Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L M Ruilope

Publications and source records attributed to L M Ruilope.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

[Effect of anti-hypertensive therapy with irbesartan on the absolute cardiovascular risk].

Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or with angiotensin receptor antagonists confers patients with arterial hypertension (AH) and associated risk factors, target organ lesion or cardiovascular disease with greater protection in morbidity and mortality terms. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of irbesartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, on the absolute cardiovascular risk in a cohort of hypertensive patients with moderate, high, or very high cardiovascular risk. This was a multicenter, prospective, observational, cohort study with 1974 patients (63 11 years; 47% males) with newly diagnosed essential AH or AH non-controlled with anti-hypertensive monotherapy, and moderate to very high cardiovascular risk. Irbesartan therapy at a dosage of 150300 mg was instituted as monotherapy or associated with hydrochlorothiazide, 12.5 mg. The clinical follow-up was 6 months. The evaluated parameters included the absolute cardiovascular risk, measured either quantitatively (Framingham algorithm) or qualitatively (low, moderate, high, and very high risk groups following the WHO/International Hypertension Society guidelines). Irbesartan therapy led to a significant (p = 0.0001) decrease in SBP (from 170.9 18.4 to 138.5 16.5 mmHg) and DBP (from 96.6 11 to 82 9 mmHg). The quantitative absolute cardiovascular risk decreased by 29.8% (from 12.14 8 to 8.65 6.2; p < 0.0001). The percentage of patients with very high cardiovascular risk decreased from 1.52% to 0.51% and that for patients with high cardiovascular risk from 92.77% to 88.32%. The latter patients changed to the moderate risk group. As a result, this moderate risk group increased from 5.71% to 11.17%. The adverse reaction rate was very low as only 2.2% of patients had some adverse reaction. In conclusion, irbesartan as monotherapy or associated with hydrochlorothiazide has been shown to be effective in reducing the absolute cardiovascular risk, which is obtained by a substantial decrease in arterial pressure and a good safety profile on the biochemical parameters. Tolerability was excellent, with a very low rate of adverse reactions.

Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists↗
PubMed2001

[Relationship between severity of essential arterial hypertension and the prevalence hyperuricemia].

BACKGROUND: Hyperuricemia has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease in hypertensive patients. However, the relation between serum urate and severity of hypertension has not been conclusively defined as yet. We aimed at finding out whether there exists an independent relationship between changes in the prevalence of hyperuricemia and severity of hypertension. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We studied 3 cohorts of patients aged 35 to 60 years with essential hypertension diagnosed at a university hospital in Madrid, Spain. The first cohort (before 1981) included 325 patients, the second (from 1981 to 1989) comprised 271 patients and the third cohort (from 1990 to 1999) included 545 patients. Disease severity ranged from 1 to 6 according to blood pressure levels at diagnosis (WHO/ISH grades 1, 2 or 3 were assigned 1, 2 or 3 points, respectively) and target organ damage (left ventricular hypertrophy, hypertensive retinal vascular changes, and proteinuria above 300 mg/day; one point each). RESULTS: Mean serum urate concentrations in the 3 cohorts were 6.6, 5.8 and 5.5 mg/dL, respectively (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). 39% of patients in the first cohort had a serum urate concentration > 7.0 mg/dL whereas only 18.1% patients in the third group showed hyperuricemia (difference: 20.9%; 95% CI, 10.1 to 32.3; p < 0.05). Severity of hypertension was higher in the first cohort (mean SD, 2.50 1.31 points) than in the third group (1.96 1.06 points; p < 0.05), with the second cohort showing an intermediate severity (2.23 1.01 points). Serum urate levels were directly related to the severity of hypertension in the 3 groups (r = 0.08, p < 0.05). In a multivariate analysis, after adjustment for confounding variables, serum urate had no significant association with severity of hypertension. However, target organ damage, systolic blood pressure and serum creatinine were all independent predictors of severity. CONCLUSIONS: Favourable changes in the severity of hypertension for a time period significantly correlate with decreases in hyperuricemia prevalence in the same period. On the other hand, hyperuricemia appears to be an indirect marker of hypertensive renal damage.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Hyperuricemia and renal function.

Increased serum urate concentration is commonly seen in clinical practice. It does not represent a specific disease, nor is it an indication for therapy. Hyperuricemia can be the consequence of increased uric acid production and/or decreased renal capacity to excrete uric acid. In essential hypertension, it has been described in up to one third of patients and is directly related to an increase in renal vascular resistance and inversely correlated with renal plasma flow. In other words, abnormal renal hemodynamics, commonly seen in the initial stages of the disease, account for the increased serum urate concentration. This can be maintained if a decrease in glomerular filtration rate takes place. The increase in uric acid has been shown to be a potent predictor of the development of cardiovascular events and death. In addition, uric acid, particularly when elevated, could represent an independent risk factor. On the other hand, an altered renal function predicts in an independent manner a higher cardiovascular risk. For this reason, the predictive capacity of uric acid could be partly dependent on the fact that hyperuricemia runs in parallel with a deranged renal function.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗
PubMed2001

The calcium channel blocker controversy in patients with diabetic nephropathy: Is there an issue?

Chronic renal failure, proteinuria, and arterial hypertension run in parallel in the presence of diabetic nephropathy. New goal blood pressure levels have been established in diabetic patients: 130/85 mm Hg and 125/75 mm Hg depending on the level of proteinuria being below or above 1 g/d. New and lower threshold blood pressure (>130/85 mm Hg) to initiate pharmacologic therapy is required in the presence of diabetes mellitus in order to facilitate the strict blood pressure control that is required. It must be considered that both renal and cardiovascular protection are obtained with strict blood pressure control, which otherwise seems to require blockade of angiotensin II effects when proteinuria above 1 g/d is present. While awaiting the publication of long-term follow-up studies looking at renal and cardiovascular outcome in diabetic and other nephropathies in which calcium channel blockers are compared with other antihypertensive drugs, calcium channel blockers will remain the drugs needed to attain the expected goal blood pressure in diabetics, both alone (in the absence of microalbuminuria or macroalbuminuria) or in combination, particularly with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed2001

Renal function: the Cinderella of cardiovascular risk profile.

The presence of an altered renal function in essential hypertension, advanced heart failure (HF) and after a myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with higher cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Indices of altered renal function (e.g., microalbuminuria, increased serum creatinine concentrations, decrease in estimated creatinine clearance or overt proteinuria) are independent predictors of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in any of the three clinical situations. These parameters should then be routinely evaluated in clinical practice. These facts have several therapeutic implications. First, although there is no evidence-based information on the level of blood pressure that confers optimal renal protection, levels substantially lower than past recommendations are advisable. Second, hypertensive kidney damage should be prevented by early treatment of hypertensive patients, particularly those with microalbuminuria. Finally, to avoid further aggravation of high cardiovascular risk, antihypertensive agents devoid of unwanted metabolic side effects should be used for the treatment of hypertensive vascular damage. In HF, the combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and a beta-blocker seem to be the most renoprotective. Renal outcome is also improved by ACE inhibition after an MI. Finally, renal and cardiovascular outcome seem to run in parallel in all these situations.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗
PubMed2001

Kidney dysfunction: a sensitive predictor of cardiovascular risk.

Changes in renal function can be detected in patients suffering from essential hypertension and heart failure. Detection of an increased serum creatinine, a decreased creatinine clearance and of proteinuria or microalbuminuria in hypertensive patients; and the finding of a diminution in the value of estimated creatinine clearance in heart failure patients are very potent predictors for a worse outcome of the patient. The parameters commonly used to evaluate renal function have to be considered in any stratification of cardiovascular risk in hypertensive and heart failure patients.

Cardiac Output, Low↗
PubMed2001

Renal participation in cardiovascular risk in essential hypertension.

Renal damage as a consequence of uncontrolled hypertension is well recognized. Antihypertensive therapy has been proved to significantly decrease the vascular damage in the kidneys of hypertensive patients. However, prevalence of mild renal insufficiency remains present in a significant proportion of the hypertensive population. This is accompanied by a marked increase in cardiovascular risk, as a consequence of the clustering of other cardiovascular risk factors and of insufficiently controlled blood pressure. Prevention and protection of renal and cardiovascular damage in these patients will be one of the most relevant healt care tasks in the future.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗
PubMed2001

Atorvastatin prevents glomerulosclerosis and renal endothelial dysfunction in hypercholesterolaemic rabbits.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have shown that elevated plasma cholesterol can exacerbate renal disease. However, the effect of lipids on renal structure and vascular function in normal kidneys is less well established. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of hypercholesterolaemia on glomerular structure and vascular reactivity of segmental arteries in rabbits. In addition, we also studied whether or not atorvastatin can prevent these structural and vascular alterations in hypercholesterolaemic rabbits. METHODS: Male New Zealand rabbits were fed either a normal rabbit chow or a diet containing 1% cholesterol and treated or not with atorvastatin (1 mg/kg/day) for 12 weeks. Dose-response curves to acetylcholine (10(-9)-10(-4) mol/l) and sodium nitroprusside (10(-9)-10(-4) mol/l) were studied in segmental arteries in the presence or absence of the thromboxane A2/PGH2 receptor antagonist ifetroban (10(-5) mol/l). Glomerular size and structure were also evaluated. RESULTS: Compared with control animals, hypercholesterolaemic rabbits presented glomerular hypertrophy and several types of injuries (capillary collapse, hyalinosis and alterations of Bowman's capsule), suggesting diffuse glomerulosclerosis. Segmental arteries also showed relaxing responses to acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside which were lower than and similar to, respectively, those of control animals. The presence of ifetroban improved the acetylcholine response only in hypercholesterolaemic rabbits. Atorvastatin treatment prevented vascular and most glomerular changes associated with hypercholesterolaemia even in the presence of very high cholesterol levels. CONCLUSIONS: Atorvastatin exerts a protective effect on renal damage associated with hypercholesterolaemia even in the presence of deleterious levels of plasma cholesterol.

Acetylcholine↗
PubMed2001

The kidney in arterial hypertension.

The kidney facilitates the development of arterial hypertension and suffers its consequences. Once renal damage is clinically manifested, a clear increase in cardiovascular risk appears. The coincidence of renal and cardiovascular damage strengthens the need for therapies attempting the simultaneous protection of both the kidney and the cardiovascular system.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗
PubMed2001

Effect of losartan on TGF-beta1 and urinary albumin excretion in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of losartan on transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) plasma levels and urinary albumin excretion (UAE) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, mild hypertension and microalbuminuria. METHODS: Fourteen patients (eight males, aged 55+/-6 years) with type 2 diabetes mellitus, mild arterial hypertension and microalbuminuria, participating in an open, uncontrolled, pilot study were included. Patients were treated for 8 weeks with losartan. TGF-beta1 plasma levels, UAE and 24-h blood pressure monitoring were determined at baseline and at 4 and 8 weeks. RESULTS: At 4 and 8 weeks of treatment, a reduction was observed in TGF-beta1 plasma levels (5.5+/-4.5 vs 2.0+/-0.6 and 2.6+/-1.0 ng/ml, P<0.005), UAE (96+/-65 vs 59+/-59 and 64+/-47 microg/min, P<0.01), 24-h systolic blood pressure (136+/-9 vs 129+/-9 and 130+/-10 mmHg, P<0.01) and 24-h diastolic blood pressure (77+/-9 vs 74+/-8 and 74+/-7 mmHg, P<0.03). Stratifying the patients by baseline TGF-beta1, seven had TGF-beta1 plasma values higher than normal controls. At 4 and 8 weeks, they showed a marked reduction in TGF-beta1 values (9.0+/-3.9 to 2.1+/-0.7 and 2.5+/-0.7 ng/ml, P<0.01) and UAE (106+/-83 to 49+/-42 and 38+/-26 microg/min, P<0.05), with good correlation between the percentage reduction of both parameters (r=0.83, P<0.01). The remaining seven patients, with normal baseline TGF-beta1 plasma levels, showed no change in TGF-beta1 plasma levels and UAE after treatment. CONCLUSION: Treatment with losartan decreases TGF-beta1 plasma values and UAE in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with high baseline TGF-beta1 levels, suggesting that TGF-beta1 may be a marker to detect patients who may particularly benefit from renin-angiotensin system blockade.

Albuminuria↗
PubMed2001

Relevance of endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor in the effects of hypertension on rat coronary relaxations.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relative participation of nitric oxide (NO), endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF) and prostanoids in the relaxing responses induced by acetylcholine and isoproterenol in isolated coronary arteries from adult Wistar- Kyoto (WKY) rats and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). DESIGN AND METHODS: Male adult WKY rats and SHR were used in the study. Segments from left coronary arteries (approximately 350-380 microm internal diameter and 2 mm long) were mounted in an isometric myograph and pre-contracted with serotonin. Dose-response curves to acetylcholine and isoproterenol were carried out in absence and presence of the NO synthesis inhibitor NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (LNAME), the inhibitor of the cyclo-oxygenase, indomethacin and KCI. Areas under the respective dose-response curves were used to calculate the approximate relative participation of NO, EDHF and prostanoids. RESULTS: Relaxations to either acetylcholine or isoproterenol were lower in SHR than in WKY rats. In WKY rats, presence of LNAME diminished (P< 0.05) relaxation to acetylcholine from 10(-9) to 10(-6) mol/l, and induced a contracting response at 10(-5) and 10(-4) mol/l of acetylcholine. Addition of indomethacin did not significantly affect dose-related relaxation to acetylcholine 10(-9) to 10(-6) mol/l in WKY rats, and reduced (P < 0.05) the contracting response observed at 10(-5) mol/l of acetylcholine. In SHR, addition of LNAME markedly reduced (P< 0.05) acetylcholine relaxations, but did not produce any contracting effect. Addition of indomethacin on top of LNAME slightly (P< 0.05) enhanced relaxing response to acetylcholine in SHR. Presence of LNAME in the media diminished (P < 0.05) relaxation to isoproterenol in both WKY rats and SHR. Addition of indomethacin on top of LNAME increased (P< 0.05) isoproterenol-relaxing response to levels similar to and higher than control conditions in WKY rats and SHR, respectively. Addition of KCI blunted both acetylcholine- and isoproterenol-relaxations in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: NO and EDHF are the main endothelium-derived relaxing factors underlying acetylcholine and isoproterenol relaxations in rat coronary arteries, respectively. EDHF reduction, and not only NO reduction play a key role in the diminished coronary relaxations induced by acetylcholine and isoproterenol in SHR. An arachidonic acid derivative with contracting activity released by acetylcholine and isoproterenol in a differential manner, could oppose the relaxing actions of NO and EDHF.

Acetylcholine↗
PubMed2001

A random comparison of fosinopril and nifedipine GITS in patients with primary renal disease.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate in a random comparison the capacity of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (fosinopril), and that of a long-acting dihydropiridine (nifedipine GITS) to modify the decay in renal function in patients with primary renal disease, exhibiting a progressive increase in serum creatinine during the previous 2 years. METHODS: A randomized, open-label, multicenter study with a minimum follow-up of 3 years. A total of 241 patients were included in the study. All of them were hypertensive and had a 25% or at least 0.5 mg/dl increase in the value of serum creatinine during the 24 months prior to entering the study. Initial doses of fosinopril and nifedipine GITS were 10 and 30 mg respectively, and titration to 30 and 60 mg was performed if needed to obtain the expected blood pressure goal (< 140/90 mmHg). Furosemide, atenolol, and doxazosin were added as second, third, and fourth drugs if necessary, for blood pressure control. The primary end-point of the study was the appearance of double the serum creatinine values and/or the need to enter a dialysis programme. Secondary end-points were cardiovascular events, death, changes in 24 h proteinuria, and the evolution of serum creatinine. Data reflect the analysis performed by intention to treat. RESULTS: Mean age of the group was 54 +/- 14, and 59% were males. Primary glomerulonephritis (31%), nephrosclerosis (26%) and polycystic kidney disease (19%) were the three most frequent diagnostic findings. After 3 years of follow-up, 21% (27/127) of patients treated with fosinopril, and 36% (40/112) of those receiving nifedipine GITS presented a primary end-point, (OR 0.47, 95% confidence intervals 0.26-0.84, P = 0.01). Renal survival was significantly better when fosinopril constituted the first step therapy (P = 0.002). These results did not seem to be influenced by the type of primary renal disease. Proteinuria decreased at the end of the study by a mean of 57% in the fosinopril group and increased by 7% in the group receiving dihydropiridine. Blood pressure control did not differ among groups for diastolic values. During follow-up, however, the patients receiving ACEi showed systolic blood pressure values 4-6 mmHg lower. CONCLUSION: In patients with chronic renal failure and hypertension due to primary renal disease, fosinopril significantly differed from nifedipine GITS by its capacity to slow the progressive decay in renal function. The drugs also differed by their capacity to lower blood pressure. The better control, in particular of systolic blood pressure, in the fosinopril arm could have contributed in a relevant manner to the attainment of a better outcome when the ACEi was employed.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Differential effect of chronic antihypertensive treatment on vascular smooth muscle cell phenotype in spontaneously hypertensive rats.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of chronic losartan or captopril on vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) phenotype and vascular function in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Male 12-week-old rats were treated for 16 weeks with losartan (15 mg/kg per day) or captopril (60 mg/kg per day) in their drinking water. Systolic blood pressure, measured by the tail-cuff method, was reduced approximately 40 mm Hg in both treatment groups compared with a nontreated control group. Cell structure and proliferation studies were performed in VSMCs obtained from rat carotid arteries. Cells from the losartan-treated group showed a significant reduction in size, total protein content, and nucleus number, as well as proliferation after stimulation with 10% fetal calf serum and an increased percentage of cells in the G(1) phase compared with the control and captopril-treated groups. Functional studies were performed in isolated carotid arteries from these groups. Contractions elicited by 75 mmol/L KCl or 10(-)(7) mol/L norepinephrine and relaxations elicited by acetylcholine were similar in all groups. Concentration-response curves to angiotensin I or angiotensin II (10(-)(10) to 3x10(-)(7) mol/L) were almost abolished in the losartan-treated group and were not modified by preincubation with the angiotensin type 2 receptor antagonist PD 123,319. These results suggest that long-term losartan treatment significantly changes VSMC phenotype and proliferative status, apparently unrelated to blood pressure lowering or to endothelial function improvements.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Blood pressure control and benefits of antihypertensive therapy: does it make a difference which agents we use?

This article debates the important question of whether blood pressure lowering alone is responsible for the benefits accrued from antihypertensive therapy as demonstrated in many multicenter randomized clinical trials with different antihypertensive agents or whether there is evidence that some agents have special properties that result in benefits that go beyond those resulting from lowering blood pressure. Over the past >/=30 years, it has been demonstrated beyond any doubt that lowering blood pressure in severe forms of hypertension, and more recently in systolic and even mild hypertension, will result in reduced incidence of stroke and slower progression of heart and renal failure. These effects have been easier to demonstrate in sicker patients, because enough end points may be counted in the 3 to 5 years that these clinical trials last. However, risk attributable to high blood pressure comes, to a greater degree, from the much larger group of hypertensive individuals who have less severe forms of hypertension. Blood pressure lowering offers less protection from coronary heart disease, which is highly prevalent in hypertensive patients, than from stroke. With the introduction of agents such as renin-angiotensin system inhibitors or calcium channel blockers, it has been demonstrated that hypertensive vascular remodeling and endothelial dysfunction may be corrected. It has therefore been suggested that benefits beyond blood pressure lowering may be achieved with the use of specific drugs to lower blood pressure. Although some evidence suggests that this may be the case, it is difficult to extrapolate from mechanistic studies to prevention of hard end points in outcome trials and vice versa. The question remains for the time being largely unanswered.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗
PubMed2001

ACE inhibitors and appearance of renal events in hypertensive nephrosclerosis.

Nephrosclerosis constitutes a major cause of end-stage renal disease. Independently of blood pressure control, ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) are considered to be more nephroprotective than other antihypertensive agents. We have reviewed the long-term evolution of renal function in our series of essential hypertensive patients diagnosed as having nephrosclerosis when first seen in our unit. The analysis was performed depending on whether or not their antihypertensive therapy contained an ACEI alone or in combination for the whole follow-up. The end point was defined as the confirmation of a 50% reduction in creatinine clearance or entry in a dialysis program. A historical cohort of 295 patients was included in the analysis. Mean follow-up was 7.4+/-3.9 years. Diabetes prevalence was higher in ACEI-treated patients (25.7% versus 7.1%, P=0.000), but the diagnosis of diabetic nephropathy could not be confirmed on clinical grounds, including renal biopsy. Twenty-three out of 183 (12.6%) patients in the ACEI group and 23 out of 112 (20.5%) patients in the non-ACEI group experienced a renal event (P=0.0104 by log rank test). Similar results were observed when only nondiabetic patients were considered for the analysis. Cox regression analysis showed that baseline serum creatinine, absence of ACEI administration, mean proteinuria during follow-up, and age were independent predictors for the development of a renal event. In hypertensive nephrosclerosis, therapy containing an ACEI alone or in combination significantly reduces the incidence of renal events. This effect is independent of blood pressure control.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Impairment of renal vasodilation with l-arginine is related to more severe disease in untreated hypertensive patients.

Data remain insufficient to place the decreased response to L-arginine in hypertensive patients within a consistent pathophysiological sequence. The aim of the present study in patients with essential hypertension was to assess the relationships between the response to L-arginine and a set of relevant clinical and laboratory parameters. In this prospective, interventional study, we administered L-arginine to untreated hypertensive individuals and healthy control subjects and measured the clearance of inulin and of para-aminohippurate and a set of biochemical and clinical variables. L-Arginine infusion revealed major differences between control subjects and 1 subgroup (group B) of hypertensive individuals. Group B hypertensives (n=18) had no increase in inulin clearance and no decrease in renal vascular resistance with L-arginine; however, in another subset of hypertensive patients (group A, n=27), the insulin clearance increased and renal vascular resistance decreased similar to the control group (group C, n=11). The ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in group B showed both an increased mean diastolic pressure and a "nondipper" pattern in the nocturnal regulation of arterial pressure. These findings in group B were accompanied by significant alterations in optic fundus and left ventricle hypertrophy and increased microalbuminuria (all, P<0.05). Furthermore, group B individuals had significantly lower values of HDL cholesterol and a higher baseline atherogenic index, plasma insulin level, and glucose/insulin index. We disclose a previously undescribed relationship between end organ repercussion and decreased renal hemodynamic response to L-arginine. Our results may help to understand the mechanisms that lead to target organ damage in hypertension.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

What is the optimal blood pressure target in renal patients?

Chronic renal failure and arterial hypertension run in parallel. New goal BP levels have been established as 130/85 mm Hg and 125/75 mm Hg, depending on whether the level of proteinuria is less than or greater than 1 g/d. New and lower threshold BP (> 130/85 mm Hg) to initiate pharmacologic therapy is required in the presence of renal failure, to facilitate the strict BP control that is required. Hence, it is necessary to consider that both renal and cardiovascular protection are obtained with strict BP control, which otherwise seems to require blockade of angiotensin II effects when proteinuria above 1 g/d is present.

Blood Pressure↗