Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F K Port

Publications and source records attributed to F K Port.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Relationship of recipient age and development of chronic allograft failure.

BACKGROUND: The elderly are the fastest growing segment of the end stage renal disease (ERSD) population. Older renal transplant recipients experience fewer acute rejection episodes than do younger patients. Despite this, death censored graft survival is no better in these older transplant recipients than in younger recipients. We examined the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) database to determine whether recipient age itself has an independent effect on the development of chronic allograft failure (CAF). METHODS: We analyzed 59,509 patients from the files of the USRDS. To determine whether age was an independent risk factor for CAF, the population was analyzed separately for Caucasians, African-Americans, and other ethnic groups. All renal transplant recipients from 1988 to 1997 were examined. Both univariate and multivariate analysis were performed using chronic allograft failure as the outcome of interest. RESULTS: Actuarial 8-year censored graft survival was significantly decreased in the older age groups 67% for ages 18-49 vs. 61.8% for ages 50-64 vs. 50.7% for ages 65+ (P<0.001). In the multivariate analysis, recipient age was a strong and independent risk factor for the development of chronic allograft failure in Caucasians (RR 1.29 for ages 50-64, RR 1.67 for ages older than 65). These findings were reinforced by an analysis that was restricted to living donor transplants without acute rejection. CONCLUSION: In Caucasians increased recipient age is an independent risk factor for the development of chronic renal allograft failure.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Re-evaluation of risks associated with hyperphosphatemia and hyperparathyroidism in dialysis patients: recommendations for a change in management.

Hyperphosphatemia is a predictable consequence of chronic renal failure and is present in most patients on dialysis. Traditionally, the risk associated with elevated serum phosphorus has focused on its impact on renal osteodystrophy. A growing body of evidence, however, suggests that abnormalities in serum phosphorus, calcium-phosphorus product (CaxP), and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels are resulting in vascular and visceral calcification, thereby contributing to the substantially increased risk of cardiovascular death in this population. In this analysis, we review in detail the literature that describes these associations. We show that the current treatment paradigm for serum phosphorus and secondary hyperparathyroidism is ineffective for a large segment of dialysis patients. Currently, 60% of hemodialysis patients have phosphorus greater than 5.5 mg/dL, and 40% have CaxP greater than 60 mg(2)/dL(2). It is our belief that prevention of uremic calcification, cardiac death, and vascular disease should assume primary importance when evaluating the risks associated with elevated levels of phosphorus, CaxP, and PTH. We recommend that target levels should become 9.2 to 9.6 mg/dL for calcium, 2.5 to 5.5 mg/dL for phosphorus, less than 55 mg(2)/dL(2) for CaxP product, and 100 to 200 pg/mL for intact PTH.

Calcinosis↗
PubMed2000

Body size, dose of hemodialysis, and mortality.

This study investigates the role of body size on the mortality risk associated with dialysis dose in chronic hemodialysis patients. A national US random sample from the US Renal Data System was used for this observational longitudinal study of 2-year mortality. Prevalent hemodialysis patients treated between 1990 and 1995 were included (n = 9,165). A Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for patient characteristics, was used to calculate the relative risk (RR) for mortality. Both dialysis dose (equilibrated Kt/V [eKt/V]) and body size (body weight, body volume, and body mass index) were independently and significantly (P < 0.01 for each measure) inversely related to mortality when adjusted for age and diabetes. Mortality was less among larger patients and those receiving greater eKt/V. The overall association of mortality risk with eKt/V was negative and significant in all patient subgroups defined by body size and by race-sex categories in the range 0.6 < eKt/V < 1.6. The association was negative in the restricted range 0.9 < eKt/V < 1.6 (although not generally significant) for all body-size subgroups and for three of four race-by-sex subgroups, excepting black men (RR = 1. 003/0.1 eKt/V; P > 0.95). These findings suggest that dose of dialysis and several measures of body size are important and independent correlates of mortality. These results suggest that patient management protocols should attempt to ensure both good patient nutrition and adequate dose of dialysis, in addition to managing coexisting medical conditions.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Effect of waiting time on renal transplant outcome.

BACKGROUND: Numerous factors are known to impact on patient survival after renal transplantation. Recent studies have confirmed a survival advantage for renal transplant patients over those waiting on dialysis. We aimed to investigate the hypothesis that longer waiting times are more deleterious than shorter waiting times, that is, to detect a "dose effect" for waiting time. METHODS: We analyzed 73,103 primary adult renal transplants registered at the United States Renal Data System Registry from 1988 to 1997 for the primary endpoints of death with functioning graft and death-censored graft failure by Cox proportional hazard models. All models were corrected for donor and recipient demographics and other factors known to affect outcome after kidney transplantation. RESULTS: A longer waiting time on dialysis is a significant risk factor for death-censored graft survival and patient death with functioning graft after renal transplantation (P < 0.001 each). Relative to preemptive transplants, waiting times of 6 to 12 months, 12 to 24 months, 24 to 36, 36 to 48, and over 48 months confer a 21, 28, 41, 53, and 72% increase in mortality risk after transplantation, respectively. Relative to preemptive transplants, waiting times of 0 to 6 months, 6 to 12 months, 12 to 24 months, and over 24 months confer a 17, 37, 55, and 68% increase in risk for death-censored graft loss after transplantation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Longer waiting times on dialysis negatively impact on post-transplant graft and patient survival. These data strongly support the hypothesis that patients who reach end-stage renal disease should receive a renal transplant as early as possible in order to enhance their chances of long-term survival.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Long-term survival in renal transplant recipients with graft function.

UNLABELLED: Long-term survival in renal transplant recipients with graft function. BACKGROUND: Death with graft function (DWGF) is a common cause of graft loss. The risks and determinants of DWGF have not been studied in a recent cohort of renal transplant recipients. We performed a population-based survival analysis of U.S. patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) transplanted between 1988 and 1997. METHODS: Registry data were used to evaluate long-term patient survival and cause-specific risks of DWGF in 86,502 adult (>/=18 years) renal transplant recipients. RESULTS: Out of 18,482 deaths, 38% (N = 7040) were deaths with graft function. This accounts for 42. 5% of all graft loss. Patient survival with graft function was 97, 91, and 86% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. The risk of DWGF decreased by 67% (RR = 0.33, P < 0.001) between 1988 and 1997. The adjusted rate of DWGF was 4.6, 0.8, 2.2, and 1.4 deaths per 1000 person-years for cardiovascular disease, stroke, infections, and malignancy, respectively. The suicide rate was 15.7 versus 9.0 deaths per 100,000 person-years in the general population (P < 0. 001). In multivariate analysis, the following factors were independently and significantly predictive of DWGF: white recipient, age at transplantation, ESRD caused by hypertension or diabetes mellitus, length of pretransplant dialysis, delayed graft function, acute rejection, panel reactive antibody> 30%, African American donor race, age> 45 years, and donor death caused by cerebrovascular disease. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with graft function have a high long-term survival. Although DWGF is a major cause of graft loss, the risk has declined substantially since 1990. Cardiovascular disease was the predominant reported cause of DWGF. Other causes vary by post-transplant time period. Attention to atherosclerotic risk factors may be the most important challenge to further improve the longevity of patients with successful renal transplants.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Characteristics and treatment of patients not reusing dialyzers in reuse units.

Dialyzer reuse is practiced in more than 75% of the patients and dialysis units in the United States. However, reuse is not practiced in a small fraction of patients treated in reuse units (RUUs). This study evaluates both patient and facility characteristics associated with nonreuse in RUUs. The data source is from the Dialysis Mortality and Morbidity Study, Waves 1, 3, and 4, of the US Renal Data System. Only facilities that practiced dialyzer reuse were included in the analysis. A total of 12,094 patients from 1,095 reuse facilities were studied. Patients undergoing hemodialysis as of December 31, 1993, were selected. Of all patients treated in RUUs, 8% did not reuse dialyzers. Nonreuse was significantly (P < 0.02) more common, based on adjusted odds ratios (ORs), among patients who were younger (OR = 1.16 per 10 years younger), had primary glomerulonephritis (OR = 1.26 versus diabetes), had lower serum albumin level (OR = 1.72 per 1 g/dL lower), had more years on dialysis, and had higher level of education. Nonreuse patients were more likely to be treated with low-flux dialyzers (OR = 7.35; P < 0. 0001) and have a lower dialysis dose. No reuse was more likely in larger units and in not-for-profit and hospital-based units. Patient refusal accounted for one fourth of nonreuse in RUUs and was associated with the same factors, as well as with fewer comorbid conditions and non-Hispanic ethnicity. Significant geographic variations (up to eightfold) were documented. Nonreuse patients are treated with smaller, low-flux dialyzers and, on average, receive a lower Kt/V than reuse patients in the same units.

Ambulatory Care Facilities↗
PubMed2000

Differences in access to cadaveric renal transplantation in the United States.

This national study compares waitlisting and transplantation rates by gender, race, and diabetes and evaluates physiologic factors (panel-reactive antibodies [PRA], blood type, HLA matchability) and related practices (early and multiple waitlisting) as explanatory factors. This longitudinal study of the time to transplant waitlisting among 228,552 incident end-stage renal disease (ESRD) dialysis patients and to cadaveric transplantation among 46,164 waitlist dialysis patients (n = 23,275 first cadaveric transplants) used US data for 1991 to 1997. Relative rates of waitlisting (RRWL) after ESRD onset and of cadaveric transplantation (RRTx) after waitlist (Cox proportional hazards models) were adjusted for age, race, sex, ESRD cause, region, and incidence/waitlist year. We found that women have an RRWL = 0.84 (P < 0.0001) and RRTx = 0.86 (P < 0. 0001). PRA levels can explain the difference in the transplantation rate, because accounting for PRA gives an adjusted RRTx = 0.98 (NS) for women. For blacks versus whites, the RRWL = 0.59 (P < 0.0001) and RRTx = 0.55 (P < 0.0001). However, the transplantation rate can only partly be explained by ABO types, rare HLA types, and early and multiple waitlisting (adjusted RRTx = 0.67 [P < 0.0001]). For diabetes versus glomerulonephritis, the RRWL = 0.52 (P < 0.0001) and RRTx = 0.98 (NS). Older patients (40 to 59 years of age) are less likely to be waitlisted and to receive a transplant after waitlisting (RRWL = 0.57 [P < 0.0001], RRTx = 0.88 [P < 0.0001]) versus younger patients (ages 18 to 39 years). These results indicate substantial differences by age, sex, race, and diabetes in rates of waitlisting for transplantation and by age and race for transplantation after waitlisting. These differences by race were not explained by referral practices or the physiologic factors studied here.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Impact of pre-existing donor hypertension and diabetes mellitus on cadaveric renal transplant outcomes.

Hypertension (HTN) and diabetes mellitus (DM) predispose to systemic atherosclerosis with renal involvement. The prevalence of HTN and DM in cadaveric renal donors (affected donors) and the results of transplantation are unknown. We investigated these issues with national data from the US Renal Data System. A total of 4,035 transplants from affected donors were matched 1:1 with unaffected controls according to donor age and race, recipient race, and year of transplantation. Graft and patient survival were estimated. Among the 25,039 solitary renal transplantations performed between July 1, 1994, and June 30, 1997, cadaveric renal transplants from donors with HTN accounted for 15%, and donors with DM, 2%. Programs with 1-year cadaveric renal graft survival rates greater than 90% had 50% less affected donors compared with programs having 1-year cadaveric renal graft survival rates of 85% or less. Compared with donor-age-matched controls, transplants from affected donors were at minimally increased risk for primary nonfunction, delayed graft function, and acute rejection. Three-year graft survival rates were 71% in affected donor organs and 75% in controls (P = 0.001). Compared with controls, duration of HTN was an independent risk factor for graft survival (3-year graft survival rates, 75% versus 65%; relative risk = 1.36 for HTN >10 years; P < 0.001). A substantial fraction of cadaveric renal donors have preexisting HTN. Programs transplanting fewer affected donor kidneys had better than average results. Because the negative impact of donor HTN and DM on transplant outcome was of moderate degree except when the duration of donor HTN was greater than 10 years, use of affected donors should not be discouraged, but graft and patient survival analyses should account for their presence.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Cross-sectional and longitudinal predictors of serum albumin in hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Lower serum albumin concentrations predict increased mortality in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Many demographic, comorbidity, and modifiable treatment-related factors that predict HD patient outcomes may be associated with serum albumin. METHODS: Cross-sectional predictors of baseline albumin on December 31, 1993 were sought (N = 3981). Additional effects of the same baseline predictors on subsequent trends in albumin over one year were examined in a nested subsample of patients (N = 2245). Wave-1 of the United States Renal Data System Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality special study provided the data. RESULTS: Significant associations (P < 0.05) are summarized as older age, female gender, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cancer predicted a lower baseline albumin and negatively influenced subsequent albumin trends. Baseline albumin was higher for blacks (vs. whites), lower for smoking and diabetes, and lower during the first year of HD treatment (<3 months and 3 to 12 months, vs.> 1 year). Trend analysis showed more positive albumin slopes for patients in their first year on HD and more negative slopes for Native Americans (vs. whites). Baseline albumin was correlated with the type of vascular access being used [arteriovenous (AV) fistulas > AV grafts > permanent catheters > temporary catheters]. Trend analysis predicted more negative albumin slopes for AV grafts and permanent catheters (vs. AV fistula access). Baseline albumin correlated inversely with bicarbonate and directly with hematocrit. Dialysis with unmodified cellulose membranes, without reuse, predicted lower baseline albumin than the other membrane-reuse categories. CONCLUSIONS: Several exposures, which may be modifiable, were associated with serum albumin.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Description and clinical outcomes of peritoneal dialysis: analyses from the United States Renal Data System.

USRDS studies provide results that are consistent when considering the effect of time since the onset of ESRD in comparisons of PD and HD outcomes. The results are representative of patient selection and practice in the U.S., but may not apply in other countries, where patients are selected to PD using very different criteria. In international comparisons, even adjustment for comorbid conditions may not fully compensate for selection. The analytical experience from the USRDS may serve as a model for similar analyses in environments where different practices and registries are used.

Humans↗
PubMed1999

Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: The extent to which renal allotransplantation - as compared with long-term dialysis - improves survival among patients with end-stage renal disease is controversial, because those selected for transplantation may have a lower base-line risk of death. In an attempt to distinguish the effects of patient selection from those of transplantation itself, we conducted a longitudinal study of mortality in 228,552 patients who were receiving long-term dialysis for end-stage renal disease. Of these patients, 46,164 were placed on a waiting list for transplantation, 23,275 of whom received a first cadaveric transplant between 1991 and 1997. The relative risk of death and survival were assessed with time-dependent nonproportional-hazards analysis, with adjustment for age, race, sex, cause of end-stage renal disease, geographic region, time from first treatment for end-stage renal disease to placement on the waiting list, and year of initial placement on the list. RESULTS: Among the various subgroups, the standardized mortality ratio for the patients on dialysis who were awaiting transplantation (annual death rate, 6.3 per 100 patient-years) was 38 to 58 percent lower than that for all patients on dialysis (annual death rate, 16.1 per 100 patient-years). The relative risk of death during the first 2 weeks after transplantation was 2.8 times as high as that for patients on dialysis who had equal lengths of follow-up since placement on the waiting list, but at 18 months the risk was much lower (relative risk, 0.32; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.30 to 0.35; P<0.001). The likelihood of survival became equal in the two groups within 5 to 673 days after transplantation in all the subgroups of patients we examined. The long-term mortality rate was 48 to 82 percent lower among transplant recipients (annual death rate, 3.8 per 100 patient-years) than patients on the waiting list, with relatively larger benefits among patients who were 20 to 39 years old, white patients, and younger patients with diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with end-stage renal disease, healthier patients are placed on the waiting list for transplantation, and long-term survival is better among those on the waiting list who eventually undergo transplantation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

A practical approach to evaluate the potential donor pool and trends in cadaveric kidney donation.

BACKGROUND: The potential supply of transplantable cadaver kidneys is often expressed as donors per million population (pmp), which ignores some essential factors governing organ donation. METHODS: We performed a modeled analysis of kidney donor extraction rates by age, gender, race, cause of death, geographic region, and year in a cohort of evaluable deaths and actual cadaver donors between the ages of 1 and 65 years (1988-1993). Evaluable death was defined as an in-hospital death in patients between the ages of 1 and 65 years whose ICD-9-CM cause of death was not an obvious contraindication to kidney donation. The main outcome measures were the crude donation rate and an adjusted donor extraction rate (DER) per 1000 evaluable deaths. RESULTS: A total of 1.4x10(6) in-hospital deaths produced 300,502 evaluable deaths and 20,575 actual donors. Between 1989 and 1993, DER increased from 61.1 to 75 per 1,000 evaluable deaths. DERs were highest among the youngest age groups, declining significantly with age from 405.0 to 16.7/1,000 evaluable deaths for age groups 1-10 and 56-65 years, respectively. There was a small difference in donors pmp between blacks and whites (15 vs. 18). In contrast, DER was seven times higher in whites compared with blacks (112.5 vs. 16.5/1,000 evaluable deaths; P<0.001). The crude donation rate (per 1,000 evaluable deaths) was high for stroke (604.8) and trauma-related deaths (230.6), resulting in highly efficient donor extraction from these deaths. Region-specific DERs ranged from 49.4 to 83/1,000 evaluable deaths and differed significantly from the corresponding donors pmp. CONCLUSIONS: Estimating kidney donation relative to in-hospital evaluable deaths is a meaningful measure of organ procurement efficiency. Efforts to enhance cadaveric kidney donation should seek to understand and reduce the marked demographic and regional disparity in donor extraction rates.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Renal transplantation in end-stage sickle cell nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: The role of renal transplantation as treatment for end-stage sickle cell nephropathy (SCN) has not been well established. METHODS: We performed a comparative investigation of patient and allograft outcomes among age-matched African-American kidney transplant recipients with ESRD as a result of SCN (n=82) and all other causes (Other-ESRD, n=22,565). RESULTS: The incidence of delayed graft function and predischarge acute rejection in SCN group (24% and 26%) was similar to that observed in the Other-ESRD group (29% and 27%). The mean discharge serum creatinine (SCr) was 2.7 (+/-2.5) mg/dl in the SCN recipients compared to 3.0 (+/-2.5) mg/dl in the Other-ESRD recipients (P=0.42). There was no difference in the 1-year cadaveric graft survival (SCN: 78% vs. Other-ESRD: 77%), and the multivariable adjusted 1-year risk of graft loss indicated no significant effect of SCN (relative risk [RR]=1.39, P=0.149). However, the 3-year cadaveric graft survival tended to be lower in the SCN group (48% vs. 60%, P=0.055) and their adjusted 3-year risk of graft loss was significantly greater (RR= 1.60, P=0.003). There was a trend toward improved survival in the SCN transplant recipients compared to their dialysis-treated, wait-listed counterparts (RR=0.14, P=0.056). In comparison to the Other-ESRD (RR=1.00), the adjusted mortality risk in the SCN group was higher both at 1 year (RR=2.95, P=0.001) and at 3 years (RR=2.82, P=0.0001) after renal transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: The short-term renal allograft result in recipients with end-stage SCN was similar to that obtained in other causes of ESRD, but the long-term outcome was comparatively diminished. There was a trend toward better patient survival with renal transplantation relative to dialysis in end-stage SCN.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Comparing continuous hemofiltration with hemodialysis in patients with severe acute renal failure.

Continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) or CVVH with additional diffusive dialysis (CVVH-D) has theoretical advantages in treating severe acute renal failure (ARF), but no prospective clinical trials or restrospective comparison studies have clearly shown its superiority over intermittent hemodialysis (HD). To evaluate this question, all 349 adult patients with ARF receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT) at our medical center during 1995 and 1996 were analyzed using multivariate Cox proportional hazards methods. Initial univariate analysis showed the odds of death when receiving initial CVVH to be more than twice those when receiving initial HD (risk for death, 2.03; P < 0.01). Progressive exclusion of patients in whom the RRT modality might not be open to choice and the risk for death was very high (systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg; total bilirubin level > 15 mg/dL; or total RRT < 48 hours) for total RRT left 227 patients in whom the risk for death was 1.09 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67 to 1.80; P = 0.72) for initial CVVH, virtually equivalent to the risk for initial HD. Comorbid indicators significantly associated with death or failure to recover renal function included: older age; medical rather than surgical diagnosis; preexisting infection or trauma and liver disease as primary diagnoses; and abnormal bilirubin level or vital signs at initiation of RRT. These results show that the high crude mortality rate of patients undergoing CVVH was related to severity of illness and not the treatment choice itself. With the addition of more inclusive comorbidity data and a broader spectrum of interim outcomes, this type of analysis is a practical alternative to what would almost assuredly be a cumbersome and costly prospective, controlled trial comparing traditional HD with CVVH.

Acute Kidney Injury↗
PubMed1999

Predialysis blood pressure and mortality risk in a national sample of maintenance hemodialysis patients.

The role of predialysis blood pressure (BP) as a risk factor for the high mortality in chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients has remained controversial. The objective of the current study was to further explore in a national random sample of 4,499 US hemodialysis patients any relationship of systolic or diastolic and predialysis or postdialysis BP with mortality, while considering subgroups of patients and controlling for other patient characteristics and comorbidities. The main finding of this study is the association of a low predialysis systolic BP with an elevated adjusted mortality risk (relative mortality risk [RR] = 1.86 for systolic BP < 110, P < 0.0001). No association with an elevated mortality risk could be observed for predialysis systolic hypertension (RR = 0.98 to 0.99, not significant [NS]), except for an elevated risk of cerebrovascular deaths. Postdialysis systolic BP was associated with an elevated mortality risk both for low and high BP levels as compared with midrange BP. Further evaluation of the elevated mortality risk associated with low predialysis systolic BP indicated similar patterns for both diabetic and nondiabetic subgroups and for patients with and without congestive heart failure (CHF) or coronary artery disease, although it was more pronounced among those with CHF. The level of predialysis fluid excess did not modify these results substantially. The findings from this historical prospective national study do not argue against the treatment of hypertension and suggest greater attention to postdialysis hypertension. The strikingly elevated mortality risk with low predialysis systolic BP suggests that low predialysis BP needs to be viewed with great concern and avoided where possible.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Relationship of dialysis membrane and cause-specific mortality.

A number of studies have suggested that type of dialysis membrane is associated with differences in long-term outcome of patients undergoing hemodialysis, both in terms of morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship of membrane type and specific causes of death. Data from the United States Renal Data System Case Mix Adequacy Study, a national random sample of hemodialysis patients who were alive on December 31, 1990, were used. Our study was limited to patients in this data set who were undergoing dialysis for at least 1 year (n = 4,055). For the main analytic models, membrane type was classified into two categories: unmodified cellulose or MC/SYN (which combines modified cellulose [MC] and synthetic membranes [SYN]). The relationships of membrane type and major causes of mortality were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models, which adjusted for multiple (21) covariates, including demographics, comorbidity, Kt/V, and other parameters. Patients were censored at transplantation or 60 days after a switch to peritoneal dialysis. Compared with patients dialyzed with unmodified cellulose membranes, the adjusted relative mortality risk (RR) from infection was 31% lower (RR = 0.69; P = 0.03) and from coronary artery disease was 26% lower (RR = 0.74; P = 0.07) for patients dialyzed with MC/SYN membranes. No statistically significant difference (all P > 0.1) was found in mortality risk from cerebrovascular disease (RR = 1.08), other cardiac causes (RR = 0.86), malignancy (RR = 0.90), or other known causes (RR = 0.82) between patients dialyzed with MC/SYN compared with unmodified cellulose membranes. These results offer support to reported experimental and observational clinical studies that have found that unmodified cellulose membranes may increase the risk for both infection and atherogenesis. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the possibility of confounding factors, compare more specific membrane types, and determine the pathophysiology linking membrane type to cause-specific mortality.

Cause of Death↗