Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J A Purdy

Publications and source records attributed to J A Purdy.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Evaluation of an objective plan-evaluation model in the three dimensional treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Evaluation of three dimensional (3D) radiotherapy plans is difficult because it requires the review of vast amounts of data. Selecting the optimal plan from a set of competing plans involves making trade-offs among the doses delivered to the target volumes and normal tissues. The purpose of this study was to test an objective plan-evaluation model and evaluate its clinical usefulness in 3D treatment planning for nonsmall cell lung cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty patients with inoperable nonsmall cell lung cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy were studied using full 3D techniques for treatment design and implementation. For each patient, the evaluator (the treating radiation oncologist) initially ranked three plans using room-view dose-surface displays and dose-volume histograms, and identified the issues that needed to be improved. The three plans were then ranked by the objective plan-evaluation model. A figure of merit (FOM) was computed for each plan by combining the numerical score (utility in decision-theoretic terms) for each clinical issue. The utility was computed from a probability of occurrence of the issue and a physician-specific weight indicating its clinical relevance. The FOM was used to rank the competing plans for a patient, and the utility was used to identify issues that needed to be improved. These were compared with the initial evaluations of the physician and discrepancies were analyzed. The issues identified in the best treatment plan were then used to attempt further manual optimization of this plan. RESULTS: For the 20 patients (60 plans) in the study, the final plan ranking produced by the plan-evaluation model had an initial 73% agreement with the ranking provided by the evaluator. After discrepant cases were reviewed by the physician, the model was usually judged more objective or "correct." In most cases the model was also able to correctly identify the issues that needed improvement in each plan. Subsequent replanning confirmed that further manual plan optimization could be achieved in 17 patients. CONCLUSION: The objective plan-evaluation model was able to rank lung cancer radiotherapy plans from best to worst. It was useful in improving plans and may be useful to physicians in defining goals for patients based on the ability to effectively and safely treat their tumors.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗
PubMed1996

Commissioning and periodic quality assurance of a clinical electronic portal imaging device.

PURPOSE: An electronic portal imaging device (EPID) was recently installed on our dual-energy linear accelerator. Commissioning and quality assurance techniques were developed for the EPID. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A commissioning procedure was developed consisting of five parts: (a) physical operation and safety; (b) image acquisition, resolution, and sensitivity calibration; (c) image storage, analysis, and handling; (d) reference image acquisition; and (e) clinical operations. RESULTS: The physical operation and safety tests relate to the motions of the unit, stability of the unit supports, safety interlocks, and interlock overrides. Imager contrast and spatial resolutions are monitored by imaging a contrast-detail phantom. The imager calibration procedure consists of a no-radiation image to compensate for signal offsets, as well as a "flat-field image." The flat-field image is taken with 5.0 cm of homogeneous phantom material placed at isocenter to provide some photon scatter and to approximate the presence of a patient. Daily quality assurance procedures consists of safety tests and the acquisition and inspection of images of the contrast-detail phantom. After 1 year, the frequency of the daily procedure was reduced to weekly. Quarterly QA procedures are conducted by the physicist and consist of the same procedures conducted in the weekly test. The annual QA procedure consists of a duplication of the commissioning procedure. CONCLUSION: The procedures discussed in this article were applied to an ionization-chamber device. They have been useful in identifying difficulties with the EPID operation, including the need for recalibrating and monitoring the accelerator output stability.

Calibration↗
PubMed1996

A quality assurance program for ancillary high technology devices on a dual-energy accelerator.

Our facility has added high-technology ancillary devices to our dual-energy linear accelerator. After commissioning and acceptance testing of dual asymmetric jaws, dynamic wedge, portal imaging, and multileaf collimation (MLC), quality assurance programs were instituted. The programs were designed to be both periodic and patient specific when required. In addition, when dosimetric aspects were affected by these technologies, additional quality assurance checks were added. Positional accuracy checks (light and radiation) are done for both asymmetric jaws and MLC. Each patient MLC field is checked against the original simulation or digitally reconstructed radiographs. Off-axis factors and output checks are performed for asymmetric fields. Dynamic wedge transmission factors and profiles are checked periodically, and a patient diode check is performed for every new dynamic wedge portal. On-line imaging checks encompass safety checks along with periodic measurement of contrast and spatial resolution. The most important quality assurance activity is the annual review of proper operation and procedures for each device. Our programs have been successful in avoiding patient-related errors or device malfunctions. The programs are a team effort involving physicists, maintenance engineers, and therapists.

Engineering↗
PubMed1996

Systematic verification of a three-dimensional electron beam dose calculation algorithm.

A three-dimensional electron beam dose calculation algorithm implemented on a commercial radiotherapy treatment planning system is described. The calculation is based on the M. D. Anderson Hospital (M.D.A.H.) pencil beam model, which uses the Fermi-Eyges theory of thick-target multiple Coulomb scattering. To establish the calculation algorithm's accuracy as well as its limitations, it was systematically and extensively tested and evaluated against a set of benchmark measurements. Various levels of dose and spatial tolerances were used to validate the calculation quantitatively. Results are presented in terms of the percentage of data points meeting a specific tolerance level. The algorithm's ability to accurately simulate commonly used clinical setup geometries, including standard or extended SSDs, blocked fields, irregular surfaces, and heterogeneities, is demonstrated. Regions of disagreement between calculations and measurements are also shown. The clinical implication of such disagreements is addressed, and the algorithmic assumptions involved are discussed.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1995

Clinical implementation of a commercial multileaf collimator: dosimetry, networking, simulation, and quality assurance.

PURPOSE: Clinical implementation of multileaf collimation (MLC) includes commissioning (including leaf calibration), dosimetric measurements (penumbra, transmission, calculation parameters), shaping methods, networking for file transfer, verification simulation, and development of a quality assurance (QA) program. Differences of MLC and alloy shaping in terms of penumbra and stair-step effects must be analyzed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Leaf positions are calibrated to light field. The resultant decrement line, penumbras, leaf transmission data, and isodoses in various planes were measured with film. Penumbra was measured for straight edges and corners, in various media. Ion chambers were used to measure effects of MLC on output, scatter, and depth dose. We maintain midleaf intersection criteria. MLC fields are set 7 mm beyond planning target volumes. After shaping by vendor software or by our three-dimensional planning system, files are transferred to the MLC workstation by means of sharing software, interface cards, and cabling. A MLC emulator was constructed for simulation. Our QA program includes file checks, monthly checks (leaf position accuracy and interlock tests), and annual review. RESULTS: We found the MLC leaf position (light field) corresponds to decrement lines ranging from 50 to 59%. Transmission through MLC (1.5-2.5%) is less than alloy (3.5%). Multileaf penumbra is slightly wider than for alloy. Relative penumbra did not increase in the lung, and composite field dosimetry exhibited negligible differences compared with alloy. Verification simulations provide diagnostic image quality hard copies of the MLC fields. Monitor unit parameters used for alloy held for MLC. DISCUSSION: Clinical implementation for MLC as a block replacement was conducted on a site-by-site basis. Time studies indicate significant (25%) in-room time reductions. Through imaging and dosimetric analysis, the accuracy of field delivery has increased with MLC. The most significant impact of MLC is the ability to increase the number of daily treatment fields, thereby reducing normal tissue dosing, which is vital for dose escalation.

Calibration↗
PubMed1995

Three dimensional conformal radiation therapy in pediatric parameningeal rhabdomyosarcomas.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the utility of three dimensional (3D) treatment planning in the management of children with parameningeal head and neck rhabdomyosarcomas. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Five children with parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma were referred for treatment at our radiation oncology center from May 1990 through January 1993. Each patient was evaluated, staged, and treated according to the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study. Patients were immobilized and underwent a computed tomography scan with contrast in the treatment position. Tumor and normal tissues were identified with assistance from a diagnostic radiologist and defined in each slice. The patients were then planned and treated with the assistance of a 3D treatment planning system. A second plan was then devised by another physician without the benefit of the 3D volumetric display. The target volumes designed with the 3D system and the two-dimensional (2D) method were then compared. The dosimetric coverage to tumor, tumor plus margin, and normal tissues was also compared with the two methods of treatment planning. RESULTS: The apparent size of the gross tumor volume was underestimated with the conventional 2D planning method relative to the 3D method. When margin was added around the gross tumor to account for microscopic extension of disease in the 2D method, the expected area of coverage improved relative to the 3D method. In each circumstance, the minimum dose that covered the gross tumor was substantially less with the 2D method than with the 3D method. The inadequate dosimetric coverage was especially pronounced when the necessary margin to account for subclinical disease was added. In each case, the 2D plans would have delivered substantial dose to adjacent normal tissues and organs, resulting in a higher incidence of significant complications. CONCLUSIONS: 3D conformal radiation therapy has a demonstrated advantage in the treatment of sarcomas of the head and neck. The improved dosimetric coverage of the tumor and its margin for subclinical extensions may result in improvement in local control of these tumors. In addition, lowering of radiation dose to adjacent critical structures may help lower the incidence of adverse late effects in children.

Child↗
PubMed1995

Preliminary results of a prospective trial using three dimensional radiotherapy for lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the preliminary results of a prospective trial using three-dimensional (3D) treatment for lung cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Seventy patients with inoperable Stage I through IIIB lung cancer were treated with three-dimensional thoracic irradiation with or without chemotherapy (35% received chemotherapy). Total prescribed dose to the tumor ranged from 60-74 Gy (uncorrected for lung density). All patients were evaluated for local control, survival, and development of pneumonitis. These parameters were evaluated in respect to and compared with three-dimensional parameters used in their treatment planning. RESULTS: With a minimum follow-up of 6 to 30 months, the 2-year cause-specific survival rate for Stages I and II was 90% and 53% for Stage III (no difference between Stages IIIA and IIIB). Patients with local tumor control had a better 2-year overall survival rate (47%) than those with local failure (31%). Volumetrically heterogeneously calculated doses were important to the accurate delineation of dose-volume coverage as there was a wide range of discrepancies between a homogeneously prescribed point dose calculation and the heterogeneously calculated volume coverage of that prescription. High-grade pneumonitis was correlated with the location of the tumor with lower lobe tumors having a much higher risk than those with upper lobe tumors. A critical volume effect and threshold dose were apparent in the development of high-grade pneumonitis. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional therapy for lung cancer has been practically implemented at the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology and shows promising results in our preliminary analysis. The incidence of high-grade pneumonitis, however, warrants careful selection of patients for future dose escalation. Future dose escalation trials in lung cancer should be directed to volumes that limit the amount of elective nodal irradiation. However, the volume of necessary elective nodal irradiation remains unknown and should be studied prospectively. Dose escalation trials are indicated and may be facilitated by smaller target volumes.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1995

Changes in electron beam dosimetry with a new scattering foil-applicator system on a CL2100C.

PURPOSE: The optimization of clinical electron beams is a challenge to accelerator manufacturers. There are numerous variations and reports of scattering-foil and applicator configurations. The accelerator at our facility was recently updated with new foils and applicators. We conducted many dosimetric tests to critically evaluate dosimetric changes and their clinical effects. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The new dual foil systems are thicker and have shaped disks seated on the lower foils. The 12 MeV beam no longer shares a common foil used for 6 and 9 MeV. The applicators now have denser collimating plates, and Fiberglas no longer connects the plates. The new applicator set includes a rectangular 10 x 6 cm applicator that uses one photon jaw setting for all energies. After the electron beam energies were tuned to previous specifications (energy according to ionization depths, symmetry to +/- 2%, and flatness to +/- 6%), recommissioning took place. Electron beam output checks at various source-to-skin distances (SSD) were conducted for all energies and applicators. Computer-driven water scanning provided percent depth dose, profile, isodose, and Bremsstrahlung data. Surface doses, in-air electron dispersion, effective SSDs, and leakage were also measured. All results compared the previous and updated systems. RESULTS: We found little change in relative percent depth doses for 100 cm SSD between the two systems. The differences in PDD due to increasing SSD, however, decreased with the updated system. Surface doses decreased in most cases, while Bremsstrahlung increased in all cases (typically by a factor of two). Beam uniformity indices increased significantly, while penumbra widths decreased. Diagonal profiles are now quite flat for large fields. For a 20 MeV beam, the 90% width along the diagonal axis for a 25 x 25 applicator at dmax depth has increased from 25 to 32 cm. There was little or no change in 'effective SSD' or in-air dispersion. Leakage outside the applicators was reduced by a factor of two to three. The flatness characteristics of the 10 x 6 cm applicator were poor in comparison to the improved flatness of the new square applicators. CONCLUSIONS: The updated scattering foil-applicator electron beam system has yielded many dosimetric changes. Major improvements have been made in beam flatness and leakage. These positive changes have not been accompanied by any clinically significant dosimetric deficiencies.

Calibration↗