Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G M Blake

Publications and source records attributed to G M Blake.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Can the WHO criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis be applied to calcaneal quantitative ultrasound?

With the increasing number of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) devices in use worldwide it is important to develop strategies for the clinical use of QUS. The aims of this study were to examine the age-dependence of T-scores and the prevalence of osteoporosis using the World Health Organization Study Group criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis and to examine the T-score threshold that would be appropriate to identify women at risk of osteoporosis using QUS. Two groups of women were studied: (i) 420 healthy women aged 20-79 years with no known risk factors associated with osteoporosis; (ii) 97 postmenopausal women with vertebral fractures. All subjects had dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements of the spine and hip and QUS measurements on three calcaneal ultrasound devices (Hologic Sahara, Hologic UBA575+, Osteometer DTUone). A subgroup of 102 (76 on the DTUone) healthy women aged 20-40 years was used to estimate the young adult mean and SD for each QUS and DXA measurement parameter to calculate T-scores. The age-related decline in T-scores for QUS measurement parameters was half the rate observed for the bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. The average T-score for a woman aged 65 years was -1.2 for QUS measurements and -1.75 for the BMD measurements. When osteoporosis was defined by a T-score < or = -2.5 the prevalence of osteoporosis in healthy postmenopausal women was 17%, 16% and 12% for lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip BMD respectively. When the same definition was used for QUS measurements the prevalence of osteoporosis ranged from 2% to 8% depending on which ultrasound device and measurement parameter was used. Four different approaches, based on DXA-equivalent prevalence rates of osteoporosis, were utilized to examine which T-score threshold would be appropriate for identifying postmenopausal women at risk of osteoporosis using QUS measurements. These ranged from -1.05 to -2.12 depending upon the approach used to estimate the threshold and on which QUS device the measurements were performed, but all were significantly lower than the threshold of -2.5 used for BMD measurements. In conclusion, the WHO threshold of T = -2.5 for diagnosing osteoporosis requires modification when using QUS to assess skeletal status. For the three QUS devices used in this study, a T-score threshold of -1.80 would result in the same percentage of postmenopausal women classified as osteoporotic as the WHO threshold for BMD measurements. Corresponding T-score thresholds for individual measurement parameters on the two commercially available devices were -1.61, -1.94 and -1.90 for Sahara BUA, SOS and estimated heel BMD respectively and -1.45 and -2.10 for DTU BUA and SOS respectively Additional studies are needed to determine suitable T-score thresholds for other commercial QUS devices.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed2000

Cyclical etidronate therapy for prevention of postmenopausal bone loss: a 1-year open-label follow-up study.

The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the pharmacological activity of cyclical etidronate therapy is sustained beyond the dosing period. A group of 121 postmenopausal women who had completed a 2-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel study with etidronate or placebo (400 mg/day for 14 days every 3 months) and calcium agreed to participate in a 1-year open-label follow-up study to evaluate the effect of discontinuing etidronate treatment. Fifty-nine subjects in the former etidronate group and 62 in the placebo group received 500 mg/day of elemental calcium; 54/59 and 58/62 subjects, respectively, completed the study. Outcomes of the study were bone mineral density (BMD), measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and biochemical markers of bone turnover (urinary deoxypyridinoline/creatinine and serum osteocalcin). To determine whether there was a residual effect of previous therapy we compared mean percentage changes from baseline (year 0) to year 3 for both spinal and femoral neck BMD and markers of bone turnover in the former cyclical etidronate and placebo groups. To evaluate the carryover effect of treatment we compared the percent change from year 2 to year 3 for the same variables. Mean percentage change (SEM) from year 2 to year 3 for spinal BMD in the former cyclical etidronate group was -2.87% (0.48%) versus -0.99% (0.36%) in the placebo group (P = 0.0022). In the femoral neck, the BMD changes were -0.86% (0.42%) versus -1.01% (0.41%) (NS). Biochemical markers increased within 6 months toward baseline levels. Mean percentage changes from baseline (year 0) in both spinal and femoral neck BMD were significantly different between groups 1 year after treatment discontinuation. No differences between groups were maintained in deoxypyridinoline and osteocalcin. It is concluded that following withdrawal of cyclical etidronate therapy bone loss resumes at a normal and moderately accelerated rate in the proximal femur and lumbar spine, respectively. A positive effect on BMD at both cortical and trabecular sites is maintained for 1 year after treatment withdrawal.

Amino Acids↗
PubMed2000

The time of day that etidronate is ingested does not influence its therapeutic effect in osteoporosis.

To investigate whether the therapeutic effect of etidronate is affected by the time of ingestion we have retrospectively studied 110 osteoporotic patients. They had been taking etidronate according to the manufacturer's instructions for a mean duration of 2.6 years either on waking (n=47), on retiring (n=47), or during the day (n= 16). No significant differences were found between the three groups with respect to percentage change in bone mineral density at all sites either for the first year of treatment or for the mean yearly percent change throughout the total course of treatment. These findings suggest that the time of ingestion of etidronate does not influence the therapeutic effect if a two hour fast before and after ingestion is adhered to.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

Morphometric X-ray absorptiometry and morphometric radiography of the spine: a comparison of prevalent vertebral deformity identification.

Prevalent vertebral deformities are associated with a substantially increased risk of subsequent vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. Knowledge of vertebral fracture status is an important component in the prediction of further fractures in patients with osteoporosis. This study reports a comparison of the quantitative identification of vertebral deformities on morphometric X-ray absorptiometry (MXA) scans and conventional radiographs (MRX) in 161 postmenopausal women (mean age +/- SD, 64 +/- 7.1 years) recruited from patients referred by their family doctor for bone density measurement (n = 119) and osteoporotic subjects with known vertebral deformities attending an osteoporosis clinic (n = 42). Each subject had MXA scans and MRXs of the thoracolumbar spine, to image the vertebrae from T4-L4, at a single visit. The scans and radiographs were analyzed by two trained observers using six points to quantify the shape of each vertebral body. From these points, three vertebral heights were measured: anterior, middle, and posterior. Vertebral deformities were identified using the algorithms proposed by Eastell and by McCloskey. Generally good to excellent agreement (per vertebra, kappa = 0.87-0.93; per subject, kappa = 0.81-0.91) was observed between the two algorithms used for quantitative vertebral deformity identification using MXA or MRX. More moderate agreement (per vertebra, kappa = 0.70-0.79; per subject, kappa = 0.67-0.75) was seen when comparing the same algorithm between MXA and MRX. Agreement between MXA and MRX for the McCloskey algorithm was better than for the Eastell algorithm, largely because of the lower number of false positives produced by the McCloskey methodology. Deformity identification by MXA was limited because of poor image quality, primarily in the upper thoracic spine. One in six MRX deformities were missed by MXA as they occurred in vertebrae not visualized sufficiently for analysis on the MXA scans. Deformity identification was poorer in the upper thoracic spine in analyzable vertebrae with a sensitivity of 50.0% for MXA in terms of MRX using the Eastell algorithm for the vertebral levels T4-T7, compared with 80.6% for L1-L4A. MXA proved to be more effective at identifying moderate to severe MRX deformities producing a sensitivity of 22.0% for MXA in terms of identifying MRX grade 1 deformities using the Eastell algorithm, compared with 81.6% for grade 2 deformities. Although MXA image quality is inferior to that of conventional radiographs, MXA has distinct advantages such as a substantially reduced effective dose to the patient and acquisition of a single image of the spine. MXA is a potentially useful, relatively fast, low-radiation technique to identify prevalent vertebral deformities, particularly moderate to severe deformities in the middle/lower thoracic and lumbar spine, in conjunction with morphometric radiography in some patients.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed2000

Differences in skeletal kinetics between vertebral and humeral bone measured by 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography in postmenopausal women.

We have sought to investigate regional differences in skeletal kinetics between lumbar vertebrae and the humerus of postmenopausal women with 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography (PET). Twenty-six women, mean age 62 years, had dynamic PET scans of the lumbar spine and lower humerus after the injection of 180 MBq 18F-fluoride ion. Plasma arterial input functions (IFs) were calculated from a mean IF measured arterially from 10 women and scaled according to late individual venous activity. Vertebral and humeral time activity curves were measured by placing regions of interest (ROI) over lumbar vertebrae and the humeral shaft. Using a three-compartmental model and nonlinear regression analysis the macroconstant Ki, representing plasma clearance of fluoride to bone mineral, and the individual rate constants K1 (related to regional skeletal blood flow) and k2 to k4 describing transport between plasma, an extracellular fluid compartment and a bone mineral compartment, were measured. Mean vertebral Ki (3.47x10(-2) ml x min(-1) x ml(-1)) and K1 (1.08x10(-1) ml x min(-1) x ml(-1)) were found to be significantly greater than humeral Ki (1.64x10(-2) ml min(-1) ml(-1); P<0.0001) and K1 (3.90x10(-2) ml x min(-1) x ml(-1); P<0.0001) but no significant differences were found in k2, k3, and k4. These findings confirm differences in regional skeletal kinetics between lumbar vertebrae and the lower humerus. These observations may help increase our understanding of the regional differences in pathophysiology and response to treatment that have been observed in sites consisting predominantly of either trabecular or cortical bone. 18F-fluoride PET may prove to be a valuable technique in the noninvasive measurement of regional skeletal metabolism.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Monitoring skeletal response to treatment which site to measure in the femur?

In the past it was usual to interpret bone mineral density (BMD) scans of the femur using the femoral neck, trochanter, or Ward's triangle sites. Recently, a study by the International Committee for Standards in Bone Measurement recommended that the total hip should be the preferred site for the interpretation of femur BMD, and another study described a new central hip site that may offer improved precision. This article compares the longitudinal sensitivities of the different femur BMD sites for monitoring patient response to treatment. The study population was 152 postmenopausal women enrolled in a trial of a bisphosphonate therapy. Spine and hip BMD scans were performed at 0, 1, and 2 yr. The mean percentage change at 2 yr was calculated for six sites in the hip, and the spine was also included for comparison. Treatment effect was defined as the difference in the BMD change between the treated and placebo groups. Although the data analysis incorporated a term for a calibration change caused by a repair of the dual X-ray absorptiometry scanner, the effect of this event on the estimation of treatment effect was negligible. Longitudinal sensitivity was derived by dividing the treatment effect by the root mean square error (RMSE) of the statistical model. Results (and standard errors) normalized to the ratio of treatment effect: RMSE for femoral neck BMD were as follows: femoral neck: 1.00; trochanter: 1.33 (0.38); intertrochanteric: 0.84 (0.41); total hip: 1.20 (0.38); Ward's triangle: 1.03 (0.27); central hip: 1.09 (0.30); spine: 2.08 (0. 45). At none of the femur sites was the change in BMD large enough to allow monitoring of response to treatment in individual patients. However, for studies involving the follow-up of a group of subjects, the longitudinal sensitivities of the different femur sites were equal within the statistical errors of the study. In particular, total hip BMD appears to be as effective as femoral neck BMD for detecting response to treatment in the femur in the setting of a clinical trial or similar research study.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed2000

Different approaches to bone densitometry.

From 1990 to 2000, several effective new treatments were introduced for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures; these treatments were proven effective in large, international, clinical trials. At the same time, there was rapid technologic innovation, with the introduction of new radiologic methods for the noninvasive assessment of patients' bone density status. These developments led to the publication of guidelines for the clinical use of bone densitometry that include criteria for the referral of patients for investigation as well as recommendations for intervention thresholds for the initiation of preventive treatment of osteoporosis. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scanning of the spine and hip remains the technique of choice for bone densitometry studies, although there is now a wider appreciation of the need for smaller, cheaper devices for scanning the peripheral skeleton if the millions of women most at risk of a fragility fracture are to be identified and treated. This article reviews these developments, concentrating in particular on the advantages and disadvantages of the different types of equipment available for performing bone densitometry investigations, the guidelines for the referral of patients, and the principles for the interpretation of the scan findings.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1999

An unexpected change in DXA calibration not detected by routine quality control checks.

Since its commercial introduction a decade ago, the technique of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has been widely recognized as a useful and sensitive method of measuring changes in bone mineral density (BMD) at selected sites in the skeleton such as the spine and proximal femur. Because of their high precision and stable calibration, DXA scanners are frequently used in clinical trials to evaluate new treatments for osteoporosis. Quality assurance procedures based on regular scanning of phantoms are widely adopted in such trials, and continuity of the phantom BMD measurements is generally believed to ensure continuity in the in-vivo calibration. We report a change in calibration of a DXA scanner that occurred during a clinical trial where the calibration shift was different for the spine and femur sites and was not predicted or explained by the standard quality control procedures using phantoms. However, we show that provided patients enrolled in studies are thoroughly randomized and the statistical analysis is confined to the differences between the treated and control groups, then the effects of such calibration shifts on conclusions regarding the efficacy of treatment are considerably smaller than the random statistical errors.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1999

Morphometric X-ray absorptiometry and morphometric radiography of the spine: a comparison of analysis precision in normal and osteoporotic subjects.

Morphometric techniques, which use conventional lateral spine radiographs to quantify vertebral body shape (morphometric radiography, MRX), have proved a useful tool in the identification and evaluation of osteoporotic vertebral deformities. Recently a new method of acquiring the images required for vertebral morphometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanners (morphometric X-ray absorptiometry, MXA) has been developed. In this study we compare repeat analysis precision of vertebral height measurement using MXA and MRX. Twenty-four postmenopausal women were recruited (mean age 67 +/- 5.8 years): 12 normal subjects and 12 with osteoporosis and vertebral deformities. Each subject had a MXA scan and lateral thoracic and lumbar radiographs at a single appointment, which were each analyzed quantitatively in a masked fashion, using a standard 6-point method, twice by one observer and once by a second observer. Anterior (Ha), mid (Hm) and posterior (Hp) vertebral heights were measured and wedge (Ha/Hp) and mid-wedge (Hm/Hp) ratios calculated for each vertebral body. Intra- and interobserver precision were consistently poorer in MXA compared with MRX in both normal subjects and those with vertebral deformities, with MXA CV% generally at least 50% higher than corresponding values for MRX. For both MXA and MRX interobserver precision was clearly poorer than intraobserver precision, a problem associated with any morphometric technique. MXA intra- and interobserver precision were significantly poorer for subjects with vertebral deformities compared with those without, with a CV% for deformity subjects up to twice that of normal subjects. Conversely, MRX showed little or no obvious worsening of intra- or interobserver precision for deformity subjects. Comparison of MXA precision in the normal and deformed vertebrae of the deformity subjects demonstrated that the poorer precision in these subjects compared with normal subjects was the result of increased variability in point placement on the deformed vertebrae themselves. However, the precision for normal vertebrae in these subjects was also somewhat poorer than the precision in normal subjects. We conclude that MXA precision is generally poorer than that of MRX and that the presence of vertebral deformities has a more pronounced effect on MXA precision than on MRX precision.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1999

Contact quantitative ultrasound: an evaluation of precision, fracture discrimination, age-related bone loss and applicability of the WHO criteria.

The aim of this study was to assess a dry calcaneal quantitative ultrasound (QUS) device by examining: (i) short- and long-term precision; (ii) the ability of the ultrasound parameters to identify women with vertebral fractures; (iii) age- and menopause-related bone loss; (iv) applicability of the WHO criteria in scan interpretation. The study group consisted of 422 healthy women with no risk factors associated with osteoporosis (227 premenopausal and 195 postmenopausal) and 93 women with one or more vertebral fractures. All women had calcaneal QUS and bone mineral density (BMD) measurements of the lumbar spine and hip performed. Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS) measurements in the heel were combined and expressed as estimated heel BMD. Short-term precision studies yielded coefficient of variations of 0. 3% for SOS, 4% for BUA and 3.3% for estimated heel BMD. Standardized short-term precision values were approximately 0.2 SD. Long-term standardized precision errors ranged from 0.17 to 0.38 SD. All the QUS and BMD measurement parameters showed significant negative relationships with age in the postmenopausal group. Annual losses were 0.35 dB/MHz per year for BUA, 0.56 m/s per year for SOS and 0. 002 g/cm(2) per year for estimated heel BMD. All the QUS and BMD parameters were able to discriminate between healthy postmenopausal women and women with vertebral fracture. Age-adjusted odds ratios for each SD decline in QUS measurements were 3.63, 5.25 and 4.79 for BUA, SOS and estimated heel BMD respectively. Corresponding odds ratios for BMD at the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip were 2.39, 2.51 and 2.95 respectively. When the QUS and BMD parameters were expressed as T-scores, estimated heel BMD showed the least age-related decline, while femoral neck BMD displayed the greatest decrease with age. The mean T-score and prevalence of osteoporosis (T<-2.5) for a Caucasian woman aged 60-65 years were -1.35 and 21% respectively for the lumbar spine compared with -0.59 and 2% for estimated heel BMD. In conclusion, this study revealed that contact ultrasound can detect age- and menopause-related influences on bone status and was able to discriminate between healthy individuals and women with vertebral fracture. However, the widely accepted threshold of a T-score of less than -2.5 for the definition of osteoporosis may need modifying for the interpretation of QUS scans.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1999

Radiation exposure in bone mineral density assessment.

Osteoporosis is a systematic skeletal disease characterized by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue which leads to diminished biomechanical competence of the skeleton and low-trauma or atraumatic fractures. Due to increased awareness of the impact of osteoporosis on the elderly population, the use of bone densitometric techniques is becoming more widespread. Considerable progress has been made in the development of non-invasive methods for the assessment of the skeleton. While DXA and QCT are commonly used techniques, the popularity of other approaches such as RA, SXA and QUS is gaining grounds. QCT has an advantage over the other techniques in its ability to measure the true volumetric density of trabecular or cortical bone. We therefore present an overview of these current techniques for bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. In the second section we discuss the radiation doses incurred in BMD measurements by patients and methods for reducing patient and staff radiation exposure are given. Studies of radiation dose to patient from DXA confirms that patient dose is small (0.08-4.6 muSv) compared to that given by many other investigations involving ionizing radiation. Fan beam technology with increased resolution has resulted in increase patient dose radiation dose (6.7-31 muSv) but this is still relatively small. Carrying vertebral morphometry using DXA also incurs less radiation dose (< 60 muSv) than standard lateral radiographs QCT has radiation dose (25-360 muSv) comparable to simple radiological examination such as chest X-ray but lower than imaging CT. Radiation dose from other techniques such as RA and SXA are in the same order of magnitude as pencil beam DXA. For pencil beam DXA and SXA systems the time average dose to staff from scatter is very low even with the operator sitting as close as 1 m from the patient during measurement. However the scatter dose from fan beam DXA systems is considerable higher and approaches limits set by regulator bodies for occupational exposure.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1999

Individual kidney function in atherosclerotic nephropathy is not related to the presence of renal artery stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Atherosclerotic renovascular disease is increasingly recognized as an important cause of renal failure in patients over 60 years of age but the processes leading to renal dysfunction have not been defined. We have examined the relationship between renal artery stenosis and individual renal function in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. METHODS: In this prospective descriptive study over a 25-month period, we examined the relationship between the presence of renal artery stenosis and single kidney glomerular filtration rate (SKGFR). SKGFR was measured using a novel method of synchronous (51)Chromium ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid glomerular filtration rate ((51)CrEDTA-GFR) and (99m)Technetium dimercaptosuccinic acid ((99m)TcDMSA) scintigraphy. We studied 79 patients with a mean age of 68.9 years (25.2-88.2), 44 males and 35 females. The mean age of the males was 70 years (60-80) and females 67 years (25.2-88.2). RESULTS: We found that the precision of the SKGFR was 2 ml/min. For paired kidneys we found: (i) no significant difference between kidneys with stenosis (17.3 ml/min) compared to those without stenosis (13.6 ml/min) (P=0.22); (ii) kidneys with occluded renal arteries had significantly less function (2.6 ml/min) than those without occlusion (24.5 ml/min) (P<0.05). When degree of renal arteries stenosis was correlated with SKGFR there was a reduction with an increasing degree of stenosis (<30% 27 ml/min, 30-60% 17.7 ml/min, >60% stenosis 15 ml/min, P=0. 016). CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that SKGFR provides a reproducible measure of individual kidney function. There was a similar impairment of function in paired kidneys with and without renal artery stenosis, but occlusion was associated with significant reduction in function compared to the contralateral kidney. This suggests that there is a process causing renal dysfunction in patients with atherosclerotic disease independent of renal artery narrowing.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Optimizing data acquisition and analysis of morphometric X-ray absorptiometry.

Morphometric X-ray absorptiometry (MXA) uses dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners to perform vertebral morphometric measurements of the vertebrae. In this study we evaluated the four available MXA scan modes--single-energy (SE) and dual-energy fast (F), array (A) and high definition (HD)--on a commercial bone densitometer (Hologic QDR-4500A). Sixty postmenopausal women (mean age 59 years, range 40-73 years) were recruited and split into two groups matched for body mass index (BMI, kg/m2). Three MXA scans, covering 13 vertebrae from T4 to L4, were acquired on each subject; all subjects were scanned in SE and A modes, while the third scan was performed in F mode in group 1 and in HD mode in group 2. Subjects were invited to return 6 months after the commencement of the study to repeat their scans. The HD mode produced the most reliable image, with 97% of all scans analyzable to T7 and the fewest vertebrae being lost to analysis (1.5/13 vertebrae lost per scan). A SE + HD combination (using whichever image allows the analysis of more vertebrae) further decreased the number of vertebrae lost to 0.8 of 13 vertebrae, i.e. a typical scan was analyzable up to and including T5. BMI had a noticeable and scan-mode-dependent effect on MXA image quality, an increase in the number of vertebrae lost to analysis occurring once BMI exceeded 30. BMD had a far smaller effect on image quality and no effect at all using the SE + HD combination. Precision (CV%) was similar for all three dual-energy modes at around 3.5% without the scan 'compare' facility and 2.6% with it. The best precision was obtained with SE scan (2.7%/2.2%). BMI and BMD had little or no effect on precision. We conclude that optimal results are obtained by the acquisition of both SE and HD scans. However, for rapid assessment by trained operators SE scans alone offer almost equal utility.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1998

Applications of bone densitometry for osteoporosis.

Over the past decade, growing awareness of the impact of osteoporosis on the elderly population and the availability of new treatments to prevent fractures have stimulated the rapid development of new radiologic techniques to assist in diagnosis. With the ability to perform high precision measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) in the spine and hip, dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is well suited to meet this latter need. However, there is continuing interest in smaller, cheaper systems for assessing the peripheral skeleton that include DXA scanning of the distal forearm and a variety of devices for performing quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements on bone. Alongside the new equipment, new guidelines have been developed to assist in the interpretation of bone densitometry studies and, following a report by a World Health Organization working group, osteoporosis is increasingly diagnosed on the basis of the patient's T-score value (difference of BMD from young adult mean normalized to the population SD). For the future, wider provision of bone densitometry services is required to properly target the new treatments now becoming available. Since it is unlikely that conventional DXA can meet these needs, QUS is an attractive alternative, especially because this technique is now proven in its ability to predict fracture risk in the elderly and FDA approval is imminent.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1998

Review of 3,530 referrals for bone density measurements of spine and femur: evidence that radiographic osteopenia predicts low bone mass.

PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) measurements and the initial reason for referral to a BMD screening service. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Referral letters for 3,479 of the 3,530 women referred for BMD screening were classified according to the indication for screening. Mean age-matched standard deviation scores (Z scores) were derived for each of the 10 most common indications. Mean BMD between each group was compared with the age-matched value from the local normal range by means of a one-sample Student t test. Mean young normal standard deviation scores (T scores) were derived, and the percentages of women with osteopenia or osteoporosis from each referral group were calculated on the basis of the World Health Organization criteria. RESULTS: The most common reason for referral was to aid in a decision regarding hormone replacement therapy (n = 700). The highest proportion of women with osteoporosis in any group was in the radiographic osteopenia group (n = 269). CONCLUSION: Radiographic evidence of osteopenia is a strong predictor of osteoporosis. Screening for osteopenia appears justified in this and other high-risk groups and those seeking a rationale for preventive therapy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Morphometric X-ray absorptiometry: reference data for vertebral dimensions.

Vertebral fractures are a common and important consequence of osteoporosis and are often identified via morphometric analysis of conventional lateral spine radiographs (morphometric radiography or MRX). A new method of performing vertebral morphometry using images acquired on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners (morphometric X-ray absorptiometry or MXA) has recently been developed. In this study, we derive reference data for vertebral heights and height ratios using MXA scans as the data source and compare the results with previously published MRX studies. One thousand and nineteen Caucasian women (mean age 63 years, range 33-86) were recruited. An MXA scan, covering 13 vertebrae from L4 to T4, was acquired for each subject on one of four DXA systems located at three centers in the U.K. Analysis of variance found statistically significant but relatively small differences among centers, machines, and scan modes, and therefore data were pooled for reference range calculations. Three vertebral heights (anterior, mid, and posterior) were measured and four ratios (wedge, mid-wedge, and two crush) calculated. These data sets were trimmed using an iterative algorithm to remove extreme values assumed to represent deformed vertebrae, then mean and SD values were calculated using the remaining data. When the data were split by age, a small but statistically significant decrease in vertebral height between the sixth and eighth decades was found, but this was not replicated for the vertebral height ratios. Marked differences were observed between MXA data and MRX, but were comparable to those between different MRX studies. These may result from differences in image quality and point placement protocols, population differences, differences in radiographic technique, and differences in the derivation of a group of "normal" vertebrae. This study suggests that reference data of vertebral dimensions should be specific to the technique which uses those data as a reference, i.e., MXA.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗