Biomedical subjects

Florin Marcel Musteata

Publications and source records attributed to Florin Marcel Musteata.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

In vivo sampling with solid phase microextraction.

This review discusses the most recent developments and future challenges in the application of solid phase microextraction (SPME) for sampling of live biological samples. The emphasis is placed on applications of fiber SPME for analysis of volatile emissions and drugs in biological fluids. The method development section highlights the main parameters that need to be considered in the case of in vivo experiments: extraction techniques, selection of extraction phases, calibration procedures, determination of free concentrations, and automation.

Drug Evaluation, Preclinical↗

PubMed2006

Fast in vivo microextraction: a new tool for clinical analysis.

BACKGROUND: We sought to develop a technique with the potential to partly replace current methods of analysis based on blood draws. To achieve this goal, we developed an in vivo microextraction technique that is faster than conventional methods, interferes minimally with the investigated system, minimizes errors associated with sample preparation, and limits exposure to hazardous biological samples. METHODS: Solid-phase microextraction devices based on hydrophilic polypyrrole and polyethylene glycol coatings were used for direct extraction of drugs from the flowing blood of beagle dogs, over a period of 8 h. The drugs extracted on the probes were subsequently quantified by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Two calibration strategies--external and standard on the fiber--were used to correlate the amount extracted with the in vivo concentration. RESULTS: Diazepam and its metabolites were successfully monitored over the course of a pharmacokinetic study, repeated 3 times on 3 beagles. The fast microextraction technique was validated by comparison with conventional plasma analysis, and a correlation factor of 0.99 was obtained. In addition to total concentrations, the method was useful for determining free drug concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed technique has several advantages and is suitable for fast clinical analyses. This approach could be used not only for drugs, but for any other endogenous or exogenous compounds.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Determination of drug plasma protein binding by solid phase microextraction.

The plasma protein binding of drugs has been shown to have significant effects on the quantitative relationship between clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. In many clinical situations, measurement of the total drug concentration does not provide the needed information concerning the unbound fraction of drug in plasma, which is available for pharmacodynamic action. Therefore, the accurate determination of unbound plasma drug concentrations is important in understanding drug action. Many methodologies exist for determining the extent of plasma protein binding, but different methods produce a rather wide range of results for the same compound at the same concentration level. The solid phase microextraction (SPME) method reported in the present study attempts to eliminate many experimental variables that could lead to the lack of reproducibility, such as the variable content of organic solvent or ionic strength in plasma, pH shifts, and volume shifts. Five well-known drugs were chosen to study plasma protein binding: ibuprofen, warfarin, verapamil, propranolol, and caffeine, with high, intermediate and low binding properties. Dilution of plasma with isotonic PBS or incubation with 10% CO(2) in the atmosphere was found to compensate for changes in pH during incubation. The data obtained using these pH-controlled methods correlate well with the average values of plasma protein binding found in the literature. SPME, which uses an extraction phase that dissolves or adsorbs the drug of interest and rejects proteins, overcomes several limitations of currently available techniques and is a thermodynamically sound method, since the measurements are always performed at equilibrium. Compared to other methods, SPME offers several advantages: small sample size, short analysis time, possibility to automate, and ability to directly study complex samples.

Blood Proteins↗

PubMed2006

Determination of free concentration of Paclitaxel in liposome formulation.

PURPOSE: An important step in the development of liposome-based formulations is estimating the free drug concentration in the aqueous solution surrounding liposomes. This research presents a new method for determination of free concentrations, based on membrane-protected solid-phase microextraction (SPME). METHODS: For effective direct extraction of low molecular weight compounds from complex liquid samples, a hollow membrane was used to form a concentric sheath around a coated SPME fiber. The membrane blocked the access of large particles, like liposomes, to the coating surface, while target analytes with low molecular weight diffused through the membrane and reached the extraction phase. Quantification was conveniently performed by reversed-phase liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. RESULTS: The carbowax/templated resin SPME fiber was determined to be the most suitable for these assays, providing enough sensitivity when an extraction time of one hour was used. The free concentration of paclitaxel was found to be 0.36 microg/mL, significantly below the solubility limit of paclitaxel in water. CONCLUSION: The method was successfully applied for determining free paclitaxel in liposome formulations based on dioleyl-trimethyl-ammonium-propane, with good linearity over the range of concentrations of interest. The method was faster and more practical than equilibrium dialysis, as the SPME approach provided preconcentration and convenient delivery to the analytical system.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed2005

Approaches for coupling solid-phase microextraction to nanospray.

Biocompatible solid-phase microextraction (SPME) devices were prepared using two restricted access materials (RAM) as the SPME coating. The restricted access materials were immobilized on steel and platinum wires. The selective coating eliminated most of the matrix interference, which allowed the coupling to mass spectrometry without further purification. The SPME devices were interfaced to mass spectrometry by electronanospray. Several experimental set-ups are described and discussed herein. For the in situ extraction of peptides from the tryptic digests, trypsin was immobilized both on steel wires and on the inside wall of a vial. The devices were incubated together with the RAM-SPME devices and a protein (casein) solution. After the protein digestion, the resulting peptides were analyzed by SPME/nanospray. The vial approach provided the best results; up to eight peptides could be identified which corresponds to a sequence coverage of 58%. The limit of detection of SPME/nanospray for the extraction of peptides from an aqueous solution was about 50 fmol/mL. The results demonstrate that the direct coupling of SPME to nanospray can reduce analysis time and is an attractive alternative to conventional approaches like Zip-Tip purification.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2004

Assay of stability, free and total concentration of chlorhexidine in saliva by solid phase microextraction.

This paper presents the development and application of a solid phase microextraction method for the full investigation of chlorhexidine interaction with saliva during a pharmacokinetic study: chemical stability, binding to proteins, free concentration, total concentration and kinetics of elimination after oral administration. Only 0.1 mL sample were needed for each time point and the concentration of salivary proteins was determined as well. It was shown that chlorhexidine remained stable in the oral cavity for at least 9 h and high concentrations of the drug (2 microg/mL total) were still present even 8 h after mouthrinsing. Supplementary facts were uncovered: while the total concentration followed first-order elimination kinetics, the free concentration remained almost constant for several hours; this showed that the oral cavity acted like a reservoir that slowly released the drug. It was also revealed that following oral administration of chlorhexidine, the normal composition of saliva changed for a few hours, probably as a physiological response to the bitter taste of the medicine. The method had a wide linear range (0.1-40 microg/mL free chlorhexidine) that was perfectly suitable for the study of chlorhexidine retention in the oral cavity. Separation and quantitation were achieved by liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry; no interference from endogenous compounds was observed. This selective and sensitive solid-phase microextraction (SPME) approach for monitoring the free and total concentration of a drug, as well as the concentration of proteins that bind that drug, should prove to be more useful for pharmacokinetic studies than classic methods that only provide the total concentration as a final result.

Chlorhexidine↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Study of ligand-receptor binding using SPME: investigation of receptor, free, and total ligand concentrations.

The theoretical background and practical approaches for studying ligand-receptor (protein) binding by solid phase microextraction (SPME) are investigated, along with methods for simultaneous calculation of receptor, free, and total ligand concentrations. With the introduction of new extraction phases (restricted access materials, molecularly imprinted polymers, and immobilized antibodies), SPME allows better separation of small molecules of ligand from larger molecules of receptor, and improved accuracy. This sample preparation method based on nonexhaustive extraction is well suited as a general method to study and quantify systems involving multiple equilibriums, with significant advantages over currently used methods. SPME was used previously for the determination of protein binding constants, but only with conventional extraction phases and in simple cases, with a 1:1 combination ratio between the ligand and the receptor or when negligible depletion conditions were met. The new theoretical approach presented in this study allows the quantification of any binding equilibrium, regardless of the extent of depletion. Restricted-access particles are used as extraction phase, and if the amount of receptor is limited, selected regions of the binding curve may be obtained using a single sample, with a volume as low as 10 muL. The equations developed here are simple and independent of the analytical method used for the quantification of the amount of ligand. Three different practical approaches are presented: the method of multiple standard solutions, the method of successive extractions from the same sample and the method of successive additions to the same sample. The usefulness of this novel approach is demonstrated by using it to determine the binding parameters of some selected drugs to human serum albumin. These parameters are subsequently used to calculate albumin, free drug, and total drug concentrations from unknown mixtures. The results are in good agreement with previously published data. Quantification of the amount of ligand extracted by SPME is done by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry.

Cell Extracts↗