Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

I Weiner

Publications and source records attributed to I Weiner.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1988

Long-term attentional deficit in nonhandled males: possible involvement of the dopaminergic system.

Latent inhibition (LI) is a behavioral paradigm in which nonreinforced pre-exposure to a stimulus retards subsequent conditioning to that stimulus. The development of LI is considered to reflect learning not to attend to, or ignore, irrelevant stimuli. In our previous studies investigating the effects of early handling on LI, we have shown that normal LI was obtained in handled males and females, as well as in nonhandled females. In contrast, nonhandled males failed to show LI. This finding pointed to a long-term attentional deficit in nonhandled males. Since there is evidence that the development of LI is mediated by the dopaminergic system, the present experiments tested the possibility that the attentional deficit of nonhandled males may be related to a dopaminergic dysfunction. Experiment 1 tested whether the administration of haloperidol, which was shown to enhance LI in normal animals, would reinstate the LI effect in nonhandled males. Infantile handled (Days 1-22) and nonhandled male and female rats were tested in maturity in the LI paradigm, using a conditioned emotional response procedure. Experiment 2 tested the locomotor response of handled and nonhandled males to 0.3, 1 and 2.5 mg/kg D-amphetamine. Experiment 1 showed that handled males, handled females and nonhandled females showed a normal LI effect, whereas nonhandled males failed to develop LI. Haloperidol enhanced LI in all the groups, but this effect was most dramatic in nonhandled males, in which the drug reinstated LI. Experiment 2 showed that nonhandled males exhibited a reduced locomotor response to D-amphetamine.

Aging↗
PubMed1988

Disruption of latent inhibition by acute administration of low doses of amphetamine.

In the latent inhibition (LI) paradigm, nonreinforced preexposure to a stimulus retards subsequent conditioning to that stimulus. Three experiments investigated the effects of acute amphetamine administration on LI in rats. Experiments 1 and 3 used a conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure and Experiment 2 used two-way active avoidance procedure. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that, in both the CER and avoidance procedures, 1.5 mg/kg dl-amphetamine administered either in the preexposure or the conditioning stage alone did not disrupt LI. In contrast, amphetamine administered in both of the stages abolished LI. Experiment 3 showed that the abolition of LI was obtained when the preexposure and conditioning were given 24 hr apart but not when the two stages were given in one session.

Animals↗
PubMed1987

Early handling and latent inhibition in the conditioned suppression paradigm.

Latent inhibition (LI) is a behavioral paradigm in which repeated exposure to stimuli not followed by meaningful consequences renders these stimuli ineffective for subsequent learning. The development of LI is considered to reflect learning not to attend, to ignore, or tune out irrelevant stimuli. The present study investigated the differences in the development of LI between handled and nonhandled males and females. Infantile handled (days 1-22) and nonhandled, male and female Wistar rats were tested in maturity in the LI paradigm, using a conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure. The procedure consisted of three stages: preexposure, in which the to-be-conditioned stimulus, tone, was presented without being followed by reinforcement; acquisition, in which the preexposed tone was paired with shock; and test, in which LI was indexed by animals' suppression of licking during tone presentation. Handled animals exhibited less conditioned suppression as compared to nonhandled animals. LI was obtained in both the handled and the nonhandled females, but only the handled males showed the LI effect. Nonhandled males failed to develop LI. These results replicate our previous findings on LI in conditioned avoidance in demonstrating that: the effects of handling are evident in learning tasks that do not involve motivational-emotional variables, i.e., learning to ignore irrelevant stimuli; handling differentially affects males and females; the nonhandling procedure has deleterious consequences on adult behavior.

Animals↗
PubMed1987

Facilitation of discrimination transfers under amphetamine: the relative control by S+ and S- and general transfer effects.

Rats were trained in a Y-maze on a two-choice simultaneous black-white discrimination with either black or white as S+. Animals were then transferred to one of three discrimination tasks. In task 1 (New S-), a new stimulus, either vertical or horizontal stripes, was substituted for the original S-. In task 2 (New S+), a new stimulus, either vertical or horizontal stripes as in task 1, was substituted for the original S+. In task 3 (New S+/S-) animals were trained on horizontal-vertical discrimination. The pre-trial administration of 1 mg/kg d-amphetamine facilitated the acquisition of the original black-white discrimination with both black as S+ and white as S+. Likewise, the drug improved performance in all three transfer conditions. However, the course of learning in the three transfer tasks was different in the placebo- and amphetamine-treated animals. Amphetamine-treated animals were disrupted more by a change in S+ than by a change in S-, whereas the opposite pattern was evident in the placebo controls. When both discriminative stimuli were changed, placebo animals exhibited pronounced decrement in performance, whereas amphetamine animals exhibited excellent learning. The implications of these findings for the effects of amphetamine on discrimination learning are discussed.

Animals↗
PubMed1987

Facilitation of latent inhibition by haloperidol in rats.

Latent inhibition (LI) is a behavioral paradigm in which prior exposure to a stimulus not followed by reinforcement retards subsequent conditioning to that stimulus when it is paired with reinforcement. Two experiments investigated the effects of 0.1 mg/kg haloperidol administration on LI as a function of number of CS pre-exposures. The investigation was carried out using a conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure consisting of three stages: pre-exposure, in which the to-be-conditioned stimulus, tone, was repeatedly presented without reinforcement; conditioning, in which the pre-exposed stimulus was paired with shock; and test, where LI was indexed by animals' suppression of licking during tone presentation. The three stages were conducted 24 h apart. In Experiment 1, 40 CS pre-exposures were given. LI was obtained in both the placebo and haloperidol conditions, but the effect was much more pronounced under the drug. Experiment 2 used ten CS pre-exposures. LI was not obtained in the placebo animals but was clearly evident in animals injected with haloperidol. The implications of these findings for the effects of neuroleptics on learning are discussed.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1987

Latent inhibition is not affected by acute or chronic administration of 6 mg/kg dl-amphetamine.

Latent inhibition (LI) is a behavioral paradigm in which animals learn to ignore a repeatedly presented stimulus not followed by meaningful consequences. We previously reported that LI was disrupted following the administration of 1.5 mg/kg dl-amphetamine. The present experiments investigated the effects of 6 mg/kg dl-amphetamine administration on LI in a conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure consisting of three stages: pre-exposure, in which the to-be-conditioned stimulus, tone, was repeatedly presented without reinforcement; conditioning, in which the pre-exposed stimulus was paired with shock; and test, where LI was indexed by animals' suppression of licking during tone presentation. The three stages were conducted 24 h apart. In Experiment 1, the drug was administered in a 2 X 2 design, i.e. drug-no drug in pre-exposure and drug-no drug in conditioning. LI was obtained in all conditions. In Experiment 2, animals were given either 5 days of 6 mg/kg amphetamine pretreatment and amphetamine in pre-exposure and conditioning or 7 days of saline. LI was not obtained under amphetamine, but this outcome reflected a state-dependency effect. In Experiment 3, animals received either 5 days of amphetamine pretreatment and amphetamine in pre-exposure, conditioning and test or 8 days of saline. LI was obtained in both the placebo and amphetamine conditions. Experiments 4a and 4b compared the effects of two drug doses, 1.5 (4a) and 6 mg/kg (4b), administered in pre-exposure and conditioning. LI was abolished with the 1.5 mg/kg dose but not with the 6 mg/kg dose.

Amphetamine↗
PubMed1987

Facilitation of the expression but not the acquisition of latent inhibition by haloperidol in rats.

In the latent inhibition (LI) paradigm, nonreinforced preexposure to a stimulus retards subsequent conditioning to that stimulus. The administration of haloperidol in both the preexposure and the conditioning stages was found to enhance LI in the conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure (Weiner and Feldon, 1986). The present experiments investigated the effects of 0.1 mg/kg haloperidol administration on LI in a two-way avoidance procedure, consisting of two stages: preexposure, in which the to-be-conditioned stimulus, tone, was repeatedly presented without reinforcement; and conditioning, in which the animals acquired a two-way avoidance response with the tone serving as the warning signal. Experiments 1 and 2 tested whether the administration of haloperidol confirmed to the preexposure stage, where learning to ignore the nonreinforced stimulus takes place, would suffice to enhance the LI effect. In Experiment 1, preexposure and conditioning were conducted 24 hr apart. LI was obtained in both the placebo and haloperidol conditions, but the effect was not more pronounced under the drug. In addition, haloperidol-treated animals exhibited impaired avoidance performance. In Experiment 2, preexposure and conditioning were given 72 hr apart. With this interval, haloperidol did not affect avoidance performance. However, also under these conditions, the magnitude of the LI effect was not larger in the haloperidol-treated groups, indicating that the administration of the drug in the preexposure stage alone did not suffice to enhance LI.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1987

The abolition of the partial reinforcement extinction effect (PREE) by amphetamine: disruption of control by nonreinforcement.

Two groups of rats were trained to run in a straight alley. The continuously reinforced (CRF) group received a food reward on every trial. The partially reinforced (PRF) group was rewarded on a quasi-random 50% schedule. d-Amphetamine 1 mg/kg was administered to PRF animals in acquisition in a 2 X 2 design, i.e., drug-no drug on reinforced trials and drug-no drug on nonreinforced trials. In four CRF groups, the drug was administered in the same sequence as in the PRF groups. Following acquisition, all animals were given 4 days of CRF retraining and tested in extinction. No drug was given in retraining and extinction. The PREE, i.e., increased resistance exhibited by PRF animals as compared to CRF animals, was obtained in groups which received placebo on all acquisition trials or amphetamine on rewarded trials and placebo on nonrewarded trials. The PREE was abolished when amphetamine was administered throughout the acquisition trials or on nonrewarded trials, irrespective of drug treatment on rewarded trials.

Animals↗
PubMed1986

The effects of clonidine on the partial reinforcement extinction effect (PREE).

Clonidine has been reported to exert anti-anxiety effects in animals and man similar to those of benzodiazepines. The present experiment examined the effects of clonidine administration on the partial reinforcement extinction effect (PREE) which is known to be sensitive to benzodiazepine action. Two groups of rats were trained to run in a straight alley. The continuously reinforced (CRF) group received food reward on every trial. The partially reinforced (PRF) group was rewarded on a quasi-random 50% schedule. All animals were then tested in extinction. Clonidine 50 micrograms/kg was administered in a 2 X 2 design, i.e., drug-no drug in acquisition and drug-no drug in extinction. The PREE, i.e., increased resistance to extinction exhibited by PRF animals as compared to CRF animals, was obtained in animals that received saline in acquisition, independently of drug treatment in extinction, as well as in animals that received clonidine in both acquisition and extinction, but not in animals that received clonidine in acquisition alone. The administration of clonidine in extinction alone increased resistance to extinction in both the CRF and PRF animals. The increase in resistance to extinction, typically obtained with benzodiazepine treatment, indicates that clonidine exerts anxiolytic effects, supporting the involvement of the noradrenergic system in anxiety. However, clonidine did not fully reproduce the effects of benzodiazepines on the PREE, suggesting that the two classes of drugs may act via different noradrenergic mechanisms.

Animals↗
PubMed1986

Reversal and nonreversal shifts under amphetamine.

Rats were trained in a Y maze on a two-choice simultaneous brightness discrimination with light as S+ and dark as S- (position irrelevant). Half of the animals were then switched to reversal, where the reinforcement contingencies of the original training were reversed, and the other half were switched to nonreversal, in which they learned a simultaneous right-left discrimination. Nonreversal was acquired faster than reversal in saline injected animals. The administration of 1 mg/kg d-amphetamine did not affect the acquisition of the initial brightness discrimination and of nonreversal. In contrast, the drug facilitated dramatically reversal learning. The results indicate that amphetamine enhances the attention to, or the associability of, the discriminative stimuli, leading to rapid learning to these stimuli under changed contingencies of reinforcement.

Animals↗
PubMed1986

Amphetamine does not affect the partial punishment effect (PPE).

The effects of amphetamine on the partial punishment effect (PPE) at one trial per day, were examined. Two groups of animals were trained to run in a straight alley. The continuously reinforced (CRF) group received food reward on every trial. The partially punished (PP) group received food reward on every trial but in addition, received footshocks of a gradually increasing intensity in the goal box on a random 50% of the trials. In the test stage, all animals received both food and footshock on each trial. dl-Amphetamine 1.5 mg/kg was administered in a 2 X 2 design, i.e. drug-no drug in training and drug-no drug in test. The partially punished animals exhibited increased persitence in running to the goal box during test, and this "partial punishment effect" was unaffected by amphetamine.

Amphetamine↗
PubMed1986

Simultaneous brightness discrimination and reversal: the effects of amphetamine administration in the two stages.

Rats were trained in a Y-maze on a two-choice simultaneous brightness discrimination with light as S+ and dark as S- (Stage 1), and were then switched to reversal, where the reinforcement contingencies of the original training were reversed (Stage 2). d-Amphetamine, 1 mg/kg, was administered in a 2 X 2 design, i.e., drug-no drug in Stage 1 and drug-no drug in Stage 2. The administration of the drug in Stage 1 improved the acquisition of the initial brightness discrimination and facilitated reversal learning independently of the drug administered in Stage 2. In addition, the administration of the drug in Stage 2 only improved performance towards the end of reversal training. The results indicate that amphetamine enhances the attention to, or the associability of, the discriminative stimuli, leading to a rapid learning to these stimuli under changed contingencies of reinforcement.

Animals↗
PubMed1986

Amphetamine and the overtraining reversal effect.

Rats were trained in a Y-maze on a two choice simultaneous brightness discrimination with light as S+ and dark as S- (position irrelevant). Animals in the Mastery group were trained until they reached criterion and were then switched to reversal, where the reinforcement contingencies of the original training were reversed. Animals in the Overtraining group received a further 110 trials before being switched to reversal. The administration of 1 mg/kg d-amphetamine facilitated dramatically reversal learning in Mastery group. Overtraining improved reversal in saline injected animals and slowed down reversal in amphetamine-treated animals. The drug also facilitated the acquisition of the initial brightness discrimination.

Amphetamine↗
PubMed1985

The effects of early handling on latent inhibition in male and female rats.

Latent inhibition (LI) is a behavioral paradigm in which repeated exposure to stimuli not followed by meaningful consequences renders these stimuli ineffective for subsequent learning. The development of LI is considered to reflect learning not to attend to, ignore, or tune out irrelevant stimuli. The present study investigated the differences in the development of LI between handled and nonhandled males and females. Infantile handled (Days 1-22) and nonhandled, male and female Wistar rats were tested in maturity in the LI paradigm. The LI procedure consisted of two stages: pre-exposure, where animals received 60 presentations of the to-be-conditioned stimulus (tone) and test, where the animals acquired a two-way active avoidance response with the tone serving as the warning signal. Handled animals reached higher percentage of avoidance responses as compared with nonhandled animals. Latent inhibition was obtained in both the handled and the nonhandled females, but only the handled males showed the LI effect. Nonhandled males failed to develop LI. The results indicate that the effects of handling are evident in learning tasks that do not involve motivational-emotional variables, i.e., learning to ignore irrelevant stimuli; handling differentially affects males and females, with a much greater impact on males and the nonhandling procedure has significant deleterious consequences on adult behavior.

Animals↗
PubMed1985

The abolition of the partial reinforcement extinction effect (PREE) by amphetamine.

The effects of amphetamine administration on the partial reinforcement extinction effect (PREE) at one trial a day, were examined. Two groups of rats were trained to run in a straight alley. The continuously reinforced (CRF) group received food reward on every trial. The partially reinforced (PRF) group was rewarded on a quasirandom 50% schedule. All animals were then tested in extinction. dl-Amphetamine 1.5 mg/kg was administered in a 2 X 2 design, i.e., drug-no drug in acquisition and drug-no drug in extinction. The PREE, i.e., increased resistance to extinction exhibited by PRF animals as compared to CRF animals, was obtained in animals that received saline in acquisition, independently of drug treatment in extinction. In contrast, amphetamine administered in acquisition abolished the PREE irrespective of drug treatment in extinction. In addition, amphetamine administered in extinction alone increased resistance to extinction in PRF animals.

Amphetamine↗
PubMed1984

Abolition of the expression but not the acquisition of latent inhibition by chronic amphetamine in rats.

The animal amphetamine model of schizophrenia has been based primarily on stereotyped behavior. The present study sought to demonstrate an amphetamine-induced deficit in attentional processes. To this end, the effects of acute and chronic (14 days) 1.5 mg/kg dl-amphetamine administration on the ability of rats to ignore irrelevant stimuli were examined using the paradigm of latent inhibition (LI) in a conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure. The procedure consisted of three stages: pre-exposure, in which the to-be-conditioned stimulus, tone, was presented without being followed by reinforcement; acquisition, in which the pre-exposed tone was paired with shock; and test, in which LI was indexed by animals' suppression of licking during tone presentation. Experiment 1 showed that chronic but not acute treatment abolished LI. Experiment 2 showed that animals receiving chronic amphetamine pretreatment but pre-exposed and conditioned without the drug, exhibited normal LI. In Experiment 3, animals which received chronic amphetamine pretreatment and were pre-exposed under the drug but conditioned without it, also showed normal LI. The implications of these results for the animal amphetamine model of schizophrenia are discussed.

Amphetamine↗