Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J A Purdy

Publications and source records attributed to J A Purdy.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

Dosimetry and clinical implementation of dynamic wedge.

PURPOSE: Wedge-shaped isodoses are desired in a number of clinical situations. Physical wedge filters have provided nominal angled isodoses with dosimetric consequences of beam hardening, increased peripheral dosing, nonidealized gradients at deep depths, along with the practical consequences of filter handling and placement problems. Dynamic wedging uses a combination of a moving jaw and changing dose rate to achieve angled isodoses. The clinical implementation of dynamic wedge and an accompanying quality assurance program are discussed in detail. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The accelerator at our facility has two photon energies (6 MV and 18 MV), currently with dynamic wedge angles of 15 degrees, 30 degrees, 45 degrees, and 60 degrees. The segmented treatment tables (STT) that drive the jaw in concert with a changing dose rate are unique for field sizes ranging from 4.0 cm to 20.0 cm in 0.5 cm steps, resulting in 256 STTs. Transmission wedge factors were measured for each STT with an ion chamber. Isodose profiles were accumulated with film after dose conversion. For treatment-planning purposes, dmax orthogonal dose profiles were measured for open and dynamic fields. Physical filters were assigned empirically via the ratio of open and wedge profiles. RESULTS: A nonlinear relationship with wedge factor and field size was found. The factors were found to be independent of the stationary field setting or second order blocking. Dynamic wedging provided more consistent gradients across the field compared with physical filters. Percent depth doses were found to be closer to open field. The created physical filters provided planned isodoses that closely resembled measured isodoses. Comparative isodose plans show improvement with dynamic wedging. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic wedging has practical and dosimetric advantages over physical filters. Table collisions with physical filters are alleviated. Treatment planning has been solved with an empirical solution. Dynamic wedge is a positive replacement for physical filters, and a first step for commercial introduction of dynamic conformal therapy.

Humans↗
PubMed1995

The Electronic View Box: a software tool for radiation therapy treatment verification.

PURPOSE: We have developed a software tool for interactively verifying treatment plan implementation. The Electronic View Box (EVB) tool copies the paradigm of current practice but does so electronically. A portal image (online portal image or digitized port film) is displayed side by side with a prescription image (digitized simulator film or digitally reconstructed radiograph). The user can measure distances between features in prescription and portal images and "write" on the display, either to approve the image or to indicate required corrective actions. The EVB tool also provides several features not available in conventional verification practice using a light box. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The EVB tool has been written in ANSI C using the X window system. The tool makes use of the Virtual Machine Platform and Foundation Library specifications of the NCI-sponsored Radiation Therapy Planning Tools Collaborative Working Group for portability into an arbitrary treatment planning system that conforms to these specifications. The present EVB tool is based on an earlier Verification Image Review tool, but with a substantial redesign of the user interface. A graphical user interface prototyping system was used in iteratively refining the tool layout to allow rapid modifications of the interface in response to user comments. RESULTS: Features of the EVB tool include 1) hierarchical selection of digital portal images based on physician name, patient name, and field identifier; 2) side-by-side presentation of prescription and portal images at equal magnification and orientation, and with independent grayscale controls; 3) "trace" facility for outlining anatomical structures; 4) "ruler" facility for measuring distances; 5) zoomed display of corresponding regions in both images; 6) image contrast enhancement; and 7) communication of portal image evaluation results (approval, block modification, repeat image acquisition, etc.). CONCLUSION: The EVB tool facilitates the rapid comparison of prescription and portal images and permits electronic communication of corrections in port shape and positioning.

Hospital Records↗
PubMed1995

Three-dimensional treatment planning and conformal radiation therapy: preliminary evaluation.

Preliminary clinical results are presented for 209 patients with cancer who had treatment planned on our three-dimensional radiation treatment planning (3-D RTP) system and were treated with external beam conformal radiation therapy. Average times (min) for CT volumetric simulation were: 74 without or 84 with contrast material; 36 for contouring of tumor/target volume and 44 for normal anatomy; 78 for treatment planning; 53 for plan evaluation/optimization; and 58 for verification simulation. Average time of daily treatment sessions with 3-D conformal therapy or standard techniques was comparable for brain, head and neck, thoracic, and hepatobiliary tumors (11.8-14 min and 11.5-12.1, respectively). For prostate cancer patients treated with 3-D conformal technique and Cerrobend blocks, mean treatment time was 19 min; with multileaf collimation it was 14 min and with bilateral arc rotation, 9.8 min. Acute toxicity was comparable to or lower than with standard techniques. Sophisticated 3-D RTP and conformal irradiation can be performed in a significant number of patients at a reasonable cost. Further efforts, including dose-escalation studies, are necessary to develop more versatile and efficient 3-D RTP systems and to enhance the cost benefit of this technology in treatment of patients with cancer.

Bile Duct Neoplasms↗
PubMed1995

A convolution-adapted ratio-TAR algorithm for 3D photon beam treatment planning.

A convolution-adapted ratio of tissue-air ratios (CARTAR) method of dose calculation has been developed at the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology. This photon pencil-beam algorithm has been developed and implemented specifically for three-dimensional treatment planning. In a standard ratio of tissue-air ratios (RTAR) algorithm, doses to points in irregular field geometries are not adequately modeled. This is inconsistent with the advent of conformal therapy, the goal of which is to conform the dose distribution to the target volume while sparing neighboring sensitive normal critical structures. This motivated us to develop an algorithm that can model the beam penumbra near irregular field edges, while retaining much of the speed for the original RTAR algorithm. The dose calculation algorithm uses two-dimensional (2D) convolutions, computed by 2D fast Fourier transform, of pencil-beam kernels with a beam transmission array to calculate 2D off-axis profiles at a series of depths. These profiles are used to replace the product of the transmission function and measured square-field boundary factors used in the standard RTAR calculation. The 2D pencil-beam kernels were derived from measured data for each modality using commonly available dosimetry equipment. The CARTAR algorithm is capable of modeling the penumbra near block edges as well as the loss of primary and scattered beam in partially blocked regions. This paper describes the dose calculation algorithm, implementation, and verification.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1995

Measurement of a photon penumbra-generating kernel for a convolution-adapted ratio-TAR algorithm for 3D treatment planning.

A method has been developed to measure a photon penumbra-generating kernel using dosimetry equipment available in most radiation therapy departments. The kernel is used in a convolution-adapted ratio-TAR algorithm in our three-dimensional treatment planning system. The kernel is assumed to be invariant with respect to off-axis position, axially symmetric, and is divided into short- and long-range components, with a different measurement technique for each. The data required to obtain the short-range component are measured by scanning across a split-field geometry incident on a water phantom. The derivative of the measured profile is proportional to one-dimensional projections across the kernel. Because the kernel is axially symmetric, only one profile measurement is required for each depth. A CT reconstruction technique is used to extract the radial dependence of the kernel from the strip integrals. Electronic noise in the acquisition system yields significant uncertainties in the kernel shape for distances beyond 3 cm. The long-range portion of the kernel is obtained by examining tissue-air ratios (TARs). The derivative of the TAR at the center of a circular field is proportional to the kernel value at the distance corresponding to the radius of the field. The kernel measurement method was tested by comparing measured and calculated square-field profiles at a variety of depths. Agreement was within 1% within the field boundary and 3% outside the field boundary for all depths.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1994

Design of a fully integrated three-dimensional computed tomography simulator and preliminary clinical evaluation.

PURPOSE: We describe the conceptual structure and process of a fully integrated three-dimensional (3-D) computed tomography (CT) simulator and present a preliminary clinical and financial evaluation of our current system. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This is a preliminary report on 117 patients treated with external beam radiation therapy alone on whom a 3-D simulation and treatment plan and delivery were carried out from July 1, 1992, through June 30, 1993. The elements of a fully integrated 3-D CT simulator were identified: (a) volumetric definition of tumor volume and patient anatomy obtained with a CT scanner, (b) virtual simulation for beam setup and digitally reconstructed radiographs, (c) 3-D treatment planning for volumetric dose computation and plan evaluation, (d) patient-marking device to outline portal on patient's skin, and (e) verification (physical) simulation to verify portal placement on the patient. Actual time-motion (time and effort) recording was made by each professional involved in the various steps of the 3-D simulation and treatment planning on computer-compatible forms. Data were correlated with the anatomic site of the primary tumor being planned. Cost accounting of revenues and operation of the CT simulator and the 3-D planning was carried out, and projected costs per examination, depending on case load, were generated. RESULTS: Average time for CT volumetric simulation was 74 min without or 84 min with contrast material. Average times were 36 min for contouring of tumor/target volume and 44 min for normal anatomy, 78 min for treatment planning, 53 min for plan evaluation/optimization, and 58 min for verification simulation. There were significant variations in time and effort according to the specific anatomic location of the tumor. Portal marking of patient on the CT simulator was not consistently satisfactory, and this procedure was usually carried out on the physical simulator. Based on actual budgetary information, the cost of a volumetric CT simulation (separate from the 3-D treatment planning) showed that 1500 examinations per year (six per day in 250 working days) must be performed to make the operation of the device cost effective. The same financial projections for the entire 3-D planning process and verification yielded five plans per day. Some features were identified that will improve the use of the 3-D simulator, and solutions are offered to incorporate them in existing devices. CONCLUSIONS: Commercially available CT simulators lack some elements that we believe are critical in a fully integrated 3-D CT simulator. Sophisticated 3-D simulation and treatment planning can be carried out in a significant number of patients at a reasonable cost. Time and effort and therefore cost vary according to the anatomic site of the tumor being planned and the number of procedures performed. Further efforts are necessary, with collaboration of radiation oncologists, physicists, and manufacturers, to develop more versatile and efficient 3-D CT simulators, and additional clinical experience is required to make this technology cost effective in standard radiation therapy of patients with cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Integrated software tools for the evaluation of radiotherapy treatment plans.

PURPOSE: This article announces the availability of a convenient and useful software environment for the evaluation of three-dimensional (3D) radiotherapy treatment plans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using standards such as American National Standards for Information Systems C and the X Window System allowed us to bring the computation and display of dose-volume histograms, dose statistics, tumor control probabilities, normal tissue complication probabilities, and a figure of merit together under one user interface. These plan evaluation tools are not stand alone, but must interact with a 3D radiation therapy planning system to obtain the required dose matrices and patient anatomical contours. Installation of the software involves a programmer who writes a software bridge between the radiation therapy planning system and the tools, thereby providing access to local data files. This design strategy confines portability issues to one area of the software. RESULTS: Access to the other tools is through the Graphical Plan Evaluation Tool (GPET). GPET coordinates the use of each of the tools and provides graphical facilities for display of their results. Importantly, GPET assures that the displayed results of each tool have been computed with the same input specifications for all treatment plans being compared. For added convenience, the user can rearrange the resultant data to be reviewed in various ways on the video screen. The software design also allows incorporation of customized algorithms and input data for computing tumor control probability and normal tissue complication probabilities, since those currently available are controversial. CONCLUSION: The Graphical Plan Evaluation Tool unifies the simultaneous computation for several analytical tools and graphical display of their results. Within the constraints of the X Window System environment, this assemblage of software tools provides a portable, flexible, and convenient method for the quantitative evaluation of several radiotherapy treatment plans.

Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation↗
PubMed1994

Is weekly port filming adequate for verifying patient position in modern radiation therapy?

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to use daily electronic portal imaging to evaluate weekly port filming in detecting patient set-up position. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A computer-based portal alignment method was used to quantify the field displacements on 191 digitized weekly port films and 848 daily electronic portal images in 21 radiation therapy patients. An electronic portal image data set as a control for actual daily treatment position was used to evaluate weekly port films with respect to same-day field displacement, rate of field placement error detection, and prediction of subsequent daily field displacements. RESULTS: The field displacements measured on a port film frequently deviated from the corresponding field displacements on the electronic portal image obtained in the same treatment set-up. A linear regression analysis showed that the curves fitted to the same-day field displacements had slopes that differed significantly from unity (p < 0.001). Overall, the respective frequencies of field placement error, beyond clinical tolerance limits of 5, 7, and 10 mm (corresponding to head and neck, thoracic, and pelvic sites) for port filming and electronic portal imaging were 11% and 14% (p = 0.4) in the X-direction (lateral or anteroposterior) and 24% and 13% (p = .0001) in the Y-direction (caphalad-caudad). When the data were broken down by anatomical region, this discrepancy was found to be mainly due to the differences in the thorax, and head and neck image data sets. For thoracic fields, error in Y-shifts was 28% by port filming, but only 9% by portal imaging (p = 0.01). In the head and neck region, 18% of the port films exceeded tolerance, whereas only 6% of the electronic portal images did (p = 0.0001). Field displacements on the treatment set-ups between the acquisition of port films were not predicted by those films. CONCLUSION: There are discrepancies between the field displacements and field placement errors detected by weekly port films and daily electronic portal images. This study suggests that improved methods of treatment verification may be necessary in modern radiation therapy.

Diagnostic Imaging↗
PubMed1994

Assurance of high quality linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiosurgery is generally a single, high-dose radiation treatment for the brain requiring targeting accuracy on the order of a millimeter. From the initial implementation of radiosurgery, therefore, quality assurance is an ongoing process of paramount importance. In this paper, we outline the basic elements of a quality assurance program for our linear accelerator that has been in use at Washington University Medical Center over the past 2 years. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Various devices and procedures have been developed to verify the accuracy and safety of the stereotactic radiosurgery regimen. Specifically, we present methods for assessing the attainment of spatially correct patient images, the reliability of the computerized treatment planning system, achieving physical safety for the patient, as well as the proper operation of the radiation treatment device. RESULTS: Our procedures have allowed us to assure quality patient treatments and, additionally, has permitted monitoring our performance for continual improvement. For example, a plot of targeting accuracy with the number of patients shows an asymptotic approach to a value within 0.6 mm of that ideally expected. CONCLUSION: To maintain high-quality patient care, one must review critical aspects of the treatment regimen on a periodic basis. Providing for the appropriate level of staff training, periodic reviews of procedures and maintenance of forms are also very important.

Humans↗
PubMed1994

Three-dimensional radiation treatment planning study for patients with carcinoma of the lung.

PURPOSE: Several reports in the literature suggest that local-regional control and possibly survival could be improved for inoperable nonsmall cell lung cancer if the radiation dose to the target volume could be increased. Higher doses, however, bring with them the potential for increased side effects and complications of normal tissues. Three-dimensional treatment planning has shown significant potential for improving radiation treatment planning in several sites, both for tumor coverage and for sparing of normal tissue from high doses of radiation and, thus, has the potential of developing radiation therapy techniques that result in uncomplicated local-regional control of lung cancer. We have studied the feasibility of large-scale implementation of true three-dimensional technologies in the treatment of patients with cancers of the thorax. METHODS AND MATERIALS: CT scans were performed on 10 patients with inoperable nonsmall cell lung cancer to obtain full volumetric image data, and therapy was planned on our three-dimensional radiotherapy treatment planning system. Target volumes were determined using the new ICRU nomenclature--Gross Tumor Volume, Clinical Target Volume, and Planning Target Volume. Plans were performed according to our standard treatment policies based on traditional two-dimensional radiotherapy treatment planning methodologies and replanned using noncoplanar three-dimensional beam techniques. The results were quantitatively compared using dose-volume histograms, dose-surface displays, and dose statistics. RESULTS: Target volume delineation remains a difficult problem for lung cancer. Defining Gross Tumor Volume and Clinical Target Volume may depend on window and level settings of the three-dimensional radiotherapy treatment planning system, suggesting that target volume delineation on hard copy film is inadequate. Our study shows that better tumor coverage is possible with three-dimensional plans. Dose to critical structures (e.g., the heart) could often be reduced (or at least remain acceptable) using noncoplanar beams even with dose escalation to 75 to 80 Gy for the planning volume surrounding the Gross Target Volume. CONCLUSION: Commonly used beam arrangements for treatment of lung cancer appear to be inadequate to safely deliver tumor doses of higher than 70 Gy. Although conventional treatment techniques may be adequate for tumor coverage, they are inadequate for sparing of normal tissues when the prescription dose is escalated. The ability to use noncoplanar fields for such patients is a major advantage of three-dimensional planning. This capability led to better tumor coverage and reduced dose to critical normal tissues. However, this advantage was achieved at the expense of a greater time commitment by the treatment planning staff (particularly the radiation oncologist) and a greater complexity of treatment delivery. In summary, three-dimensional radiotherapy treatment planning appears to provide the radiation oncologist with the necessary tools to increase tumor dose, which may lead to increased local-regional control in patients with lung cancer while maintaining normal tissue doses at acceptable tolerance levels.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗
PubMed1994

Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in bronchogenic carcinoma: considerations for implementation.

Lung cancer continues to be a major health problem worldwide. In spite of significant technological and scientific medical progress, the final outcome of this disease is still dismal. Except for a small percentage of patients with early stage who undergo complete surgical resection, local control continues to be disappointingly low. In a recent report by Arriagada et al. (Arriagada R, Le Chevalier T, Quoix E, Rufie P, de Cremoux H, Douillard J-Y, Tarayre M, Pignon, J-P, LaPlanche, A. Effect of chemotherapy on locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma: a randomized study of 353 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991; 20:1183-1190), biopsy proven local control by RT alone was only 17%. This team also found that the addition of combination chemotherapy, although it has decreased distant metastasis, has not had any impact on local control. There are some indications in the literature to suggest that higher doses of radiation to the target volume (tumor) may result in improved local control in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer. This temptation for increasing dose to target volume, however, should not result in inappropriate normal tissue side-effects and complications. Three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiation therapy has shown a significant potential for improving radiation treatment planning in several sites, both for tumor coverage and sparing normal tissue. Using this technology, progress in uncomplicated locoregional control of lung cancer may become a reality. The following is a review of literature and analysis of the currently available information on this subject.

Carcinoma, Bronchogenic↗
PubMed1994

Quality assurance and dosimetric evaluation for an endocavitary unit.

The use of endocavitary contact therapy for selected rectal carcinomas continues to be an effective treatment option. Very small volumes are treated with an extremely high dose rate associated with rapid fall-off in depth and an overall high dose. The clinical benefits of the high dose rate leads to dosimetric and quality-assurance challenges. In addition, the operating room environment creates concerns in terms of dosimetry and radiation safety due to varying room line voltages and uncontrolled environments. The unit at our facility delivers 50 kVp X-rays using an SSD of 35 mm with lead-lined procotscopes of 24 and 29 mm. The dose rate is approximately 10 Gy per minute. Establishment of daily, monthly, and annual quality assurance reviews have been made and assessed. Parallel-plate ionization chambers measure outputs and relative depth dose with different phantoms. Silver bromide film is used to evaluate beam profiles. An electron diode system was chosen for day-of-treatment output checks. An ion chamber survey meter measures scatter and leakage exposure rates. Day-of-treatment output checks have assured output stability in various operating rooms. Trends in output have been confirmed by monthly ion chamber checks. Percent depth dose measurements carried out in liquid water compared well with accepted published data as did corrected polystyrene measurements. Radiation survey measurements detected acceptable exposure rate levels. The established comprehensive quality assurance program incorporates cross checking with multiple dosimetry systems. The confidence level of dose delivery has increased with the introduction of a day-of-treatment output checks.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Brachytherapy↗
PubMed1993

Advances in 3-dimensional radiation treatment planning systems: room-view display with real time interactivity.

PURPOSE: We describe our 3-dimensional (3-D) radiation treatment planning system for external photon and electron beam 3-D treatment planning which provides high performance computational speed and a real-time display which we have named "room-view" in which the simulated target volumes, critical structures, skin surfaces, radiation beams and/or dose surfaces can be viewed on the display monitor from any arbitrary viewing position. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We have implemented the 3-D planning system on a graphics superworkstation with parallel processing. Patient's anatomical features are extracted from contiguous computed tomography scan images and are displayed as wireloops or solid surfaces. Radiation beams are displayed as a set of diverging rays plus the polygons formed by the intersection of these rays with planes perpendicular to the beam axis. Controls are provided for each treatment machine motion function. Photon dose calculations are performed using an effective pathlength algorithm modified to accommodate 3-D off-center ratios. Electron dose calculations are performed using a 3-D pencil beam model. RESULTS: Dose distribution information can be displayed as 3-D dose surfaces, dose-volume histograms, or as isodoses superimposed on 2-D gray scale images of the patient's anatomy. Tumor-control-probabilities, normal-tissue-complication probabilities and a figure-of-merit score function are generated to aid in plan evaluation. A split-screen display provides a beam's-eye-view for beam positioning and design of patient shielding block apertures and a concurrent "room-view" display of the patient and beam icon for viewing multiple beam set-ups, beam positioning, and plan evaluation. Both views are simultaneously interactive. CONCLUSION: The development of an interactive 3-D radiation treatment planning system with a real-time room-view display has been accomplished. The concurrent real-time beam's-eye-view and room-view display significantly improves the efficacy of the 3-D planning process.

Computer Systems↗
PubMed1993

Independent collimator dosimetry for a dual photon energy linear accelerator.

PURPOSE: The independent collimator feature in medical linear accelerators can define radiation fields that are asymmetric with respect to the flattening filter and oblique to the incident surface. Prior to clinical implementation, it is necessary to evaluate the dosimetry of this non-standard treatment delivery technique. An investigation of the independent collimator dosimetry for 6 MV and 18 MV x-ray beams has been undertaken. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Dose to tissue in free space, percent depth dose and dose distribution were measured and compared to that for symmetric field collimation. RESULTS: The dosimetry results were consistent for both photon modes. Dose in free space with asymmetric collimation can be calculated from the corresponding symmetric field dose in free space to within 1.2 +/- 0.7% by applying an appropriate off-axis factor. Asymmetric field percent depth dose differs from symmetric field percent depth dose on average by 1.1 +/- 0.7% for 6 MV and by 0.7 +/- 0.5% for 18 MV for field sizes ranging from 5 x 5 to 20 x 20, centered 3 cm and 10 cm off-axis. The measured isodose curves demonstrate divergence effects and reduced doses (less than 3%) adjacent to the field edge closest to the flattening filter center. This dose asymmetry result is identical to that from secondary collimation. CONCLUSION: The methodology for clinical implementation of the independent collimator feature is straightforward. However, accurate representation of the isodose distributions by commercial radiotherapy treatment planning systems requires special dose calculation algorithms.

Particle Accelerators↗
PubMed1993

Entrance and exit dose regions for a Clinac-2100C.

PURPOSE: While significant advances have taken place in confirming dose in homogeneous media and accounting for changes due to distant heterogeneities, interface dosimetry is still a dose assessment problem. The entrance and exit surfaces of the patient are a prime example where dose assessment is questionable, but important, in many clinical situations. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data were taken to examine the effect of such parameters as field size, source-to-skin distance, blocking tray, compensation materials (lead, aluminum and brass) and various patient support materials (Mylar, graphite, thermal plastic, and foam) on the surface doses from a dual energy (6 MV, 18 MV) linear accelerator. Measurements were conducted with a thin window parallel-plate chamber. RESULTS: Relative surface dose was found to have a proportional dependence on field size for both energies with surface doses ranging from 6% to 53%. A surface depth dose of 22.6% for a 15 cm field was measured for the low energy beam while a surface dose of 22.3% was observed for the 18 MV beam. The surface dose increased significantly for short source to skin distances and with the presence of a blocking tray. Compensating filter materials had little influence on surface dose. However, patient support devices such as Alpha Cradle and the graphite of the table can increase the surface dose to as much as 92%. CONCLUSION: We found there was a loss in dose at the exit surface (in comparison with percent depth dose tables, which assume infinite depth) on the order of 15% and 11% for the 6 MV and 18 MV beams, respectively. However, this loss is quickly compensated for with the introduction of most inherent backscattering media, [which in fact can increase the dose] for example, graphite in the patient support assembly tabletop.

Humans↗
PubMed1993

Objective evaluation of 3-D radiation treatment plans: a decision-analytic tool incorporating treatment preferences of radiation oncologists.

PURPOSE: Selecting the optimal radiation treatment plan from a set of competing plans involves making trade-offs among the doses delivered to the target volumes and normal tissues by the competing plans. Evaluation of 3-dimensional radiation treatment plans is difficult because it requires the review of vast amount of graphical and numerical data. We have developed an objective plan-ranking model based on the concepts of decision analysis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Our model ranks a set of tentative radiation treatment plans from best to worst. A figure of merit is computed for each plan based on probabilities of possible clinical complications such as non-eradication of the tumor and radiation induced damage to the nearby healthy normal tissues, and weights which indicate their clinical relevance. This figure of merit is used to rank the plans. Key issues addressed by the model include the incorporation of individual treatment preferences of the radiation oncologist and clinical features of the patient. RESULTS: A methodology has been established for eliciting the treatment preferences of radiation oncologists. Results of this elicitation, and examples of several plan evaluations are presented. An interactive computer-based tool has been developed as one of a set of tools to assist in the evaluation of 3-dimensional radiation treatment plans. CONCLUSION: The paper presents a decision-analytic model incorporating radiation oncologists' treatment preferences and an interactive computer-based tool for objectively ranking competing radiation treatment plans. The tool can be used by radiation oncologists for the evaluation of competing plans, or as part of a system which tries to automatically generate optimal treatment plans using mathematical or symbolic techniques.

Decision Support Techniques↗