Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Hidalgo

Publications and source records attributed to M Hidalgo.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1999

Outpatient therapy with oral ofloxacin for patients with low risk neutropenia and fever: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Hospitalization and treatment with broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics is the standard care for patients with neutropenia and fever. This randomized clinical trial evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of ambulatory care with oral ofloxacin for patients with low risk, chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and fever. METHODS: Patients with solid tumors who were treated with conventional dose chemotherapy, presented with fever (axillary temperature >38 degrees C on 2 occasions or >38.5 degrees C on a single occasion) and neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count, <500 cells/microL), and met low risk criteria were eligible for this study. They were randomized either to hospitalization and treatment with broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics, which consisted of a combination of cefazidime and amikacin, or to outpatient treatment with oral ofloxacin. The definitions of fever of unknown origin, clinical and microbiologic infection, success, success with modification, and failure were the usual ones for this type of study. RESULTS: One hundred episodes were randomized, and 95 were evaluable (47 were randomized to ceftazidime/amikacin and 48 to ofloxacin). Baseline characteristics, as well as the proportion of patients with microbiologic and clinical infections, were similar in the two groups. In 91% of episodes in the inpatient group and 89% in the ofloxacin group, patients recovered uneventfully (P=1; 95% CI for the difference, -0.09 to 0.13), with 2 and 5 patients requiring modification of the antibiotics, respectively. Eight percent of episodes in the control group and 10.4% in the experimental group resulted in treatment failure. Eight patients (16%) in the outpatient group experienced failure with ambulatory care and were admitted to the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient oral antibiotic therapy with oral ofloxacin for patients with low risk neutropenia and fever is safe and similar in efficacy to hospitalization and treatment with broad-spectrum parenteral antibiotics.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1999

Phase I-II study of gemcitabine and fluorouracil as a continuous infusion in patients with pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities, and efficacy of gemcitabine combined with fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable, locally advanced, nonresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer were candidates for the study. 5-FU was given via protracted venous infusion (PVI) at a fixed dosage of 200 mg/m2/d, and gemcitabine was administered weekly for 3 consecutive weeks every 4 weeks. The initial dose of gemcitabine was 700 mg/m2 and was escalated in increments of 100 mg/m2/wk until the appearance of severe toxicity. Measurements of efficacy included the following: response rate; clinical benefit response, which is a composite measurement of pain, performance status, and weight loss; time to disease progression; and survival. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients received a total of 109 courses. Dose-limiting toxicity, which consisted of grade 4 neutropenia with fever (one patient) and grade 4 thrombocytopenia (one patient), was observed in two of three patients treated with 1,100 mg/m2/wk of gemcitabine. On the basis of these results, the MTD of gemcitabine with 5-FU via PVI on this schedule was 1,000 mg/m2. Sixteen patients developed grade 3-4 neutropenia, and three patients developed grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia. Grade 3-4 nonhematologic toxicity consisted of diarrhea (two patients) and cutaneous toxicity, asthenia, edema, mucositis, and nausea and vomiting (one patient each). The delivered dose-intensity of gemcitabine was similar at the 1,000 mg/m2 dose level (599 mg/m2/wk) as at the 900 mg/m2 (601 mg/m2/wk) dose level. For this reason, the recommended dose of gemcitabine for phase II evaluation on this schedule was 900 mg/m2. Five patients had objective responses (one complete response and four partial responses; response rate, 19.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.5 to 39.3), and 10 patients had improvement of disease-related symptoms (45%; 95% CI, 24 to 67). After a median follow-up of 17.7 months (range, 7.8 to 24.8 months), the median progression-free survival and overall survival times were 7.4 months (95% CI, 3.3 to 11.4) and 10.3 months (95% CI, 8.1 to 12.5), respectively. CONCLUSION: The MTD of gemcitabine when combined with 5-FU via PVI on this schedule was 1,000 mg/m2/ wk; however, on the basis of administered dose-intensity, the recommended dose for additional investigation is 900 mg/m2. This combination chemotherapy regimen was well tolerated and showed promising antitumor activity in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

A multicenter randomized Phase II trial of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor-supported, platinum-based chemotherapy with flexible midcycle cisplatin administration in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma. PSAMOMA Cooperative Group, Spain.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze whether the addition of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) to platinum-based combination chemotherapy could increase platinum dose intensity and response rates and decrease hematologic toxicity in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with untreated advanced ovarian carcinoma (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] Stage IIC-IV) were treated after maximum debulking surgery with cyclophosphamide, 750 mg/m2, and carboplatin, 350 mg/m2, on Day 1 plus cisplatin, 75 mg/m2, on Day 14 when clinically indicated (adequate bone marrow and renal function). Patients were randomized to receive chemotherapy alone (Arm A) or chemotherapy supported with G-CSF (5 microg/kg subcutaneously on Days 2-13; Arm B). RESULTS: Between November 1993 and April 1995, 80 patients were included. Seventy-eight patients were evaluable for dose intensity calculations. Both groups were well matched with regard to age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, histopathologic subtype, tumor grade, FIGO stage, and residual tumor after surgery. The dose intensities calculated in mg/m2/week for cyclophosphamide and carboplatin were similar in both groups; however, the dose intensity of cisplatin was higher in Arm B (5.7 mg/m2 vs. 10.3 mg/m2). The occurrence of Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3-4 neutropenia was less common in the G-CSF arm (55% vs. 7.7%). Response rates (52% vs. 68%) and pathologic complete responses (32% vs. 25%) were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS; The addition of G-CSF to this platinum-based chemotherapy regimen in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma resulted in a modest increment in platinum dose intensity and appeared to reduce the incidence of Grade 3-4 neutropenia.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

A phase II study of a novel gemcitabine plus cisplatin regimen administered every three weeks for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the clinical activity and toxicity of a novel chemotherapy combination regimen of gemcitabine plus cisplatin, administered every three weeks, in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six previously untreated stages III (14) and IV (12) patients were included. Gemcitabine was administered on days 1 and 8 at a dose of 1250 mg/m2 and cisplatin was administered at a dose of 100 mg/m2 on day 1, every 21 days. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were evaluable for response. One patient achieved a complete response, and 16 patients partial responses. The overall response rate was 65.3% (95% CI: 45%-82%). The main toxicity was hematological: neutropenia NCIC-CTC grade 3-4 in 54% of the patients, and thrombocytopenia grade 3-4 in 23%. The non-hematological toxicity was mild and tolerable. Only 13% of gemcitabine injections were dose-reduced or omitted due to toxicity. The actual dose-intensity of gemcitabine was 715 mg/m2/week, and 31 mg/m2/week for cisplatin. These figures represent the 86% and 93% of the theoretical dose intensity of both drugs, respectively. With a median follow-up of 10 months (range 7-13), 17 patients are still alive and nine have died. The median overall survival is 12 months. CONCLUSION: This novel combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin administered every three weeks is well tolerated and induces a remarkably high response rate. The regimen proves more interesting than the four-week schedules, particularly regarding patients who are candidates for local therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Phase II trial of cisplatin and gemcitabine in advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the toxicity profile and efficacy of cisplatin combined with gemcitabine in patients with irresectable locally recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Gemcitabine was given at a dose of 800 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15, plus cisplatin at a dose of 50 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8; every four weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients with a median age of 59 years (range 42-74) were included. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 22 patients were assessable for response. Eleven cases had advanced recurrent locoregional disease while 13 patients had metastatic disease. One CR (4.7%) and four PR (18%) were observed, for an overall response rate of 22.7% (95% CI: 8%-42%). The main toxicity was hematological: neutropenia grade 3-4 in 28% of the cycles and thrombocytopenia grade 3-4 in 16%. The most significant non-hematological toxicity was asthenia grade 2-3 in 24% of the cycles. CONCLUSIONS: This cisplatin plus gemcitabine combination schedule has a favourable toxicity profile with a discrete activity in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Risk factors for treatment-related death in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a multivariate analysis.

PURPOSE: It has been suggested that age is associated with chemotherapy-related death in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) treated with doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relative influence of increasing age and other clinical parameters on the occurrence of treatment-related death in elderly patients with intermediate- or high-grade NHL treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) chemotherapy. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients 60 years of age or older with intermediate- or high-grade NHL treated with CHOP chemotherapy in a single cancer center. The following variables were recorded: age (60 to 69, 70 to 79, and 80 to 94 years), histology (Working Formulation [WF] D, E, F, G, and H), Ann Arbor stage, B symptoms, extranodal involvement, bulky disease (> 7 cm), performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] scale), International Prognostic Index (IPI score), serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level and doxorubicin relative dose-intensity (RDI). The relationship between these features and treatment-related death was assessed in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: From 1982 to 1991, 267 consecutive patients were treated. Median age was 70 years (range, 60 to 94 years). There were 35 toxic deaths. Sixty-three percent of the deaths occurred after the first cycle. Infection accounted for 82% of the toxic deaths. In the univariate analysis, the features associated with an increased risk of toxic death were ECOG performance status 2 to 4 (relative risk [RR], 7.82), B symptoms (RR, 3.38), diffuse large-cell histology (RR, 3.06), bulky disease (RR, 2.58), serum levels of LDH (RR, 2.53), and IPI score (RR, 2.46). The age groups did not show significance. In the regression model, performance status 2 to 4 was the only independent predictor of treatment-related death (RR, 3.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.98 to 4.06). CONCLUSION: Our results show that in elderly patients with NHL treated with doxorubicin-based chemotherapy the risk for treatment-related death is associated with poor performance status rather than with increasing chronologic age.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1998

A Phase I and pharmacological study of the glutamine antagonist acivicin with the amino acid solution aminosyn in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

Acivicin is a glutamine analogue antimetabolite that inhibits several glutamate-dependent synthetic enzymes. Previous studies of this agent administered on a 72-h continuous i.v. infusion schedule every 3 weeks demonstrated a high rate of severe, albeit reversible, central nervous system (CNS) toxicity at the 30 mg/m2/day dose level. Animal studies have shown that the CNS toxicity of acivicin can be prevented by a concomitant infusion of amino acids postulated to block drug uptake in the CNS by a saturable transport system that is common to endogenous amino acids. This study evaluated the feasibility of escalating acivicin doses in cancer patients by administering acivicin with a concomitant 96-h i.v. infusion of a mixture of 16 amino acids (Aminosyn, 10%). Twenty-three patients with advanced malignancies were treated with acivicin on a 72-h continuous infusion schedule at doses ranging from 25 to 60 mg/m2/day every 3 weeks. Reversible, dose-limiting CNS toxicity, characterized by lethargy, confusion, and decreased mental status, occurred in the two patients enrolled at the 60 mg/m2/day dose level, precluding further dose escalation. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose for additional evaluation of acivicin on this schedule is 50 mg/m2/day. Other toxicities observed were dose-related neutropenia that was grade 4 in four patients (four courses), complicated with fever in three of those patients, and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in three patients (three courses). Pharmacokinetics studies performed in 15 patients revealed that the acivicin plasma Css increased from 0.44 microg/ml (range, 0.28-0.59 microg/ml) at the 25 mg/m2/day to 1.06 microg/ml (0.64-1.5 microg/ml) at the 50 mg/m2/dose level. Acivicin Css at the MTD was not significantly higher than previously reported values with single-agent acivicin on the same schedule of administration at the MTD of 25 mg/m2/day dose level (0.60 microg/ml; range, 0.43-0.81 microg/ml). Neurotoxicity did not correlate with acivicin Css, but relationships between exposure to acivicin and the occurrence of both neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were well described by a sigmoidal Emax model. This trial demonstrated that concomitant infusions of amino acid can prevent acivicin-induced CNS toxicity, which allows the dose of acivicin to be escalated 2-fold above previously tolerable doses; however, this effect did not translate in a significant increment in acivicin Css.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Mediastinal non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (MNSGCT) treated with cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Primary mediastinal non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (MNSGCT) constitute a rare malignancy. This study was performed to review our experience with cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with MNSGCT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with MNSGCT treated with cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy between 1978-1995 in three university hospitals in Spain were retrospectively studied. RESULTS: There were 25 males and two females with a median age of 26 years (range 4-71). Fifteen patients had disease confined to the mediastinum and 12 had metastatic disease. All patients were treated with cisplatin chemotherapy regimens (PVB: 7, BEP: 6, and other regimens 12) and considered for residual mass surgery (RMS) when indicated. Eleven patients (40.7%) were rendered disease-free with initial treatment: four with chemotherapy alone, one with surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy and six with chemotherapy plus RMS. Three of these patients relapsed at two, six and seven months. The remaining 16 had unfavourable responses (five partial response, three no change, seven progressive disease and one toxic death). Eleven patients received salvage treatment but none of them achieved a durable response. After a median follow-up of 77 months (range 1-168), 10 patients remain alive. Actuarial survival at five years is 31.7%. No patients in this series developed a haematological malignancy. Chromosomal analysis showed that 2 out of 10 patients (20%) had a 47XXY karyotype. CONCLUSIONS: Only patients who achieved disease-free status are likely to be cured. Therefore, new up-front strategies are needed for the treatment of MNSGCT.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Octreotide (SMS 201-995) for hematopoietic support-dependent high-dose chemotherapy (HSD-HDC)-related diarrhoea: dose finding study and evaluation of efficacy.

Emphasis has been put on the intensification of chemotherapy programs through high-dose chemotherapy regimens. While their myelosuppression is managed through the use of colony-stimulating factors and/or infusion of autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transfusions (PBPCT), extramedullary dose-limiting toxicities, including gastrointestinal mucosal injury, are a treatment-limiting factor and their management is a critical issue in HSD-HDC. Octreotide is effective in the control of diarrhoea induced by fluoropyrimidines. We have studied its effect on hematopoietic support-dependent high-dose chemotherapy (HSD-HDC) related diarrhoea. HSD-HDC-treated patients were included in the study when they had > or =4 loose stools per day. Diagnostic work-up included physical examination, stool culture, Clostridium difficile toxin assay, abdominal plain films, complete blood counts, liver and renal function tests. Patients were treated with 0.1 mg octreotide, q 8 h, subcutaneously for 48 h. Responding patients (< or =2 loose stools per day) continued treatment at the same dose for an additional 24 h. Lack of response (> or =3 loose stools per day), led to dose escalation by 0.1 mg increments, up to a 0.5 mg/dose and the latter dose was maintained for 24 h. Patients not responding at 0.5 mg/8 h were considered failures. A consecutive cohort of 24 HSD-HDC treated patients was studied. Fourteen (n = 14) (58.33%) patients developed severe diarrhoea with a median number of 7.5 loose stools per day (range, 4-11). Diarrhoea started at a median of 8 days (2-18) from day 0 of the infusion of HSD-HDC. Seven patients (50%) had less than 500 ANC/mm3 (grade 4 neutropenia) simultaneously with the diarrhoea. Twelve of 14 patients (86%) had their diarrhoea controlled, seven of them (50%) at the starting dose level of octreotide. In five of the responding patients (35.7%), octreotide had to be increased to 0.2 mg (one patient), 0.3 mg (two patients) and 0.5 mg (two patients). No toxicity was observed, while one patient had a subcutaneous hematoma at the injection site. We have concluded that octreotide appears to be safe and effective in controlling the diarrhoea induced by HSD-HDC. Prospective controlled trials are needed to confirm its value.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Lack of ability of ciprofloxacin-rifampin prophylaxis to decrease infection-related morbidity in neutropenic patients given cytotoxic therapy and peripheral blood stem cell transplants.

We compared ciprofloxacin alone with ciprofloxacin plus rifampin (C + R) as a prophylactic antibacterial regimen for 40 patients with solid tumors treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation support. No differences were found between groups in the time elapsed to the onset of fever, incidence of febrile episodes, amphotericin B use, and length of hospital stay. However, C + R combination prophylaxis significantly reduced the incidence of gram-positive bacteremia (five versus zero episodes) but was associated with a higher incidence of drug-related side effects.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Patient selection in high-dose chemotherapy trials: relevance in high-risk breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of the selection criteria that are used in current high-dose consolidation chemotherapy (HDCT) trials on the outcome of high-risk breast cancer patients treated with conventional adjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1975 to 1995, 265 breast cancer patients at our institution showed involvement of ten or more positive axillary lymph nodes. Of these, 171 received standard adjuvant combination chemotherapy, but not HDCT consolidation, and were the subjects of our study. One hundred twenty-eight patients met the standard selection criteria for HDCT with hematological support (< 60 years, no significant concomitant disease, and no progression during adjuvant treatment), whereas 43 did not. Clinical outcome was analyzed by using disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) as endpoints. To provide an assessment of the short-term efficacy of HDCT, we also evaluated the outcome in a cohort of 39 patients from the last 4 years who met the criteria for, and were actually treated with, HDCT after adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 4.4 years (range, 0.7 to 17.2 years), 112 of the 171 patients have had a relapse, and 87 have died. The estimated 5-year DFS was 32.3%, and OS was 49.4%. DFS was significantly higher for patients who met the HDCT criteria (36.6% at 5 years) than for those who did not (15.8% at 5 years; P < .05). OS was also significantly more favorable in patients meeting HDCT criteria (55.4% at 5 years) than in patients not meeting HDCT criteria (22.7% at 5 years; P < .01). We performed a multivariate analysis to adjust for other potential prognostic factors and found that meeting the HDCT criteria and having undergone locoregional radiotherapy were the only significant independent predictors for DFS and OS. Finally, we compared the outcome of the 128 patients who met the HDCT criteria and were treated with conventional adjuvant chemotherapy only with that of the 39 patients who met the criteria and who actually underwent HDCT, and we did not observe significant differences in the DFS or OS between these groups. CONCLUSIONS: Meeting HDCT inclusion criteria is an independent indicator of favorable prognosis in high-risk breast cancer patients. The selection of patients by these criteria may explain, at least in part, the promising short-term results of nonrandomized adjuvant HDCT trials in high-risk breast cancer.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1997

Study of escalating doses of paclitaxel plus cisplatin in patients with inoperable head and neck cancer.

This phase I/II study sought to determine the response rate and toxicity profile of escalating doses of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) when administered with fixed doses of cisplatin with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in 28 patients with head or neck cancer. The study was designed as a modified dose-finding trial and contained five dose-escalation levels of paclitaxel. Dose level 1 contained seven patients, and doses ranged from 175 to 220 mg/m2; dose level 2, 230 to 250 mg/m2 (five patients); dose level 3, 250 mg/m2 only (four patients); dose level 4, 260 to 280 mg/m2 (six patients); and dose level 5, 280 to 300 mg/m2 (six patients). Dose levels greater than 200 mg/m2 were supported with concomitant granulocyte colony-stimulating support. Paclitaxel was given on day 1 by 3-hour infusion; cisplatin 75 mg/m2 was given on day 2. Courses were given every 3 weeks. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 27 were evaluable for response. The overall response rate was 77% (10 complete responses, 11 partial responses, four no change, and two disease progression). Over a median follow-up of 15 months (range, 7 to 22 months), 16 patients showed no evidence of disease and three are alive with disease. A dose-effect relationship was found between paclitaxel and peripheral neuropathy. Twenty-seven of 28 patients experienced alopecia, peripheral neuropathy, myalgias, and arthralgias. Most toxicities were grade 1 or 2; the mean duration of symptoms was 7 days. No dose-limiting hematologic toxicity was observed, nor was any significant neutropenia seen in those patients receiving filgrastim. The paclitaxel/cisplatin combination was found to be an effective first-line regimen for patients with head or neck cancer. Although the number of patients in this study was small, no relationship was noted between patient response and disease site.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Phase I/II study of paclitaxel/cisplatin as first-line therapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer.

A phase I/II study was conducted to determine the response rate and the toxicity of escalating doses of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) plus cisplatin with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in patients with untreated advanced head and neck carcinoma. Twenty-eight patients with locally advanced inoperable squamous cell head and neck carcinoma were included. Median age was 51 years. Karnofsky performance status was > or =90% in all patients. Primary tumor sites were oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx, oral cavity, parotid gland, nasal cavity, and unknown primary. We observed 13 complete responses, eight partial responses, four patients with stable disease, and two patients with progressive disease for an overall response rate of 78%. Toxicity was paresthesia grade 1/2 in 27 patients, and myalgias were grade 1/2 in 23 patients and grade 3 in four patients. One patient died 5 days after the first cycle due to acute renal failure, respiratory distress, and pancytopenia. No dose-limiting hematologic toxicity has been observed, and intrapatient escalations were performed in all patients when planned. Calculated dose intensity for the two drugs was 100% in all evaluable patients. The combination of escalating doses of paclitaxel 175 to 300 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 was active in untreated head and neck carcinoma, with an overall response rate of 78%. No dose-limiting toxicity has been encountered at paclitaxel doses up to 300 mg/m2 given with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Cross-reactive, serotype- and monotype-specific neutralization epitopes on VP7 of serotype G3 and G5 porcine rotavirus strains.

VP7 specific monoclonal antibodies raised against serotype G5 porcine rotavirus strains isolated in Venezuela showed either a serotype G5- or monotype-specific pattern of reactivity by neutralization against a panel of 53 group A rotavirus isolates representative of all established G serotypes. Monoclonal antibodies raised against two G3 porcine strains were either specific for a subset of porcine G3 strains or reactive with another subset of porcine G3 strains and with most G5 strains. Neither were reactive with G3 strains from other species. Analysis of neutralization resistant mutants selected with these monoclonal antibodies indicated that epitopes defined by cross-reactive, serotype- and monotype-specific monoclonal antibodies overlap functionally and that binding and neutralization by these antibodies depended on specific amino acid residues in the region A or C of VP7. Results indicate that a high degree of monotypic variation occurs among G5 and G3 porcine rotavirus strains and the existence of at least one common epitope shared by G5 and G3 porcine strains, in the major neutralization domain of these VP7s.

Amino Acid Sequence↗