The great experiment: the admission of women students to St Mary's Hospital Medical School, 1916-1925.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to J S Garner.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has developed a new set of definitions for surveillance of nosocomial infections. The new definitions combine specific clinical findings with results of laboratory and other tests that include recent advances in diagnostic technology; they are formulated as algorithms. For certain infections in which the clinical or laboratory manifestations are different in neonates and infants than in older persons, specific criteria are included. The definitions include criteria for common nosocomial infections as well as infections that occur infrequently but have serious consequences. The definitions were introduced into hospitals participating in the CDC National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (NNIS) in 1987 and were modified based on comments from infection control personnel in NNIS hospitals and others involved in surveillance, prevention, and control of nosocomial infections. The definitions were implemented for surveillance of nosocomial infections in NNIS hospitals in January 1988 and are the current CDC definitions for nosocomial infections. Other hospitals may wish to adopt or modify them for use in their nosocomial infections surveillance programs.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Although infection control nurses have played a major role in hospital infection control programs for more than a decade, there was little published scientific evidence with which to evaluate whether having an infection control nurse, or any other component of an infection control program, would actually reduce a hospital's nosocomial infection rate. To develop such evaluative evidence, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) carried out several nationwide studies in random samples of U.S. hospitals. Data from the studies show that having an infection control nurse for every 250 occupied hospital beds is an important component in reducing nosocomial urinary tract infections, bacteremia, and postoperative pneumonia.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A statistical algorithm was used to identify potentially important clusters among nosocomial infections reported each month by 7 community hospitals. Epidemiologic review and on-site investigations distinguished outbreaks of clinical disease from factitious clusters. In 1 year, 8 outbreaks were confirmed. They involved 82 patients--approximately 2% of patients with nosocomial infections and 0.09% of all discharges. One true outbreak occurred for every 12,000 discharges--at least 1 outbreak per year for the average community hospital. Five (63%) outbreaks were recognized independently by the hospitals' infection control personnel. Four (50%) resolved spontaneously; the hospitals' own control measures were necessary in 2; and 2 resolved only after an outside investigation. Organized surveillance appears necessary to detect some outbreaks, and control measures are needed to stop many. Since, however, outbreaks account for such a small proportion of nosocomial infections, infection control programs should be sufficiently staffed and managed so that most of the effort is directed toward the surveillance and control of endemic infection problems, but with adequate resources remaining to respond to outbreaks when they occur.
A new guideline developed by the Centers for Disease Control suggests that hospitals adopt one of two alternative isolation systems: the category system or the disease-specific system. The older category system has been modified to reflect current knowledge; for example, the category of protective isolation has been deleted, new categories for contact precautions and tuberculosis precautions have been added, the specific precautions indicated in the other categories have been substantially modified, and many infections have been assigned to new categories. The disease-specific system, a newly developed approach, lists the specific isolation precautions indicated for each infectious disease. Whereas the revised category system offers greater simplicity in practice, the disease-specific system minimizes unnecessary precautions. Both systems allow patient-care personnel more decision-making authority in determining which precautions to apply.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
To study the impact of the professional background of infection control personnel, we compared the characteristics and activities of 107 infection control nurses (ICNs) with those of 13 infection control laboratorians (ICLs), all in hospitals with 300 beds or more. Although the two groups performed similarly in many respects. ICNs spent more time teaching, whereas ICLs spent more time and appeared more proficient in investigating outbreaks. Staff nurses at hospitals with ICNs found the infection control person more visible on the wards and more available for discussing infection control matters. ICNs appeared less hesitant to speak up to personnel not following correct handwashing techniques. ICNs and ICLs appear to offer different skills that should be considered when filling different infection control positions.