Use of pure porcine insulin versus partially purified insulin of bovine/porcine origin might be expected to have certain clinical benefits, e.g., a lower incidence of skin reactions, a lower insulin dosage, better diabetes regulation, and greater preservation of endogenous insulin secretion. To test this hypothesis, we randomly assigned 112 newly diagnosed, untreated, insulin-dependent diabetic children to therapy with either pure porcine or partially purified bovine/porcine insulin. They were followed for 1 yr, data being available on at least 90 subjects at each visit. More skin reactions were found in the group treated with the bovine/porcine insulin. This insulin was of higher antigenicity, and binding of radiolabeled insulin (mean +/- SE) by serum from bovine/porcine insulin treatment was 35.5 +/- 2.6 versus 16.8 +/- 1.4% (P less than .001) for pure porcine insulin treatment 12 mo after initiation of insulin therapy. However, throughout the 12 mo of observation the levels of glycosylated hemoglobin, insulin dosage, fasting plasma glucose, and C-peptide concentration were similar for the groups. Reported incidences of hypoglycemia and nocturia were also similar. Thus, insulin-antibody formation and skin reactions were minimized by the use of pure porcine versus partially purified bovine/porcine insulin, but no other clinical advantages were apparent.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Comparison of the counterregulatory hormone response to semisynthetic human insulin and purified porcine insulin in normal subjects and patients with type I diabetes mellitus.

The counterregulatory hormone responses to semisynthetic human insulin and purified porcine insulin were compared in 20 healthy volunteers (ten men and ten women) and 16 patients (8 men and 8 women) with type I diabetes mellitus (IDDM). In both groups blood glucose fell to similar levels following insulin administration; no difference in counterregulatory hormone response or hypoglycemic awareness was noted when comparing human to porcine insulin. However, when men were compared to women, significant differences were noted in basal glucagon, cortisol, and growth hormone levels, as well as in norepinephrine, prolactin, and cortisol responses to hypoglycemia. These differences could not be attributed to insulin species, different doses of insulin, or degree of hypoglycemia. These findings suggest that hormonal response to and awareness of hypoglycemia are similar in healthy subjects and patients with IDDM following administration of human and porcine insulin and that hormonal responses in men and women should be studied separately to avoid confusion in interpreting results arising from differences in sex.

Adult↗