Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G H Bardy

Publications and source records attributed to G H Bardy.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1992

Clinical experience with a tiered-therapy, multiprogrammable antiarrhythmia device.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this report is to describe our initial experience with a tiered-therapy, variable detection criteria, multiprogrammable antiarrhythmia device capable of antitachycardia pacing, cardioversion, and defibrillation in 50 cardiac arrest survivors. METHODS AND RESULTS: An epicardial lead system was used in 35 patients. A transvenous lead system was used in 15 patients. The index arrhythmia leading to device implantation was ventricular fibrillation (VF) in 23 patients, ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 21 patients, and both VT and VF in six patients. Postoperatively, all 50 patients benefited from the additional functions available in the new device compared with a device capable only of high-energy termination of arrhythmias using a simple rate detection algorithm. Total patient survival over a mean follow-up period of 15 +/- 5 months was 96%, with no patient succumbing to sudden arrhythmic death, cardiac death, or surgical death. Nine patients (18%) avoided the need for a bradycardia pacemaker because of the device's backup bradycardia pacing function. A programmable tachycardia cycle length stability algorithm prevented inappropriate device intervention into atrial fibrillation in 11 patients (22%). Detection schema flexibility, antitachycardia pacing capabilities, and low-energy cardioversion options allowed the elimination or avoidance of antiarrhythmic drugs in 41 patients (82%). Device data storage facilitated troubleshooting and reprogramming of detection algorithms and therapeutic schema in all 50 patients. Finally, the ability to perform noninvasive programmed electrical stimulation obviated the need for invasive cardiac catheterization in 35 of 35 patients who required electrophysiological testing after device implantation. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that a multiprogrammable antiarrhythmia device can provide a substantial advance in the treatment of patients with disabling or life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias by minimizing the use of painful shocks, reducing the need for antiarrhythmic drugs, lowering the incidence of inappropriate shocks, facilitating electrophysiological evaluation, and obviating the need for dual-device therapy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Narrow QRS ventricular tachycardia.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency and clinical characteristics of narrow QRS ventricular tachycardia (QRS duration less than or equal to 0.11 seconds). DESIGN: Consecutive survey of patients with ventricular tachycardia. SETTING: Tertiary, referral-based arrhythmia service at a university medical center. PATIENTS: Sequential sample of patients with inducible ventricular tachycardia who had a 12-lead electrocardiogram of the tachycardia available for review. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 106 patients with ventricular tachycardia, 5 (4.7%; 95% CI, 2.1% to 10.6%) had ventricular tachycardia with a QRS duration less than or equal to 0.11 seconds. Three of the five patients were previously incorrectly diagnosed as having supraventricular tachycardia. All five patients had at least two electrocardiographic findings other than QRS duration to suggest ventricular tachycardia. CONCLUSIONS: Narrow QRS ventricular tachycardia should be considered in the differential diagnosis of narrow QRS tachycardias. Electrocardiographic findings other than QRS duration are usually present to suggest the diagnosis.

Diagnosis, Differential↗
PubMed1991

Electrode system influence on biphasic waveform defibrillation efficacy in humans.

BACKGROUND: Several clinical studies have demonstrated a general superiority of biphasic waveform defibrillation compared with monophasic waveform defibrillation using epicardial lead systems. To test the breadth of utility of biphasic waveforms in humans, a prospective, randomized evaluation of defibrillation efficacy of monophasic and single capacitor biphasic waveform pulses was performed for two distinct nonthoracotomy lead systems as well as for an epicardial electrode system in 51 cardiac arrest survivors undergoing automatic defibrillator implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: The configurations tested consisted of a right ventricular-left ventricular (RV-LV) epicardial patch-patch system, an RV catheter-chest patch (CP) nonthoracotomy system, and a coronary sinus (CS) catheter-RV catheter nonthoracotomy system. For each configuration, the defibrillation current and voltage waveforms were recorded via a digital oscilloscope to measure defibrillation threshold voltage, current, resistance, and stored energy. Biphasic waveform defibrillation proved more efficient than monophasic waveform defibrillation for the epicardial RV-LV system (4.8 +/- 4.1 versus 6.7 +/- 4.9 J, p = 0.047) and the nonthoracotomy RV-CP system (23.4 +/- 11.1 versus 34.3 +/- 10.4 J, p = 0.0042). Biphasic waveform defibrillation thresholds were not significantly lower than monophasic waveform defibrillation thresholds for the CS-RV nonthoracotomy system (15.6 +/- 7.2 versus 20.0 +/- 11.5 J, p = 0.11). Biphasic waveform defibrillation proved more efficacious than monophasic waveform defibrillation in 13 of 20 patients (65%) with RV-LV epicardial patches, 10 of 15 patients (67%) with an RV-CP nonthoracotomy system, and nine of 16 patients (56%) with an RV-CS nonthoracotomy system. CONCLUSIONS: Biphasic pulsing was useful with nonthoracotomy lead systems as well as with epicardial lead systems. However, the degree of biphasic waveform defibrillation superiority appeared to be electrode system dependent. Furthermore, for a few individuals, biphasic waveform defibrillation proved less efficient than monophasic waveform defibrillation, regardless of the lead system used.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Signal-averaged electrocardiographic late potentials in resuscitated survivors of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation.

The results of signal-averaged electrocardiography and programmed electrical stimulation were evaluated in 25 patients with recurrent sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) and 46 patients with a history of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation (VF) to characterize the electrophysiologic substrate responsible for these different clinical arrhythmia presentations. Patients with VT had a higher incidence of late potentials (VT 83%, VF 50%, p = 0.005). Significant differences between these groups were also noted in response to programmed electrical stimulation. A sustained ventricular arrhythmia was induced in 24 of 25 (96%) patients with a history of VT but in only 27 of 46 (59%) of VF patients (p = 0.005). In addition, VF was induced in 11 (24%) patients in the VF group but in none of the patients in the VT group (p = 0.005). When the 2 groups were compared on the basis of select clinical characteristics, no significant difference in age, sex, presence of coronary artery disease or ejection fraction was noted. The frequency of prior myocardial infarction was significantly higher in the VT group (VT 20 of 25, 80%; VF 24 of 46, 52%; p = 0.03). Finally, no significant relation between the presence of late potentials and induced arrhythmias was noted in either group. The inability of signal-averaged electrocardiography to predict inducibility in VF patients may represent a significant limitation of this technique in identifying patients at risk for sudden cardiac death.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Biophysical and anatomical considerations for safe and efficacious catheter ablation of arrhythmias.

The development of catheter ablation techniques for therapy of cardiac arrhythmias continues to evolve. Although many patients have benefited from catheter ablation procedures, failure to ablate the arrhythmogenic substrate and complications from the pulse used in these procedures remain too frequent occurrences. The purpose of this review is to focus on these problems of inefficacy and safety with attention directed to the role various direct current and radiofrequency pulses have had in the genesis of these difficulties.

Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗
PubMed1990

Long-term outcome in patients who survive out of hospital ventricular fibrillation and undergo electrophysiologic studies: evaluation by electrophysiologic subgroups.

The long-term outcome of 241 survivors of out of hospital ventricular fibrillation who underwent programmed electrical stimulation was evaluated. Patients were categorized according to the rhythm induced at baseline drug-free electrophysiologic testing. Ventricular fibrillation was induced in 39 patients (16%) (Group 1), sustained ventricular tachycardia in 66 patients (27%) (Group 2) and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in 34 patients (14%) (Group 3); 102 patients (42%) (Group 4) did not have an arrhythmia inducible at baseline electrophysiologic testing. Antiarrhythmic drugs were administered over the long term to 92% of patients in Group 2, 91% of patients in Group 1 and 47% of patients in Group 4. At a mean follow-up time of 30 +/- 15 months, recurrent sudden cardiac death or nonfatal ventricular fibrillation occurred in 11 (28%) of 39 patients with inducible ventricular fibrillation (Group 1), 14 (21%) of 66 patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia (Group 2), 4 (12%) of 34 patients with inducible nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (Group 3) and 16 (16%) of 102 patients without inducible arrhythmias (Group 4). Actuarial analysis revealed a 2 year cumulative arrhythmia-free survival rate of 65% for patients in Group 2, 71% for patients in Group 1, 79% for patients in Group 3 and 81% for patients in Group 4 (p = 0.02). Actuarial survival of patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation suppressed by electrophysiologically guided drug therapy was not significantly different from that in patients whose arrhythmia was not suppressed. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that only the presence of congestive heart failure was an independent predictor of outcome in these patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents↗
PubMed1990

An effective and adaptable transvenous defibrillation system using the coronary sinus in humans.

With use of a coronary sinus catheter electrode, a right ventricular catheter electrode and a chest wall patch electrode system, defibrillation threshold voltage, current and energy were measured with four distinct transvenous defibrillation techniques delivered in random sequence in each of 12 survivors of cardiac arrest immediately before implantation of a standard epicardial patch defibrillation system. The four transvenous defibrillation techniques were 1) single pathway monophasic pulsing, 2) single pathway biphasic pulsing, 3) dual pathway sequential pulsing, and 4) dual pathway simultaneous pulsing. A transvenous defibrillation method was considered to be potentially useful only if the defibrillation threshold was less than or equal to 500 V (less than or equal to 15 J delivered energy). The 500 V value would allow a 2:1 defibrillation safety margin for a device with a maximal output of 30 J. No single transvenous pulsing technique was uniformly superior in efficacy. However, by choosing the best pulsing technique for each patient, it was possible to obtain an average defibrillation threshold of 410 +/- 135 V leading edge voltage, 7.2 +/- 2.5 A leading edge current and 11.3 +/- 7.4 J delivered energy for the group of 12 patients. With the ability to vary defibrillation technique, transvenous antiarrhythmic device implantation would have been possible in 10 (83%) of the 12 patients at or below a 15 J defibrillation threshold cutoff point. In contrast, if only one transvenous defibrillation method had been used, as few as 5 and at most 8 of the 12 patients would have been candidates for a transvenous defibrillation system given a 15 J defibrillation threshold cutoff point for insertion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗
PubMed1990

Radio-frequency ablation: effect of voltage and pulse duration on canine myocardium.

The purpose of this investigation was to examine in vivo the relationship of radio-frequency (RF) pulse voltage and duration on the volume of tissue injury. RF 500-kHz pulses of 20-, 40-, and 60-V amplitude (RMS) were applied to the epicardium of 18 dogs for pulsing periods of 5-20 s. Systematic and quantitative tissue analysis was then performed after 30 days. No chronic lesions were evident on microscopic examination for 20-V RF pulse applications up to 15 s. Application of 20-V pulses for 20 s produced small lesions having a volume of 2.4 +/- 0.7 mm3. At 40 V, the volume of tissue injury ranged from 39.1 +/- 10.3 mm3 for 5 s of pulse application to 128.8 +/- 24.8 mm3 for 20 s of pulse application. Over the first 15 s of 40-V pulse application, the volume of tissue injury increased as pulse application time increased. There was no further increase in tissue injury for 40-V pulsing durations greater than 15 s. At 60 V, volumes of tissue injury ranged from 122.7 +/- 33.5 mm3 at 5 s to 313.6 +/- 73.7 mm3 at 20 s. Lesion size increased significantly for pulse durations of up to 10 s. Thereafter, 60-V pulses yielded little increase in tissue injury. In addition, persistent 60-V pulsing for periods greater than 9 s duration resulted in arcing and tissue vaporization in 28% of the applications. Thus RF energy is limited in its ability to create safe and effective tissue injury.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1990

Transvenous defibrillation in humans via the coronary sinus.

A consistently effective transvenous defibrillation system for use in automatic defibrillators could significantly alter the approach to patients at risk of sudden death. Transvenous defibrillation systems that use a right ventricular (RV) electrode only or an RV electrode in combination with a chest patch are relatively inefficient at applying current to the posterolateral left ventricle. An RV electrode combined with a coronary sinus (CS) electrode, however, may improve current distribution to the posterolateral left ventricle. The purpose of this investigation, therefore, was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a specially designed transvenous lead system with a CS electrode capable of current delivery to this relatively inaccessible region of the heart. In 20 survivors of cardiac arrest, we determined defibrillation efficacy immediately before defibrillator surgery for monophasic pulses delivered between an RV catheter electrode and a CS catheter electrode system and compared these findings with an RV catheter electrode-thoracic patch defibrillation system. Subsequently, we referenced the efficacy of both transvenous systems to an epicardial patch electrode system at the time of defibrillator implantation. The mean delivered-energy defibrillation threshold for the CS-RV electrode system was 17.5 +/- 7.9 J, which was substantially lower than the RV electrode-thoracic patch system (25.6 +/- 11.4 J, p = 0.0016 [46% more]). Defibrillation threshold voltage was 529 +/- 123 V for the CS-RV electrode system and 647 +/- 164 V (22% more) for the RV electrode-thoracic patch system (p = 0.0013).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Coronary Vessels↗
PubMed1990

Short-term morbidity and mortality of implantation of automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

Over the 3-year period from Jan. 1, 1986, through Dec. 31, 1988, we have implanted 101 automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators into patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. There were 82 male patients and 19 female patients. The mean age was 58 years with a range of 25 to 82 years. The indication for implantation was ventricular fibrillation in 89 patients and recurrent ventricular tachycardia in 12 patients. Seventy-seven patients had a history of prior myocardial infarction or coronary artery disease, or both. Eighteen patients had nonischemic cardiomyopathy. One patient had a prolonged QT syndrome and five patients had no evidence of preexisting structural heart disease. The mean injection fraction was 37% +/- 17%. Forty-one of the automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantations were associated with procedures necessitating cardiopulmonary bypass. The hospital mortality rate was 4% and the morbidity rate was 15%. The only statistical difference between those patients who did and did not have postoperative complications was a history of a prior myocardial infarction (90% versus 54%, p less than 0.05). Twenty percent of patients had new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation after implantation of the device. Eleven percent of patients had sustained ventricular tachycardia postoperatively. Although there was a trend toward a higher complication/death rate in the patients whose automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator was inserted in association with cardiopulmonary bypass (24% versus 15%) and the occurrence of new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (27% versus 15%), these findings were not statistically significant. Automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation with and without concomitant cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with a clinically important morbidity and mortality rate and development of postoperative arrhythmias.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Evaluation of electrode polarity on defibrillation efficacy.

The effect of electrode polarity on defibrillation thresholds in humans is unknown. This prospective, randomized evaluation of electrode polarity on defibrillation thresholds was performed in 21 survivors of ventricular fibrillation (VF) undergoing cardiac surgery. Defibrillation was always performed with 2 identical large rectangular, wire mesh electrodes positioned over the anterior wall of the right ventricle and the posterolateral wall of the left ventricle. The initial electrode polarity for the left ventricular (LV) electrode was chosen randomly for determination of the defibrillation threshold. Subsequently, electrode polarity was reversed. The defibrillation threshold was defined as the lowest pulse amplitude that would effectively terminate VF with a single discharge delivered 10 seconds after initiation of an episode of VF with alternating current. For each defibrillation pulse, voltage, current, resistance and delivered energy were recorded. Of the 21 patients, 15 (71%) had a lower defibrillation threshold when the LV electrode was positive, 2 patients (10%) had a lower defibrillation threshold when the LV electrode was negative and 4 patients (19%) had equal defibrillation thresholds (within 0.5 J) regardless of polarity. The mean leading edge defibrillation threshold voltage was 370 +/- 88 volts when the LV electrode was negative and 320 +/- 109 volts (14% less) when the LV electrode was positive (p = 0.014). Mean leading edge defibrillation threshold current was 9.3 +/- 3.1 amps when the LV electrode was negative compared to 7.7 +/- 3.1 amps (17% less) when the LV electrode was positive (p = 0.0033). There were no differences in resistance with the 2 configurations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Prospective comparison of sequential pulse and single pulse defibrillation with use of two different clinically available systems.

Sixteen out-of-hospital survivors of ventricular fibrillation underwent a prospective, randomized, intraoperative comparison of sequential pulse and single pulse defibrillation with use of two distinct electrode systems and waveform shapes currently available for clinical use. Defibrillation was tested alternately with either the single pulse or the sequential pulse system 10 s into an episode of ventricular fibrillation. Sequential pulse defibrillation was performed with two 4 ms truncated exponential pulses of constant duration delivered to three equally spaced oval epicardial patch electrodes composed of concentric coils. The posterior left ventricular electrode served as the common cathode. The first anode was over the anterior right ventricle and the second anode was over the anterior left ventricle. Single pulse defibrillation was performed with the standard intracardiac defibrillation system with use of a single truncated exponential pulse with a fixed 65% tilt delivered across two rectangular, wire mesh epicardial patch electrodes positioned over the anterior right ventricle and posterolateral left ventricle. During defibrillation threshold determination, voltage and current waveforms were recorded and used to determine pulsing resistance and delivered and stored energy. Average defibrillation threshold leading edge voltage for the single pulse technique was 273 +/- 101 V compared with 246 +/- 67 V (11% less) for the sequential pulse technique (p = 0.136). Defibrillation threshold leading edge current for the single pulse technique was 6.7 +/- 2.5 A compared with 5.2 +/- 1.7 A (29% less) for the sequential pulse method (p = 0.005). The defibrillation threshold delivered energy was 5.6 +/- 4.0 J for the single pulse technique and 3.5 +/- 1.8 J (38% less) for the sequential pulse technique (p = 0.021).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1989

A prospective randomized evaluation of biphasic versus monophasic waveform pulses on defibrillation efficacy in humans.

Biphasic waveforms have been suggested as a superior waveform for ventricular defibrillation. To test this premise, a prospective randomized intraoperative evaluation of defibrillation efficacy of monophasic and biphasic waveform pulses was performed in 22 survivors of out of hospital ventricular fibrillation who were undergoing cardiac surgery for implantation of an automatic defibrillator. The initial waveform used in a patient for defibrillation testing, either monophasic or biphasic, was randomly selected. Subsequently, each patient served as his or her own control for defibrillation testing of the other waveform. The defibrillation threshold was defined as the lowest pulse amplitude that would effectively terminate ventricular fibrillation with a single discharge delivered 10 s after initiation of an episode of ventricular fibrillation induced with alternating current. Each defibrillation pulse was recorded oscilloscopically, and defibrillation pulse voltage, current, resistance and stored energy were measured. Fifteen (68%) of the 22 patients had a lower defibrillation threshold with the biphasic pulse, 3 (14%) had a lower threshold with the monophasic pulse and 4 (18%) had equal defibrillation thresholds (within 1.0 J) regardless of waveform. The mean leading edge defibrillation threshold voltage was 317 +/- 105 V when the monophasic pulse was used and 267 +/- 102 V (16% less) when the biphasic pulse was used (p = 0.008). Mean leading edge defibrillation threshold current was 7.9 +/- 3.7 A when the monophasic pulse was used and 6.8 +/- 3.8 A (14% less) when the biphasic pulse was used (p = 0.051).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗
PubMed1989

A prospective, randomized evaluation of effect of ventricular fibrillation duration on defibrillation thresholds in humans.

The effect of ventricular fibrillation duration in humans on defibrillation efficacy as it pertains to the time of intervention of an automatic implantable defibrillator is unknown. If a difference in defibrillation efficacy exists in the early period after ventricular fibrillation onset, it may affect algorithms used by antiarrhythmic devices for arrhythmia detection and therapy. Therefore, a prospective, randomized evaluation was performed of the effect of ventricular fibrillation durations of 10 s and 20 s on defibrillation thresholds in 10 survivors of sudden cardiac arrest undergoing implantation of an automatic cardioverter defibrillator. The initial duration of ventricular fibrillation was chosen randomly. Subsequently, each patient served as his or her own control for the alternate duration of ventricular fibrillation to that chosen initially. The mean leading edge defibrillation threshold voltage was 411 +/- 114 V when ventricular fibrillation persisted for 10 s and 419 +/- 125 V when it persisted for 20 s (p = 0.73). The mean defibrillation threshold current was 11.4 +/- 2.8 A when ventricular fibrillation persisted for 10 s and 11.4 +/- 3.2 A when it persisted for 20 s (p = 0.97). The delivered energy defibrillation threshold was 11.5 +/- 5.9 J when ventricular fibrillation persisted for 10 s and 12.0 +/- 6.9 J when it persisted for 20 s (p = 0.67). These findings show that the defibrillation threshold does not change between 10 and 20 s of ventricular fibrillation in out-of-hospital survivors of cardiac arrest at the time of surgical implantation of an automatic defibrillator. The data may have influence on the programming of defibrillator detection algorithms.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1989

Effect of voltage and charge of electrical ablation pulses on canine myocardium.

Multiple paired lesions produced by a train of high-voltage low-charge rectangular pulses (20 A, 30 microsecond) and a train of low-voltage high-charge rectangular pulses (2 A, 300 microsecond) were made to the left ventricular epicardium of 23 dogs to determine the relative influence of voltage and charge delivery on injury of canine myocardium. Both pulsing methods contained equal amounts of energy (15 J) delivered over equal periods of time (100 ms), and both pulsing methods were nonarcing and therefore nonbarotraumatic. The volume of cardiac tissue injury resulting from both types of pulses was then evaluated from planimetered serial histological sections after 1, 10, and 30 days. Over the 30-day period, lesion size progressively decreased to 56% of its original value for the high-voltage low-charge pulse. In contrast, lesion size from the low-voltage high-charge pulse remained relatively constant, decreasing only 12% of its original value. These results indicate that when energy delivery is held constant, voltage, not charge, is the dominant mediator of cell injury. Also, cells subjected to high voltages appear to recover partially over time with significantly less constancy of tissue injury than that seen with low-voltage high-charge pulses.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Direct surgical treatment of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia.

Atrioventricular node reentry tachycardia is a common type of supraventricular tachycardia. Rarely is it incapacitating and refractory to drug therapy, but when it is, the only option in therapy until recently has been atrioventricular node ablation or antitachycardia pacemaker insertion. The purpose of this paper is to review the case histories of four patients in whom we have surgically abolished atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia while intentionally preserving atrioventricular node conduction. All four patients had atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia confirmed by electrophysiologic study as diagnosed by established criteria. One patient had a left posterior atrioventricular accessory pathway, in addition to atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. All patients underwent intraoperative epicardial and endocardial mapping. Direct surgical dissection of the atrioventricular node node was performed in all four patients during normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass. Early and late postoperative electrophysiologic studies were used to evaluate the success of the surgical dissection. None of the patients had any evidence of dual atrioventricular node pathways or spontaneous or inducible atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia postoperatively. At last follow-up (15 weeks to 21 months postoperatively), all patients were free from arrhythmias and cardiac medications, all were in normal sinus rhythm, and all had a subjectively improved life-style. This technique of direct surgical dissection of the atrioventricular node during normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass has allowed for complete cure of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia, while maintaining normal atrioventricular node function in these four patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

Prospective evaluation of initially ineffective defibrillation pulses on subsequent defibrillation success during ventricular fibrillation in survivors of cardiac arrest.

The effect of initially ineffective defibrillation pulses on subsequent defibrillation success is not known. Therefore, the voltage, current and energy at the defibrillation threshold were compared with the defibrillation rescue pulse voltage, current and energy that terminated ventricular fibrillation when an ineffective pulse just below the defibrillation threshold had been used initially. This lower amplitude ineffective pulse was termed a "subdefibrillation threshold" pulse. The pulse that restored sinus rhythm after the subdefibrillation threshold pulse was delivered was termed the "subdefibrillation threshold rescue pulse." This comparison was undertaken, intraoperatively, in 14 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors using a sequential-pulse catheter-patch defibrillation system. Each of the 14 patients required higher voltage, current, delivered energy and stored energy for defibrillation with the subdefibrillation threshold rescue pulse than with the defibrillation threshold pulse. The defibrillation threshold voltage was 451 +/- 127 volts compared with a subdefibrillation threshold rescue voltage of 585 +/- 147 volts (p less than 0.00002). The defibrillation threshold current was 5.5 +/- 2.4 amps compared with a subdefibrillation threshold rescue current of 7.2 +/- 2.7 amps (p less than 0.00001). Delivered and stored energies were 10.9 +/- 7.4 and 12.3 +/- 7.2J, respectively, for the defibrillation threshold pulse and were 17.6 +/- 9.4 J (p less than 0.00002) and 20.5 +/- 9.3 J (p less than 0.00005), respectively, for the subdefibrillation threshold rescue pulse. It is concluded that the risk of requiring considerably higher energies than anticipated for defibrillation must be incurred, should defibrillation fail because of an initially insufficient defibrillation pulse.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗