Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Hidalgo

Publications and source records attributed to M Hidalgo.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Development of matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors in cancer therapy.

The matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a family of zinc-dependent proteinases involved in the degradation of the extracellular matrix. The MMPs have been implicated in the processes of tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis; are frequently overexpressed in malignant tumors; and have been associated with an aggressive malignant phenotype and adverse prognosis in patients with cancer. A number of MMP inhibitors are being developed for the treatment of cancer. The most extensively studied class of MMP inhibitors includes collagen peptidomimetics and nonpeptidomimetic inhibitors of the MMP active site, tetracycline derivatives, and bisphosphonates. The hydroxamate peptidomimetic inhibitor batimastat and its orally bioavailable analogue marimastat, which bind covalently to the zinc atom at the MMP-active site, were the first MMP inhibitors to be studied in detail. Marimastat is currently being studied in randomized clinical trials. The nonpeptidic MMP inhibitors were synthesized in an attempt to improve the oral bioavailability and pharmaceutical properties of the peptidic inhibitors. Several members of this class of compounds are undergoing evaluation in phase III clinical trials. The tetracyclines and, particularly, the nonantibiotic chemically modified tetracyclines, interfere with several aspects of MMP expression and activation and inhibit tumor growth and metastases in preclinical models. A representative agent of this class, Col-3, is currently undergoing phase I clinical trials. The development of the MMP inhibitors, like that of other targeted and predominantly antiproliferative compounds, poses a challenge because the paradigms that have governed the design of clinical oncology trials may not be relevant to this new class of agents. The anticipated need for long-term administration of these drugs, together with their cytostatic mechanism of action, will require novel clinical trial design strategies.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Incidence and predisposing factors for incisional hernia in patients with liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Cirrhotic patients who are transplanted have a high risk of developing incisional hernia (IH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have analysed the incidence and treatment of IH in 465 patients with liver transplantation (LT). In order to find predisposing factors, we compared these patients with a similar group of patients with LT without IH. Fifty-four patients (11.6%) developed an IH. Forty-six of these (85%) were males, and in 37% the entire laparotomy incision was involved. Forty patients have been operated on for the hernia, three by primary repair and 37 (92.5%) with a polypropylene mesh. After a follow-up of 42 months, 6 (15%) IHs recurred. Comparing groups, IH patients were older (P<0.05), of male gender (P<0.001), and received more steroids (P<0.01). The IH rate was not related to suture material. CONCLUSIONS: Our rate of IH is perhaps reasonable in these high risk patients. It appears that IH can be reduced if steroids are reduced or avoided. We recommend a large mesh for repair.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

The rapamycin-sensitive signal transduction pathway as a target for cancer therapy.

The high frequency of mutations in cancer cells which result in altered cell cycle regulation and growth signal transduction, conferring a proliferative advantage, indicates that many of these aberrant mechanisms may be strategic targets for cancer therapy. The macrolide fungicide rapamycin, a natural product with potent antimicrobial, immunosuppressant, and anti-tumor properties, inhibits the translation of key mRNAs of proteins required for cell cycle progression from G1 to S phase. Rapamycin binds intracellularly to the immunophilin FK506 binding protein 12 (FKBP12), and the resultant complex inhibits the protein kinase activity of a protein kinase termed mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). The inhibition of mTOR, in turn, blocks signals to two separate downstream pathways which control the translation of specific mRNAs required for cell cycle traverse from G1 to S phase. Blocking mTOR affects the activity of the 40S ribosomal protein S6 kinase (p70s6k) and the function of the eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein-1 (4E-BP1), leading to growth arrest in the the G1 phase of the cell cycle. In addition to its actions on p70s6k and 4E-BP1, rapamycin prevents cyclin-dependent kinase activation, inhibits retinoblastoma protein (pRb) phosphorylation, and accelerates the turnover of cyclin D1 that leads to a deficiency of active cdk4/cyclin D1 complexes, all of which can inhibit cell cycle traverse at the G1/S phase transition. Both rapamycin and CCI-779, an ester analog of rapamycin with improved pharmaceutical properties and aqueous solubility, have demonstrated impressive activity against a broad range of human cancers growing in tissue culture and in human tumor xenograft models, which has supported the development of compounds targeting rapamycin-sensitive signal-transduction pathways. CCI-779 has completed several phase I clinical evaluations and is currently undergoing broad disease-directed efficacy studies. The agent appears to be well tolerated at doses that have resulted in impressive anti-tumor activity in several types of refractory neoplasms. Important challenges during clinical development include the definition of a recommended dose range associated with optimal biological activity and maximal therapeutic indices, as well as the ability to predict which tumors will be sensitive or resistant to CCI-779.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗
PubMed2000

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irofulven, a novel mushroom-derived cytotoxin, administered for five consecutive days every four weeks in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the toxicity and pharmacologic behavior of the novel mushroom-derived cytotoxin irofulven administered as a 5-minute intravenous (IV) infusion daily for 5 days every 4 weeks to patients with advanced solid malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase I trial, 46 patients were treated with irofulven doses ranging from 1.0 to 17.69 mg/m(2) as a 5-minute IV infusion (two patients received a 1-hour infusion) daily for 5 days every 4 weeks. The modified continual reassessment method was used for dose escalation. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on days 1 and 5 to characterize the plasma disposition of irofulven. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were treated with 92 courses of irofulven. The dose-limiting toxicities on this schedule were myelosuppression and renal dysfunction. At the 14.15-mg/m(2) dose level, renal dysfunction resembling renal tubular acidosis occurred in four of 10 patients and was ameliorated by prophylactic IV hydration. The 17.69-mg/m(2) dose level was not tolerated because of grade 4 neutropenia and renal toxicity, whereas the 14.15-mg/m(2) dose level was not tolerable with repetitive dosing because of persistent thrombocytopenia. Other common toxicities included mild to moderate nausea, vomiting, facial erythema, and fatigue. One partial response occurred in a patient with advanced, refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer lasting 7 months. Pharmacokinetic studies of irofulven revealed dose-proportional increases in both maximum plasma concentrations and area under the concentration-time curve, while the agent exhibited a rapid elimination half-life of 2 to 10 minutes. CONCLUSION: Given the results of this study, the recommended dose of irofulven is 10.64 mg/m(2) as a 5-minute IV infusion daily for 5 days every 4 weeks. The preliminary antitumor activity documented in a patient with advanced pancreatic cancer and the striking preclinical antitumor effects of irofulven observed on intermittent dosing schedules support further disease-directed evaluations of this agent on the schedule evaluated in this study.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the differentiating agent vesnarinone in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the maximum-tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and pharmacokinetic profile of vesnarinone given once daily in combination with gemcitabine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients were treated with oral vesnarinone once daily on a continuous schedule at doses of 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 mg in combination with intravenous (IV) gemcitabine at a dose of 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. To determine whether biologically relevant concentrations were being achieved, predose concentrations (C(min)) of vesnarinone were obtained weekly. Plasma gemcitabine and 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine concentrations were obtained during courses 1 and 2. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were treated with 92 courses of vesnarinone/gemcitabine. The principal toxicities of the regimen consisted of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, which were dose-limiting in two of eight heavily pretreated new patients treated at the 90 mg/1,000 mg/m(2) dose level and one of 10 minimally pretreated new patients at the 120 mg/1,000 mg/m(2) dose level. None of three patients treated with 15 courses at the vesnarinone/gemcitabine dose levels of 60 mg/1,000 mg/m(2) experienced DLT. Pharmacokinetic studies of vesnarinone revealed significant interpatient variability at any given dose level. There was evidence of a linear relationship between vesnarinone dose and mean C(min) at dosages of vesnarinone less than 150 mg, with plateauing of mean C(min) values at higher dosages. There was no impact of vesnarinone on gemcitabine concentrations, and the vesnarinone pharmacokinetics did not change with gemcitabine between weeks 1 and 2. Two partial responses occurred in patients with refractory breast and non-small-cell lung carcinoma. CONCLUSION: When combined with gemcitabine, the recommended dose of vesnarinone for phase II evaluations is 90 mg orally once daily with gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) IV on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. There is no evidence of pharmacokinetic interaction between vesnarinone and gemcitabine. Further studies of vesnarinone as a single agent or in combination with gemcitabine and other antineoplastic agents are warranted.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Phase I and pharmacologic study of PN401 and fluorouracil in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of administering PN401, an oral uridine prodrug, as a rescue agent for the toxic effects of fluorouracil (5-FU), and to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of 5-FU when given with PN401, with an 8-hour treatment interval between these agents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with escalating doses of 5-FU, given as a rapid intravenous infusion weekly for 3 consecutive weeks every 4 weeks. PN401 was administered orally 8 hours after 5-FU administration, to achieve sustained plasma uridine concentrations of at least 50 micromol/L. Initially, patients received 6 g of PN401 orally every 8 hours for eight doses (schedule 1). When dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was consistently noted, patients then received 6 g of PN401 every 2 hours for three doses and every 6 hours thereafter for 15 doses (schedule 2). RESULTS: Twenty-three patients received 50 courses of 5-FU and PN401. Among patients on schedule 1, DLT (grade 4 neutropenia complicated by fever and diarrhea) occurred in those receiving 5-FU 1,250 mg/m(2)/wk. Among patients on schedule 2, 5-FU 1,250 mg/m(2)/wk was well tolerated, but grade 4, protracted (> 5 days) neutropenia was consistently noted in those treated with higher doses of the drugs. Nonhematologic effects were uncommon and rarely severe. The pharmacokinetics of 5-FU, assessed in 12 patients on schedule 2, were nonlinear, with the mean area under the time-versus-concentration curve (AUC) increasing from 298 +/- 44 to 962 +/- 23 micromol/L and mean clearance decreasing from 34 +/- 4 to 15.6 +/- 0.38 L/h/m(2) as the dose of 5-FU was increased from 1,250 to 1,950 mg/m(2)/wk. 5-FU AUCs achieved with 5-FU 1,250 mg/m(2)/wk for 6 weeks along with the intensified PN401 dose schedule were approximately five-fold higher than those achieved with 5-FU alone. Plasma uridine concentrations increased with each of the three PN401 doses given every 2 hours, and uridine steady-state concentrations were greater than 50 micromol/L. CONCLUSION: Treatment with oral PN401 beginning 8 hours after 5-FU administration is well tolerated and results in sustained plasma uridine concentrations above therapeutic-relevant levels. The recommended 5-FU dosage for phase II evaluations is 1,250 mg/m(2)/wk for 3 weeks every 4 weeks with the intensified PN401 dose schedule (schedule 2). At this dose, systemic exposure to 5-FU as measured by AUC was five-fold higher than that observed after administration of a conventional 5-FU bolus.

Acetates↗
PubMed2000

Phase I and pharmacologic study of the specific matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor BAY 12-9566 on a protracted oral daily dosing schedule in patients with solid malignancies.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of administering BAY 12-9566, a matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitor with relative specificity against MMP-2, MMP-3, and MMP-9, on a protracted oral daily dosing schedule in patients with advanced solid malignancies. The study also sought to determine the principal toxicities of BAY 12-9566, whether plasma BAY 12-9566 steady state concentrations (C(ss)) of biologic relevance could be sustained for prolonged periods, and whether BAY 12-9566 affected plasma concentrations of MMP-2, MMP-9, and tissue inhibitor of MMP-2 (TIMP-2). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with solid malignancies were treated with BAY 12-9566 at daily oral doses ranging from 100 to 1,600 mg. BAY 12-9566 dose schedules included 100 mg once daily, 400 mg once daily, 400 mg twice daily, 400 mg three times daily, 400 mg four times daily, and 800 mg twice daily. Plasma was collected to study the range of BAY 12-9566 C(ss) values achieved, and exploratory studies were performed to assess the effects of BAY 12-9566 on plasma concentrations of MMP-2, MMP-9, and TIMP-2. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were treated with 47 28-day courses of BAY 12-9566. The most common side effects were headache, nausea, vomiting, abnormalities in hepatic functions, and thrombocytopenia, which were rarely clinically significant. BAY 12-9566 was well tolerated on all dose schedules, and there was no consistent dose-limiting toxicity that precluded treatment in the range of dose schedules evaluated. Instead, dose escalation was terminated because BAY 12-9566 plasma C(ss) values increased less than proportionately and plateaued as the daily dose was increased within the dose range of 100 to 1,600 mg/d, suggesting saturable drug absorption. Mean plasma C(ss) values achieved with all dose schedules exceeded BAY 12-9566 concentrations required to inhibit MMPs in vitro and in vascular invasion and tumor proliferation in vivo models. There were no consistent effects of BAY 12-9566 on the plasma concentrations of MMP-2 and MMP-9 over the continuous dosing period at any dose schedule level. However, plasma levels of TIMP-2 seemed to increase in a dose-dependent manner (r(2) =.50, P =.046). CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose of BAY 12-9566 for subsequent disease directed studies is 800 mg twice daily, which resulted in biologically relevant plasma C(ss) values and an acceptable toxicity profile. Although exploratory studies of MMPs in plasma were not revealing, it is conceivable that some tumor types and disease settings are more likely to produce more readily quantifiable levels of activated MMPs than others. Therefore, attempts to identify and quantify surrogate markers of MMP inhibitory effects should continue to be performed in disease-directed studies in more homogenous patient populations.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

Rifampin does not improve the efficacy of quinolone antibacterial prophylaxis in neutropenic cancer patients: results of a randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the addition of rifampin to a quinolone-based antibacterial prophylactic regimen in patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation (PBSCT) decreases the incidence of neutropenia and fever, Gram-positive bacteremia, and infection-related morbidity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with solid tumors undergoing HDC with PBSCT were randomized to receive prophylactic antibiotics with either ciprofloxacin 500 mg orally every 8 hours or the same ciprofloxacin regimen with rifampin 300 mg orally every 12 hours. Prophylaxis was started 48 hours before stem-cell reinfusion. Patients were monitored to document the occurrence of neutropenia and fever, incidence and cause of bacterial infection, time to onset and duration of fever, requirement for intravenous antimicrobials, and length of hospital admission. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were randomized to receive ciprofloxacin and 65 to receive ciprofloxacin plus rifampin, and from these groups, 62 and 61 were assessable, respectively. The proportion of patients who developed neutropenia and fever was 87% in the group treated with ciprofloxacin and 78% in the group treated with ciprofloxacin and rifampin (P =.25). Although there was a trend toward a reduction in the overall incidence of bacteremia (12 v 4 patients), and Gram-positive bacteremia (8 v 2 patients) with the addition of rifampin, none of these comparisons was statistically significant (P =.05 and P =.09, respectively). CONCLUSION: The results of this study, which demonstrate that rifampin does not improve ciprofloxacin antibacterial prophylaxis in cancer patients undergoing HDC with PBSCT support but that it does increase the occurrence of undesirable side effects, do not support the routine use of rifampin in this setting.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Seroprevalence to bovine virus diarrhoea virus and other viruses of the bovine respiratory complex in Venezuela (Apure State).

Six hundred and fifteen serum samples obtained from cows in five districts of Apure State, Venezuela, were tested by ELISA for antibodies to bovine virus diarrhoea virus (BVDV). The same samples were also ELISA-tested for antibodies to bovine herpesvirus type 1 (BHV-1) and bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV). Additionally, the haemagglutination-inhibition (HI) test was used for detecting antibodies to parainfluenza virus type 3 (PIV-3). Overall, seroprevalence to BVDV was 36+/-7% (SE); seroprevalence varied by district (19-42%). BHV-1 seroprevalence was 67+/-4%; variation by district was similar to that of BVDV. However, the first 80 serum samples tested by BHV-1 ELISA all had a strong background reaction with the control antigen. Therefore, these sera were adsorbed to a homogenate of non-infected bovine kidney cell line (MDBK) and retested by ELISA. The non-specific reactivity was significantly reduced (p<0.001 by Wilcoxon's signed-rank test). Compared to the virus-neutralisation (VN) test, the adsorbed BHV-1 ELISA showed 94% agreement and gave a kappa value of 0.84, indicating that the adsorption did not interfere with test accuracy. Seroprevalence against BRSV was 85+/-3%, and showed differences across districts. Most of the cows (94+/-2%) were seropositive to PIV-3, and there were no significant differences among districts.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Outpatient therapy with oral ofloxacin for patients with low risk neutropenia and fever: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Hospitalization and treatment with broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics is the standard care for patients with neutropenia and fever. This randomized clinical trial evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of ambulatory care with oral ofloxacin for patients with low risk, chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and fever. METHODS: Patients with solid tumors who were treated with conventional dose chemotherapy, presented with fever (axillary temperature >38 degrees C on 2 occasions or >38.5 degrees C on a single occasion) and neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count, <500 cells/microL), and met low risk criteria were eligible for this study. They were randomized either to hospitalization and treatment with broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics, which consisted of a combination of cefazidime and amikacin, or to outpatient treatment with oral ofloxacin. The definitions of fever of unknown origin, clinical and microbiologic infection, success, success with modification, and failure were the usual ones for this type of study. RESULTS: One hundred episodes were randomized, and 95 were evaluable (47 were randomized to ceftazidime/amikacin and 48 to ofloxacin). Baseline characteristics, as well as the proportion of patients with microbiologic and clinical infections, were similar in the two groups. In 91% of episodes in the inpatient group and 89% in the ofloxacin group, patients recovered uneventfully (P=1; 95% CI for the difference, -0.09 to 0.13), with 2 and 5 patients requiring modification of the antibiotics, respectively. Eight percent of episodes in the control group and 10.4% in the experimental group resulted in treatment failure. Eight patients (16%) in the outpatient group experienced failure with ambulatory care and were admitted to the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient oral antibiotic therapy with oral ofloxacin for patients with low risk neutropenia and fever is safe and similar in efficacy to hospitalization and treatment with broad-spectrum parenteral antibiotics.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1999

Incidence and clinical impact of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in the faecal flora of cancer patients treated with high dose chemotherapy and ciprofloxacin prophylaxis.

This study evaluated the susceptibility of Escherichia coli to quinolones in 72 stool samples collected from 31 patients with solid tumours who had undergone high dose chemotherapy (HDC) and peripheral blood stem-cell (PBSC) rescue with ciprofloxacin prophylaxis. Samples were obtained at admission, after completing prophylaxis and three months later. All E. coli strains isolated from baseline samples were susceptible to quinolones. Fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli strains were isolated in 10 (32%) patients in the second sample. In eight of these patients isolates were susceptible 3 months later. No patient developed infection due to fluorquinolone-resistant E. coli. No differences were observed in outcome between patients with susceptible and resistant flora.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Comparative activity of the cyclopropylpyrroloindole compounds adozelesin, bizelesin and carzelesin in a human tumor colony-forming assay.

Adozelesin, bizelesin and carzelesin are synthetic cyclopropylpyrroloindole (CPI) analogs, a class of potent antineoplastic agents modeled on the antitumor antibiotic CC-1065, that specifically bind to the minor groove of DNA and preferentially alkylate AT-rich regions. These compounds were evaluated against fresh human tumors in a human tumor colony-forming assay (HTCFA) to assess and to compare their relative antitumor spectra, concentration-response relationships and schedule-dependence. Human tumor colony-forming units were treated with adozelesin and bizelesin at concentrations of 0.02, 0.1 and 0.5 ng/ml as a continuous exposure for 14 days, and to 0.2, 1.0 and 5.0 ng/ml as a 1 h exposure. Carzelesin concentrations were 0.04, 0.2 and 1 ng/ml as a continuous exposure, and 0.6, 3.0 and 15.0 ng/ml as a 1 h exposure. A response was scored if there was 50% or less colony survival. The three analogs had similar antitumor activity against colon carcinoma, kidney carcinoma and melanoma colony-forming units. Adozelesin also displayed activity against both breast and non-small cell lung carcinoma colony-forming units, and carzelesin was active against ovarian carcinoma colony-forming units. Significantly positive concentration-response relationships were apparent with all three agents. Responses increased from below 15% at the lowest concentration to above 45% at the highest concentration for the three drugs on all schedules (p < 0.01). At the highest concentration, the overall response rate was significantly higher (p < 0.01) with carzelesin on the continuous schedule (71%) compared to the 1 h schedule (46%). However, overall response rates for adozelesin and bizelesin were similar on both schedules (1 h/continuous: adozelesin, 67/58%; bizelesin, 49/44%), indicating that adozelesin and bizelesin are less schedule dependent than carzelesin in the HTCFA. These results demonstrate that the CPIs have broad-spectrum activity against human tumor colony-forming units in the HTCFA at very low concentrations, as well as differences with regard to schedule dependence which may help guide the optimal clinical development of these agents.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1999

A phase I trial of topical topitriol (calcitriol, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3) to prevent chemotherapy-induced alopecia.

This study evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of topical topitriol (calcitriol, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3) to prevent chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA). Patients with breast cancer scheduled to receive FAC chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, adriamycin and cyclophosphamide) were eligible for the study. Initially, the first six patients were randomized in a double-blind fashion to have received topitriol or placebo with all subsequent patients being treated with topitriol. Topitriol cream (0.0025 or 0.005%; 25 and 50 microg/g concentration) was administered topically twice a day. Three different doses and schedules of administration were evaluated including: 500 and 1000 microg daily for 7 days prior to chemotherapy, and 2000 microg daily for 5 days prior and 5 days post-chemotherapy. Fourteen patients were treated (12 with topitriol and two with placebo) at three different dose levels. All patients developed grade 2 alopecia between day 20 and 30 after chemotherapy, demonstrating the lack of efficacy of topical topitriol on this schedule of administration to prevent CIA. Eight patients exposed to topitriol developed a toxic maculopapular dermatitis in areas exposed to the drug. In conclusion, topical topitriol at the doses and schedules evaluated in this trial was ineffective to prevent CIA and induced a local dermatitis in areas exposed to the drug.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed1999

Antitumor activity of MGI 114 (6-hydroxymethylacylfulvene, HMAF), a semisynthetic derivative of illudin S, against adult and pediatric human tumor colony-forming units.

MGI 114 (6-hydroxymethylacylfulvene, HMAF) is a novel semisynthetic antitumor compound derived from the sesquiterpene mushroom toxin illudin S. Although illudins did not demonstrate significant activity as antiproliferative agents in tumor-bearing animals, several properties including its potent inhibition of DNA synthesis and a unique interaction with DNA led to a structure-activity-based synthetic effort to obtain analogs with improved therapeutic potential. MGI 114 was selected for further development based on its antitumor activity in numerous preclinical tests. MGI 114 was evaluated against adult and pediatric human tumors taken directly from cancer patients and cultured in a human tumor colony-forming assay (HTCFA) to assess the antitumor spectra, concentration-response relationship, schedule dependence and activity of this agent against tumors considered resistant to conventional anticancer drugs. Human tumor colony-forming units were treated with HMAF at concentrations of 0.001, 0.01, 0.1 and 1 microg/ml, both as a 1 h exposure and as a continuous 14 day exposure. A response was scored if there was 50% or less colony survival. In vitro response rates in the range of 50-80% were observed against tumor colony-forming units originating from carcinomas of the colon, kidney, breast, lung cancer, ovary and melanoma. MGI 114 also demonstrated antitumor activity against neuroblastoma colony-forming units. Antitumor activity was not influenced by exposure time as demonstrated by the similar responses rates obtained with the 1 h and continuous exposure at all concentrations tested. However, there was a significant positive concentration-response relationship to both exposure duration with responses increasing from below 10% at the lowest concentration to over 70% at the highest concentration, except for the pediatric tumors on the 1 h exposure for which this relationship was less apparent. At the higher concentration tested, MGI 114 displayed substantial antiproliferative effects in the range of 70% against tumor specimens resistant to classic cytotoxic agents including irinotecan, paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. These results demonstrate that MGI 114 exhibits a broad spectrum of antitumor activity against both adult and pediatric primary tumor colony-forming units in a concentration-dependent manner both at short and prolonged exposure duration. The substantial in vitro activity of MGI 114 at concentrations achievable in clinical trials, together with its activity against tumors resistant to classic standard cytotoxic drugs, justifies the further clinical evaluation of this unique agent.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Phase I-II study of gemcitabine and fluorouracil as a continuous infusion in patients with pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities, and efficacy of gemcitabine combined with fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable, locally advanced, nonresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer were candidates for the study. 5-FU was given via protracted venous infusion (PVI) at a fixed dosage of 200 mg/m2/d, and gemcitabine was administered weekly for 3 consecutive weeks every 4 weeks. The initial dose of gemcitabine was 700 mg/m2 and was escalated in increments of 100 mg/m2/wk until the appearance of severe toxicity. Measurements of efficacy included the following: response rate; clinical benefit response, which is a composite measurement of pain, performance status, and weight loss; time to disease progression; and survival. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients received a total of 109 courses. Dose-limiting toxicity, which consisted of grade 4 neutropenia with fever (one patient) and grade 4 thrombocytopenia (one patient), was observed in two of three patients treated with 1,100 mg/m2/wk of gemcitabine. On the basis of these results, the MTD of gemcitabine with 5-FU via PVI on this schedule was 1,000 mg/m2. Sixteen patients developed grade 3-4 neutropenia, and three patients developed grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia. Grade 3-4 nonhematologic toxicity consisted of diarrhea (two patients) and cutaneous toxicity, asthenia, edema, mucositis, and nausea and vomiting (one patient each). The delivered dose-intensity of gemcitabine was similar at the 1,000 mg/m2 dose level (599 mg/m2/wk) as at the 900 mg/m2 (601 mg/m2/wk) dose level. For this reason, the recommended dose of gemcitabine for phase II evaluation on this schedule was 900 mg/m2. Five patients had objective responses (one complete response and four partial responses; response rate, 19.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.5 to 39.3), and 10 patients had improvement of disease-related symptoms (45%; 95% CI, 24 to 67). After a median follow-up of 17.7 months (range, 7.8 to 24.8 months), the median progression-free survival and overall survival times were 7.4 months (95% CI, 3.3 to 11.4) and 10.3 months (95% CI, 8.1 to 12.5), respectively. CONCLUSION: The MTD of gemcitabine when combined with 5-FU via PVI on this schedule was 1,000 mg/m2/ wk; however, on the basis of administered dose-intensity, the recommended dose for additional investigation is 900 mg/m2. This combination chemotherapy regimen was well tolerated and showed promising antitumor activity in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Adult↗