Biomedical subjects

Dan Oberg

Publications and source records attributed to Dan Oberg.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Do topical nasal decongestants affect polyps?

CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis that decongestants reduce the size of nasal polyps could not be verified. Decongestion is therefore recommended prior to nasal endoscopy, especially in polyp diagnosis, as it does not artificially change the size of the polyps. OBJECTIVE: The role of nasal decongestants in nasal stuffiness is well established and their action is well known. Decongestants are also used prior to nasal endoscopy to achieve a better view of the nasal cavity in order to diagnose polyps. The question is whether this decongestion invalidates the estimation of polyp size in clinical and scientific practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate possible effects of topical decongestants on polyp extension in patients with nasal polyposis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The effect of the decongestants nafazoline and epinephrine on nasal polyp size was assessed by means of a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized study. A sensitive endoscopic scoring system, lateral imaging, was used to assess the size and extension of the nasal polyps. RESULTS: No significant effect of decongestion on polyp size could be found for either treatment.

Administration, Intranasal↗

PubMed2006

Prevalence of upper and lower airway symptoms: the Skövde population-based study.

CONCLUSION: This study was able to present representative data from Sweden as a whole and illuminates the epidemiological background of symptoms of the upper and lower airways. Current regular smokers, compared with non-smokers, had more problems with nasal blockage, cough and asthma. The relationship between the upper and lower airways was confirmed as regards airway symptoms. BACKGROUND: Epidemiology of common respiratory symptoms is basic information in health care. This study has focused on the prevalence of upper and lower airway symptoms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A random sample of 1900 age- and gender-stratified adults was recruited from a general population for this study, which included a structured interview about symptoms of nasal secretions and blockage, cough and asthma, and a clinical examination with nasal endoscopy, and peak nasal-inspiratory flow (PNIF). Smoking habits were evaluated by a questionnaire for current and previous smoking. RESULTS: A response rate of 73% was achieved. The prevalence of various symptoms varied between age strata and gender. There was a statistically significant relationship between subjectively experienced nasal blockage and objectively observed nasal congestion. PNIF was negatively related to age and height and was increased in male gender. Smoking was most common among females and related to nasal blockage, cough and asthma, but not to nasal secretions. Significant relationships between the upper and lower airways were found.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Prevalence of nasal septal perforation: the Skövde population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with nasal septal perforation appear from time to time in Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) practices, but the prevalence in a general population is not known. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to investigate the prevalence of nasal septal perforation in an adult Swedish population, and to relate septal perforation to possible risk factors, such as age, gender, diabetes mellitus, nasal polyps, and smoking. METHODS: A random sample of 1,900 inhabitants over the age of 20, stratified for age and gender, was drawn from the municipal population register in Skövde, Sweden, in December 2000. Subjects were called to clinical visits that included questions about diabetes and smoking habits. Nasal endoscopy was performed and, when a perforation was observed, the size was measured. RESULTS: In total, 1,387 volunteers (73% of the sample) were investigated. The sample size was adequate, with a good fit to the whole population. The prevalence of nasal septal perforation was 0.9% [95% CI 0.5-1.6%]. Nasal polyps was a possible risk factor, odds ratio of 11.5 [95% CI 3.0-43.5], but not age, gender, diabetes, or smoking. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of nasal septal perforation was found to be less than 1% in an adult population.

Adult↗