Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J S Garner

Publications and source records attributed to J S Garner.

31 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1982

Operating room practices for the control of infection in U. S. hospitals, October 1976 to July 1977.

We estimated the frequency of selected infection control practices in the operating room from a nationwide survey of hospitals. Our survey confirmed that, in many hospitals, practices which have not received scientific or budgetary scrutiny have become part of the perioperative routine. Almost half of the hospitals reported using nonrecommended tacky, or disinfectant, mats at the entrance to operating rooms, and more than three-fourths were performing nonrecommended environmental cultures in the operating room at a cost ranging from $2,000 to $20,000 per year. When routine nose and throat cultures were taken of operating room personnel, we found an obvious pecking order, rather than a scientific rationale for culturing. In almost all instances, we found wide variations in practice among hospitals. This nonuniformity may be due to such factors as lack of a convincing scientific basis for evaluating the relative efficacy of alternative practices, the strong influence of industry marketing, the individual preferences of surgeons and operating room supervisors and the lack of completeness and agreement of statements from various scientific and professional organizations.

Bacteriological Techniques↗
PubMed1981

Techniques and uses of nosocomial infection surveillance in U.S. hospitals, 1976-1977.

From personal interviews in a representative sample of hospitals, we found that 97 per cent of them had some type of infection surveillance system; most involved continuous, hospital-wide surveillance, written definitions of infections, active case-finding methods and basic analytic techniques. Infection control nurses spent an average of about half of their time on surveillance. In larger hospitals (greater than or equal to 200 beds), the heads of the infection surveillance and control programs reported a greater awareness of most nosocomial infections if they were in hospitals with more intensive surveillance systems, and most indicated the surveillance data were used for a variety of specific purposes. Although 81 percent of persons who described surveillance reported using surveillance data in inservice education, only 31 percent of U.S. staff nurses recalled its having been presented. "Clean" wound, surgeon-specific rates of surgical wound infection were reported back to surgeons in only 16 percent of the hospitals. Ninety-seven percent of the hospital administrators believed that surveillance data are not a hindrance in defending the hospital against litigation for alleged malpractice, and 65 percent considered the information more often a help.

Cross Infection↗
PubMed1980

Nosocomial surgical infections: incidence and cost.

The data reported in this article support the findings of Dr. Altemeier; that is, infections among surgical patients remain a serious problem today. Urinary tract infections account for approximately 40 per cent of nosocomial infections among surgical patients. Surgical wound and skin infections account for one third of the nosocomial infections among surgical patients. Rates for wound infections rise with age, with increased length of hospitalization before surgery, and with increased duration of surgery. They are higher for patients who have an infection at a distant site and for those who have the more hazardous surgical procedures as determined by risk categories. Gram-negative organisms are more prevalent than gram-positive organisms. A nosocomial surgical wound infection lengthens the hospitalization by an average of 7.4 days and raises the cost of hospitalization by more than 800 dollars. Further analysis of the data is necessary in order to identify the risk factors likely to be most helpful in determining which patients are at increased risk of acquiring a nosocomial infection. Only when these factors are identified can the most direct and effective contact and preventive measures be implemented.

Aged↗
PubMed1979

Contamination of intravenous infusion fluid: effects of changing administration sets.

Daily change of intravenous (i.v.) infusion administration sets has been recommended by the Center for Disease Control since 1973 to reduce the risk of infusion bacteremia. To evaluate this recommendation, we undertook a prospective, randomized, controlled trial that compared the rates of i.v.-associated bacteremia, in-use i.v. fluid contamination, and phlebitis in 300 patients whose administration sets were changed every 24 h with those in 300 patients whose administration sets were changed every 48 h. No i.v.-associated bacteremia occurred. Twelve of 600 infusions (2%) had positive infusion-fluid cultures: five in one group and seven in the other. Both groups had comparable rates of phlebitis. In this study population with low rates of fluid contamination, no benefit accrued from changing the administration sets every 24 h instead of every 48 h. In hospitals with low rates of fluid contamination, the routine changing of i.v. administration sets every 48 h will result in substantial financial savings.

Candida albicans↗
PubMed1976

Nosocomial staphylococcal cervical lymphadenitis in infants: report of an outbreak.

Staphylococcus aureus infections developed in 16 of 721 infants born at a general hospital during a six-month period (October 1972 to March 1973). Twelve of the 16 affected infants had cervical adenitis, which usually became manifest two to four months after they were discharged from the hospital. Although most infants with adenitis underwent incision and drainage procedures, physicians noted few constitutional symptoms. Staphylococcal phage types from infants with adenitis were identical to phage types commonly recovered from colonized newborns and nursery personnel at the hospital. Despite the long period between hospital discharge and onset of clinical symptoms, cases of cervical adenitis were probably nosocomial in origin.

Cross Infection↗