Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M A Overbeeke

Publications and source records attributed to M A Overbeeke.

56 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Involvement of Gly96 in the formation of the Rh26 epitope.

BACKGROUND: The Rh system, a complex blood group system, comprises at least 45 antigens. Red cells expressing c usually express Rh26. Rare cells that are c+ Rh:-26 give variable reactions with anti-c and may have weak expression of f (ce). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Serologic and molecular studies were performed with red cells from persons with the c+ Rh:-26 phenotype occurring in two unrelated Dutch families. Red cells of 11 members of these two families were typed for Rh26, for c (with monoclonal and polyclonal reagents), and for f (ce). The cDNA of three donors was sequenced, while restricted DNA analysis was carried out on material from available members of the two families. RESULTS: Serologic tests showed that the rare c+ Rh:-26 phenotype was associated with a weak expression of c and a normal expression of f. The cDNA analysis of three members of one family revealed a single-point mutation (G286A) in exon 2 of the ce allele. Allele-specific primer amplification, polymerase chain reaction followed by allele-specific restriction analysis, and single-strand conformation polymorphism showed the same polymorphism in all other members of both families, whereas it was absent in 80 control donors. CONCLUSION: The c+ Rh:-26 phenotype, identified in two families, is associated with a single-point mutation at nucleotide 286 (G286A) in the ce allele, which predicts a Gly96Ser amino acid substitution. This substitution also affects c, because all anti-c reagents reacted more weakly. Other polymorphic sites apparently are involved in the formation of the Rh26 epitope as well, because Rh26 is expressed only on the c polypeptide, whereas Gly96 is expressed on all polypeptides.

Alleles↗

Genotyping of RHD by multiplex polymerase chain reaction analysis of six RHD-specific exons.

BACKGROUND: Qualitative RHD variants are the result of the replacement of RHD exons by their RHCE counterparts or of point mutations in RHD causing amino acid substitutions. For RHD typing, the use of at least two RHD typing polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays directed at different regions of RHD is advised to prevent discrepancies between phenotyping and genotyping results, but even then discrepancies occur. A multiplex RHD PCR based on amplification of six RHD-specific exons in one reaction mixture is described. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Six RHD-specific primer sets were designed to amplify RHD exons 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9. DNA from 119 donors (87 D+, 14 D- and 18 with known D variants; whites and nonwhites) with known Rh phenotypes was analyzed. RESULTS: All six RHD-specific exons from 85 D+ individuals were amplified, whereas none of the RHD exons from 13 D- individuals were amplified. Multiplex PCR analysis showed that the genotypes of two donors typed as D+ were DIVa and DVa. Red cell typing confirmed these findings. From all D variants tested (DIIIc, DIVa, DIVb, DVa, DVI, DDFR, DDBT) and from RoHar, RHD-specific exons were amplified as expected from the proposed genotypes. CONCLUSION: The multiplex PCR assay is reliable in determining genotypes in people who have the D+ and partial D phenotypes as well as in discovering people with new D variants. Because the multiplex PCR is directed at six regions of RHD, the chance of discrepancies is markedly reduced. The entire analysis can be performed in one reaction mixture, which results in higher speed, higher accuracy, and the need for smaller samples. This technique might be of great value in prenatal RHD genotyping.

Alleles↗