PubMed1978
Many questions regarding duodenitis remain unanswered. However, the evidence suggests that duodenitis is a clinical entity which can give rise to dyspepsia and, on rare occasions, gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Conventional and double contrast radiology has only a small part to play in the diagnosis of duodenitis but is important in helping to exclude other lesions such as duodenal ulcer. Provided care is taken during the fibre-optic visualization of the duodenal bulb, the endoscopic appearances of moderately severe duodenitis correlate well with the histological changes seen. A diagnosis of apparent duodenitis should be confirmed by the histological criteria described. Treatment at present is similar to that of peptic ulcer, with the withdrawal of any predisposing and precipitating factors such as aspirin, alcohol and smoking. Antacids may relieve the symptoms. It is not yet known what effect these measures may have on the duodenitis as opposed to the symptoms of dyspepsia. The H2-receptor antagonist, cimetidine, should be effective in treating duodenitis but double blind clinical and endoscopic studies are required to confirm this. The place of surgery is as yet undefined. With the data at present available, it appears that duodenitis is part of the pathophysiological spectrum of the duodenal ulcer diathesis rather than a separate disease. It may represent both the production and healing phases of duodenal ulceration. In some patients the duodenal mucosa may proceed from normal to duodenitis and then to normal again without the development of frank duodenal ulceration (Figure 4). Prospective studies are required which should include a long-term clinical follow-up of a large number of patients with duodenitis accurately and specifically diagnosed by endoscopy and histopathology.