the HARVEST-PIUMA collaboration, we studied 1564 subjects with hypertension stage I. At entry, all subjects were untreated and all underwent ABP monitoring and echocardiography. Diabetes, hypertension grade > I, renal failure or previous cardiovascular morbid events were exclusion criteria. Clinic BP was 143/92 mmHg (SD 9/5) and 24 h ABP was 128/81 mmHg (SD 10/8). RESULTS: Prevalence of ICH (daytime ABP < 130 mmHg systolic and 80 mmHg diastolic) was 10.4%. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, sex (P = 0.002), smoking (P = 0.038) and clinic diastolic BP (P = 0.0002) were the sole independent predictors of ICH according to the following equation: Y = 2.6438 + 0.5128 x sex (0 = men; 1 = women) + 0.4543 x current smoking (0 = yes; 1 = no) - 0.0531 x clinic diastolic BP (mmHg) and P (probability of ICH) = exp(Y)/[1 + (exp(Y)]. Left ventricular (LV) mass at echocardiography was a further independent predictor (P = 0.002) of ICH according to the following equation: Y= 3.4343 + 0.4603 x sex + 0.5989 x current smoking - 0.0482 x clinic diastolic BP - 0.0312 x LV mass [g/height (m)2.7]. LV mass was greater (P < 0.01) in the group with ambulatory hypertension [42.3 g/height (m)2.7] than in that with ICH [39.2 g/height (m)2.7] and not dissimilar between the ICH group and a control group of 370 healthy normotensive subjects [38.1 g/height (m)2.7]. CONCLUSIONS: In untreated subjects with stage I hypertension, ICH is most frequent among women, nonsmokers and subjects with low clinic BP and smaller LV mass. These findings allow identification of subjects with indication to ABP monitoring because of suspected ICH.

Adult↗

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: The proportion of left ventricular (LV) mass variability explained by blood pressure in essential hypertension is small, and several non-haemodynamic determinants of LV mass have been identified or hypothesized. This study examines the possible relation between blood lipids and LV mass in hypertension. DESIGN: Never-treated non-diabetic hypertensive patients. SETTING: Hospital hypertension outpatient clinics in Umbria, Italy. PATIENTS: We investigated the association between high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol and echocardiographic LV mass in 1306 never-treated subjects with essential hypertension. Subjects with previous cardiovascular events, diabetes and current or previous antihypertensive or lipid-lowering therapy were excluded. RESULTS: HDL-cholesterol showed an inverse association with LV mass (r = -0.30, P < 0.001). No association was found between LV mass and total or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. With multiple linear regression analysis we tested the independent contribution of several potential determinants of LV mass in women and in men. Average 24 h blood pressure (both pulse and mean), body mass index, height, stroke volume, age (all P < 0.01) and low HDL-cholesterol (P < 0.0001 in women, P < 0.001 in men) were associated with a greater LV mass in both sexes. Triglycerides showed a weak univariate association with LV mass in women (r = 0.11, P < 0.02), which did not hold in a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Low HDL-cholesterol is an independent predictor of LV mass in untreated hypertensive subjects. Common hormonal and metabolic mechanisms, including insulin resistance, could explain this association, which may contribute to the adverse prognostic significance of low HDL-cholesterol levels.

Adult↗

Original articles prognostic value of combined echocardiography and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in hypertensive patients at low or medium cardiovascular risk.

BACKGROUND: The clinical value of echocardiography and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in hypertensive patients at low immediate risk of cardiovascular disease is still unknown. METHODS: Echocardiography and ABPM were performed in 715 untreated subjects with essential hypertension World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension stage I or II and low or medium cardiovascular risk defined by the absence of diabetes, previous cardiovascular events, left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy at electrocardiography, proteinuria, stages III-IV retinopathy and creatinine levels > 106.08 mmoll (1.2 mg/dl) and the presence of one or two traditional risk factors. RESULTS: The LV mass was increased in 26.5% of these subjects. Subjects with a limited blood pressure reduction from day to night (non-dippers) were 11.3%. Over 1-13 years of follow-up, 31 subjects developed a first major cardiovascular event. The event rate (per 100 person-years) was 0.60 in the subgroup with a normal LV mass vs 1.63 in that with an increased LV mass (p < 0.017), and 0.74 in dippers vs 3.75 in non-dippers (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, the relative risk of cardiovascular events was 1.70 (95% confidence interval-CI 1.23-2.36) for each 11 g/m(2.7) increment in LV mass (p < 0.01), and 2.77 (95% CI 1.12-6.83) in non-dippers vs dippers (p < 0.05). Overall, on the basis of results of combined echocardiography and ABPM, 33% of subjects were at increased risk of future cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: At standard first-line work-up performed on hypertensive subjects at low or medium cardiovascular risk, combined echocardiography and ABPM identify an increase in the risk of subsequent cardiovascular disease in one third of subjects.

Blood Pressure↗

[Pulse pressure and mean pressure: physiopathology and predictive value of coronary events and ictus].

Increased pulse pressure (PP) reflects an increased stiffness of aorta and other large elastic arteries. These arteries dilate by about 10% during systole and contract owing to elastic return during diastole. As a result, blood flow towards periphery becomes less pulsatile and more continuous. An increased stiffness of aorta and large elastic arteries due to progressively reduced elastic content with aging (atherosclerotic processes) leads to increased systolic blood pressure (BP), because of their reduced distension during systole, and decreased diastolic BP due to their reduced blood content at the beginning of diastole. Several epidemiological studies have shown that PP is the BP component which most closely predicts cardiovascular risk, particularly over 55 years of age. In particular, increased PP is an important predictor of coronary events, while increased mean BP is a more specific predictor of cerebrovascular events.

Blood Pressure↗

Subclinical left ventricular dysfunction in systemic hypertension and the role of 24-hour blood pressure.

The relation between blood pressure (BP) and left ventricular (LV) systolic function in systemic hypertension is controversial. We assessed the relation of LV midwall fractional shortening (FS) to 24-hour BP in 1,702 never-treated hypertensive subjects (age 48 +/- 12 years), who underwent 24-hour BP monitoring and echocardiography. Stress-corrected endocardial and midwall FS (the latter calculated taking into account the epicardial migration of midwall during systole) were predicted in hypertensives on the basis of the values observed in 130 healthy normotensives (age 43 +/- 13 years, office BP 126/78 mm Hg). Subjects below the fifth percentile of observed-to-predicted FS had depressed LV function. The use of midwall FS resulted in an increase from 3.5% to 17.5% in the proportion of patients with depressed chamber function. Compared with the group with normal function, subjects with low midwall LV function had similar office systolic BP (155 +/- 21 vs 154 +/- 17 mm Hg), but increased 24-hour systolic BP (140 +/- 17 vs 133 +/- 12 mm Hg, p <0.001). Midwall FS had a closer negative relation to 24-hour systolic BP than to office systolic BP (r = -0.27 vs -0.08, p <0.001), whereas this difference was not apparent for diastolic BP (r = -0.23 vs -0.20). Compared with endocardial FS, midwall FS had a stronger inverse association to LV mass (r = -0.45 vs -0.16, p <0.001). Thus, an increased 24-hour BP load may chronically lead to depressed myocardial function in systemic hypertension in the absence of clinically overt heart disease.

Adult↗

Clinical relevance of office underestimation of usual blood pressure in treated hypertension.

Average 24-h blood pressure (BP) is more representative of usual BP than office BP. However, the clinical relevance of 24-h BP in treated hypertensive subjects is incompletely known. Thus, we studied 395 uncomplicated hypertensive subjects (209 men, 53+/-10 years) who were receiving antihypertensive drug therapy from >1 year. All subjects underwent 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring and M-mode echocardiography. Subjects were classified by tertile of the difference between observed and predicted 24-h systolic BP (the latter determined by regressing 24-h systolic BP on office systolic BP): higher-than-predicted (III tertile), around the regression line (II tertile), and lower-that-predicted (I tertile) 24-h BP. Despite similar office BP (144/89, 141/88, and 144/89 mm Hg in the III, II, and I tertile, P = not significant), age, body mass index, and duration of hypertension, left ventricular mass was greater in the subjects with higher-than-predicted 24-h systolic BP (50+/-14 g x m(-2.7)) than in the other two groups (46+/-13 g x m(-2.7) and 42+/-10 g x m(-2.7), both P < .05). The III tertile also showed a more concentric left ventricular geometric pattern (relative wall thickness was 0.42+/-0.08, 0.40+/-0.07, and 0.38+/-0.07 in the III, II, and I tertile, P < .001) and a reduced systolic function at the midwall level (16.8+/-3, 17.7+/-3, and 18.2+/-3, P < .001). In conclusion, treated hypertensive subjects whose 24-h BP is notably higher than one would predict from office BP are more likely to develop left ventricular hypertrophy, a strong adverse prognostic marker. In a sizable subset of treated hypertensive subjects, BP measured in the physician's office underestimates usual BP and its impact on left ventricular structure.

Antihypertensive Agents↗

Arterial wall thickening at different sites and its association with left ventricular hypertrophy in newly diagnosed essential hypertension.

The impact of hypertension on vascular structure at different arterial sites and the relation of vascular hypertrophy with left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy in the early stages of essential hypertension are unclear. In 96 newly diagnosed, never-treated, uncomplicated hypertensive subjects aged < 55 years (43 +/- 9 years, 68 men, clinic blood pressure 152/99 mm Hg, 24-h blood pressure 135/89 mm Hg), we measured LV mass (M-mode echocardiography) and intima-media thickness (IMT) of the carotid and femoral arteries (high-resolution B-mode ultrasound). The average of 24 carotid and 24 femoral IMT readings (common and internal carotid or common and superficial femoral, right and left side, far and near wall, three sampling points per segment) was analyzed. Carotid and femoral IMT were strongly related to each other (r = 0.77). Subjects with LV hypertrophy (n = 33) had a greater IMT at the carotid (0.84 +/- 0.2 v 0.71 +/- 0.2 mm, P < .0001) and femoral (0.77 +/- 0.1 v 0.64 +/- 0.1 mm, P < .0001) level. Carotid IMT showed a positive correlation with LV mass (r = 0.46) and age (r = 0.38), and an inverse one with high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (r = -0.26). Femoral IMT was associated positively to LV mass (r = 0.50), age (r = 0.33) and triglycerides (r = 0.29), and inversely to HDL-cholesterol (r = -0.33). The association between IMT (both carotid and femoral) and LV mass held after controlling for age and other confounders in a multiple regression analysis. In summary, in the early stages of hypertension arterial wall thickening appears to be a diffuse process, which occurs in parallel at the carotid and femoral level and shows a positive association with LV hypertrophy.

Adolescent↗

Long-term effects of losartan and enalapril, alone or with a diuretic, on ambulatory blood pressure and cardiac performance in hypertension: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: The long-term effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers on ambulatory blood pressure and cardiac performance have never been examined comparatively. OBJECTIVE: We compared losartan and enalapril in their long-term effects on office and ambulatory blood pressure, cardiac structure and function, and routine biochemical tests. DESIGN: In the setting of the Progetto Ipertensione Umbria Monitoraggio Ambulatoriale (PIUMA) study, 22 hypertensive subjects were studied with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and echocardiography before and after an average of 3.3 years of treatment with losartan 50mg daily. These subjects were matched in a 1:3 ratio with a group of 66 subjects treated with enalapril 20mg daily. Case-control sampling was based on age (+/-5years), sex, pre-treatment office blood pressure (+/-5mmHg) and ambulatory blood pressure (+/-5mmHg), and duration of treatment (+/-6months). An additional group of subjects who interrupted their treatment with enalapril (n=18) or losartan (n =2) because of unwanted effects before execution of the follow-up study was not included in the analysis. RESULTS: Hydrochlorothiazide was added during follow-up in order to optimize blood pressure control (office blood pressure <140mmHg systolic and 90mmHg diastolic) in 10 subjects (45%) in the losartan group and 34 subjects (52%) in the enalapril group. Office and ambulatory blood pressures were lowered to a similar extent by losartan and enalapril. Left ventricular mass decreased from 98 to 87g/m(2) with losartan (P <0.01) and from 98 to 89 g/m(2) with enalapril (P <0.01). The change in left ventricular mass over time was more closely associated with the change in ambulatory blood pressure than with office blood pressure in both groups. Left ventricular internal diameter did not change with either drug. The endocardial shortening fraction, mid-wall shortening fraction and Doppler indexes of active diastolic relaxation did not change with either drug. None of the biochemical parameters showed a significant change. Serum uric acid showed a slight and non-significant reduction only in the losartan group. CONCLUSION: In this case-control study in uncomplicated subjects with essential hypertension, losartan and enalapril, alone or combined with a diuretic, effectively and equally lowered office and ambulatory blood pressure and induced a significant reduction in left ventricular mass during long-term treatment. Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function remained unchanged with either regimen.

Adult↗

Continuous relation between left ventricular mass and cardiovascular risk in essential hypertension.

The detection of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy on echocardiography is a powerful risk indicator in essential hypertension. However, the prognostic impact of LV mass values within the "normal" range and the shape of the relation between LV mass and prognosis remain unclear. Thus, 1925 white subjects with uncomplicated essential hypertension underwent off-therapy 24-hour blood pressure monitoring and M-mode echocardiography. During 4. 0+/-2 years of follow-up, there were 181 major cardiovascular events (2.4/100 patient-years) and 49 deaths from all causes. In the 5 gender-specific quintiles of LV mass distribution (partition values: 92, 105, 120, and 138 g/m(2) in men and 79, 91, 102, and 116 g/m(2) in women), cardiovascular event rates were 0.8, 1.7, 2.2, 2.9, and 4. 3 per 100 patient-years. After adjustment for several risk factors, including 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure, the relative risk (RR) of developing a cardiovascular event increased progressively from the first quintile (RR 1) to the second (RR 1.6, 95% CI 0.8 to 3.1), third (RR 1.9, 95% CI 1.01 to 4.0), fourth (RR 3.0, 95% CI 1.5 to 5. 8), and fifth (RR 3.5, 95% CI 1.8 to 6.8) quintile. For all-cause death, the RR in the fifth quintile compared with the first quintile was 4.3 (95% CI 1.2 to 13.4). In conclusion, the powerful relation between LV mass and risk of cardiovascular disease in subjects with uncomplicated essential hypertension is continuous over a wide range of LV mass values, even below the current "upper normal" limits. The relation remains significant after control for traditional risk factors, including ambulatory blood pressure.

Adult↗

Prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure : current evidence and clinical implications.

This article is a critical review of the available evidence on the prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure (ABP). Several event-based cohort studies have shown that ABP improves cardiovascular risk stratification over and beyond traditional risk factors, including office BP. Most of these studies have been conducted in subjects with essential hypertension who were untreated at the time of execution of ABP monitoring; other studies have been conducted in subjects who were poorly controlled with treatment or in the general population. In these studies, ABP was examined as a continuous variable or with operational risk categories. Cardiovascular risk showed a direct and independent association with the observed ABP (systolic, diastolic, and pulse) and an inverse association with the degree of BP reduction from day to night. Cardiovascular risk was also directly associated with the difference between the observed value of ABP and that predicted from the office BP. White-coat hypertension versus ambulatory hypertension and dippers versus nondippers are 2 classifications based on arbitrary operational risk categories. A blunted or absent BP reduction from day to night, defined with ABP as a continuous variable or with operational thresholds, was also associated with a worse outcome regardless of the average value of ABP during the 24 hours. Overall, these studies indicate that ABP monitoring is particularly valuable to refine cardiovascular risk stratification in untreated subjects with office hypertension and in those with resistant hypertension. Intervention studies targeted at ABP are now needed.

Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory↗