Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F K Port

Publications and source records attributed to F K Port.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Effect of dialysis membranes and middle molecule removal on chronic hemodialysis patient survival.

The type of dialysis membrane used for routine therapy has been recently shown to correlate with the survival of chronic hemodialysis patients. We examined whether this effect of dialysis membrane could be explained by differences in dialyzer removal of middle molecules using data from the 1991 Case Mix Adequacy Study of the United States Renal Data System. The sample analyzed included patients who had been treated by hemodialysis for 1 year or more, who were dialyzed with the 19 most commonly used dialyzers in 1991, and for whom delivered urea Kt/V could be calculated from predialysis and postdialysis blood urea nitrogen concentrations. Vitamin B12 (1,355 daltons) was used as a marker for middle molecules, and the clearance of vitamin B12 was estimated based on in vitro data. After adjustments for case mix, comorbidities, and urea Kt/V, the relative risk of mortality for a 10% higher calculated total cleared volume of vitamin B12 was 0.953 (P < 0.0001 v 1.000). Similar results were obtained when middle molecule removal was adjusted for body size. We conclude that both small and middle molecule removal indices appear to be independently associated with the risk of mortality in chronic hemodialysis patients. Differences in mortality when using different types of dialysis membrane may be explained by differences in middle molecule removal.

Humans↗
PubMed1999

Dialysis modality and the risk of allograft thrombosis in adult renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Renal vascular thrombosis (RVT) is a rare but catastrophic complication of renal transplantation. Although a plethora of risk factors has been identified, a large proportion of cases of RVT is unexplained. Uremic coagulopathy and dialysis modality may predispose to RVT. We investigated the impact of the pretransplant dialysis modality on the risk of RVT in adult renal transplant recipients. METHODS: Renal transplant recipients (age 18 years or more) who were enrolled in the national registry between 1990 and 1996 (N = 84,513) were evaluated for RVT occurring within 30 days of transplantation. Each case was matched with two controls from the same transplant center and with the year of transplantation. The association between RVT and 18 factors was studied with multivariate conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Forty-nine percent of all cases of RVT (365 out of 743) occurred in repeat transplant recipients with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 5.72 compared with first transplants (P < 0.001). There were a significantly higher odds of RVT in peritoneal dialysis (PD)-compared with hemodialysis (HD)-treated patients (OR = 1.87, P = 0.001). Change in dialysis modality was an independent predictor of RVT: switching from HD to PD (OR = 3.59, P < 0.001) and from PD to HD (OR = 1.62, P = 0.047). Compared with primary transplant recipients on HD (OR = 1.00), the highest odds of RVT were in repeat transplant recipients treated with PD (OR = 12.95, P < 0.001) and HD (OR = 4.50, P < 0.001). Other independent predictors of RVT were preemptive transplantation, relatively young and old donor age, diabetes mellitus and systemic lupus erythematosus as causes of end-stage renal disease, recipient gender, and lower panel reactive antibody levels (PRAs). CONCLUSIONS: The strongest risk factors for RVT were retransplantation and prior PD treatment. Prevention of RVT with perioperative anticoagulation should be studied in patients who have a constellation of the identified risk factors.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Survival advantage in Asian American end-stage renal disease patients.

UNLABELLED: Survival advantage in Asian American end-stage renal disease patients. BACKGROUND: An earlier study documented a lower mortality risk for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients in Japan compared with the United States. We compared the mortality of Caucasian (white) and Asian American dialysis patients in the United States to evaluate whether Asian ancestry was associated with lower mortality in the United States. METHODS: The study sample from the U.S. Renal Data System census of ESRD patients treated in the United States included 84,192 white or Asian patients starting dialysis during May 1995 to April 1997, of whom 18,435 died by April 30, 1997. Patient characteristics were described by race. Relative mortality risks (RRs) for Asian Americans relative to whites were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusting for characteristics and comorbidities. Population death rates were derived from vital statistics for the United States and Japan by age and sex. RESULTS: Adjusting for demographics, diabetes, comorbidities, and nutritional factors, the RR for Asian Americans was 0.75 (P = 0.0001). Race-specific background population death rates accounted for over half of the race-related mortality difference. For whites, mortality decreased as the body mass index (BMI) increased. For Asians, the relationship between BMI and survival was u-shaped. The ratio of Asian American/white dialysis death rates and the ratio of Asian American/white general population death rates both varied by age in a similar pattern. The population death rates of Asian American and Japanese were also similar. CONCLUSION: Among dialysis patients, Asian Americans had a markedly lower adjusted RR than whites. The effect of BMI on survival differed by race. Compared with the respective general population, dialysis patients had the same relative increase in death rates for both races. The difference in death rates between the United States and Japan does not appear to be primarily treatment related, but rather is related to background death rates.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Clinical and biochemical correlates of starting "daily" hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Daily hemodialysis has been proposed to improve outcomes for patients with end-stage renal disease. There has been increasing evidence that daily hemodialysis might have potential advantages over intermittent dialysis. However, despite these potential advantages, daily hemodialysis is infrequently used in the United States, and published accounts on the technique are few. METHODS: We describe patient outcomes after increasing their hemodialysis frequency from three to six times per week in a cohort of 72 patients treated at nine centers during 1972 to 1996. Analyses of predialysis blood pressure and laboratory parameters from 6 months before until 12 months after starting frequent hemodialysis used a repeated-measures statistical technique. RESULTS: Predialysis systolic and diastolic blood pressures fell by 7 and 4 mm Hg, respectively, after starting frequent hemodialysis (P = 0.02). Reductions were greatest among patients being treated with antihypertensive medications, despite a reduction in their dosage of medications. Postdialysis weight fell by 1.0% within one month of starting frequent hemodialysis and improved control of hypertension. After the initial drop, postdialysis weight increased at a rate of 0.85 kg per six months. Serum albumin rose by 0.29 g/dl (P < 0.001) between months 1 to 12 of treatment with daily hemodialysis. Hematocrit rose by 3.0 percentage points (P = 0.02) among patients (N = 56) not treated with erythropoietin during this period. Two years after the start of daily hemodialysis, Kaplan-Meier analyses showed a patient survival of 93%, a technique survival of 77%, and an arteriovenous fistula patency of 92%. Vascular access patency was excellent despite more frequent use of the access. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that in certain patients, daily hemodialysis might have advantages over three times per week hemodialysis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Prescription of twice-weekly hemodialysis in the USA.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency and characteristics of two hemodialysis sessions/week, to identify factors which influence or predict this prescription, and to examine the outcomes of patients receiving hemodialysis two times/week as compared to the more common treatment of three times/week. METHODS: Data from a national sample of 15,067 adult hemodialysis patients were utilized to compare twice-weekly with thrice-weekly therapy by logistic regression. RESULTS: Patients treated less than one year were more likely to be treated twice-weekly (6.1%) than patients on dialysis for one year or more (2.7%) (AOR = 1.49, p = 0.002). Treatment schedules also varied significantly by geographic region. Factors predictive of twice-weekly hemodialysis (p < 0.05) were older age, Caucasian race, female gender, higher serum albumin, lower serum creatinine levels, and lower body mass index. A higher estimated renal function at the start of ESRD was also predictive of a twice-weekly schedule among incident patients (AOR = 1.05, p = 0.05). In addition, Cox-adjusted survival analysis indicated a lower mortality risk (RR = 0.76, p = 0. 02) for twice-weekly hemodialysis compared to thrice-weekly among prevalent patients. For incident patients, however, the results were not significant when adjusted for GFR at ESRD onset (RR = 0.85, p = 0.31). CONCLUSION: Geographic differences in prescribed treatment remained unexplained by measured characteristics. The survival advantage associated with twice-weekly hemodialysis is likely to be related to patient selection and greater residual renal function.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Prognosis after primary renal transplant failure and the beneficial effects of repeat transplantation: multivariate analyses from the United States Renal Data System.

BACKGROUND: Survival of transplant recipients after primary renal allograft failure has not been well studied. METHODS: A cohort of 19,208 renal transplant recipients with primary allograft failure between 1985 and 1995 were followed from the date of allograft loss until death, repeat transplantation, or December 31, 1996. The mortality, wait-listing, and repeat transplantation rates were assessed. The mortality risks associated with repeat transplantation were estimated with a time-dependent survival model. RESULTS: In total, 34.5% (n=6,631) of patients died during follow-up. Of these deaths, 82.9% (n=5,498) occurred in patients not wait-listed for repeat transplantation, 11.9% (n=789) occurred in wait-listed patients, and 5.2% (n=344) occurred in second transplant recipients. Before repeat transplantation, the adjusted 5-year patient survival was 36%, 49%, and 65% for type I diabetes mellitus (DM), type II DM, and nondiabetic end-stage renal disease, respectively (P<0.001; DM vs. nondiabetics). The adjusted 5-year patient survival was lower in Caucasians (57%, P<0.001) compared with African-Americans (67%) and other races (64%). The 5-yr repeat transplantation rate was 29%, 15%, and 19%, whereas the median waiting time for a second transplant was 32, 90, and 81 months for Caucasians, African-Americans, and other races, respectively (P<0.0001 each). Repeat transplantation was associated with 45% and 23% reduction in 5-year mortality for type I DM and nondiabetic end-stage renal disease, respectively, when compared with their wait-listed dialysis counterparts with prior transplant failure. CONCLUSIONS: The loss of a primary renal allograft was associated with significant mortality, especially in recipients with type I DM. Repeat transplantation was associated with a substantial improvement in 5-year patient survival. Recipients with type I DM achieved the greatest proportional benefit from repeat transplantation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

A critical examination of trends in outcomes over the last decade.

The past decade has seen substantial improvements in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) outcomes, especially mortality, in the United States. Incidence rates for treated ESRD have doubled for most age groups, probably because of improved survival among high-risk populations, such as patients with diabetes and hypertension. The ESRD patient population is becoming older and has a greater incidence of diabetes because of changes in the types of patients starting treatment. The number of patients added to the waiting list each year for transplants has increased dramatically, whereas the number of transplantations performed annually has remained relatively constant. Although transplantation is consequently less available than before, transplant survival, both of the patient and the graft, has improved dramatically. Length of stay for hospitalizations has decreased. Both dialysis mortality and all ESRD mortality have decreased. It is important to monitor such statistics to try and modify adverse trends in outcomes for patients with ESRD. The ability to monitor patient outcomes through national databases has improved greatly during the last decade. Large-scale population-based studies of practices and outcomes for patients with ESRD offer a potent addition to the previously available arsenal of research tools, which was previously dominated by studies from single or few institutions and more expensive randomized clinical trials.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Trends in treatment and survival for hemodialysis patients in the United States.

Details regarding dialysis therapy have been studied by the US Renal Data System (USRDS) in four random samples of US hemodialysis patients during the years 1986 to 1997. During this decade, the delivered dose of hemodialysis therapy has increased by at least 0.2 Kt/V. The frequency of twice weekly dialysis prescription decreased, whereas the duration of each treatment showed only minor changes. A large shift to more biocompatible membranes, particularly to synthetic membranes, was observed. The use of acetate dialysate almost disappeared. Outcomes research by the USRDS showed significantly lower mortality risk associated independently with higher delivered Kt/V, substituted cellulose or synthetic membranes, and bicarbonate dialysate. The projected reduction in mortality risk from these changes in hemodialysis therapy was of a similar magnitude to the observed 14% to 17% reduction in mortality rate during the years 1990 to 1996. National observational studies of dialysis patients may influence the practice of dialysis and lead to improved survival.

Humans↗
PubMed1998

Reuse of dialyzers and clinical outcomes: fact or fiction.

Since its introduction in the United States more than two decades ago, the practice of dialyzer reuse has continued to grow. In recent years, it appears to have been based mainly on economic, rather than medical, considerations. However, adverse reactions, such as immune hemolytic anemia caused by anti-Nform antibody associated with dialyzer reuse, and infectious outbreaks have been reported. The validity of earlier reports suggesting improved morbidity and mortality in patients dialyzed with reprocessed dialyzers have been disputed with recent data. In the current Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Study (DMMS), we collected demographic, comorbidity, laboratory, treatment, socioeconomic, and insurance data on a large random sample of approximately 20,000 of the US dialysis patient population over a 3-year period, using the dialysis records. Data were collected predominantly on patients receiving incenter hemodialysis as of December 31, 1993. Morbid and mortal events through 1996 were examined in relation to various patient and dialysis unit characteristics. The results show that there has been a significant increase in the practice of dialyzer reuse in the United States. Large regional differences exist, and reuse is greatest in freestanding for-profit (FSFP) units (87%) and freestanding nonprofit (FSNP) units (77%) and least in hospital units (49%). There has been a significant increase in the proportion of units using Renalin (Minntech, Minneapolis, MN) and a substantial decrease in the proportion of the units using formalin. Approximately 15% of the units each year switch the type of sterilant.

Disinfectants↗
PubMed1998

Association of serum phosphorus and calcium x phosphate product with mortality risk in chronic hemodialysis patients: a national study.

Elevated serum phosphorus is a predictable accompaniment of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the absence of dietary phosphate restriction or supplemental phosphate binders. The consequences of hyperphosphatemia include the development and progression of secondary hyperparathyroidism and a predisposition to metastatic calcification when the product of serum calcium and phosphorus (Ca x PO4) is elevated. Both of these conditions may contribute to the substantial morbidity and mortality seen in patients with ESRD. We have analyzed the distribution of serum phosphorus in two large national, random, cross-sectional samples of hemodialysis patients who have been receiving dialysis for at least 1 year. Data were obtained from two special studies of the United States Renal Data System, the Case Mix Adequacy Study (1990) and the Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Study Wave 1 (1993). The relative risk of death by serum phosphorus quintiles is described after adjusting for age at onset of ESRD, race, sex, smoking status, and the presence of diabetes, the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, and/or neoplasm. Logistic regression analysis is then used to describe the demographic, comorbid, and laboratory parameters associated with high serum phosphorus. Serum phosphorus was similar in these two study populations and averaged 6.2 mg/dL. Ten percent of patients had levels greater than 9 mg/dL and at least 30% of each group had serum phosphorus levels greater than 7 mg/dL. The adjusted relative risk of death by serum phosphorus level was not uniform across all quintiles, being constant below a level of 6.5 mg/dL and increasing significantly above this level. The relative risk of death for those with a serum phosphorus greater than 6.5 mg/dL was 1.27 relative to those with a serum phosphorus of 2.4 to 6.5 mg/dL. This increased risk was not diminished by statistical adjustment for coexisting medical conditions, delivered dose of dialysis, nutritional parameters, or markers of noncompliance. Evaluation of predictors of serum phosphorus greater than 6.5 mg/dL revealed in multivariate analysis that younger age at onset of ESRD, female sex, white race, diabetes, active smoking, and higher serum creatinine levels were all significant predictors. Analysis of serum calcium revealed no correlation with relative risk of death. The Ca x PO4 product, however, showed a mortality risk trend similar to that seen with serum phosphorus alone. Those in the highest quintile of the Ca x PO4 product (>72 mg2/dL2) had a relative mortality risk of 1.34 relative to those with products of 42 to 52 mg2/dL2. The relative mortality risk by log parathyroid hormone (PTH) level was elevated for patients with higher levels, but the mortality risk associated with hyperphosphatemia was independent of PTH. For hemodialysis patients who have been receiving dialysis for at least 1 year, we conclude that a large percentage have a serum phosphorus level above 6.5 mg/dL and that this places them at increased risk of death. This increased risk is independent of PTH. The mechanism(s) responsible for death is unknown, but may be related to an abnormally high Ca x PO4 product. Although mechanisms are not clearly established, this study supports the need for vigorous control of hyperphosphatemia to improve patient survival.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Simple nutritional indicators as independent predictors of mortality in hemodialysis patients.

A strong association exists between nutritional status and morbidity and mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease who are treated with hemodialysis. Described here is the predictive value for mortality over 5 years of follow-up of a number of risk factors, recorded at baseline, in a national sample of 3,607 hemodialysis patients. Among the variables studied were case-mix covariates, caregiver classifications of nutritional status, serum albumin concentration, and body mass index (BMI). The Case Mix Adequacy special study of the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) provided these measurements as of December 31, 1990. The USRDS patient standard analysis file provided follow-up data on mortality for all patients through December 31, 1995, by which time 64.7% of the patients had died. BMI is a simple anthropometric measurement that has received little attention in dialysis practice. Caregiver classification refers to documentation in a patient's dialysis facility medical records that stated an individual to be "undernourished/cachectic," "obese/overweight," or "well-nourished." The mean serum albumin was 3.7 +/- 0.45 (SD) g/dL, and the mean BMI was 24.4 +/- 5.3 (SD) kg/m2. By caregiver classification, 20.1% of patients were undernourished, and 24.9% obese. In hazard regression models, including but not limited to the Cox proportional hazards model, low BMI, low serum albumin, and the caregiver classification "undernourished" were independently and significantly predictive of increased mortality. In analyses allowing for time-varying relative mortality risks (ie, nonproportional hazards), the greatest predictive value of all three variables occurred early during follow-up, but the independent predictive value of baseline serum albumin and BMI measurements on mortality risk persisted even 5 years later. No evidence of increasing mortality risk was found for higher values of BMI. Serum albumin was confirmed to be a useful predictor of mortality risk in hemodialysis patients; BMI was established as an independently important predictor of mortality; both serum albumin and BMI, measured at baseline, continue to possess predictive value 5 years later; the subjective caregiver classification of nutritional status "undernourished" has independent value in predicting mortality risk beyond the information gained from two other markers of nutritional status--BMI and serum albumin.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Noncompliance in hemodialysis: predictors and survival analysis.

Noncompliance with hemodialysis (HD), depending on the definition, occurs in 2% to more than 50% of patients. To better understand predictors and outcomes of noncompliance, we evaluated patient characteristics associated with noncompliance and the impact of noncompliance on survival. Using data from two USRDS special studies, we identified 6,251 patients who were on dialysis for more than 1 year for inclusion in this study. Noncompliance was defined in four ways: skipping one or more HD sessions in a month, shortening by 10 or more minutes one or more HD sessions in a month, an interdialytic weight gain (IWG) of more than 5.7% of dry weight, or a serum phosphate (PO4) of greater than 7.5 mg/dL. Sociodemographic predictors of noncompliance were identified using logistic regression. Survival analysis was done using Cox proportional hazards models with adjustments for sociodemographics, comorbid conditions, and dose of HD. Overall, 8.5% of patients skipped HD, 20% shortened HD (7% three or more times), 10% had more than a 5.7% IWG, and 22% had a PO4 greater than 7.5. There was a significant correlation among the measures of noncompliance. Blacks (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.10), patients aged 20 to 39 years (AOR = 1.62), and smokers (AOR = 1.34) were significantly more likely to skip HD than whites, patients aged 40 to 59 years, and nonsmokers, respectively (P < 0.01 for each). Similar results were seen for the other measures of noncompliance, except for PO4, in which blacks were significantly less likely to be noncompliant (NC) (AOR = 0.85, P < 0.05). Compared with compliant patients, those who skipped one or more HD sessions in a month had a 25% higher risk of death (P < 0.01). Those who had greater than a 5.7% IWG had a 35% higher risk of death (P < 0.001), whereas those with a PO4 > 7.5 had a 13% higher risk of death (P < 0.05). Overall, patients who shortened HD sessions did not have a higher risk of death, but those who shortened three or more in 1 month had a 20% higher risk of death (P < 0.05). Compliance with a medical regimen is a complex issue. Noncompliance in HD often, but not always, is associated with a higher risk of an adverse outcome. This is a US government work. There are no restrictions on its use.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Long-term renal allograft survival: prognostic implication of the timing of acute rejection episodes.

BACKGROUND: The timing of an acute rejection may have a variable impact on renal allograft survival. To determine whether the time of first acute transplant rejection (ATR) is an independent predictor of long-term allograft survival, we studied 31,600 first cadaveric renal transplants that were functional on the first transplant anniversary, from 217 U.S. centers. METHODS: Transplant patients were divided into four groups according to the time to the first ATR: no rejection in year 1 (group I); predischarge ATR (group II); first ATR between discharge and month 6 (group III); and first ATR in months 7-12 (group IV). RESULTS: Four-year allograft survival after year 1, estimated by a Cox proportional hazard model adjusting for 19 cofactors, was 78%, 72%, 69%, and 54% for groups I-IV, respectively (P<0.0001 for each comparison to group I). In those patients who had ATR episodes in more than one time period, later episodes were associated with worse long-term allograft survival, an observation that was independent of previous ATR episodes. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that late occurrence of a first acute rejection portends a worse prognosis for allograft survival after the first year. Later rejections, in combination with previous rejections, also lead to worse long-term allograft survival. Unlike early ATRs occurring in the setting of supervised immunosuppression, late occurring ATR may reflect inadequate immunosuppression from noncompliant behavior or may reflect disruption or lack of immune tolerance to the allograft. Efforts to minimize late transplant loss require a combination of strategies directed at both immunologic and behavioral factors.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1997

Delayed graft function: risk factors and implications for renal allograft survival.

Delayed graft function (DGF) may be associated with diminished kidney allograft survival. We studied the risk factors that lead to nonimmediate function of a renal allograft and the consequences of DGF on short- and long-term renal transplant survival. Data from the U.S. Renal Data System were used to measure the relationships among cold ischemia time, delayed graft function, acute rejection, and graft survival in 37,216 primary cadaveric renal transplants (1985-1992). These relationships were investigated using the unconditional logistic and Cox multivariate regression methods. Cold ischemia time was strongly associated with DGF, with a 23% increase in the risk of DGF for every 6 hr of cold ischemia (P<0.001). Acute transplant rejection occurred more frequently in grafts with delayed function (37% vs. 20%; odds ratio=2.25, P=0.001). DGF was independently predictive of 5-year graft loss (relative risk=1.53, P<0.001). The presence of both early acute rejection and DGF portended a dismal 5-year graft survival rate of 35%. Zero-HLA mismatch conferred a 10-15% improvement in 1- and 5-year graft survival regardless of early functional status of the allograft. However, the 5-year graft survival rate in HLA-mismatched kidneys without DGF was significantly higher than that of zero-mismatched kidneys with DGF (63% vs. 51%; P<0.001). DGF independently portends a significant reduction in short- and long-term graft survival. Delayed function and early rejection episodes exerted an additive adverse effect on allograft survival. The deleterious impact of delayed function is comparatively more severe than that of poor HLA matching.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Growth rates in pediatric dialysis patients and renal transplant recipients.

We compared growth rates by modality over a 6- to 14-month period in 1,302 US pediatric end-stage renal disese (ESRD) patients treated during 1990. Modality comparisons were adjusted for age, sex, race, ethnicity, and ESRD duration using linear regression models by age group (0.5 to 4 years, 5 to 9 years, 10 to 14 years, and 15 to 18 years). Growth rates were higher in young children receiving a transplant compared with those receiving dialysis (ages 0.5 to 4 years, delta = 3.1 cm/yr v continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis [CCPD], P < 0.01; ages 5 to 9 years, delta = 2.0 to 2.6 cm/yr v CCPD, chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), and hemodialysis, P < 0.01). In contrast, growth rates in older children were not statistically different when comparing transplantation with each dialysis modality. For most age groups of transplant recipients, we observed faster growth with alternate-day versus daily steroids that was not fully explained by differences in allograft function. Younger patients (<15 years) grew at comparable rates with each dialysis modality, while older CAPD patients grew faster compared with hemodialysis or CCPD patients (P < 0.02). There was no substantial pubertal growth spurt in transplant or dialysis patients. This national US study of pediatric growth rates with dialysis and transplantation shows differences in growth by modality that vary by age group.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Association of gender and access to cadaveric renal transplantation.

Previous studies have revealed that females are less likely than males to receive a renal transplant, the most successful form of treatment of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The purpose of this study was to determine whether the barrier is to inclusion on the transplant waiting list or to transplantation after being placed on the transplant waiting list. An existing data set was used that included data from the Michigan Kidney Registry, supplemented with data received from the Organ Procurement Agency of Michigan. White and black patients less than 65 years of age and starting ESRD treatment between January 1, 1984, and December 31, 1989, were included. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the effect of gender on (1) time to transplantation among all ESRD patients, (2) time from diagnosis of ESRD to inclusion on the transplant waiting list among all ESRD patients, and (3) time from inclusion on the waiting list to transplantation among those patients on the waiting list. Patients were censored at the time of living-related transplantation or death, and were monitored until December 31, 1989. In all, 5,026 incident ESRD patients were included in the study (44.3% female). Of these, 1,626 patients were included on the waiting list (40.1% female); 823 of these received a transplant (37.7% female). Adjusting for age, race, and diagnosis, females were 25% less likely to receive a cadaveric transplant than males (female to male relative rate ratio [RR], 0.75; P < 0.001). Females with ESRD aged 46 to 55 years and 56 to 65 years were 33% (RR, 0.67; P < 0.001) and 29% (RR, 0.71; P < 0.05) less likely to be included on the transplant waiting list, respectively, than their male counterparts. There was no difference in the rate of wait list inclusion among ESRD patients younger than 46 years. Females with ESRD who were included on the transplant waiting list were 26% (RR, 0.74; P < 0.001) less likely to receive a transplant than males on the waiting list. These results indicate that females are both less likely to be on the transplant waiting list (ages over 45 years) and, once on the list, less likely to receive a transplant (all ages) than males. Further study is necessary to determine the factors contributing to these important barriers to transplantation among females with ESRD.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Clinical outcome relative to the dose of dialysis is not what you think: the fallacy of the mean.

Several recent retrospective studies of mortality relative to the dose of dialysis have been widely interpreted to indicate that adequate thrice-weekly hemodialysis requires a single pool Kt/V (spKt/V) of at least 1.4 to 1.6 and higher. In these studies, mortality rate has been correlated to the mean delivered spKt/V, (spKt/Vd)m, with coefficient of variation (CV) on the means ranging up to 45%. To evaluate these reported relationships, two large databases were analyzed using population constants to transform urea reduction ratio and spKt/Vd to equilibrated Kt/Vd (eKt/Vd), which expresses dose corrected for treatment time. The eKt/V dose (D) values were correlated to the reported relative risks (RR) of mortality to derive a RR/D function. The RR/D function, derived from these data with stepwise linear regression analysis, is nonlinear, with a steep linear increase in RR for eKt/Vd less than 1.05 and constant RR for eKt/Vd > or = 1.05. This RR/D function is mathematically expressed as RR = 1.96 - 1.03(eKt/Vd) (equation 1) when 0.50 < or = eKt/Vd < or = 1.05, and RR = 0.88 (equation 2) when eKt/V > or = 1.05. We show that regression of RR on (eKt/Vd)m with large CV results in overestimation of RR relative to eKt/Vd for individual patients because of extrapolation of the linear relationship beyond the threshold where the slope becomes zero (see equation 2 above). It is concluded that (1) current clinical data indicate that adequate dialysis is provided with eKt/Vd of 1.0 to 1.1 on a thrice-weekly schedule, (2) it is essential to assure that all patients achieve this level of therapy, which is best accomplished using urea kinetic modeling for both prescription and measurement of delivered eKt/Vd, and (3) the current HEMO study is well designed to determine whether higher levels of eKt/Vd will further improve clinical outcome.

Female↗