PubMed1983
In the past three decades significant strides have been made in attempts at nonparenteral immunization. Appreciation of the importance of secretory immunity led to attempts to stimulate antibody production locally. The vaccines developed against respiratory pathogens as a result of this new knowledge have many practical limitations, such as the need for highly trained personnel, expensive equipment, very cooperative recipients for intranasal or aerosol administration, and a vaccine that is both adequately attenuated, immunogenic, and stable during storage. With recognition of the presence of a common mucosal defense system, new approaches to vaccine development have become possible. Oral immunization, by stimulating GALT, presents a promising approach for protecting many secretory surfaces against a variety of infectious agents. Recently, emphasis has been placed on developing an oral vaccine against S. mutans. McGhee et al. have demonstrated antibody to S. mutans in saliva and tears following oral ingestion of that antigen, without a rise in serum antibody, in both humans and rats. The rats were afforded protection from caries after rechallenge with both the original and cross-reacting serotypes of S. mutans. Similar results have recently been seen with viral antigens. Mice have been shown to have significant protection against influenza infection following oral immunization. And in a pilot study with human volunteers, the secretory antibody response in nasal washes was similar following either oral or parenteral vaccination. Oral immunization may prove to be far superior to parenteral vaccination against a variety of pathogens, because of fewer side effects and greater ease in vaccine preparation and administration.