Biomedical subjects

James F Dempsey

Publications and source records attributed to James F Dempsey.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

A conceptual model integrating spatial information to assess target volume coverage for IMRT treatment planning.

PURPOSE: We propose a model that integrates the spatial location of each voxel within a clinical target volume (CTV) to differentiate the merit of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans with similar dose-volume histogram (DVH). This conceptual model is based on the hypothesis that various subregions within a given CTV that may carry different degree of risk in containing microscopic disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We hypothesize that a correlation between the probability of microscopic tumor extension and the risk of lymph node metastasis of a particular voxel point within CTV can be inferred based on its distance from the surface of radiographically evident gross disease. A preliminary observation was gathered from existing clinicopathologic data, and, based on these observations, a conceptual model for exponential-decay microscopic-extension probability function around primary tumor and linear function parameters relating the likelihood of lymph node metastasis to the distance from primary tumor was proposed. This model was generated to provide scoring functions to examine the merit of IMRT plans. To test the feasibility of this model, we generated two IMRT plans with similar and clinically acceptable DVH-based CTV coverage. Planning data were transferred to a data analysis software package (Matlab, The Mathworks Inc.). A 3D scoring function was calculated for each voxel inside the CTV. The adequacy of target coverage was evaluated by several novel approaches: 2D dose-volume scoring-function histograms (DVSH), the integral probability of relative residual tumor burden (RRTB), and tumor control probabilities (TCP) employing the scoring function as a pseudo-clonogen density distribution. RESULTS: Incorporating parameters for the risk of containing microscopic disease in each voxel into the scoring function algorithm, 2D DVSHs, RRTBs, integral RRTBs, and TCPs were computed. On each axial image, an RRTB map could locate the regions at greatest risk. These scoring functions were able to differentiate the merit of CTV coverage of clinically different IMRT plans but having very similar DVHs; one with cold spots centrally located over the gross tumor, and the other with more acceptable cold spots on the periphery of the CTV further away from the gross tumor volume. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the feasibility and potential utility of an IMRT scoring method derived from this conceptual modeling approach. These methods are capable of ranking treatment plans with similar DVH profiles but different underdosed regions within the target. We will examine the accuracy of model parameters by performing tumor-specific image-pathologic correlation studies. Upon validation of these parameters, incorporating this scoring function model into plan optimization may have the potential to avoid underdosing subvolumes within CTV that harbor a higher likelihood of microscopic disease.

Humans↗

PubMed2003

Patterns of failure in patients receiving definitive and postoperative IMRT for head-and-neck cancer.

PURPOSE: To analyze the patterns of locoregional failure in patients with head-and-neck cancer treated with inverse planning intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between February 1997 and December 2000, 165 patients with histologically confirmed head-and-neck cancer were treated using a parotid-sparing inverse planning IMRT protocol. Thirty-nine patients who received either palliative repeat irradiation or IMRT as a boost were excluded from this analysis, leaving 126 patients for this analysis. Of the 126 patients, 30 were women and 96 were men (median age 56 years, range 13-84). Fifty-two patients (41%) received definitive IMRT. Of the 52 patients, 17 were treated with RT alone and 35 with concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens. Seventy-four patients (59%) received postoperative IMRT. The median follow-up was 26 months (range 12-55). IMRT was used only in the upper neck for salivary sparing. The lower neck was treated with a conventional AP low-neck port abutted to the inferior IMRT dose distribution border. The radiation dose was prescribed to the two clinical target volumes (CTVs) according to the assumed risk of containing disease. The mean dose for definitive IMRT patients was 72.64 +/- 4.83 Gy to CTV1 and 64.34 +/- 5.15 Gy to CTV2. The mean dose to CTV1 and CTV2 in postoperative cases was 68.53 +/- 4.71 Gy and 60.95 +/- 5.33 Gy, respectively. The locations of failure were analyzed. RESULTS: Seventeen locoregional failures (persistent or recurrent disease) were found. Of these 17 failures, 9 (53%) were inside CTV1. One failure (6%) was marginal to CTV1 but inside CTV2. One failure (6%) occurred outside CTV1 but inside CTV2. Another failure was marginal to CTV2. Of the 17 failures, 5 (28%) were found outside of the IMRT field and in the lower neck. Dose-volume histogram analysis revealed that for all but 1 patient, the recurrent/persistent disease within the CTVs received comparable or superior dose coverage relative to the CTV. The 2-year actuarial locoregional control rate was 85%, and the ultimate locoregional control rate after surgical salvage was 89%. We observed no dermal failure and only one marginal failure in the region adjacent to the spared parotid glands. CONCLUSION: We have shown that the target definition and coverage for patients treated with IMRT for parotid sparing is adequate. The predominant tumor failure within CTV1 may imply the need to identify patients with radioresistant tumor subvolumes (such as hypoxic regions) within the CTV. This information would assist in discriminating a subgroup of tumors for a more aggressive and target-specific therapeutic approach.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Validation of dynamic MLC-controller log files using a two-dimensional diode array.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivered with multi-leaf collimator (MLC) in the step-and-shoot mode uses multiple static MLC segments to achieve intensity modulation. For typical IMRT treatment plans, significant numbers of segments are delivered with monitor units (MUs) of much less than 10. Verification of the ability of the linear accelerator (linac) to deliver small MU segments accurately is an important step in the IMRT commissioning and quality assurance (QA) process. Recent studies have reported large discrepancies between the intended and delivered segment MUs. These discrepancies could potentially cause large errors in the delivered patient dose. We have undertaken a systematic study to evaluate the accuracy of the dynamic MLC log files, which are created automatically by our commercial MLC workstation after each delivery, in recording the fractional MU delivered in the step-and-shoot mode. Two linac models were evaluated with simple-geometry leaf sequences and delivered with different total MUs and different nominal dose rates. A commercial two-dimensional diode array was used for the measurement. Large discrepancies between the intended and delivered segment MUs were found. The discrepancies were larger for small MU segments at higher dose rate, with some small MU segments completely undelivered. The recorded fractional MUs in the log files were found to agree with what was delivered within the limits of our experimental uncertainty. Our results indicate that it is important to verify the delivery accuracy of small MU segments that could potentially occur in a patient treatment and that the log files are useful in checking the integrity of the linac delivery once validated. Thus validated log files can be used as a QA tool for general IMRT delivery and patient-specific plan verification.

Documentation↗

PubMed2003

A method for the reconstruction of four-dimensional synchronized CT scans acquired during free breathing.

Breathing motion is a significant source of error in radiotherapy treatment planning for the thorax and upper abdomen. Accounting for breathing motion has a profound effect on the size of conformal radiation portals employed in these sites. Breathing motion also causes artifacts and distortions in treatment planning computed tomography (CT) scans acquired during free breathing and also causes a breakdown of the assumption of the superposition of radiation portals in intensity-modulated radiation therapy, possibly leading to significant dose delivery errors. Proposed voluntary and involuntary breath-hold techniques have the potential for reducing or eliminating the effects of breathing motion, however, they are limited in practice, by the fact that many lung cancer patients cannot tolerate holding their breath. We present an alternative solution to accounting for breathing motion in radiotherapy treatment planning, where multislice CT scans are collected simultaneously with digital spirometry over many free breathing cycles to create a four-dimensional (4-D) image set, where tidal lung volume is the additional dimension. An analysis of this 4-D data leads to methods for digital-spirometry, based elimination or accounting of breathing motion artifacts in radiotherapy treatment planning for free breathing patients. The 4-D image set is generated by sorting free-breathing multislice CT scans according to user-defined tidal-volume bins. A multislice CT scanner is operated in the ciné mode, acquiring 15 scans per couch position, while the patient undergoes simultaneous digital-spirometry measurements. The spirometry is used to retrospectively sort the CT scans by their correlated tidal lung volume within the patient's normal breathing cycle. This method has been prototyped using data from three lung cancer patients. The actual tidal lung volumes agreed with the specified bin volumes within standard deviations ranging between 22 and 33 cm3. An analysis of sagittal and coronal images demonstrated relatively small (<1 cm) motion artifacts along the diaphragm, even for tidal volumes where the rate of breathing motion is greatest. While still under development, this technology has the potential for revolutionizing the radiotherapy treatment planning for the thorax and upper abdomen.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Ionization chamber volume averaging effects in dynamic intensity modulated radiation therapy beams.

The commercial cylindrical ionization chamber ionization integration accuracy of dynamically moving fields was evaluated. The ionization chambers were exposed to long (14 cm), narrow (0.6, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 cm) 6 MV and 18 MV fields. Rather than rely on the linear accelerator to reproducibly scan across the chamber, the chambers were scanned beneath fixed portals. A water-equivalent phantom was constructed with cavities that matched the chambers and placed on a computer-controlled one-dimensional table. Computer-controlled electrometers were utilized in continuous charge integrate mode, with 10 samples of the charge, along with time stamps, acquired for each chamber location. A reference chamber was placed just beneath the linear accelerator jaws to adjust for variations in linear accelerator dose rate. The scan spatial resolution was selected to adequately sample regions of steep dose gradient and second spatial derivative (curvature). A fixed measurement in a 10 x 10 cm2 field was used to normalize the profiles to absolute chamber response. Three ionization chambers were tested, a microchamber (0.009 cm3), a Farmer chamber (0.6 cm3) and a waterproof scanning chamber (0.125 cm3). The larger chambers exhibited severe under-response at the small field's centers, but all of the chambers, independent of orientation, accurately integrated the ionization across the scanned portal. This indicates that the tested ionization chambers provide accurate integrated charges in regions of homogeneous dose regions. Partial integration (less than the field width plus the chamber length plus 2 cm), yielded integration errors of greater than 1% and 2% for 6 MV and 18 MV, respectively, with errors for the Farmer chamber of greater than 10% even for the 4 cm wide field.

Equipment Failure Analysis↗

PubMed2003

Initial evaluation of commercial optical CT-based 3D gel dosimeter.

We evaluated the OCTOPUS-ONE research laser CT scanner developed and manufactured by MGS Research, Inc. (Madison, CT). The scanner is designed for imaging 3D optical density distributions in BANG gels. The scanner operates in a translate-rotate configuration with a single scanning laser beam. The rotating cylindrical gel phantom is immersed in a refractive index matching solution and positioned at the center of a square tank made of plastic and glass. A stationary polarized He-Ne laser beam (633 nm) is reflected from a mirror moving parallel to the tank wall and scans the gel. Another mirror moves synchronously along the opposite side of the tank and collects the transmitted light and sends it to a single stationary silicon photodetector. A filtered backprojection algorithm is used to reconstruct projection data in a plane. The laser-mirrors-detector assembly is mounted on a horizontal platform that moves vertically for slice selection. We have tested the mechanical and optical setup, projection centering on the axis of rotation, linearity, and spatial resolution. We found the optical detector to respond linearly to transmitted light from control samples. The spatial resolution of the scanner was determined by employing a split field resolution technique. We obtained the horizontal and vertical full widths at half maxima of the laser beam intensity profiles as 0.6 and 0.8 mm, respectively. Dose calibration tests of the gel were performed using a nine-field (2 x 2 cm2 each) dose pattern irradiated at different dose levels. Finally, we compared gel-derived 2D planar dose distribution against radiochromic film measured dose distribution for both the nine-field and a uniform 5 x 5 cm2 field of 6 MV x rays. Very similar dose distributions were observed in gel and radiochromic film except in regions of steep dose gradient and highest dose. A dose normalization of 15.6% was required between the two dosimeters due to differences in overall radiation response. After normalization, analysis using the gamma evaluation showed that the radiochromic film and gel-measured dose distributions differed by a maximum gamma of 1.3 using 5% and 1.5 mm dose difference and distance-to-agreement criteria. The optical CT scanner has great potential as a 3D dosimeter, but a few refinements and further testing are necessary before its routine clinical use.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2002

Determination and delineation of nodal target volumes for head-and-neck cancer based on patterns of failure in patients receiving definitive and postoperative IMRT.

PURPOSE: We present the guidelines for target volume determination and delineation of head-and-neck lymph nodes based on the analysis of the patterns of nodal failure in patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data pertaining to the natural course of nodal metastasis for each head-and-neck cancer subsite were reviewed. A system was established to provide guidance for nodal target volume determination and delineation. Following these guidelines, 126 patients (52 definitive, 74 postoperative) were treated between February 1997 and December 2000 with IMRT for head-and-neck cancer. The median follow-up was 26 months (range 12-55), and the patterns of nodal failure were analyzed. RESULTS: These guidelines define the nodal target volume based on the location of the primary tumor and the probability of microscopic metastasis to the ipsilateral and contralateral (Level I-V) nodal regions. Following these guidelines, persistent or recurrent nodal disease was found in 6 (12%) of 52 patients receiving definitive IMRT, and 7 (9%) of 74 patients receiving postoperative IMRT had failure in the nodal region. CONCLUSION: On the basis of our clinical experience in implementing inverse-planning IMRT for head-and-neck cancer, we present guidelines using a simplified, but clinically relevant, method for nodal target volume determination and delineation. The intention was to provide a foundation that enables different institutions to exchange clinical experiences in head-and-neck IMRT. These guidelines will be subject to future refinement when the clinical experience in head-and-neck IMRT advances.

Follow-Up Studies↗

PubMed2002

Toward automated quality assurance for intensity- modulated radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether high-quality, relatively inexpensive, document and transparency scanners used as densitometers are sufficiently quantitative for routine quality assurance (QA). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The scanner we investigated used a linear amplifier, digitizing gray-scale images to 12-bit resolution with a user-selected spatial resolution of 0.170 mm(2) pixels. To reduce Newton's rings artifacts, the standard glass platen was replaced by glass with an antireflective coating. Conversion of reading to transmission was conducted by permanently placing a calibrated photographic step tablet on the scanner platen. After conversion to light transmission, a zero-phase two-dimensional Wiener filter was used to reduce pixel-to-pixel signal variation. Light-scatter artifacts were removed by deconvolution of a measured light-spread kernel. The light-spread kernel artifacts were significant along the scanner's detector axis, but were insignificant along the scanning axis. RESULTS: Pixel-to-pixel noise was better than 2% for optical densities, ranging from 0.4 to 2.0 and 0 to 2.7 for the unfiltered and filtered images, respectively. The document scanning system response was compared against a confocal scanning laser densitometer. A series of IMRT dose distribution and dose calibration film sets were scanned using the two scanners, and the measured dose was compared. The maximum mean and standard deviation of the measured dose difference between the document scanner and confocal scanner was 1.48% and 1.06%, respectively. CONCLUSION: While the document scanners are not as flexible as dedicated film densitometers, these results indicate that, using the intensity and scatter corrections, the system provides accurate and precise measurements up to an optical density of 2.0, sufficient for routine IMRT film QA. For some film types, this requires the reduction in monitor units to limit the dose delivered to the film. The user must be cautious that the delivered IMRT dose is scaled appropriately. This inexpensive and accurate system is being integrated into an automated QA program.

Artifacts↗

PubMed2002

Applicator-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: We are introducing a novel method for delivering highly conformal dose distributions to cervical cancer tumors using external beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy. The method, termed applicator-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy (AGIMRT), will use an applicator substitute placed in the vagina and uterus to provide spatial registration and immobilization of the gynecologic organs. The main reason for the applicator substitute will be to localize the fornices, cervix, and uterus with the expectation that the other nearby organs will also be reproducibly positioned with respect to the applicator substitute. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dose distributions will be used as a substitute for high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy procedures. The flexibility of IMRT will enable customized dose distributions that have the potential to reduce complications and improve local control, especially for locally advanced disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS: To test the advantages of IMRT over intracavitary brachytherapy, volumetric scans of three cervical cancer patients were obtained with implanted CT-compatible applicators. IMRT dose distribution simulations using tomotherapy, were compared against intracavitary brachytherapy using cesium tubes to investigate the dosimetric differences of the two modalities. Because these tumor volumes do not image well on CT, the target volumes were defined as the isodose surface containing the traditional point A, defined as 2 cm superior to the vaginal fornices and 2 cm lateral to the intrauterine canal. One patient had a uterus that wrapped superior and anterior to the bladder. For this case, the cervix and uterus were selected as the target volume. To determine the potential for using an applicator substitute to localize internal organs, the posterior bladder and anterior rectal surfaces were localized relative to the colpostats. Comparisons of the colpostat-localized surfaces were conducted for two scan studies for 3 patients. RESULTS: The IMRT distributions covered the point-A isodose surfaces while reducing doses to the bladder and rectum. Brachytherapy showed extensive underdose regions in the target volume for the wrapped-around target. Spatial positioning was better than 0.7 and 1.3 cm in the rectum and bladder, respectively, indicating the potential that an applicator substitute may be able to localize these structures. CONCLUSIONS: AGIMRT has the potential for improving critical structure avoidance while maintaining highly reproducible and accurate internal organ registration found with brachytherapy.

Female↗

PubMed2002

Performance evaluation of an 85-cm-bore X-ray computed tomography scanner designed for radiation oncology and comparison with current diagnostic CT scanners.

INTRODUCTION: The demand for computed tomography (CT) virtual simulation is constantly increasing with the wider adoption of three-dimensional conformal and intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Virtual simulation CT studies are typically acquired on conventional diagnostic scanners equipped with an external patient positioning laser system and specialized planning and visualization software. Virtual simulation technology has matured to a point where conventional simulators may be replaced with CT scanners. However, diagnostic CT scanner gantry bores (typically 65-70 cm) can present an obstacle to the CT simulation process by limiting patient positions, compared to those that can be attained in a conventional simulator. For example, breast cancer patients cannot always be scanned in the treatment position without compromising reproducibility and appropriateness of setup. Extremely large patients or patients requiring special immobilization or large setup devices are often unable to enter the limited-bore gantry. A dedicated 85-cm-bore radiation oncology CT scanner has the potential to eliminate these problems. The scanner should provide diagnostic-quality images at diagnostic-comparable dose levels. The purpose of this study was to independently evaluate the performance of a novel 85-cm-bore CT X-ray scanner designed specifically for radiation oncology and compare it against diagnostic-type, 70-cm-bore scanners that may be used in the same setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed image quality and dosimetric measurements on an 85-cm-bore CT scanner (AcQSim CT, Marconi Medical Systems, Inc., Cleveland, OH) and a 70-cm-bore, diagnostic-type scanner (UltraZ CT, Marconi Medical Systems, Inc.). Image quality measurements were performed using a manufacturer-supplied phantom (Performance Phantom, Marconi Medical Systems, Inc.), following the manufacturer's suggested testing procedures, and an independent image quality phantom (CATPHAN 500, The Phantom Laboratory, New York, NY). The standard image quality parameters evaluated for the purpose of comparison were as follows: slice thickness accuracy, high-contrast resolution (limiting spatial resolution), low-contrast resolution, uniformity and noise, and CT number accuracy and linearity. Standard head and body protocols were employed throughout most of our measurements and were kept equal between the two scanners. The computed tomography dose index was measured for standard head and body imaging protocols using accepted methods and procedures. For comparison purposes, data for a diagnostic-type, 70-cm-bore scanner (GE HighSpeed CT/i) were extracted from the literature. The results obtained for the 85-cm-bore scanner are compared with the following: (1) manufacturer-provided autoperformance phantom test results (validating its use for routine quality assurance), (2) a similar set of measurements performed on a conventional 70-cm-bore, diagnostic-type CT scanner (UltraZ CT, Marconi Medical Systems, Inc.), and (3) current available data on other diagnostic-type CT scanners (GE HighSpeed CT/i). RESULTS: Head and body doses seem on average to be slightly (1-2 cGy) higher for the 85-cm-bore unit than for conventional 70-cm units. Measured slice thickness was within acceptable criteria, +/-0.5 mm. There does not seem to be any significant difference in high-contrast resolution. Both units render a limiting value of approximately 7-8 lp/cm for slice thickness 8-10 mm. Both units exhibit comparable CT number uniformity, accuracy, and linearity. Noise levels seem to be slightly increased (by approximately 0.05-0.2%) for the large-bore geometry. Low-contrast resolution for both units was comparable (4.5-5.5 mm @ 0.35%). All image quality parameters are well within diagnostic acceptable levels. CONCLUSION: The overall imaging performance and mechanical integrity of the 85-cm-bore scanner are comparable to those of conventional diagnostic scanners that may be employed in a radiation oncology setting.

Computer Simulation↗

PubMed2002

PET-guided three-dimensional treatment planning of intracavitary gynecologic implants.

PURPOSE: Positron emission tomography (PET) provides physiologic information that is not available from computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance studies. PET images may allow more accurate delineation of three-dimensional treatment planning target volumes of brachytherapy gynecologic (GYN) implants. This study evaluates the feasibility of using PET as the sole source of target, normal structure, and applicator delineation for intracavitary GYN implant treatment planning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Standard Fletcher-Suit brachytherapy tandem and colpostat applicators were used for radiation delivery. After insertion of the applicator in the operating room, the patient was taken to a PET scanner, where 555 MBq (15 mCi) 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) was administered intravenously. Forty-five minutes later, three localization tubes containing 18F-FDG were inserted into the source afterloading compartments of the tandem and colpostat. A whole-pelvis scan was performed, and the images were transferred to a commercial brachytherapy three-dimensional treatment planning system. A Foley catheter was inserted into the urinary bladder while the patient was in the operating room. The regions of radioactivity in the three applicator tube image were contoured for reconstruction of the applicator, along with the bladder, rectum, and 18F-FDG-defined target volumes. A treatment plan was generated that included dose-volume histograms and three-dimensional dose distribution displays, allowing the physician an opportunity to determine if adequate target coverage and normal-tissue sparing had been obtained. For a more conservative approach, three-dimensional dose distributions and dose-volume histograms delivered with conventional source arrangements and loading could be observed. The accuracy of applicator localization from the PET images was verified using a water phantom containing two aluminum CT-compatible tandems. The PET-defined and CT scan applicator reconstructions were compared. RESULTS: Feasibility of using PET images for treatment planning of brachytherapy intracavitary GYN implants has been demonstrated. A phantom study demonstrated applicator reconstruction accuracy in the axial direction to be better than 2 mm. Reconstruction accuracy in the longitudinal direction (principally craniocaudal) was similar to the PET scanner's voxel size of 4.3 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Brachytherapy intracavitary GYN implant design has traditionally been based on patient tumor staging, palpation, and clinical experience. PET images have the potential to provide better spatial information about the relationship of tumor and normal structures to the applicator. This information can be used to optimize the delivery of radiation therapy treatments. Thus far, six patients have been scanned using this process.

Brachytherapy↗

PubMed2002

Dosimetry of therapeutic photon beams using an extended dose range film.

For intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dose distribution verification, multidimensional measurements are required to quantify the steep dose-gradient regions. High resolution, two-dimensional dose distributions can be measured using radiographic film. However, the photon energy response of film is known to be a function of depth, field size, and photon beam energy, potentially reducing the accuracy of dose distribution measurements. The dosimetric properties of the recently developed Kodak EDR2 film were investigated and compared to those of Kodak XV film. The dose responses of both film types to 6 MV and 18 MV photon beams were investigated for depths of 5 cm, 10 cm, and 15 cm and field sizes of 4x4 cm2 and 15x15 cm2. This analysis involved the determination of sensitometric curves for XV and EDR2 films, the determination of dose profiles from exposed XV and EDR2 films, and comparison of the film-generated dose profiles to ionization chamber measurements. For the combinations of photon beam energy, depth, and field size investigated here, our results indicate that the sensitometric curves are nearly independent of field size and depth of calibration. For a field size of 4x4 cm2, a single sensitometric curve for either EDR2 and XV film can be used for the determination of relative dose profiles. For the larger field size, the sensitometric curve for EDR2 film is superior to XV film in regions where the dose falls below 20% of the central axis dose, due to the effects that the increased low energy scattered photon contributions have on film response. The limited field size and depth dependence of sensitometric data measured using EDR2 film, along with the inherently wide linear dose-response range of EDR2 film, makes it better suited to the verification of IMRT dose distributions.

Calibration↗