Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

I Bakran

Publications and source records attributed to I Bakran.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

[Treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].

American, British and European guidelines on the management and treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were issued in last years. In October 1998 Croatian guidelines were presented. They are very similar to British guidelines. The treatment of COPD depends on the severity of the disease and reversibility of bronchoconstriction. The drug of first choice is ipratropium bromide, but useful are also beta2-agonists of short (albuterol) and long action (salmeterol) and theophylline. Inhalation of corticosteroids is also indicated. The prerequisite of successful treatment is to stop smoking.

Humans↗

Multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial of inhaled fluticasone propionate in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. International COPD Study Group.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains controversial because of a lack of placebo-controlled studies. We compared the effect of inhaled fluticasone propionate with placebo in the treatment of patients with COPD. METHODS: We used a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. We enrolled from 13 European countries, New Zealand, and South Africa, 281 outpatient current or ex-smokers, aged between 50 and 75 years. They had a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of between 35% and 90% of predicted normal values, a ratio of FEV1 to forced vital capacity of 70% or less and bronchodilator reversibility of less than 15%, as well as a history of chronic bronchitis. Patients were randomly assigned fluticasone propionate 500 microg (n=142) or placebo (n=139) twice daily via a metered-dose inhaler for 6 months. The main outcome measures were the number of patients who had at least one exacerbation by the end of treatment, the number and severity of exacerbations, clinic lung function, diary card symptoms and peak expiratory flow and 6 min walking distance. FINDINGS: 51 (37%) patients in the placebo group compared with 45 (32%) in the fluticasone propionate group had had at least one exacerbation by the end of treatment (p=0.449). Significantly more patients had moderate or severe exacerbations in the placebo group than in the fluticasone propionate group (86% vs 60%, p<0.001). Diary-card and clinic morning peak expiratory flows improved significantly in the fluticasone propionate group (p<0.001, p=0.048, respectively), as did clinic FEV1 (p<0.001), forced vital capacity (p<0.001), and mid-expiratory flow (p=0.01). Symptom scores for median daily cough and sputum volume were significantly lower with fluticasone propionate treatment than with placebo (p=0.004 and p=0.016, respectively). At the end of treatment, patients on fluticasone propionate had increased their 6 min walking distance significantly more than those on placebo (p=0.032). Fluticasone propionate was tolerated as well as placebo, with few adverse effects and without a clinically important effect on mean serum cortisol concentration. INTERPRETATION: Fluticasone propionate may be of clinical benefit in patients with COPD over at least 6 months. Inhaled corticosteroids may have an important role in the long-term treatment of COPD.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Pharmacokinetic changes in patients with oedema.

The pharmacokinetics of furosemide (frusemide) in patients with oedema have been relatively well studied, but in many studies it is unclear whether the disease or the oedema per se has the major effect. The rate of absorption of oral furosemide in patients with oedema was decreased, but total bioavailability was almost unchanged. The peak serum concentration (Cmax) and time taken to achieve Cmax were either decreased or unchanged. Binding of furosemide to plasma proteins is lower in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), decompensated liver cirrhosis (DLC) and nephrotic syndrome, probably as a result of hypoalbuminaemia. The elimination half-life (t1/2) can be unchanged (CHF, DLC) or prolonged (chronic renal failure: CRF). Plasma and renal clearance are reduced in patients with CRF and nephrotic syndrome, but are almost unchanged in CHF and DLC. Disease-induced disorders are mainly responsible for the alterations of furosemide pharmacokinetics in oedematous conditions, while the influence of oedema per se is probably not clinically relevant. The pharmacokinetics of digoxin have been studied in a small number of studies only. In patients with CHF, considerable interindividual differences have been found. Because digoxin has a narrow therapeutic window, this drug should be administered cautiously to oedematous patients. Theophylline has higher bioavailability in patients with oedema, with a significantly higher Cmax in patients with hepatic cirrhosis and CHF than in healthy volunteers (29 and 22%, respectively). Furthermore, clearance decreases and t1/2 increases in these patients. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are often administered as prodrugs, and their pharmacokinetic profile could be influenced by the diseases that accompany oedematous states. However, the effect of oedema is difficult to discriminate from that of the disease. Individual ACE inhibitors are affected differently, but importantly the dosage of perindopril should be reduced in patients with CHF, while for most other ACE inhibitors the changes in pharmacokinetic parameters are clinically irrelevant. In conclusion, studies on pharmacokinetic changes in oedema are limited. Besides affecting absorption (after oral administration) and conversion of the prodrug to the active form, probably as a result of the associated disease, oedema has not been proven to cause any clinically relevant changes in pharmacokinetic parameters for individual drugs. However, further studies of this aspect of pharmacokinetics are needed.

Edema↗

Adverse drug reactions resulting in hospital admission.

A 14-month (1992/3) prospective study was performed in two departments of the University Hospital Centre (UHC) in Zagreb. The aim of the study was to assess the rate of drug-related hospitalizations, drugs that caused adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and all factors which could have been of importance for their appearance. One hundred and thirty (2.5%) of 5,227 patients were admitted to hospital because of ADRs. The most frequently ADR-related drugs were nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and analgesics (64.6%). They were followed by cardiovascular agents (20.8%) and antimicrobials (3.8%). Acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) caused 38.5% of hospital admissions, other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) 23.1% and medigoxin 15.4% of hospitalizations. The most frequent ADRs were upper gastro-intestinal tract bleeding (64.6%), cardiac rhythm disturbances (13.9%), blood cell disorders (4.6%) and hypoglycemia (2.3%). Regarding the patients' age, 52.3% of patients was younger and 47.7% older than 65. Sixty-one point five percent of patients was taking more than one drug, older patients (48 patients--77.4%) have been taking a significantly higher number of drugs than the younger (32 patients--47.1%) (p < 0.0001) ones. Drug interactions caused 23.8% of ADRs. Only 11 (8.5%) of patients suspected themselves that the drug might have caused the ADR. Improvement was observed in the majority of patients (65.4%), 25.4% recovered completely, 4 (3.0%) died in the hospital because of ADRs. 3.0% of patients as well died of their underlying diseases, 2.3% were transferred to other departments for their underlying diseases, and one patient left the hospital on his free will.

Adolescent↗

Double-blind placebo controlled clinical trial of almitrine bismesylate in patients with chronic respiratory insufficiency.

The efficacy and safety of almitrine bismesylate, a new respiratory stimulant, in patients with the hypoxaemic form of chronic respiratory insufficiency caused by chronic bronchitis and emphysema has been assessed. The multicentre trial of 12 weeks duration was double-blind and placebo controlled, with individual and group comparisons. Twenty three patients received almitrine 50 mg b.d. p.o. and 17 took placebo. In the almitrine group a significant increase in PaO2 was achieved (control value 54.4 mm Hg, rising to 59.1 mm Hg after 6 weeks, and to 59.4 mm Hg after 12 weeks). There was also a significant decrease in PaCO2 in the almitrine group after 12 weeks. No correlation was found between the plasma almitrine concentration, PaO2 and PaCO2. Lung function (FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, Raw, TLC, RV, FRC) did not change in either group, but the degree of dyspnoea and performance in the 6 min walking test were significantly improved in the almitrine group. Adverse reactions appeared in 6 out of 23 patients on almitrine bismesylate (headache, urticaria, breathlessness, diarrhoea, chest pain, nausea and vomiting), causing drop out of 4 patients. Thus, almitrine bismesylate can be considered useful in the treatment of patients with chronic respiratory insufficiency.

Adult↗

Intensive monitoring of adverse drug reactions in infants and preschool children.

Intensive monitoring of adverse drug reactions (ADR) in infants and preschool children in the paediatric outpatient unit covering the town of Karlovac (150,000 inhabitants) was performed over a period of three months. Data were obtained by physical examination of children and the history given by their parents. In all 2359 children were examined. ADR were recorded in 63 children and were reported to the National ADR monitoring centre in Zagreb. Using the algorithm of Hutchinson et al. (1979), all ADR were classified as "definite", "probable", "possible" and "unlikely". Drugs were prescribed in 97.3% of children, 60.24% received an antimicrobial agent (43% of them on the basis of a sensitivity test), and an antipyretic was given to 1878 children, mostly paracetamol. ADR were most frequently caused by antibiotics (49 reactions to penicillin V, and 15 to amoxycillin) and secretolytics (7 reactions). ADR were followed by complete recovery and not a single child was hospitalized because of an ADR. The results, when compared with the very small number of broadly comparable studies, indicate that the incidence of ADR in this population is rather small and of minor importance.

Age Factors↗

Aminophylline vs. salbutamol in exercise-induced asthma.

A comparative, double-blind, cross-over trial of aminophylline (6 mg/kg i.v.) and salbutamol (200 mcg per inhalationem) was conducted in six male patients (20 to 46 years) with exercise-induced asthma (EIA). Both aminophylline and salbutamol successfully prevented EIA. The serum concentration of theophylline was within the normal range (9.8--20.3 mcg/ml). The effect of salbutamol was slightly more pronounced than the effect of aminophylline but not statistically significant. Because of the more convenient method of application, the authors give priority to salbutamol in the prevention of EIA.

Adult↗