Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Karl Broich

Publications and source records attributed to Karl Broich.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Mild cognitive impairment.

Mild cognitive impairment is a syndrome defined as cognitive decline greater than expected for an individual's age and education level but that does not interfere notably with activities of daily life. Prevalence in population-based epidemiological studies ranges from 3% to 19% in adults older than 65 years. Some people with mild cognitive impairment seem to remain stable or return to normal over time, but more than half progress to dementia within 5 years. Mild cognitive impairment can thus be regarded as a risk state for dementia, and its identification could lead to secondary prevention by controlling risk factors such as systolic hypertension. The amnestic subtype of mild cognitive impairment has a high risk of progression to Alzheimer's disease, and it could constitute a prodromal stage of this disorder. Other definitions and subtypes of mild cognitive impairment need to be studied as potential prodromes of Alzheimer's disease and other types of dementia.

Aged↗

Clinical practice with anti-dementia drugs: a consensus statement from British Association for Psychopharmacology.

The British Association for Psychopharmacology (BAP) coordinated a meeting of experts to review the evidence on the drug treatment for dementia. The level of evidence (types) was rated using a standard system: Types 1a and 1b (evidence from meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials or at least one controlled trial respectively); types 2a and 2b (one well-designed study or one other type of quasi experimental study respectively); type 3 (non-experimental descriptive studies); and type 4 (expert opinion). There is type 1a evidence for cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine) for mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease; memantine for moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease; and for the use of bright light therapy and aromatherapy. There is type 1a evidence of no effect of anti inflammatory drugs or statins. There is conflicting evidence regarding oestrogens, with type 2a evidence of a protective effect of oestrogens but 1b evidence of a harmful effect. Type 1a evidence for any effect of B12 and folate will be forthcoming when current trials report. There is type 1b evidence for gingko biloba in producing a modest benefit of cognitive function; cholinesterase inhibitors for the treatment of people with Lewy body disease (particularly neuropsychiatric symptoms); cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine in treatment cognitive impairment associated with vascular dementia; and the effect of metal collating agents (although these should not be prescribed until more data on safety and efficacy are available). There is type 1b evidence to show that neither cholinesterase inhibitors nor vitamin E reduce the risk of developing Alzheimer's disease in people with mild cognitive impairment; and there is no evidence that there is any intervention that can prevent the onset of dementia. There is type 1b evidence for the beneficial effects of adding memantine to cholinesterase inhibitors, and type 2b evidence of positive switching outcomes from one cholinesterase inhibitor to another. There is type 2a evidence for a positive effect of reminiscence therapy, and type 2a evidence that cognitive training does not work. There is type 3 evidence to support the use of psychological interventions in dementia. There is type 2 evidence that a clinical diagnosis of dementia can be made accurately and that brain imaging increases that accuracy. Although the consensus statement dealt largely with medication, the role of dementia care in secondary services (geriatric medicine and old age psychiatry) and primary care, along with health economics, was discussed. There is ample evidence that there are effective treatments for people with dementia, and Alzheimer's disease in particular. Patients, their carers, and clinicians deserve to be optimistic in a field which often attracts therapeutic nihilism.

Aged↗

Selective COX-2 inhibitors and risk of thromboembolic events - regulatory aspects.

In the 1990s, the pharmaceutical industry developed selective COX-2 inhibitors (coxibs) as alternatives to conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), with the expectation of similar analgetic and anti-inflammatory efficacy but a reduced risk of adverse gastrointestinal (GI) effects. Marketing authorisation (MA) was granted for rofecoxib and celecoxib as first representatives of this new pharmacological class at the end of the 1990s in the EU. In the following years MAs were granted for the 'second generation' coxibs etoricoxib, parecoxib/valdecoxib and lumiracoxib. However, data from large clinical 'outcome studies' as well as epidemiological data raised concerns about the cardiovascular (CV) safety of the coxibs. In consequence, two comprehensive review processes (referrals) were initiated by the European Medicines Agency (EMEA). As a result, in the EU the use of coxibs has been contraindicated in patients with established coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease and peripheral arterial disease and a number of warning statements concerning CV, GI and skin toxicity have been introduced in the coxib product informations. This article provides a description of the regulatory actions taken and discusses some specific aspects of the past and future regulatory assessment of coxibs.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems↗

Changes in regional cerebral blood flow by therapeutic vagus nerve stimulation in depression: an exploratory approach.

Abnormalities in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) have been reported to characterize depressive episodes; they are at least partly reversed by antidepressant treatment. Treatment-specific as well as response-related changes in rCBF have been reported. We explored the changes in rCBF induced by vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), a recently proposed antidepressant strategy, by application of single photon emission-computed tomography with (99m)Tc-hexamethyl-propylene amine oxime in otherwise treatment-refractory patients. Both region-of-interest (ROI) and statistical parametric mapping (SPM) analytic approaches were used. Decreases of rCBF in the amygdala, left hippocampus, left subgenual cingulate cortex, left and right ventral anterior cingulum, right thalamus and brain stem were observed; the only increase of rCBF was found by SPM analysis in the middle frontal gyrus. This pattern shares features with changes of rCBF previously associated with the administration of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Similarities to other brain-stimulation strategies in antidepressant treatment were less pronounced.

Adult↗

Do recent efficacy data on the drug treatment of acute bipolar depression support the position that drugs other than antidepressants are the treatment of choice? A conceptual review.

This conceptual review summarises the results of relevant studies on antidepressants, mood stabilisers such as lithium and anticonvulsants, and second generation antipsychotics in the indication of bipolar depression. Based on methodological and clinical considerations, the position of antidepressants and the possible alternatives in this indication are reviewed very carefully. In addition the regulatory requirements for licensing a drug for the indication "short-term treatment of bipolar depression" are described.

Acute Disease↗

Placebo-controlled studies in depression: necessary, ethical and feasible.

Placebo-controlled trials are used widely in the development of new pharmacological treatments. They have sometimes been challenged as being unethical, in clinical situations where patients can receive an existing effective and acceptable treatment. It has been argued that studies of potential antidepressants should employ only a comparator-controlled design, whereby new compounds have to be found at least as efficacious as existing treatments. By contrast, others have argued that sole use of comparator-controlled trials is itself unethical, as more patients will be exposed to potentially unhelpful treatments. This article reviews the rationale for conducting placebo-controlled treatment studies in depressed patients, examines the underlying ethical issues, and describes the provisions that should be applied when investigating the efficacy and tolerability of potentially valuable new antidepressant treatments. Placebo-controlled studies of new antidepressants are justified, both scientifically and ethically; restrictions on placebo-controlled investigations will hinder the arrival of more efficacious and better tolerated antidepressants.

Antidepressive Agents↗

Regulatory issues in vascular dementia: a European perspective.

In many studies vascular dementia (VaD) is the second most frequent cause of organic acquired cognitive dysfunction; accounting for 10% to 50% of the cases, depending on the geographical area, patient population, and diagnostic criteria used. There is growing evidence that VaD does not include only multi-infarct dementia (MID) but relates to complex interactions of different etiologies (risk factors, cerebrovascular disease), structural changes in the brain, host factors and cognition. This resulted in reconceptualization of VaD to emphasize the differences from Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the diagnostic criteria used (DSM-IV, ICD-10, NINDS-AIREN, or ADDTC) are based on the experience with AD and as such have their limitations and are not interchangeable. From a regulatory point of view, therefore, future research is needed to better define VaD in general and possible subtypes of VaD as targets for drug trials. Methodological issues in VaD trials, as opposed to AD, will be emphasized. The European Medicinal Products Evaluation Agency (EMEA) has adopted a guideline for trials of symptomatic treatments of dementia, particularly in AD. There is no explicit guideline for VaD trials; however, many of the recommendations for AD are already applicable to VaD for drugs aiming at alleviating symptoms of dementia. On the other hand, VaD may be potentially preventable, underscoring the importance of primary and secondary prevention as in other cerebrovascular disorders. Large long-term trials are necessary to study the importance of different risk factors and possible intervention strategies with special reference to VaD.

Aged↗