Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Thijs

Publications and source records attributed to L Thijs.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and postprandial hypotension in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension. Systolic Hypertension in Europe (SYST-EUR) Trial Investigators.

The present analysis was undertaken to evaluate postprandial (PP) changes in blood pressure (BP) assessed with ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) in elderly subjects with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) on conventional measurement. A total of 530 patients (335 women and 195 men, aged 60-100 years, median 70 years) who performed an ABPM during the placebo run-in period of the Syst-Eur trial were included into the analysis. The PP changes in BP and heart rate (HR) were calculated by subtracting the mean systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP) and HR in the 2 h preceding the main meal from the corresponding means covering the 2 h after the meal. The reproducibility of the postprandial fall in BP and heart rate (PPH) was assessed by contrasting the first and second ABPM in a subgroup of 147 patients who performed two ABPM's during the placebo run-in period. The mean SBP and DBP decreased and reached the nadir 2 h after the main meal while HR did not change. When PPH was assessed by comparing BP in the 2 h before and after the meal, both SBP and DBP decreased significantly (respectively -6.6 mm Hg, -5.4 mm Hg; P < 0.001). In 67.6% of all patients a decrease in SBP was observed and in 24.1% it exceeded 16 mm Hg. The corresponding values for DBP were 71.3% and 24.5% (DBP decreased more than 12 mm Hg). A greater fall in DBP was associated with a greater decrease in HR (r = 0.20, P < 0.001), while changes in SBP and HR were not interrelated. Regression analysis did not identify any significant covariate of PPH. Group means of PPH could be reproduced without significant changes in their values, but the within-subject reproducibility of the PP changes was low. There were no differences in PPH according to the place of residence of the patients. In conclusion, the descriptive analysis of the meal-induced changes in ABPM in elderly subjects with ISH showed that in every day circumstances most of them experience falls in both SBP and DBP within 2 h after the meal.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Limitations of the difference between clinic and daytime blood pressure as a surrogate measure of the 'white-coat' effect. Syst-Eur investigators.

BACKGROUND: The difference between clinic and ambulatory average daytime blood pressures is frequently taken as a surrogate measure of the 'white-coat effect' (i.e. the pressor reaction triggered in the patient by the physician's visit). OBJECTIVE: To assess the reproducibility of this difference and its relationship with clinic and average ambulatory daytime blood pressure levels. DESIGN AND METHODS: These issues were addressed with two large groups of subjects in whom both clinic and ambulatory blood pressures were measured, namely 783 outpatients with systolic and diastolic essential hypertension [Group 1, aged 50.8+/-9.4 years (mean +/- SD)], participating in standardized Italian trials of antihypertensive drugs, and 506 elderly patients (group 2, age 71+/-7 years) with isolated systolic hypertension, participating in the European Syst-Eur trial. RESULTS: The clinic-daytime blood pressure difference for the essential systolic and diastolic hypertensive patients (group 1) was 13.6+/-14.3 mmHg for systolic and 9.1+/-8.6 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure (P always < 0.01). This difference for the elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension (group 2) was 21.2+/-16.0 mmHg for systolic and only 1.3+/-10.2 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively). In both studies little or no systematic clinic-daytime difference could be observed for heart rate. The reproducibility of the clinic-daytime blood pressure difference, tested for 108 essential systolic and diastolic hypertensive patients from group 1 and 128 isolated systolic hypertensives from group 2, was invariably lower than that both of daytime and of clinic blood pressure values. Finally, the clinic-daytime blood pressure difference was progressively higher for increasing levels of clinic blood pressure and progressively lower for higher levels of ambulatory daytime blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, the clinic-daytime blood pressure difference has a limited reproducibility; depends not only on clinic but also on daytime average blood pressure, which means that its size is a function of the blood pressure criteria employed for selection of the patients in a trial; and is never associated with a systematic clinic-daytime difference in heart rate, which further questions its use as a reliable surrogate measure of the true pressor response induced in the patient by the doctor's visit.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Correlates of cognitive status of old patients with isolated systolic hypertension: the Syst-Eur Vascular Dementia Project.

OBJECTIVE: To assess cognitive functions and their correlates for a dementia-free cohort of old patients with isolated systolic hypertension. DESIGN: Cross-sectional data from the randomization period of the European Trial in Elderly with Systolic Hypertension (Syst-Eur Vascular Dementia Project). SETTING: Sixteen European countries and Israel. PARTICIPANTS: We studied 2252 patients aged 60-100 years (mean 70). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Spearman correlation of MMSE scores to demographic data or blood pressure. RESULTS: The MMSE was successfully completed for 1474 women and 751 men. The baseline blood pressure averaged 173 +/- 10/86 +/- 6 mmHg (means +/- SD). Median age at which education of patients at school had stopped was 15 years. Men and women who consumed alcohol (28%) had median intakes of 8 and 3 g/day, respectively. The median MMSE score was 29 (range 15-30). The maximum score of 30 was attained by 609 (30%) subjects. Fifty-nine (3%) patients had a MMSE score of 23 or less. The MMSE score decreased with advancing age (r = -0.21, P < 0.001). Both for men and for women, it was positively correlated to the level of education (r = 0.30 and r = 0.32, P < 0.001). For women after adjustment for age and the level of education, the score was correlated negatively to systolic blood pressure (r = -0.07, P < 0.05) but positively to intake of alcohol (r = 0.06, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In a cohort of elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension, baseline cognitive function measured in terms of the MMSE score was high, probably due to selective recruitment of patients who were not clinically demented. Blood pressure was a weak contributor to cognitive status compared with age and level of education. Baseline cognitive function of women was negatively and independently correlated to systolic blood pressure.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Quality of life of elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension: baseline data from the Syst-Eur trial. Syst-Eur Trial Investigators.

OBJECTIVE: To describe measures of quality of life of elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension at entry to a placebo-controlled randomized trial of antihypertensive treatment and to investigate factors associated with these. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analyses at entry to a randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Patients attending hypertension clinics or general practitioners' surgeries at 30 centres in 10 European countries. PATIENTS: Six hundred and thirty-one patients aged 60 years or more, with a sitting systolic blood pressure during the run-in phase of 160-219 mmHg, a sitting diastolic blood pressure below 95 mmHg and a standing systolic blood pressure of 140 mmHg or more. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cognitive function tests (Reitan Trail Making A and B), Brief Assessment Index (a measure of depressed mood) and four subscales from the Sickness Impact Profile (Ambulation, Social Interaction, Sleep and Rest and Housework). RESULTS: Poor quality of life was generally associated with increasing age, previous treatment with antihypertensive drugs, presence of cardiovascular complications and, among women, high diastolic blood pressure, higher consumption of alcohol and high body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: At entry to the trial there was considerable heterogeneity of patients in terms of measures of quality of life and cognitive performance. It remains to be determined whether these influence subsequent quality of life during randomized treatment.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1998

Detection of cerebral aging, an absolute need: predictive value of cognitive status.

Cognitive performance is predictive of functional status, morbidity and mortality in the elderly. In the SYST-EUR study, the Vascular Dementia Project run on 3,111 subjects 60 years old and over, with isolated systolic hypertension, has shown that the cognitive status as measured by the MMSE was inversely correlated with systolic blood pressure (p < 0.001) and age (p < 0.001) and positively correlated with the level of education (p < 0.001). It is significantly lower in patients with cardiovascular complications (p = 0.0001). Moderate alcohol consumption is linked to a higher MMSE score in women (p < 0.001) but not in men. In this study, the incidence of dementia is low and significantly related to the baseline value of the MMSE score and further analysis will show the influence of the treatment of systolic hypertension with calcium antagonists as first step on this incidence.

Aging↗
PubMed1998

Calcium channel blockade and cardiovascular prognosis in the European trial on isolated systolic hypertension.

In the double-blind Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) Trial, active treatment was initiated with nitrendipine (10 to 40 mg/d) with the possible addition of enalapril (5 to 20 mg/d) and/or hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 to 25 mg/d) titrated or combined to reduce sitting systolic blood pressure by at least 20 mm Hg to <150 mm Hg. In the control group, matching placebos were used similarly. In view of persistent concerns about the use of calcium channel blockers as first-line antihypertensive drugs, this report explored to what extent nitrendipine, administered alone, prevented cardiovascular complications. Age at randomization averaged 70.2 years and systolic/diastolic blood pressure 173.8/85.5 mm Hg. Of 2398 actively treated patients, 1327 took only nitrendipine (average dose, 23.4 mg/d), and 1042 progressed to other treatments including nitrendipine (n=757; 35.7 mg/d), enalapril (n=783; 13.4 mg/d), and/or hydrochlorothiazide (n=294; 21.0 mg/d). Compared with the whole placebo group (n=2297), patients receiving monotherapy with nitrendipine had 25% (P=0.05) fewer cardiovascular end points, and those progressing to other active treatments showed decreases (P</=0. 01) in total mortality (40%), stroke (59%), and all cardiovascular end points (39%). Among the control patients, 863 used only the first-line placebo. Compared with this subgroup, patients receiving monotherapy with nitrendipine showed a nearly 50% (P</=0.004) reduction of all types of end points, including total and cardiovascular mortality. The full relative benefit from nitrendipine was seen as early as 6 months after randomization. To ascertain that the benefit conferred by the dihydropyridine was not due to selection bias, the 1327 patients remaining on monotherapy with nitrendipine were matched by gender, age, previous cardiovascular complications, and systolic blood pressure at entry with an equal number of placebo patients. In this analysis, nitrendipine reduced (P</=0.05) cardiovascular mortality by 41%, all cardiovascular end points by 33%, and fatal and nonfatal cardiac end points by 33%. Despite the limitations inherent in post hoc analyses, the present findings suggest that the calcium channel blocker nitrendipine, given as a single antihypertensive medication, prevents cardiovascular complications in older patients with isolated systolic hypertension.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Conventional and ambulatory measurements of blood pressure in old patients with isolated systolic hypertension: baseline observations in the Syst-Eur trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare clinic and am measurements of blood pressure in old patients with isolated systolic hypertension and their reproducibilities. PATIENTS: In total 610 patients aged >/= 60 years with isolated systolic hypertension detected by clinic measurement were monitored during the placebo run-in phase of the Syst-Eur trial. METHODS: The time-weighted 24 h blood pressure, clock-time day and night blood pressures, the cumulative-sum-derived crest and trough blood pressures and the high and low blood pressure levels according to the square-wave model were computed. The daily alteration between the high and low spans of blood pressure was quantified using the day-night difference, the cumulative-sum-derived magnitude of circadian alteration, the Fourier amplitude and the difference between the high and low blood pressure levels of the square-wave model. RESULTS: The daytime am systolic blood pressure was, on average, 21 mmHg lower than the clinic systolic blood pressure, whereas diastolic pressure was, on average, similar with both techniques of measurement. Clinic levels of blood pressure in the 141 patients who underwent repeat measurements and the parameters describing the difference between the daily high and low spans of blood pressure were equally reproducible. However, both were less reproducible than the ambulatory blood pressure levels. The reproducibility coefficients, expressed as percentages of near maximum variation, were 49 and 50% for the clinic systolic and diastolic blood pressures, 30 and 32% for the mean 24 h systolic and diastolic blood pressures and 45-55% for the parameters describing the daily alteration between the high and low spans of blood pressure. CONCLUSION: Values of blood pressure in old patients with isolated systolic hypertension were more reproducible for ambulatory than they were for clinic measurements. Levels in patients selected because they have a high clinic blood pressure may be substantially higher with conventional than they are with daytime ambulatory measurement. The prognostic significance of this difference for the present patients is currently under investigation.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1998

Power spectral analysis of heart rate variability by autoregressive modelling and fast Fourier transform: a comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the results from autoregressive modelling (ARM) and from fast Fourier transform (FFT), the most commonly used methods for the analysis of short-term heart rate variability in the frequency domain. METHODS & RESULTS: RR interval and respiratory activity were recorded in the supine and standing positions under standardized laboratory conditions in a population-based sample of 614 subjects. The low-(LF) and high-frequency (HF) components of heart rate variability were identified by power spectral analysis, by use of FFT, with application of two sets of frequency ranges, and by ARM; LF and HF power were expressed in both normalized (%) and absolute units (ms2). The RR interval, its variance and the HF power decreased from the supine to the standing position (P < 0.001). The LF power increased on standing when expressed in normalized units, but decreased in absolute units, whereas the LF-to-HF ratio increased (P < 0.001). On the low side of the spectrum, FFT slightly overestimated the LF component obtained with ARM, when the predefined frequency range was 0.05-0.15 Hz (P < 0.001); the underestimation of LF in the frequency range 0.07-0.14 Hz was more pronounced, particularly in the erect position (P < 0.001). Both FFT methods overestimated (P < 0.001) the ARM HF component, more so for the 0.15-0.50 Hz range than for the 0.14-0.35 Hz range. Finally, we observed considerable within-subject differences between methods, which were estimated by calculation of the limits of agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Different methods for spectral decomposition of short-term heart rate variability yield similar qualitative results, but the quantitative results differ between ARM and FFT, and within the FFT method according to the selected frequency range.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. The Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) Trial Investigators.

BACKGROUND: Isolated systolic hypertension occurs in about 15% of people aged 60 years or older. In 1989, the European Working Party on High Blood Pressure in the Elderly investigated whether active treatment could reduce cardiovascular complications of isolated systolic hypertension. Fatal and non-fatal stroke combined was the primary endpoint. METHODS: All patients (> 60 years) were initially started on masked placebo. At three run-in visits 1 month apart, their average sitting systolic blood pressure was 160-219 mm Hg with a diastolic blood pressure lower than 95 mm Hg. After stratification for centre, sex, and previous cardiovascular complications, 4695 patients were randomly assigned to nitrendipine 10-40 mg daily, with the possible addition of enalapril 5-20 mg daily and hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25.0 mg daily, or matching placebos. Patients withdrawing from double-blind treatment were still followed up. We compared occurrence of major endpoints by intention to treat. FINDINGS: At a median of 2 years' follow-up, sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressures had fallen by 13 mm Hg and 2 mm Hg in the placebo group (n = 2297) and by 23 mm Hg and 7 mm Hg in the active treatment group (n = 2398). The between-group differences were systolic 10.1 mm Hg (95% CI 8.8-11.4) and diastolic, 4.5 mm Hg (3.9-5.1). Active treatment reduced the total rate of stroke from 13.7 to 7.9 endpoints per 1000 patient-years (42% reduction; p = 0.003). Non-fatal stroke decreased by 44% (p = 0.007). In the active treatment group, all fatal and non-fatal cardiac endpoints, including sudden death, declined by 26% (p = 0.03). Non-fatal cardiac endpoints decreased by 33% (p = 0.03) and all fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular endpoints by 31% (p < 0.001). Cardiovascular mortality was slightly lower on active treatment (-27%, p = 0.07), but all-cause mortality was not influenced (-14%; p = 0.22). INTERPRETATION: Among elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension, antihypertensive drug treatment starting with nitrendipine reduces the rate of cardiovascular complications. Treatment of 1000 patients for 5 years with this type of regimen may prevent 29 strokes or 53 major cardiovascular endpoints.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Critical care in Europe.

Intensive care medicine developed in Europe following the polio epidemic in Denmark in 1952 and is now a specialty in its own right. Across Europe differences exist between countries regarding unit size, policy, staffing, and patient demographics. There is in particular a marked north/south divide, with smaller units dealing with sicker patients in the south than the north. The United Kingdom appears to be similar to the countries of Southern Europe. Guidelines for training and structure are being developed in an attempt to create more uniformity and improve communication between units.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Therapy in old patients with isolated systolic hypertension: fourth progress report on the Syst-Eur trial.

The Syst-Eur trial is a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled therapeutical trial in patients at least 60 years old and with isolated systolic hypertension. Its scope is to investigate the effects of modern antihypertensive drug treatment on morbidity and mortality and to assess possible adverse effects of the drugs used. Patients were recruited in 22 countries in western and eastern Europe and Israel. At three run-in visits 1 month apart their sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) on single-blind placebo treatment averaged 180-219 mm Hg with diastolic blood pressure (DBP) lower than 95 mm Hg. After stratification for sex and the presence of cardiovascular complications, the patients were randomized either to active treatment or placebo. Active treatment consisted of nitrendipine (10-40 mg/day) with the possible addition of enalapril (5-20 mg/day) and/or hydrochlorothiazide (12.5-25 mg/day), titrated or combined to reduce the sitting SBP by at least 20 mm Hg to below 150 mm Hg. Matching placebos were employed similarly. The present progress report is based on the data received at the Coordinating Office before 1 March 1996. At that time 3433 subjects had been randomized. A total of 2015 patients had been followed for at least 1 year on double-blind treatment and 1298 patients for at least 2 years. At baseline BP was similar in both treatment groups and averaged 174/86 mm Hg. According to a per-protocol analysis at 1 year, BP fell (P < 0.001) on average by 22.6 +/- 15.7/6.0 +/- 8.0 mm Hg in the active treatment group and by 12.2 +/- 15.9/1.7 +/- 7.3 mm Hg in the placebo group. At 2 years BP was 10.2/5.7 mm Hg lower (P < 0.001) on active treatment than on placebo. At 1 year the percentage of patients who had reached goal BP was 19.9% in the placebo group and 41.4% in the active treatment group. At 2 years these percentages were 20.9 and 43.2 respectively.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Conventional and ambulatory blood pressure and menopause in a prospective population study.

Whether menopause would be associated with a rise in blood pressure (BP) was prospectively assessed in a cohort study. A total of 315 women (30-70 years at follow-up) were randomly selected from the population. They were matched on age and rank of body mass index with 315 men. Five BP readings were obtained by conventional sphygmomanometry (CBP) at the subjects' homes on each of two baseline visits and at one follow-up visit. The 24-h ambulatory BP was recorded at follow-up. Menstrual status was assessed by questionnaire. The statistical tests were two-sided and accounted for age, body mass index, antihypertensive treatment, contraceptive pill intake or changes in these variables. From baseline to follow-up (median, 5.2 years), 166 and 105 women stayed pre- or postmenopausal, while menses ceased in 44 perimenopausal women. In cross-sectional analyses, the postmenopausal women, compared with their pre- and perimenopausal counterparts, had a 4-5 mm Hg higher systolic CBP (15 readings per subject) and 24-h BP (P < or = 0.05 for differences between peri- and postmenopausal women). Furthermore, systolic CBP rose nearly 5 mm Hg per decade more (P < or = 0.05) in peri- and postmenopausal women than in premenopausal subjects. In addition, the longitudinal results showed that systolic CBP did not change in women who stayed premenopausal throughout follow-up (P=0.71), but increased by approximately 4 mm Hg over 5 years in peri- (P=0.07) and postmenopausal (P= 0.01) subjects (P=0.02 for difference between pre-and postmenopausal women). Such trends were not observed for diastolic BP in women or for systolic and diastolic BP in men. In conclusion, menopause per se may potentiate the age-related increase in systolic pressure. Because confined to systolic pressure, this specific effect of menopause may be mediated via a reduction in arterial compliance.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

For how many days should blood pressure be measured at home in older patients before steady levels are obtained?

This study investigated the period of time that blood pressure (BP) should be measured at home in older patients in order to obtain steady BP values. Thirty-six men and 38 women (> or =60 years) were recruited at one family practice. At one office visit the family physician measured supine, sitting and standing BPs three times consecutively in each position. During 10 consecutive days, BP was measured at home five times daily. The supine and standing BPs were measured once in the morning and in the evening and the sitting BP once at noon. These home BP values were averaged over the first day (1-day), over the first 3 days (3-day) and all 10 days (10-day) of measurements. In both the supine (-5.1 mm Hg) and sitting (-3.8 mm Hg) positions the 10-day average systolic home BP was significantly lower than the corresponding office BP. The opposite was observed for the 10-day average standing home BP values (+7.3/+3.4 mm Hg). Comparison of the 3-day and 10-day average home BP values showed only a significantly lower 10-day than 3-day systolic BP level in the supine position (-1.1 mm Hg, 95% CI -1.9 to -0.2 mm Hg). Repeated measures ANOVA, showed a small but significant decrease over time only for the supine systolic home BP (-0.29 mm Hg per day, 95% CI -0.49 to -0.08 mm Hg per day). We conclude that in older subjects, 3 days of home measurements may suffice to obtain steady values for the sitting and standing BPs. A longer interval might be required for the supine BP.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Salt and blood pressure in community-based intervention trials.

This article reviews community-based salt intervention trials. In the Belgian Salt Intervention Trial, a controlled 5-y intervention in two Belgian towns resulted in a reduction in urinary sodium of 17 mmol/24 h (P < 0.001) in adult (aged > or = 20 y) women in the intervention town, which differed from the concurrent trend (an increase of 8 mmol/24 h) in the control town (P = 0.01). However, both systolic (-7.5 compared with -7.9 mm Hg) and diastolic (-2.3 compared with -3.0 mm Hg) pressures declined to the same extent in women of the two towns. In adult men in the intervention town, decreases were observed in urinary sodium (-12 mmol/24 h) and in systolic (-5.6 mm Hg) and diastolic (-2.4 mm Hg) blood pressures, but these trends were the same in the control town (-12 mmol/24 h, -4.9 mm Hg, and 0.2 mm Hg, respectively). The Belgian study and the four other community-based salt intervention trials reviewed show that, in general, salt intake in the long-run cannot be restricted below 5 g/24 h. More moderate salt restriction may constitute a more realistic goal, but its influence on blood pressure in the community at large is probably trivial.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Relationships between changes in left ventricular mass and in clinic and ambulatory blood pressure in response to antihypertensive therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the relationships between changes in left ventricular mass in response to 6-month antihypertensive therapy and changes in conventional and automated measurements of clinic blood pressure, average 24 h ambulatory blood pressure and daytime and night-time blood pressures. DESIGN: After a placebo run-in period, patients with essential hypertension (World Health Organization stages I-II) were treated for 6 months with one or a combination of two first-line antihypertensive drugs. METHODS: Investigations included echocardiography, conventional and automated clinic blood pressure measurements and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Daytime and night-time blood pressures were assessed according to two clock-time-dependent and two clock-time-independent methods, with a wide and a narrow approach for each technique. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients completed the 6-month treatment period. Left ventricular mass, adjusted for sex and body size, was correlated significantly to systolic and diastolic clinic blood pressures, both before (r = 0.57 and r = 0.48, P < 0.001) and during antihypertensive therapy (r = 0.43, P < 0.001 and r = 0.27, P < 0.05). Changes in left ventricular mass were significantly related to changes in blood pressure. The correlation coefficients amounted to 0.39 (P < 0.01) and 0.40 (P < 0.01) for the conventional and automated measurements of clinic systolic blood pressures, respectively, and to 0.45 (P < 0.001) for the average 24 h systolic blood pressure; these r values were 0.27 (NS), 0.20 (NS) and 0.43 (P < 0.01), respectively, for the diastolic blood pressure. The average 24 h blood pressure added 7.4% (P < 0.05) and 6.2% (P = 0.06) to the variance of the changes in mass explained in terms of the conventional and the automated measurements of clinic systolic blood pressures, respectively, and 11.2% (P < 0.05) and 14.5% (P < 0.01) for the diastolic blood pressures. The changes in daytime and night-time blood pressures predicted the changes in left ventricular mass significantly (P < 0.01) and to a similar extent, irrespective of the analytical method. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment-induced changes in left ventricular mass were significantly related to the changes in clinic, 24 h, daytime and night-time blood pressures; the changes in 24 h ambulatory blood pressure add to the variance of the changes in left ventricular mass explained in terms of clinic blood pressure data.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Prediction of cardiac structure and function by repeated clinic and ambulatory blood pressure.

We performed imaging echocardiography, Doppler velocimetry, and repeated clinic and ambulatory blood pressure measurements in 74 hypertensive individuals to clarify why reports differ on the strength of the relationships of left ventricular characteristics with clinic blood pressure, on the superiority of ambulatory over clinic pressure, and on the importance of day-time and nighttime pressures. Clinic pressure was measured five times with an automated device and five times with the conventional technique on 2 different days. The partial correlation coefficients of left ventricular mass and wall thickness with the first automated systolic and diastolic clinic pressures amounted to .38 to .45 (P < .001), improved with increasing numbers of measurements, and reached .56 to .58 for the average of 10 automated pressure determinations. Similar trends were observed for conventional clinic pressures. Average 24-hour pressures were significantly related to mass and wall thickness (partial r = .50 to .61, P < .001) and explained 3% to 6% (systolic) and 5% to 12% (diastolic) of the variance of cardiac structure in addition to the first automated or conventional clinic pressure (P < .05). However, when 10 clinic measurements were averaged, only diastolic 24-hour pressure added information over and above clinic pressure (P < .05); the additional explained variance was larger with regard to the conventional (+4% for mass and +7% for wall thickness) rather than the automated (+3% for wall thickness only) pressures. Mass and wall thickness were more closely related to day-time than nighttime pressures and were not independently related to day-night differences in pressure, except when men and women were considered separately; the results were similar when four different definitions of day and night were applied. Finally, the weak association of left ventricular diastolic function with blood pressure did not improve on repeated clinic or ambulatory blood pressure measurements. In conclusion, increasing numbers of measurements strengthen the relationships of clinic pressure with left ventricular mass and wall thickness and, conversely, diminish the additional predictive power of 24-hour blood pressure. The importance of nighttime pressure and of the nighttime pressure fall does not seem to depend on the definition of day and night but differs in men and women.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Nocturnal blood pressure fall on ambulatory monitoring in a large international database. The "Ad Hoc' Working Group.

A wide range of definitions is used to distinguish subjects in whom blood pressure (BP) falls at night (dippers) from their counterparts (nondippers). In an attempt to standardize the definition of nondipping, we determined the nocturnal BP fall and night-day BP ratio by 24-hour ambulatory monitoring in 4765 normotensive and 2555 hypertensive subjects from 10 to 99 years old. In all subjects combined, the systolic/diastolic nocturnal fall and corresponding ratio averaged (+/- SD) -16.7 +/- 11.0/ -13.6 +/- 8.1 mm Hg and 87.2 +/- 8.0%/83.1 +/- 9.6%, respectively. In normotensive subjects, the 95th percentiles were -0.3/-1.1 mm Hg for the nocturnal fall and 99.7%/98.3% for the night-day ratio. Both the fall and ratio showed a curvilinear correlation with age. The smallest fall and largest ratio were observed in older (> or = 70 years) subjects. A higher BP on conventional sphygmomanometry was associated with a larger systolic (partial r = .11) and diastolic (r = .12) nocturnal BP fall. The diastolic (r = .08) but not the systolic night-day ratio increased with higher conventional BP. The nocturnal BP fall was larger and the corresponding night-day ratio smaller in oscillometric (n = 5884) than in auscultatory (n = 1436) recordings, in males (n = 3730) than in females (n = 3590), and in Europe (n = 4556) than in the other continents (n = 2764). The distributions of the nocturnal BP fall and night-day ratio showed considerable overlap among normotensive and hypertensive subjects, but the overlap tended to be larger for the ratio than for the fall. Of all subjects, 3.2% had systolic and diastolic ratios of 100% or more. With adjustments applied for confounders, the probability of being a nondipper increased 2.8 times (95% confidence interval, 2.0-4.0) from 30 to 60 years and 5.7 times (4.4-7.4) from 60 to 80 years. The odds ratios were 1.0 (0.8-1.4) for males versus females. 1.6 (1.2-2.1) for subjects with definite hypertension versus normotensive subjects, 2.4 (1.2-4.7) for Asians (n = 2213, 96% Japanese) versus inhabitants of the other continents, and 2.4 (1.5-3.8) for subjects examined with auscultatory versus oscillometric devices. In conclusion, the mathematical definition of nondipping, ie, having a night-day ratio of 100% or more for systolic and diastolic BPs, closely approximated the 95th percentiles of the night-day ratio in normotensive subjects. The ratio depends less on BP level than the nocturnal BP fall and is therefore to be preferred in the definition of dipping status. Notwithstanding the present findings, the reproducibility of nondipping and its prognostic significance need further clarification.

Adolescent↗