Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Koziol-McLain

Publications and source records attributed to J Koziol-McLain.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Health care providers' missed opportunities for preventing femicide.

BACKGROUND: Homicide of women (femicide) by intimate partners is the most serious form of violence against women. The purpose of this analysis of a larger multisite study was to describe health care use in the year prior to murder of women by their intimate partner in order to identify opportunities for intervention to prevent femicide. METHODS: A sample of femicide cases was identified from police or medical examiner records. Participants (n = 311) were proxy informants (most often female family members) of victims of intimate partner femicide from 11 U.S. cities. Information about prior domestic abuse and use of health care and other helping agencies for victims and perpetrators was obtained during structured telephone interviews. RESULTS: Most victims had been abused by their partners (66%) and had used health care agencies for either injury or physical or mental health problems (41%). Among women who had been pregnant during the relationship, 23% were beaten by partners during pregnancy. Among perpetrators with fair or poor physical health, 53% had contact with physicians and 15% with fair or poor mental health had seen a doctor about their mental health problem. Among perpetrators with substance problems, 5.4% had used alcohol treatment programs and 5.7% had used drug treatment programs. CONCLUSIONS: Frequent contacts with helping agencies by victims and perpetrators represent opportunities for the prevention of femicide by health care providers.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Predictive validity of a screen for partner violence against women.

BACKGROUND: While public health leaders recommend screening for partner violence, the predictive value of this practice is unknown. The purpose of this study was to test the ability of a brief three-question violence screen to predict violence against women in the ensuing months. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of adult women participating in the Colorado Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), a population-based, random-digit-dialing telephone survey. During 8 monthly cohorts, 695 women participated in the BRFSS; 409 women participated in follow-up telephone interviews approximately 4 months later. Violent events during the follow-up period, measured using a modified 28-item Conflict Tactics Scale, were compared between women who initially screened positive and those who screened negative. RESULTS: Among BRFSS respondents, 8.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]=6.3%-10.5%) had an initial positive screen. During the follow-up period, women who screened positive were 46.5 times (5.4-405) more likely to experience severe physical violence, 11.7 times (5.0- 27.3) more likely to experience physical violence, 3.6 (2.4-5.2) times more likely to experience verbal aggression, and 2.5 times (1.2-5.1) more likely to experience sexual coercion. In a multivariate model, separation from one's spouse and a positive screen were significant independent predictors of physical violence. CONCLUSIONS: A brief violence screen identifies a subset of women at high risk for verbal, physical, and sexual partner abuse over the following 4 months. Women with a positive screen who are separated from their spouse are at highest risk.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Drugs and traffic crash responsibility: a study of injured motorists in Colorado.

BACKGROUND: Alcohol is a contributing factor in a large proportion of traffic crashes. However, the role of other drugs is unknown. The objectives of this study are to determine the prevalence of recent drug use among drivers injured in traffic crashes, and to determine the extent to which drugs are responsible for crashes. METHODS: We studied 414 injured drivers who presented to an urban emergency department within 1 hour of their crash. Demographic and injury data were collected from medical records. Urine toxicologic assays were conducted for legal and illegal drugs. Traffic crash reports were analyzed for crash responsibility by a trained crash reconstructionist. The causal role of drugs in traffic crashes was measured by comparing drug assay results in drivers judged responsible for their crashes (cases) and those not responsible (controls). Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: Thirty-two percent (95% CI = 27-37) of the urine samples were positive for at least one potentially impairing drug. Marijuana was detected most frequently (17%), surpassing alcohol (14%). Compared with drug- and alcohol-free drivers, the odds of crash responsibility were higher in drivers testing positive for alcohol alone (odds radio [OR] = 3.2, 95% CI = 1.1-9.4) and in drivers testing positive for alcohol in combination with other drugs (OR = 3.5, 95% CI = 1.2-11.4). Marijuana alone was not associated with crash responsibility (OR = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.5-2.4). In a multivariate analysis, controlling for age, gender, seat belt use, and other confounding variables, only alcohol predicted crash responsibility. CONCLUSION: Alcohol remains the dominant drug associated with injury-producing traffic crashes. Marijuana is often detected, but in the absence of alcohol, it is not associated with crash responsibility.

Accidents, Traffic↗
PubMed2000

Seeking care for nonurgent medical conditions in the emergency department: through the eyes of the patient.

INTRODUCTION: The policy goal of shifting nonurgent visits from the emergency department to nonemergency health care settings is commonly devised, planned, and implemented without considering patients' perspectives. The purpose of this study was to gain an understanding of the context in which patients choose to seek health care in an emergency department. Human science provided the framework for this exploratory descriptive research study. METHODS: This study was conducted at an urban, university emergency department in Denver, Colo. Uninsured adult patients triaged as nonurgent who were being discharged home were eligible to participate. Eligible patients from 15 randomly selected shifts were asked to participate. Following their ED visit, open-ended interviews began with the question, "Can you tell me the story, or the chain of events, that led to your coming to the emergency department today?" Each interview was audiotaped. Transcripts were analyzed to identify common themes. Patients also rated their severity of illness from 1 (not severe) to 5 (life-threatening), and they rated their satisfaction with the health care they received from 1 (not satisfied) to 5 (extremely satisfied). RESULTS: The 30 study participants ranged in age from 17 to 60 years; 22 participants (73%) were women. Most patients (73%) rated their severity of illness as 3 or less and their satisfaction with the health care they received as 4 or more (83%). Five themes for seeking care were identified: (1) toughing it out, (2) symptoms overwhelming self-care measures, (3) calling a friend, (4) nowhere else to go, and (5) convenience. Despite the fact that the patients had nonurgent medical problems, their stories revealed that distress in their lives had influenced their need for emergency care. CONCLUSIONS: Access was prominent in the minds of uninsured patients seeking ED care for nonurgent medical diagnoses. Typically, patients did not perceive themselves as having an urgent problem, had been unsuccessful in gaining access to alternative non-ED health care settings, and found the emergency department to be a convenient and quality source of health care. The patients' stories relayed a context for ED visits that goes beyond medical diagnoses. This perspective has important implications for quality care delivery and for including patients in planning ways to access emergency health care.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Acceptance and self-reported use of national occupational medicine practice guidelines.

The authors conducted a survey to ascertain post-training attitudes and self-reported use of the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine occupational medicine practice guidelines. Trainees were surveyed 3 to 4 months after completing a case-based practice ACOEM occupational practice guidelines seminar. Of 96 physician respondents, 95% reported that the guidelines improved their practice in some manner. Fifty-two percent of physicians thought that guideline use decreased medical costs. Seventy-one percent reported that their care complied with the guidelines in 70% or more of their cases; however, "actually considering the guidelines in particular cases" was reported by only 47%. Discussion of cases was frequent (92%) and involved physicians, patients, and other health care providers. We concluded that physicians' attitudes toward the guidelines are positive and that reported compliance is high. Guidelines are discussed frequently.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2000

Beliefs about and use of occupational medicine practice guidelines by case managers and insurance adjusters.

Workers' compensation case managers and adjusters have increased their use of practice guidelines recently, partly in response to state regulations. However, informally reported rates of use are not as high as desired for the best managed care practices and the greatest reductions in lost work time. Although there are several studies of physicians' use of guidelines, there are few if any studies about case managers' and adjusters' beliefs about, and utilization of, either general medical or occupational medical practice guidelines. Information about attitudes, beliefs about practice guidelines, and actual use should help developers make the guidelines more usable and bring about more effective interaction among case managers, adjusters, treating physicians, and other health professionals. This article reports on pre- and post-training surveys of a cohort of case managers and adjusters who participated in a case-based guideline training course. It then compares their responses to those of the physicians whose cases they might manage.

Case Management↗
PubMed2000

Suggested improvements in practice guidelines: market research to support clinical quality improvement.

The American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine's Practice Guideline Dissemination Project included market research to better understand the wants and needs of physicians, case managers, and insurance adjusters who used the guidelines. We used structured and open-ended survey questions and focus groups administered to a cohort of physicians, adjusters, and case managers trained as part of the project. Respondents were generally satisfied with the format and contents of the guidelines. They requested additional material on case management and facilitation of effective treatment and return to work by other health professionals. They also suggested a variety of formats to improve the accessibility of the guidelines. The suggestions may be used in new product development or for guideline revisions.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2000

Measuring injury risk factors: question reliability in a statewide sample.

BACKGROUND: Recently (1996-98), Colorado added 15 questions pertaining to injury related risks and behaviors to the behavioral risk factor surveillance system (BRFSS). Questions addressed bicycle helmet use, traffic crashes, exposure to violence, suicidal behavior, and gun storage. OBJECTIVE: To measure the test-retest reliability of these injury related questions. METHODS: Of 330 BRFSS participants, 229 (69%) were called a second time and reasked nine selected injury questions. Retests were completed 7-28 days after the original interview. RESULTS: Test-retest agreement was very high (kappa >0.80) for bicycle helmet use, domestic police visits, and gun ownership. All other injury risk questions had substantial agreement (kappa >0.60). CONCLUSIONS: The injury related questions added to the Colorado BRFSS have high test-retest reliability.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Behavioral risk factors in emergency department patients: a multisite survey.

BACKGROUND: Many people rely on EDs for routine health care. Often, however, screening and counseling for health risks are not provided. OBJECTIVE: To determine prevalence rates of chronic disease and injury risk factors and access to routine health care in a random sample of ED patients in 3 cities. METHODS: A prospective survey was conducted at 3 hospital EDs in Akron, OH, Boston, MA, and Denver, CO. A modified version of the national Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey was administered by trained researchers to a convenience sample of non-critically ill patients during randomly selected shifts. RESULTS: Of 1,143 eligible patients, 923 (81%) agreed to participate. Their mean age was 39 (range = 17-96) years. Most were female (58%), white (60%), and unmarried (68%). Thirty-eight percent had no access to primary care. Injury-prone behaviors were prevalent: 53% of the respondents did not wear seat belts regularly; 15% had no working smoke detector; 3% kept loaded, unlocked handguns in their homes; 11% had attempted suicide; 23% had a positive CAGE screen for alcoholism; 3% had operated a motor vehicle in the preceding month while alcohol-intoxicated; and 11% had ridden in an automobile with an intoxicated driver. Cancer and chronic disease risks were also common: 48% smoked; 16% had not received a blood pressure check in the preceding year; and 4% reported unsafe sexual practices. Among women aged > 50 years, 42% had not received a Pap test in the prior 2 years and 14% had never had mammography. Many prevalence rates and access to care varied among the 3 sites. However, for most risk factors, prevalence rates did not differ in patients with and without access to primary health care. CONCLUSIONS: ED patients have high rates of injury and chronic disease risks, and many have no other source of routine health care. Research is needed to determine whether ED-based programs, designed to reduce injury and chronic disease risks, are feasible and cost-effective.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Accuracy of 3 brief screening questions for detecting partner violence in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: To devise a brief screening instrument to detect partner violence and to partially validate this screen against established instruments. DESIGN: Prospective survey. SETTING: Two urban, hospital-based emergency departments. PARTICIPANTS: Of 491 women presenting during 48 randomly selected 4-hour time blocks, 322 (76% of eligible patients) participated. Respondents had a median age of 36 years; 19% were black, 45% white, and 30% Hispanic, while 6% were of other racial or ethnic groups; 54% were insured. INTERVENTIONS: We developed a partner violence screen (PVS), consisting of 3 questions about past physical violence and perceived personal safety. We administered the PVS and 2 standardized measures of partner violence, the Index of Spouse Abuse (ISA) and the Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the PVS were compared with the ISA and the CTS as criterion standards. RESULTS: The prevalence rate of partner violence using the PVS was 29.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24.6%-34.8%). For the ISA and CTS, the prevalence rates were 24.3% (95% CI, 19.2%-30.1 %) and 27.4% (95% CI, 21.7%-33.6%), respectively. Compared with the ISA, the sensitivity of the PVS in detecting partner abuse was 64.5%; the specificity was 80.3%. When compared with the CTS, sensitivity of the PVS was 71.4%; the specificity was 84.4%. Positive predictive values ranged from 51.3% to 63.4%, and negative predictive values ranged from 87.6% to 88.7%. Overall, 13.7% of visits were the result of acute episodes of partner violence. CONCLUSION: Three brief directed questions can detect a large number of women who have a history of partner violence.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Testing a test.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Data Interpretation, Statistical↗
PubMed1997

Writing a research abstract.

Research abstracts may be difficult to write, especially for novice researchers. Reading abstracts from previous ENA Scientific Assemblies with a critical eye will help you focus on the abstract elements described in this article. Your abstracts should be clear, logical, and grammatically correct. Having others (for example, clinical nurses and a nurse researcher) review your abstract and provide feedback before submission is also helpful. And, after your research abstract has been accepted and presented, it's still not over--the next step is writing the research manuscript!

Abstracting and Indexing↗
PubMed1997

Intoxicated ED patients: a 5-year follow-up of morbidity and mortality.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the rates of alcohol-related morbidity and mortality in a cohort of intoxicated ED patients 5 years after presentation and to compare them with those of non-intoxicated ED patients. METHODS: The study group comprised 150 consecutive ED patients who presented with intoxication (blood alcohol level higher than 100 mg/dL) in June 1986 and 50 control patients matched for age, sex, ED arrival time, and date. The setting was an urban university hospital ED. Morbidity and mortality over a 5-year follow-up period were measured using hospital ED and admission records from all state Level I trauma centers and computerized statewide databases. RESULTS: The 5-year mortality rate among alcohol-intoxicated patients was 2.4 times that of the comparison group (95% confidence interval, .3 to 18.9). The 5-year death rate among intoxicated patients aged 40 to 69 years was especially high (19%). Thirty-seven percent of the intoxicated patients made at least one alcohol-related ED revisit during the follow-up period, compared with 6% of the comparison group (P < .001). Intoxicated patients were more likely to revisit EDs because of suicidal behavior or domestic violence (P = .001). Admission to an alcohol detoxification unit during the follow-up period occurred in 24% of the intoxicated patients, compared with 10% of the sober controls (P = .03). At least one arrest for drunk driving occurred in 47% of the intoxicated group; the rate was lower, but still substantial, in the comparison group (20%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: A single alcohol-related ED visit is an important predictor of continued problem drinking, alcohol-impaired driving and, possibly, premature death.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

The Colorado motorcycle safety survey: public attitudes and beliefs.

BACKGROUND: Motorcycle riders have a high risk of traumatic brain injury, disability, and death. Epidemiologic studies have proven that helmets reduce the severity of brain injuries and the cost of care. Yet, Colorado remains one of three states with no helmet law for riders. OBJECTIVES: This study measured public support for (1) a mandatory motorcycle helmet use law and (2) mandatory motorcycle operator safety training. We also sought to ascertain citizens' attitudes toward traffic safety mandates from the federal government. METHODS: Structured telephone interviews were conducted with 407 Colorado adults selected by random-digit dialing. RESULTS: Sixty-five percent of respondents believed that motorcycle riders of all ages should be required to wear helmets. An additional 18% believed that only riders under age 21 should be required to wear helmets. Only 17% of respondents opposed all helmet laws. Even among motorcyclists, most supported helmet laws for all riders (47%) or for those <21 years of age (26%). In a multiple logistic regression, there were three significant independent predictors of a pro-helmet law stance: older age, female gender, and not possessing a motorcycle operator's license. Most respondents also supported mandatory motorcycle operator safety training. Despite supporting state helmet use regulations, a large proportion (41%) opposed mandatory Federal mandates to enact them. CONCLUSION: Even in Colorado, a state with no helmet use requirements, there is strong public support for a regulatory strategy of motorcycle helmet use laws.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Insufficient stocking of poisoning antidotes in hospital pharmacies.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether antidotes for poisoning and overdose are available in hospitals that provide emergency department care. DESIGN: Written survey of hospital pharmacy directors, each of whom reported the amount currently in stock of 8 different antidotes: antivenin (Crotalidae) polyvalent, cyanide kit, deferoxamine mesylate, digoxin immune Fab, ethanol, naloxone hydrochloride, pralidoxime chloride, and pyridoxine hydrochloride. PARTICIPANTS: Pharmacy directors of all hospitals with emergency departments in Colorado, Montana, and Nevada. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportions of hospitals with insufficient stocking of each antidote, defined as complete lack of the antidote or an amount inadequate to initiate treatment of 1 seriously poisoned 70-kg patient. RESULTS: Questionnaires were mailed to 137 hospital pharmacy directors and 108 (79%) responded. Only 1 (0.9%) of the 108 hospitals stocked all 8 antidotes in adequate amounts. The rate of insufficient stocking for individual antidotes ranged from 2% (for naloxone) to 98% (for digoxin immune Fab). In a multiple regression analysis, smaller hospital size and lack of a formal review of antidote stocking were independent predictors of the number of antidotes stocked insufficiently. CONCLUSIONS: Insufficient stocking of antidotes is a widespread problem in Colorado, Montana, and Nevada. Although these states are served by a certified regional poison center, potentially lifesaving antidotes are frequently not available when and where they might be needed to treat a single poisoned patient.

Analysis of Variance↗