Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L M Ruilope

Publications and source records attributed to L M Ruilope.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Atorvastatin prevents glomerulosclerosis and renal endothelial dysfunction in hypercholesterolaemic rabbits.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have shown that elevated plasma cholesterol can exacerbate renal disease. However, the effect of lipids on renal structure and vascular function in normal kidneys is less well established. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of hypercholesterolaemia on glomerular structure and vascular reactivity of segmental arteries in rabbits. In addition, we also studied whether or not atorvastatin can prevent these structural and vascular alterations in hypercholesterolaemic rabbits. METHODS: Male New Zealand rabbits were fed either a normal rabbit chow or a diet containing 1% cholesterol and treated or not with atorvastatin (1 mg/kg/day) for 12 weeks. Dose-response curves to acetylcholine (10(-9)-10(-4) mol/l) and sodium nitroprusside (10(-9)-10(-4) mol/l) were studied in segmental arteries in the presence or absence of the thromboxane A2/PGH2 receptor antagonist ifetroban (10(-5) mol/l). Glomerular size and structure were also evaluated. RESULTS: Compared with control animals, hypercholesterolaemic rabbits presented glomerular hypertrophy and several types of injuries (capillary collapse, hyalinosis and alterations of Bowman's capsule), suggesting diffuse glomerulosclerosis. Segmental arteries also showed relaxing responses to acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside which were lower than and similar to, respectively, those of control animals. The presence of ifetroban improved the acetylcholine response only in hypercholesterolaemic rabbits. Atorvastatin treatment prevented vascular and most glomerular changes associated with hypercholesterolaemia even in the presence of very high cholesterol levels. CONCLUSIONS: Atorvastatin exerts a protective effect on renal damage associated with hypercholesterolaemia even in the presence of deleterious levels of plasma cholesterol.

Acetylcholine↗
PubMed2001

The kidney in arterial hypertension.

The kidney facilitates the development of arterial hypertension and suffers its consequences. Once renal damage is clinically manifested, a clear increase in cardiovascular risk appears. The coincidence of renal and cardiovascular damage strengthens the need for therapies attempting the simultaneous protection of both the kidney and the cardiovascular system.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗
PubMed2001

Effect of losartan on TGF-beta1 and urinary albumin excretion in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of losartan on transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) plasma levels and urinary albumin excretion (UAE) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, mild hypertension and microalbuminuria. METHODS: Fourteen patients (eight males, aged 55+/-6 years) with type 2 diabetes mellitus, mild arterial hypertension and microalbuminuria, participating in an open, uncontrolled, pilot study were included. Patients were treated for 8 weeks with losartan. TGF-beta1 plasma levels, UAE and 24-h blood pressure monitoring were determined at baseline and at 4 and 8 weeks. RESULTS: At 4 and 8 weeks of treatment, a reduction was observed in TGF-beta1 plasma levels (5.5+/-4.5 vs 2.0+/-0.6 and 2.6+/-1.0 ng/ml, P<0.005), UAE (96+/-65 vs 59+/-59 and 64+/-47 microg/min, P<0.01), 24-h systolic blood pressure (136+/-9 vs 129+/-9 and 130+/-10 mmHg, P<0.01) and 24-h diastolic blood pressure (77+/-9 vs 74+/-8 and 74+/-7 mmHg, P<0.03). Stratifying the patients by baseline TGF-beta1, seven had TGF-beta1 plasma values higher than normal controls. At 4 and 8 weeks, they showed a marked reduction in TGF-beta1 values (9.0+/-3.9 to 2.1+/-0.7 and 2.5+/-0.7 ng/ml, P<0.01) and UAE (106+/-83 to 49+/-42 and 38+/-26 microg/min, P<0.05), with good correlation between the percentage reduction of both parameters (r=0.83, P<0.01). The remaining seven patients, with normal baseline TGF-beta1 plasma levels, showed no change in TGF-beta1 plasma levels and UAE after treatment. CONCLUSION: Treatment with losartan decreases TGF-beta1 plasma values and UAE in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with high baseline TGF-beta1 levels, suggesting that TGF-beta1 may be a marker to detect patients who may particularly benefit from renin-angiotensin system blockade.

Albuminuria↗
PubMed2001

Relevance of endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor in the effects of hypertension on rat coronary relaxations.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relative participation of nitric oxide (NO), endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF) and prostanoids in the relaxing responses induced by acetylcholine and isoproterenol in isolated coronary arteries from adult Wistar- Kyoto (WKY) rats and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). DESIGN AND METHODS: Male adult WKY rats and SHR were used in the study. Segments from left coronary arteries (approximately 350-380 microm internal diameter and 2 mm long) were mounted in an isometric myograph and pre-contracted with serotonin. Dose-response curves to acetylcholine and isoproterenol were carried out in absence and presence of the NO synthesis inhibitor NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (LNAME), the inhibitor of the cyclo-oxygenase, indomethacin and KCI. Areas under the respective dose-response curves were used to calculate the approximate relative participation of NO, EDHF and prostanoids. RESULTS: Relaxations to either acetylcholine or isoproterenol were lower in SHR than in WKY rats. In WKY rats, presence of LNAME diminished (P< 0.05) relaxation to acetylcholine from 10(-9) to 10(-6) mol/l, and induced a contracting response at 10(-5) and 10(-4) mol/l of acetylcholine. Addition of indomethacin did not significantly affect dose-related relaxation to acetylcholine 10(-9) to 10(-6) mol/l in WKY rats, and reduced (P < 0.05) the contracting response observed at 10(-5) mol/l of acetylcholine. In SHR, addition of LNAME markedly reduced (P< 0.05) acetylcholine relaxations, but did not produce any contracting effect. Addition of indomethacin on top of LNAME slightly (P< 0.05) enhanced relaxing response to acetylcholine in SHR. Presence of LNAME in the media diminished (P < 0.05) relaxation to isoproterenol in both WKY rats and SHR. Addition of indomethacin on top of LNAME increased (P< 0.05) isoproterenol-relaxing response to levels similar to and higher than control conditions in WKY rats and SHR, respectively. Addition of KCI blunted both acetylcholine- and isoproterenol-relaxations in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: NO and EDHF are the main endothelium-derived relaxing factors underlying acetylcholine and isoproterenol relaxations in rat coronary arteries, respectively. EDHF reduction, and not only NO reduction play a key role in the diminished coronary relaxations induced by acetylcholine and isoproterenol in SHR. An arachidonic acid derivative with contracting activity released by acetylcholine and isoproterenol in a differential manner, could oppose the relaxing actions of NO and EDHF.

Acetylcholine↗
PubMed2001

A random comparison of fosinopril and nifedipine GITS in patients with primary renal disease.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate in a random comparison the capacity of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (fosinopril), and that of a long-acting dihydropiridine (nifedipine GITS) to modify the decay in renal function in patients with primary renal disease, exhibiting a progressive increase in serum creatinine during the previous 2 years. METHODS: A randomized, open-label, multicenter study with a minimum follow-up of 3 years. A total of 241 patients were included in the study. All of them were hypertensive and had a 25% or at least 0.5 mg/dl increase in the value of serum creatinine during the 24 months prior to entering the study. Initial doses of fosinopril and nifedipine GITS were 10 and 30 mg respectively, and titration to 30 and 60 mg was performed if needed to obtain the expected blood pressure goal (< 140/90 mmHg). Furosemide, atenolol, and doxazosin were added as second, third, and fourth drugs if necessary, for blood pressure control. The primary end-point of the study was the appearance of double the serum creatinine values and/or the need to enter a dialysis programme. Secondary end-points were cardiovascular events, death, changes in 24 h proteinuria, and the evolution of serum creatinine. Data reflect the analysis performed by intention to treat. RESULTS: Mean age of the group was 54 +/- 14, and 59% were males. Primary glomerulonephritis (31%), nephrosclerosis (26%) and polycystic kidney disease (19%) were the three most frequent diagnostic findings. After 3 years of follow-up, 21% (27/127) of patients treated with fosinopril, and 36% (40/112) of those receiving nifedipine GITS presented a primary end-point, (OR 0.47, 95% confidence intervals 0.26-0.84, P = 0.01). Renal survival was significantly better when fosinopril constituted the first step therapy (P = 0.002). These results did not seem to be influenced by the type of primary renal disease. Proteinuria decreased at the end of the study by a mean of 57% in the fosinopril group and increased by 7% in the group receiving dihydropiridine. Blood pressure control did not differ among groups for diastolic values. During follow-up, however, the patients receiving ACEi showed systolic blood pressure values 4-6 mmHg lower. CONCLUSION: In patients with chronic renal failure and hypertension due to primary renal disease, fosinopril significantly differed from nifedipine GITS by its capacity to slow the progressive decay in renal function. The drugs also differed by their capacity to lower blood pressure. The better control, in particular of systolic blood pressure, in the fosinopril arm could have contributed in a relevant manner to the attainment of a better outcome when the ACEi was employed.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Differential effect of chronic antihypertensive treatment on vascular smooth muscle cell phenotype in spontaneously hypertensive rats.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of chronic losartan or captopril on vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) phenotype and vascular function in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Male 12-week-old rats were treated for 16 weeks with losartan (15 mg/kg per day) or captopril (60 mg/kg per day) in their drinking water. Systolic blood pressure, measured by the tail-cuff method, was reduced approximately 40 mm Hg in both treatment groups compared with a nontreated control group. Cell structure and proliferation studies were performed in VSMCs obtained from rat carotid arteries. Cells from the losartan-treated group showed a significant reduction in size, total protein content, and nucleus number, as well as proliferation after stimulation with 10% fetal calf serum and an increased percentage of cells in the G(1) phase compared with the control and captopril-treated groups. Functional studies were performed in isolated carotid arteries from these groups. Contractions elicited by 75 mmol/L KCl or 10(-)(7) mol/L norepinephrine and relaxations elicited by acetylcholine were similar in all groups. Concentration-response curves to angiotensin I or angiotensin II (10(-)(10) to 3x10(-)(7) mol/L) were almost abolished in the losartan-treated group and were not modified by preincubation with the angiotensin type 2 receptor antagonist PD 123,319. These results suggest that long-term losartan treatment significantly changes VSMC phenotype and proliferative status, apparently unrelated to blood pressure lowering or to endothelial function improvements.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Blood pressure control and benefits of antihypertensive therapy: does it make a difference which agents we use?

This article debates the important question of whether blood pressure lowering alone is responsible for the benefits accrued from antihypertensive therapy as demonstrated in many multicenter randomized clinical trials with different antihypertensive agents or whether there is evidence that some agents have special properties that result in benefits that go beyond those resulting from lowering blood pressure. Over the past >/=30 years, it has been demonstrated beyond any doubt that lowering blood pressure in severe forms of hypertension, and more recently in systolic and even mild hypertension, will result in reduced incidence of stroke and slower progression of heart and renal failure. These effects have been easier to demonstrate in sicker patients, because enough end points may be counted in the 3 to 5 years that these clinical trials last. However, risk attributable to high blood pressure comes, to a greater degree, from the much larger group of hypertensive individuals who have less severe forms of hypertension. Blood pressure lowering offers less protection from coronary heart disease, which is highly prevalent in hypertensive patients, than from stroke. With the introduction of agents such as renin-angiotensin system inhibitors or calcium channel blockers, it has been demonstrated that hypertensive vascular remodeling and endothelial dysfunction may be corrected. It has therefore been suggested that benefits beyond blood pressure lowering may be achieved with the use of specific drugs to lower blood pressure. Although some evidence suggests that this may be the case, it is difficult to extrapolate from mechanistic studies to prevention of hard end points in outcome trials and vice versa. The question remains for the time being largely unanswered.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗
PubMed2001

ACE inhibitors and appearance of renal events in hypertensive nephrosclerosis.

Nephrosclerosis constitutes a major cause of end-stage renal disease. Independently of blood pressure control, ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) are considered to be more nephroprotective than other antihypertensive agents. We have reviewed the long-term evolution of renal function in our series of essential hypertensive patients diagnosed as having nephrosclerosis when first seen in our unit. The analysis was performed depending on whether or not their antihypertensive therapy contained an ACEI alone or in combination for the whole follow-up. The end point was defined as the confirmation of a 50% reduction in creatinine clearance or entry in a dialysis program. A historical cohort of 295 patients was included in the analysis. Mean follow-up was 7.4+/-3.9 years. Diabetes prevalence was higher in ACEI-treated patients (25.7% versus 7.1%, P=0.000), but the diagnosis of diabetic nephropathy could not be confirmed on clinical grounds, including renal biopsy. Twenty-three out of 183 (12.6%) patients in the ACEI group and 23 out of 112 (20.5%) patients in the non-ACEI group experienced a renal event (P=0.0104 by log rank test). Similar results were observed when only nondiabetic patients were considered for the analysis. Cox regression analysis showed that baseline serum creatinine, absence of ACEI administration, mean proteinuria during follow-up, and age were independent predictors for the development of a renal event. In hypertensive nephrosclerosis, therapy containing an ACEI alone or in combination significantly reduces the incidence of renal events. This effect is independent of blood pressure control.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Impairment of renal vasodilation with l-arginine is related to more severe disease in untreated hypertensive patients.

Data remain insufficient to place the decreased response to L-arginine in hypertensive patients within a consistent pathophysiological sequence. The aim of the present study in patients with essential hypertension was to assess the relationships between the response to L-arginine and a set of relevant clinical and laboratory parameters. In this prospective, interventional study, we administered L-arginine to untreated hypertensive individuals and healthy control subjects and measured the clearance of inulin and of para-aminohippurate and a set of biochemical and clinical variables. L-Arginine infusion revealed major differences between control subjects and 1 subgroup (group B) of hypertensive individuals. Group B hypertensives (n=18) had no increase in inulin clearance and no decrease in renal vascular resistance with L-arginine; however, in another subset of hypertensive patients (group A, n=27), the insulin clearance increased and renal vascular resistance decreased similar to the control group (group C, n=11). The ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in group B showed both an increased mean diastolic pressure and a "nondipper" pattern in the nocturnal regulation of arterial pressure. These findings in group B were accompanied by significant alterations in optic fundus and left ventricle hypertrophy and increased microalbuminuria (all, P<0.05). Furthermore, group B individuals had significantly lower values of HDL cholesterol and a higher baseline atherogenic index, plasma insulin level, and glucose/insulin index. We disclose a previously undescribed relationship between end organ repercussion and decreased renal hemodynamic response to L-arginine. Our results may help to understand the mechanisms that lead to target organ damage in hypertension.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

What is the optimal blood pressure target in renal patients?

Chronic renal failure and arterial hypertension run in parallel. New goal BP levels have been established as 130/85 mm Hg and 125/75 mm Hg, depending on whether the level of proteinuria is less than or greater than 1 g/d. New and lower threshold BP (> 130/85 mm Hg) to initiate pharmacologic therapy is required in the presence of renal failure, to facilitate the strict BP control that is required. Hence, it is necessary to consider that both renal and cardiovascular protection are obtained with strict BP control, which otherwise seems to require blockade of angiotensin II effects when proteinuria above 1 g/d is present.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed2000

Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT).

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of antihypertensive drugs newer than diuretics and beta-blockers has not been established. We compared the effects of the calcium-channel blocker nifedipine once daily with the diuretic combination co-amilozide on cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in high-risk patients with hypertension. METHODS: We did a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial in Europe and Israel in 6321 patients aged 55-80 years with hypertension (blood pressure > or = 150/95 mm Hg, or > or = 160 mm Hg systolic). Patients had at least one additional cardiovascular risk factor. We randomly assigned patients nifedipine 30 mg in a long-acting gastrointestinal-transport-system (GITS) formulation (n=3157), or co-amilozide (hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg [corrected] plus amiloride 2.5 mg; n=3164). Dose titration was by dose doubling, and addition of atenolol 25-50 mg or enalapril 5-10 mg. The primary outcome was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, heart failure, or stroke. Analysis was done by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Primary outcomes occurred in 200 (6.3%) patients in the nifedipine group and in 182 (5.8%) in the co-amilozide group (18.2 vs 16.5 events per 1000 patient-years; relative risk 1.10 [95% CI 0.91-1.34], p=0.35). Overall mean blood pressure fell from 173/99 mm Hg (SD 14/8) to 138/82 mm Hg (12/7). There was an 8% excess of withdrawals from the nifedipine group because of peripheral oedema (725 vs 518, p<0.0001), but serious adverse events were more frequent in the co-amilozide group (880 vs 796, p=0.02). Deaths were mainly non-vascular (nifedipine 176 vs co-amilozide 172; p=0.81). 80% of the primary events occurred in patients receiving randomised treatment (157 nifedipine, 147 co-amilozide, difference 0.33% [-0.7 to 1.4]). INTERPRETATION: Nifedipine once daily and co-amilozide were equally effective in preventing overall cardiovascular or cerebrovascular complications. The choice of drug can be decided by tolerability and blood-pressure response rather than long-term safety or efficacy.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

[Relationship between cardiovascular risk profile and anti-hypertensive drug use. GEDEC (Spanish group of cardiovascular studies].

BACKGROUND: Hypertension guidelines emphasize the selection of antihypertensive treatment on the basis of absolute cardiovascular risk. Moreover, compelling and possible indications for each antihypertensive drug class are recommended for patients with other concomitant conditions. The aim of the present study was to analyze the relationship between the cardiovascular risk profile and co-morbid conditions on antihypertensive drug class use. METHODS: This is an observational, multicenter, cross-sectional study performed in 2,850 essential hypertensive patients. Antihypertensive drug treatment has been evaluated on the basis of the presence of other cardiovascular risk factors, target organ damage or cardiovascular diseases, as well as the absolute cardiovascular risk profile. RESULTS: Patients with diabetes were treated more frequently with calcium channel blockers (CCB) and ACE inhibitors. However, the presence of hypercholesterolemia or smoking habit did not influence the use of antihypertensive drug classes. The presence of cerebrovascular disease increased the use of CCB and ACE inhibitors, whereas coronary disease increased the use of CCB and betablockers. The use of diuretics and angiotensin II receptor antagonists was increased in patients with cardiac failure, whereas neither betablockers nor ACE inhibitors were affected by this concomitant disease. Patients with the highest cardiovascular risk received more antihypertensive treatment than those with lower risk, but this was not accompanied by switching from old classes to new ones. CONCLUSION: Cardiovascular risk profile seems to have little influence on the use of antihypertensive drug classes, particularly the presence of hypercholesterolemia or cardiac failure. It seems adequate to emphasize the necessity of an individualization of antihypertensive treatment, based on the presence of concomitant conditions that influence the absolute cardiovascular risk.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

The protective role of atorvastatin on function, structure and ultrastructure in the aorta of dyslipidemic rabbits.

Responses to both an endothelium-dependent (acetylcholine 10(-9)-10(-5) mol/l) and an endothelium-independent vasodilator (sodium nitroprusside 10(-10)-10(-6) mol/l) were studied in aortic rings from rabbits fed or not with a diet containing 0.5% cholesterol plus 14% coconut oil for 14 weeks and treated or not with atorvastatin (2.5 mg/kg/day). Morphometric and ultrastructure analyses were also performed. Rabbits fed the dyslipidemic diet presented higher plasma cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations than controls (P < 0.05). This was associated with intima-media thickening and, consequently, aortic stenosis (29 +/- 3%) since vessel cross-sectional area did not change. Endothelial cells presented numerous alterations in dyslipidemic rabbits. Atorvastatin treatment only reduced plasma levels in dyslipidemic rabbits (P < 0.05), which were nevertheless higher than those of controls. In addition, it prevented the reduction in acetylcholine relaxation in hypercholesterolemic animals. Atorvastatin administration also enhanced the response to acetylcholine in rabbits fed a control diet. Likewise, atorvastatin treatment reduced lesion area and consequently increased aortic lumen in dyslipidemic rabbits but did not modify media thickening. It also prevented the majority of the ultrastructural changes observed in endothelial cells. In conclusion, chronic atorvastatin treatment exerts a protective role in vascular function, structure and ultrastructure even in the presence of high cholesterol and triglyceride plasma levels.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Treatment of hypertension in diabetes mellitus.

In this article we emphasize the need for prompt intervention in diabetic patients with high blood pressure in order to protect the heart, brain, kidney, and the vascular tree against arteriosclerotic damage, which is the main cause of mortality in type 1, and particularly type 2 diabetes mellitus. Recent placebo-controlled, randomized trials indicate that compared with the nondiabetic population, a lower blood pressure threshold for intervention and a lower target blood pressure are adequate in terms of target organ protection. Although all major classes of antihypertensive drugs have demonstrated a potential benefit in treating diabetic hypertensive patients, blocking the renin-angiotensin system with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors is especially useful in patients at high risk for myocardial infarction and/or renal damage. The new class of antihypertensive agents that block the angiotensin II receptor have renal effects very close to those observed with ACE inhibitors. The potential role of this new class in the treatment of hypertension in diabetes will depend on the results of ongoing trials.

Angiotensin II↗
PubMed2000

Effect of atorvastatin on endothelium-dependent constrictor factors in dyslipidemic rabbits.

Relaxations to acetylcholine and contractions to acetylcholine in the presence of the nitric oxide (NO) synthesis inhibitor (L-N(G)-nitroarginine methyl ester, L-NAME) were studied in aortic rings from rabbits fed either a control or a diet containing 0.5% cholesterol+14% coconut oil for 14 weeks and treated or not with atorvastatin (2.5 mg kg(-1) day(-1)). Rings were incubated with the endothelin (ET(A)) receptor antagonist BQ123, and/or the thromboxane A(2) (TXA(2))/prostaglandin H(2) (PGH(2)) receptor antagonist ifetroban. In rabbits, high cholesterol and triglyceride plasma levels were associated with intimal thickening and blunted acetylcholine-relaxation as compared with controls. By contrast, acetylcholine+L-NAME response was higher. Incubation with either ifetroban or BQ123 increased acetylcholine-relaxation in both diet groups and it reduced the constrictor response only in dyslipidemic rabbits. Removal of endothelium reduced acetylcholine+L-NAME contraction in dyslipidemic rabbits, although increased it in control animals. Atorvastatin treatment reduced plasma lipid levels and lesion size in dyslipidemic animals. Likewise, it prevented acetylcholine-relaxation reduction. In addition, atorvastatin reduced constrictor response in dyslipidemic rabbits but only in rings with endothelium. Incubation with either ifetroban or BQ123 did not further modify these responses in atorvastatin-treated animals in any group. These data suggest that ET and TXA(2) availabilities seem to participate in the endothelial dysfunction associated with dyslipidemia. Atorvastatin treatment reduces intimal thickening and improves endothelial dysfunction in rabbits. This effect seems to be a consequence of its ability to act on ET and TXA(2) systems.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Comparative study of home and office blood pressure in hypertensive patients treated with enalapril/HCTZ 20/6 mg: the ESPADA study.

The introduction and generalization of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring has shown the clinical relevance of home BP. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of home-measured BP for monitoring and controlling patients with arterial hypertension while on a homogeneous treatment. An additional objective was to establish the degree of office BP control obtained. This was a prospective, longitudinal, observational and multicenter study in a cohort of 156 patients of both sexes, aged over 18 years and with essential hypertension. All of them received the fixed combination enalapril/HCTZ 20/6 mg as the only hypertensive agent for at least 4 weeks previously. Office BP was the average of three measurements. For home BP, a semi-automated device (OMRON HEM 705 CP) was used. The patients measured their BP twice a day for 2 consecutive days. The average differences between the two measuring methods were low, but significant: 3.99 mmHg for systolic BP (SBP; p < 0.05), 2.02 mmHg for diastolic BP (DBP; p < 0.05). Pearson's regression coefficient between the office and home values was highly significant (p < 0.0001) for SBP, DBP and heart rate. Home BP measurement was highly reproducible as shown by the high within-class correlation coefficient for individual measurements on the first day compared with the second: 0.88 (95% confidence interval, CI 0.82-0.92; p < 0.00001) for SBP and 0.89 for DBP (95% CI 0.83-0.93; p < 0.00001). The percentage of patients with strict office DBP and SBP control (< 140/90 mmHg) was 61.3% and with DBP control (<90 mmHg) 92%. In conclusion, in the ESPADA study, the application of home BP measurement is valid, reproducible and shows a high correlation with office BP.

Age Factors↗