Biomedical subjects

L Thijs

Publications and source records attributed to L Thijs.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

PubMed1997

Determining the trough-to-peak ratio in parallel-group trials. Systolic Hypertension in Europe (SYST-EUR) Trial Investigators.

We explored how in parallel-group trials interindividual variability, correction for placebo effects, and smoothing of blood pressure profiles can be handled in measuring the trough-to-peak ratio in 244 individuals with isolated systolic hypertension (> or = 60 years) enrolled in the placebo-controlled Systolic Hypertension in europe Trial. Net treatment effects were computed by subtracting the mean changes from baseline during placebo (n = 133) from those during active treatment (n = 111). At entry, systolic/diastolic pressures averaged 176/86 mm Hg in the clinic and 149/80 mm Hg on 24-hour ambulatory monitoring. With corrections applied for baseline and placebo, nitrendipine (10 to 40 mg/d), with the possible addition of enalapril (5 to 20 mg/d) and/or hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 to 25 mg/d), reduced (P < .001) these blood pressure values by 16.6/7.3 and 9.8/4.7 mm Hg, respectively. The net trough-to-peak ratios were first determined from blood pressure profiles (12 hours) with 1-hour precision, synchronized by the morning and evening doses of the double-blind medication. According to the usual approach, disregarding interindividual variability, the systolic/diastolic net trough-to-peak ratios were 0.46/0.40 in the morning and 0.77/0.99 in the evening. In individual subjects, the baseline-adjusted trough-to-peak ratios were nonnormally distributed. We therefore used a nonparametric technique to calculate the net trough-to-peak ratios from the results in individual subjects. In the morning, these ratios averaged 0.25 systolic (95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 0.41) and 0.15 diastolic (95% confidence interval, 0.00 to 0.31) and in the evening, 0.19 and 0.36 (95% confidence intervals, 0.00 to 0.38 and 0.14 to 0.56), respectively. When the blood pressure profiles were smoothed by substituting the 1-hour averages by moving or fixed 2-hour averages or by Fourier modeling, the trough-to-peak ratios remained unchanged after the morning dose (0.20/0.13, 0.20/0.14, and 0.16/0.21, respectively) but tended to increase in the evening (0.32/0.38, 0.28/0.40, and 0.48/0.49). In conclusion, the parallel-group analysis proposed makes it possible for one to correct the trough-to-peak ratio for baseline as well as placebo, to account for interindividual variability, and to calculate a confidence interval for the net trough-to-peak ratio. Accounting for interindividual variability reduces the trough-to-peak ratio. Smoothing affects the individualized net trough-to-peak ratios in an unpredictable way and should therefore be avoided.

Aged↗

PubMed1997

Optimal definition of daytime and night-time blood pressure.

OBJECTIVE: To review and categorize methods to define daytime and night-time blood pressures and to propose an optimal definition. METHODS: The methods can be divided into clock-time-independent and clock-time-dependent methods and, in addition, into wide methods, which use all pressure measurements for the entire 24 h period, and narrow methods, which exclude some of the measurements. RESULTS: The asleep and awake blood pressures, mostly defined as the in-bed and out-of-bed blood pressures, can be considered the optimum standard. Wide (square-wave fitting) and narrow (cumulative-sum analysis) clock-time-independent methods perform well with most subjects, but are problematic with reverse dippers because they identify periods of high and low blood pressure in these subjects that do not coincide with the day and the night. The results from fixed-time methods deviate from the awake and asleep blood pressures whens the predefined times do not coincide with the times subjects go to bed and arise; this is less of a problem for the narrow methods, in which data from morning and evening transition periods are discarded, than it is for the rigid time schedules of the wide methods. Reproducibilities of the various methods are roughly similar. CONCLUSION: We suggest that the optimal definition of daytime and night-time blood pressure is provided by the narrow clock-time-dependent method, in which data from morning and evening transition periods are excluded, because it is simple, reasonably accurate and reproducible and can be applied without disruption of the living habits of most subjects.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1997

[Isolated systolic hypertension and cognitive function in the aged. Experience of the Syst-Eur study].

OBJECTIVE: To determinate cognitive status and its correlates in older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. METHODS: Syst-Eur is a double-blind placebo-controlled outcome trial conducted in European patients over 60 years of age with isolated systolic hypertension. Moreover, a side-project--the Vascular Dementia Project--is designed to assess cognitive functions and to follow-up their evolution to determine the influence of antihypertensive therapy on vascular dementia incidence. Cognitive functions were evaluated at entry with the MiniMental State Examination (MMSE) in 2250 patients included in Syst-Eur. Cognitive impairment was defined with a MMSE score < or = 23 and led to further evaluation. Baseline blood pressure (BP) was based on the average of six sitting blood pressure readings at three run-in visits 1 month apart. Statistical analysis used Spearman correlation. RESULTS: The MMSE was analysed in 1374 women and 751 men whose mean age was 70 years (range: 60-100). The median level of education expressed as the age at which they stopped their education at school, was 15 years. Baseline blood pressure averaged 173 +/- 10/86 +/- 6 mmHg. Before randomisation in the trial, 899 (40%) patients had received antihypertensive therapy and 602 (27%) had experienced cardiovascular complications. The MMSE-scores ranged from 15 to 30 (median = 29). The maximal score of 30 was reached by 609 (30%) subjects. Among the 59 (3%) patients with a MMSE-score of 23 or less, 5 were considered to be demented according to the DSM IIIR criteria. The MMSE-scores decreased with advancing age in men (r = -0.16; p < 0.001) and women alike (r = -0.24; p < 0.001). In both men and women, they were positively correlated with the level of education (r = 0.30 and 0.32, respectively; p < 0.001). They were negatively correlated with systolic blood pressure (r = 0.10; p < 0.001) and slightly positively correlated with diastolic blood pressure (r = 0.05; p = 0.03). Previously treated patients or patients reporting cardiovascular complications at baseline had lower MMSE-scores than their non-treated counterparts or subjects without cardiovascular complications (median = 28 and 29, respectively, p < 0.003). CONCLUSION: In a European cohort of 2225 patients over 60 years of age with isolated systolic hypertension, the level of cognitive functions evaluated with the MMSE decreases with advancing age or lesser educational level. It also decreases with higher systolic blood pressure or lower diastolic blood pressure. The influence of antihypertensive therapy on cognitive status will be prospectively evaluated in Syst-Eur Vascular Dementia Project.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in clinical trials.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is increasingly used in clinical trials. The preliminary threshold values proposed for diagnosing hypertension and adjusting treatment based on ambulatory monitoring cannot yet be widely recommended because they have not been validated in prospective studies. The trough-to-peak or surface ratios may be useful instruments for assessing the duration of action of antihypertensive drugs. Trials with ambulatory monitoring just as clinical experiments based on conventional sphygmomanometry need to be properly controlled, because ambulatory blood pressure measurement is not completely devoid of a placebo effect. Ambulatory compared with conventional blood pressure measurements are characterized by higher reproducibility which makes it possible to reduce sample size in cross-over but not in parallel group trials. Finally, ambulatory monitors used in clinical research should have successfully passed one of the standardized validation protocols.

Blood Pressure↗

PubMed1996

Effect of strength training on blood pressure measured in various conditions in sedentary men.

To examine the effect of long term strength training on heart rate and blood pressure, measured in different conditions, and on their variability, thirty healthy, previously sedentary men were randomized into a training and a control group. The strength training program consisted of 48 training sessions on a multigym apparatus at a frequency of 3 sessions each week, involving leg press, bench press, leg curl, shoulder press, leg extension and sit ups. The control group was asked not to change their sedentary lifestyle. In the subjects of the training group the load could be increased significantly for all exercises (p < 0.01). Heart rate and blood pressure were measured at rest in the supine and sitting position, during 24 hours with a non-invasive ambulatory device and during an exercise test on a cycloergometer. Repeated measures analysis of variance did not show an effect of strength training on heart rate or on blood pressure. In addition, power spectral analysis of the RR interval (ECG) and of the beat-to-beat blood pressure in the supine subject revealed similar total, low frequency and high frequency power before and after training, indicating that the neural control of both heart rate and blood pressure was not affected by a 16-week program of strength training.

Blood Pressure↗

PubMed1996

Prediction of the actual awake and asleep blood pressures by various methods of 24 h pressure analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationships of daytime and night-time blood pressures and the day-night pressure differences, obtained by various analytical methods, with the actual awake and asleep pressures and the awake-asleep pressure difference. METHODS: Ambulatory blood pressure was successfully monitored by use of the SpaceLabs 90202 device in 91 healthy young men during a weekend, when they went to bed and awoke at variable and often unusual times. The actual 'awake' and 'asleep' blood pressures were calculated on the basis of these times, noted by the subjects. The 24 h recordings were further analysed by use of two clock time-independent methods (square-wave fitting; cumulative sum analysis) and by one 'wide' (A) and one 'narrow' (B) fixed-time method (daytime: 0700-2200 h or 1000-2000 h; night-time: 2200-0700 h or 0000-0600 h, for methods A and B, respectively). RESULTS: In the total study population, square-wave fitting (+1.1 +/- 1.5 mmHg, mean +/- SD) and cumulative sum analysis (2.4 +/- 1.9 mmHg) overestimated the actual awake systolic blood pressure and underestimated the asleep pressure (-0.7 +/- 1.7 and -1.8 +/- 1.8 mmHg, respectively). The fixed-time techniques underestimated the awake pressure (-2.6 +/- 3.1 and -0.2 +/- 3.2 mmHg for methods A and B, respectively) and overestimated the asleep pressure by +4.9 +/- 5.5 and +2.7 +/- 6.1 mmHg, respectively. The actual awake-asleep pressure difference was overestimated by square-wave fitting (+1.8 +/- 1.9 mmHg) and more so by cumulative sum analysis (+4.2 +/- 2.5 mmHg); the underestimation by the fixed time approach averaged -3.0 +/- 8.4 mmHg with method B and amounted to -7.5 +/- 8.3 mmHg with method A. Overall, the SD of the various differences between the estimated and the actual awake and asleep pressures, and consequently the limits of agreement, were larger for the fixed-time methods than for the clock time-independent techniques. In the 47 subjects who went to bed before 2400 h and awoke between 0600 and 1000 h, the results of the clock time-independent methods were similar to the results in the total study population, whereas the deviations of the fixed time pressures from the actual awake and asleep blood pressures were considerably reduced. The results were similar for diastolic blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Clock time-independent methods, particularly square-wave fitting, can predict the actual awake and asleep blood pressures and the awake-asleep pressure differences with reasonable accuracy and the results are independent of the awake-asleep pattern of the subjects. However, fixed-time methods are only reliable when the subjects go to bed and arise within well-defined periods, and yield more accurate results when the morning and evening phases are excluded from the daytime and night-time periods.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Advantages and disadvantages of the meta-analysis approach.

UNLABELLED: ADVANTAGES OF META-ANALYSIS: Literature reviews have traditionally been largely narrative. Meta-analysis now offers the opportunity to critically evaluate and statistically combine results of comparable studies or trials. Its major purposes are to increase the numbers of observations and the statistical power, and to improve the estimates of the effect size of an intervention or an association. METHODS: There is, as yet, no unanimously accepted strategy for performing a meta-analysis but researchers agree that each meta-analysis should be conducted like a scientific experiment and begin with a protocol, which clearly states its aim and methodology. Meta-analysts disagree on the criteria for inclusion or exclusion of primary studies, with relation to publication status, comparability and required scientific quality, but sensitivity analyses make it possible to assess the impact of various selection criteria on the results. Several statistical methods have been developed to analyse data extracted from the literature; more recently, meta-analyses have also been performed on individual subject data. CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analysis is superior to narrative reports for systematic reviews of the literature, but its quantitative results should be interpreted with caution even when the analysis is performed according to rigorous rules.

Humans↗

PubMed1996

Prognostic significance of peak oxygen uptake in hypertension.

The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of cardiopulmonary fitness in hypertension. From 1972 to 1982 oxygen uptake and heart rate were recorded during an exercise test to exhaustion in 216 patients (143 men). Their outcome was ascertained in 1994. During 3,411 patient years of follow-up, 53 patients suffered at least one fatal or nonfatal cardiovascular event and 25 patients died. After adjustment for age, gender, and weight, the relative hazard rates (RHR; Cox regression) of peak oxygen uptake (l.min-1) amounted to 0.44 (P = 0.01) for the first occurring cardiovascular events and 0.35 (P = 0.05) for all-cause mortality. These RHR remained significant after additional adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors (RHR = 0.45 and 0.28, respectively; P < 0.05). Heart rate at 50 W did not predict outcome after adjustment for age and gender (P = 0.94 and 0.14, respectively), nor after additional adjustment for heart rate at rest (P = 0.86 and 0.61, respectively). In conclusion, a lower peak oxygen uptake, but not a higher submaximal heart rate, is significantly and independently associated with a higher incidence of cardiovascular events and a higher total mortality in hypertensive patients.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗

PubMed1996

Ambulatory monitoring uncorrected for placebo overestimates long-term antihypertensive action. Systolic Hypertension in Europe (SYST-EUR) Trial Investigators.

This study compares blood pressure (BP) changes during active antihypertensive treatment and placebo as assessed by conventional and ambulatory BP measurement. Older patients (> or = 60 years, n=337) with isolated systolic hypertension by conventional sphygmomanometry at the clinic were randomized to placebo or active treatment consisting of nitrendipine (10 to 40 mg/d), with the possible addition of enalapril (5 to 20 mg/d) and/or hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 to 25 mg/d). At baseline, clinic systolic/diastolic BP averaged 175/86 mm Hg and 24-hour and daytime ambulatory BPs averaged 148/80 and 154/85 mm Hg, respectively. After 13 months (median) of active treatment, clinic BP had dropped by 22.7/7.0 mm Hg and 24-hour and daytime BPs by 10.5/4.5 and 9.7/4.3 mm Hg, respectively (P<.001 for all). However, clinic (9.8/1.6 mm Hg), 24-hour (2.1/1.1 mm Hg), and daytime (2.9/1.0 mm Hg) BPs decreased also during placebo (P<.05, except for daytime diastolic BP); these decreases represented 43%/23%, 20%/24%, and 30%/23% of the corresponding BP fall during active treatment. After subtraction of placebo effects, the net BP reductions during active treatment averaged only 12.9/5.4, 8.3/3.4, and 6.8/3.2 mm Hg for clinic, 24-hour, and daytime BPs, respectively. The effect of active treatment was also subject to diurnal variation (P<.05). Changes during placebo in hourly systolic and diastolic BP means amounted to (median) 21% (range, -1% to 42%) and 25% (-3% to 72%), respectively, of the corresponding changes during active treatment. In conclusion, expressed in millimeters of mercury, the effect of antihypertensive treatment on BP is larger with conventional than with ambulatory measurement. Regardless of whether BP is measured by conventional sphygmomanometry or ambulatory monitoring, a substantial proportion of the long-term BP changes observed during active treatment may be attributed to placebo effects. Thus, ambulatory monitoring uncorrected for placebo or control observations, like conventional sphygmomanometry, overestimates BP responses in clinical trials of long duration.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

Prognostic value of invasive hemodynamic measurements at rest and during exercise in hypertensive men.

In 1994, we ascertained the outcome of 143 hypertensive men in whom invasive hemodynamic measurements were performed at rest and during graded bicycle exercise during the period 1972-1982 to assess (1) which of the hemodynamic components of blood pressure is associated with the incidence of cardiovascular events and total mortality, and (2) whether the hemodynamic response to dynamic exercise adds prognostic precision to the data at rest. During 2186 patient years of follow-up, 38 patients suffered at least one fatal or nonfatal cardiovascular event and 17 patients died. Cox regression analysis showed that systolic pressure and systemic vascular resistance measured at rest, during submaximal exercise (50 W), and at peak effort were significant (P < .01) predictors of the age-adjusted incidence of cardiovascular events and total mortality. However, exercise blood pressure did not significantly predict the incidence of cardiovascular events over and above pressure at rest; by contrast, exercise systemic vascular resistance added prognostic precision to vascular resistance at rest (P < .01). As for total mortality, systolic pressure and systemic vascular resistance at peak exercise carried prognostic information that was independent of the results at rest (P < .05); this was not the case for measurements during submaximal exercise. We conclude that the prognostic importance of blood pressure is related to systemic vascular resistance. The prognostic precision of exercise pressure, on top of pressure at rest, is limited. Exercise systemic vascular resistance, however, provides prognostic information beyond that available from measurements at rest, particularly for the incidence of cardiovascular events.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1996

Life style as a blood pressure determinant.

In Belgium, an affluent Western European country, participation in sports, alcohol intake, and living in a working class area were identified as the life style factors with the closest associations with the blood pressure level. Obesity was another important blood pressure correlate. Sodium intake, determined from the 24 h urinary output, and smoking were not associated with blood pressure. Controlled intervention studies have proven that weight reduction, endurance training and alcohol abstinence effectively reduce blood pressure. In the light of these intervention studies, the Belgian findings and the published work highlight the potential of preventive strategies aimed at these major life style factors.

Ethanol↗

PubMed1996

Conventional and ambulatory blood pressure measurement in older patients with isolated systolic hypertension:second progress report on the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring project in the Syst-Eur trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare clinic and ambulatory blood pressure measurement and the reproducibility of these measurements in older patients with isolated systolic hypertension.PATIENTS: A total of 477 patients aged >/= 60 years with isolated systolic hypertension on clinic measurement were monitored during the placebo run-in phase of the Syst-Eur trial. METHODS: The time-weighted 24 h blood pressure, clock time day and night blood pressure, the cumulative sum-derived crest and trough blood pressure and the high and low blood pressure levels of the square-wave model were computed. The daily alteration between the high and low blood pressure spans was quantified using the clock time day-night difference, the cumulative sum-derived circadian alteration magnitude, the Fourier amplitude and the difference between the high and low blood pressure levels of the square-wave model. RESULTS: The daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure was, on average, 21 mmHg lower than the clinic blood pressure, whereasthe diastolic blood pressure was, on average, similar with both techniques of measurement. In the 132 patients who underwent repeat measurements, clinic blood pressure levels and the parameters describing the difference betgween the daily high and low blood pressure spans were equally reproducible. However, both were less reproducible than the ambulatory blood pressure levels. The repeatability coefficients, expressed as percentages of near maximum variation, were 50 and 51% for the clinic systolic and diastolic blood pressures, 30 and 33% for the mean 24 h systolic and diastolic blood pressures and between 44 and 54% for the parameters describing the daily alteration between the high and low blood pressure spans. CONCLUSION: In older patients with isolated systolic hypertension, clinic and ambulatory systolic blood pressure may differ greatly; the prognostic significance of this difference remains to be elucidated. Furthermore, the level of blood pressure in these patients is more reproducible by ambulatory measurement than it is by clinic measurement.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1996

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in clinical trials.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is increasingly being used in clinical trials. Trials with ambulatory monitoring, just like clinical experiments based on conventional sphygmomanometry, need to be controlled properly, because ambulatory blood pressure measurements are not completely devoid of placebo-like effects. The trough: peak ratio might be a useful instrument for assessment of the durations of action of antihypertensive drugs. However, its error term and confidence interval need to be reported and its determination in clinical trials requires further standardization. Ambulatory compared with conventional blood pressure measurements are characterized by a higher reproducibility. This property makes a reduction in sample size possible in cross-over but not in parallel group trials, if instead of the conventional blood pressure the 24 h or daytime blood pressures are compared. Trials focusing on the full course of the blood pressure through the day need a larger sample size than do those just concerning the conventional blood pressure level.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1996

Ambulatory blood pressure during antihypertensive therapy guided by conventional pressure.

Subjects with elevated conventional clinic or office blood pressure (CBP) may have normal ambulatory blood pressure (ABP). The purpose of this review is to summarize studies in which ABP was monitored while the initiation or intensification of antihypertensive therapy was guided by CBP. These studies show that ABP does not decrease or decreases only slightly in response to treatment in subjects with elevated CBP and low ABP, whereas the CBP is significantly reduced in such patients.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1996

Diurnal blood pressure curve in children and adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diurnal blood pressure curve in healthy normotensive children. Thirty-one children were re-examined after a median interval of 123 days in order to study the reproducibility of the diurnal profile. SUBJECTS: Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and conventional blood pressure readings were obtained in 228 normotensive children, whose ages ranged from 6 to 16 years and of whom 116 were boys and 112 girls. RESULTS: The conventional blood pressure averaged 99+/-11/57+/-9 mmHg in boys and 98+/-12/56+/-9 mmHg in girls (means+/-SD); the corresponding 24 h pressures were 111+/-7/66+/-5 mmHg and 109+/-7/65+/-5 mmHg, respectively. Of the children, 83% had a significant diurnal blood pressure rhythm for systolic pressure and 89% for diastolic pressure. The nocturnal blood pressure fall was normally distributed, averaging 12.0+/-6.3 mmHg systolic and 14.2+/-5.9 mmHg diastolic. There was no evidence for a bimodal distribution. The amplitude of the diurnal blood pressure curve, determined by the Fourier approach, was positively skewed with a mean of 12.5+/-4.2 mmHg for systolic and 14.0+/-4.1 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure. The daily blood pressure maximum occurred at 1344+/-4 h 46 min for systolic and 1321+/-4 h 22 min for diastolic blood pressure. For systolic blood pressure the cumulative sum (cusum)-derived circadian alteration magnitude was 1.7+/-6.2 mmHg higher in boys than in girls, whereas the cusum plot height was also 7.3+/-27.0 mmHg x h higher in male subjects. The repeatability coefficient (2SD of the difference between paired recordings, expressed as a percentage of nearly maximal variation) was 80% for the conventional systolic pressure and 40% for the conventional diastolic blood pressure. The repeatability coefficients for the ambulatory blood pressure levels varied from 32 to 45% and for the parameters describing the diurnal blood pressure profile from 42 to 78%. CONCLUSION: A significant diurnal blood pressure rhythm is observed in most normotensive children and adolescents. There is no evidence for a bimodal distribution of the nocturnal blood pressure fall. The reproducibility of the parameters of the diurnal blood pressure curve tended to be less than that of the ambulatory blood pressure level. Thus, one 24 h recording is probably insufficient to characterize a child's diurnal blood pressure profile fully.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1996

Antihypertensive therapy in older patients with isolated systolic hypertension: the Syst-Eur experience in general practice

Background and objective. This interim report from the Syst-Eur trial investigated the level of blood pressure control achieved during the double-blind period in patients followed in general practices. Methods. In the Syst-Eur trial elderly patients (60 years or older) with isolated systolic hypertension were randomized to either active or placebo treatment. Active treatment consisted of nitrendipine combined with enalapril and/or hydrochlorothiazide to reduce systolic pressure to Results. This analysis was restricted to patients of general practitioners who had been followed for at least 12 months. The placebo (N = 204) and active treatment (N = 217) groups had similar characteristics at randomization. At one year, the difference in sitting pressure between the two treatment groups was 10 mmHg systolic and 4 mmHg diastolic. Fewer patients remained on monotherapy in the placebo than in the active treatment group and on placebo the second and third line medications were started earlier. Nitrendipine tablets were discontinued in 10 patients on placebo and in 21 patients assigned to active treatment (P Conclusions. A significant blood pressure reduction can be achieved and maintained in older patients with isolated systolic hypertension followed by general practitioners. Whether this blood pressure reduction results in a clinically meaningful decrease of cardiovascular complications is under investigation. Keywords. Antihypertensive treatment, general practice, isolated systolic hypertension, randomized clinical trial.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1996

Antihypertensive therapy in older patients with isolated systolic hypertension: the Syst-Eur experience in general practice. The Syst-Eur Investigators.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This interim report from the Syst-Eur trial investigated the level of blood pressure control achieved during the double-blind period in patients followed in general practices. METHODS: In the Syst-Eur trial elderly patients (60 years or older) with isolated systolic hypertension were randomized to either active or placebo treatment. Active treatment consisted of nitrendipine combined with enalapril and/or hydrochlorothiazide to reduce systolic pressure to < 150 mmHg and by > or = 20 mmHg. Matching placebos were used in the control group. RESULTS: This analysis was restricted to patients of general practitioners who had been followed for at least 12 months. The placebo (N = 204) and active treatment (N = 217) groups had similar characteristics at randomization. At one year, the difference in sitting pressure between the two treatment groups was 10 mmHg systolic and 4 mmHg diastolic. Fewer patients remained on monotherapy in the placebo than in the active treatment group and on placebo the second and third line medications were started earlier. Nitrendipine tablets were discontinued in 10 patients on placebo and in 21 patients assigned to active treatment (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: A significant blood pressure reduction can be achieved and maintained in older patients with isolated systolic hypertension followed by general practitioners. Whether this blood pressure reduction results in a clinically meaningful decrease of cardiovascular complications is under investigation.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

Treatment of hypertensive patients according to the conventional or ambulatory pressure: a progress report on the APTH trial. APTH Investigators. Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Treatment of Hypertension.

The main objective of the Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Treatment of Hypertension (APTH) trial is to test the hypothesis that antihypertensive treatment based on ambulatory monitoring may be more beneficial than treatment guided by conventional sphygmomanometry. After a 2-month run-in period on single-blind placebo, hypertensive patients were randomized to two groups, one in which the target pressure was a sitting diastolic pressure from 80 through 89 mm Hg on conventional sphygmomanometry (conventional blood pressure [CBP] group), and one in which a daytime (from 10 to 20 h) diastolic pressure from 80 through 89 mm Hg had to be achieved (ambulatory blood pressure [ABP] group). After randomization all patients were started on lisinopril 10 mg/day. One month later lisinopril could be continued at 10 or 20 mg/day or discontinued depending on the attained blood pressure level. This article is an interim report on 207 patients followed for two months into the trial. At one month lisinopril was discontinued more frequently in the ABP than the CBP group (24 vs 9 patients, p = 0.004). Nevertheless at two months, blood pressure control was not significantly different in the two treatment groups. The baseline-adjusted differences in systolic pressure between the two treatment arms of the trial (ABP-CBP group) were +2.7 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI]): -2.9, +8.3) for the conventional pressure, +0.4 mm Hg (CI: -4.3, +5.1) for the 24 h pressure, -0.1 mm Hg (CI: -5.1, +4.8) for the daytime pressure and -0.7 mm Hg (CI: -6.7, +5.4) for the night-time pressure. The corresponding differences in diastolic pressure were -1.3 mm Hg (CI: -4, +1.4), +0.1 mm Hg (CI: -3, +3.1), -1.1 mmgH (CI: -4.4, +2.1) and +0.3 mm Hg (CI: -3.7, +4.3), respectively. Thus, the present findings do not refute the APTH research hypothesis. In terms of blood pressure control and the number of patients remaining on antihypertensive drugs, treatment based on ambulatory recordings may be preferable to treatment guided by conventional sphygmomanometry.

Antihypertensive Agents↗