Biomedical subjects

Meixi Lin

Publications and source records attributed to Meixi Lin.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

The distribution of fitness effects of nonsynonymous mutations varies phylogenetically across animals.

The distribution of fitness effects (DFE) describes the selection coefficients of newly arising mutations and fundamentally influences population genetic processes. However, the extent and mechanisms of differences in the DFE for non-synonymous mutations have not been systematically investigated across species with divergent phylogenetic histories and ecologies. Here, we inferred the DFE in natural populations of 11 animal (sub)species, including humans, mice, fin whales, vaquitas, wolves, collared flycatchers, pied flycatchers, halictid bees, Drosophila, and mosquitoes. We found that mammals have a higher proportion of strongly deleterious mutations (defined as s≤-0.01; 22% to 47% in mammals; 0.0% to 5.4% in insects and birds) and a lower proportion of weakly deleterious mutations than insects and birds. Further, the DFE co-varies with phylogeny, such that the mean mutation effects are more similar in closely related species (Pagel's λ = 0.84, P = 0.01). Next, we investigated whether various summary statistics of the DFE were related to variation in life-history traits across these organisms. We found some support for genome size, body mass, and long-term effective population size being correlated with the DFE. Overall, our findings are consistent with predictions derived independently from the Fisher's Geometric Model (FGM), which defines organismal complexity as the number of phenotypes under selection. FGM predicts that mutations are more deleterious in complex organisms, while strongly deleterious mutations occur more frequently in smaller populations. Our study demonstrates strong phylogenetic signal in the evolution of a fundamental population genetics parameter, and proposes that, through mechanisms of epistasis, long-term population size and organismal complexity could be underlying variation in the DFE across animals.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2025

Large future genetic diversity losses are predicted even with habitat protection.

Genetic diversity within species is the basis for evolutionary adaptive capacity and has recently been included as a target for protection in the United Nations' Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF). However, we lack large-scale mathematical frameworks to quantify how much genetic diversity has already been lost, let alone to predict future losses under 21st century conservation scenarios. To fill this gap, we developed an area-based spatio-temporal predictive framework of genetic diversity calibrated with population-scale genomic data of 29 plant and animal species. To estimate present genetic diversity loss with our framework, we used species' habitat area and population sizes losses reported in the Living Planet Index, the Red List, and new GBF indicators across 13,808 species for the last 5 decades. Applying our evolutionary framework across these species, we estimate genetic diversity loss lags behind population and habitat area declines, with an estimated current 13-22% π genetic diversity loss. However, we forecast future genetic diversity losses will reach 41-76% even if populations are not further contracted. These results highlight that safeguarding existing habitats is insufficient to maintain the genetic health of species and relying solely on continuous genetic monitoring underestimates lagging long term impacts.

Genetic diversity↗

PubMed2025

The distribution of fitness effects varies phylogenetically across animals.

The distribution of fitness effects (DFE) describes the selection coefficients () of newly arising mutations and fundamentally influences population genetic processes. However, the extent and mechanisms of DFE variation have not been systematically investigated across species with divergent phylogenetic histories and ecological functions. Here, we inferred the DFE in natural populations of eleven animal (sub)species, including humans, mice, fin whales, vaquitas, wolves, collared flycatchers, pied flycatchers, halictid bees, Drosophila, and mosquitoes. We find that the DFE co-varies with phylogeny, where the expected mutation effects are more similar in closely related species (). Additionally, mammals have a higher proportion of strongly deleterious mutations (22% to 47% in mammals; 0.0% to 5.4% in insects and birds) and a lower proportion of weakly deleterious mutations than insects and birds. Population size is significantly negatively correlated with the expected impact of new deleterious mutations (), and the proportion of new beneficial mutations (). These findings align with Fisher's Geometric Model (FGM), which defines organismal complexity as the number of phenotypes under selection. Consistent with the FGM's predictions, we observe that mutations are more deleterious in complex organisms, while beneficial mutations occur more frequently in smaller populations to compensate for the drift load. Our study demonstrates strong phylogenetic constraints in the evolution of a fundamental population genetics parameter, and proposes that, through mechanisms of global epistasis, long-term population size and organismal complexity drive variation in the DFE across animals.

Fisher’s geometric model↗

PubMed2024

Evolutionary consequences of domestication on the selective effects of new amino acid changing mutations in canids.

The domestication of wild canids led to dogs no longer living in the wild but instead residing alongside humans. Extreme changes in behavior and diet associated with domestication may have led to the relaxation of the selective pressure on traits that may be less important in the domesticated context. Thus, here we hypothesize that strongly deleterious mutations may have become less deleterious in domesticated populations. We test this hypothesis by estimating the distribution of fitness effects (DFE) for new amino acid changing mutations using whole-genome sequence data from 24 gray wolves and 61 breed dogs. We find that the DFE is strikingly similar across canids, with 26-28% of new amino acid changing mutations being neutral/nearly neutral (|s| < 1e-5), and 41-48% under strong purifying selection (|s| > 1e-2). Our results are robust to different model assumptions suggesting that the DFE is stable across short evolutionary timescales, even in the face of putative drastic changes in the selective pressure caused by artificial selection during domestication and breed formation. On par with previous works describing DFE evolution, our data indicate that the DFE of amino acid changing mutations depends more strongly on genome structure and organismal characteristics, and less so on shifting selective pressures or environmental factors. Given the constant DFE and previous data showing that genetic variants that differentiate wolf and dog populations are enriched in regulatory elements, we speculate that domestication may have had a larger impact on regulatory variation than on amino acid changing mutations.

Journal Article↗